Abstract
Alkaline p-nitrophenylphosphate phosphatase (pNPPase) from the halophilic archaeobacterium Halobacterium salinarum (previously halobium) was solubilized at low salt concentration in reverse micelles of hexadecyltrimethylammoniumbromide in cyclohexane with 1-butanol as cosurfactant. The enzyme maintained its catalytic properties under these conditions. The thermodynamic “solvation–stabilization hypothesis” has been used to explain the bell-shaped dependence of pNPPase activity on the water content of reverse micelles, in terms of protein–solvent interactions. According to this model, the stability of the folded protein depends on a network of hydrated ions associated with acidic residues at the protein surface. At low salt concentration and low water content (the ratio of water concentration to surfactant concentration; w0), the network of hydrated ions within the reverse micelles may involve the cationic heads of the surfactant. The bell-shaped profile of the relationship between enzyme activity and w0 varied depending on the concentrations of NaCl and Mn2+.
Keywords: alkaline phosphatase, archaea, CTAB, Halobacterium
Introduction
Extreme halophilic organisms may have intracellular salt concentrations as high as 4 M, and proteins from these organisms require environments with high ionic strength to maintain their active conformations (Lanyi 1974). These proteins are characterized by an excess of negatively charged amino acids on their surface that interact with ions in the surrounding medium (Zaccai and Eisenberg 1990, Madern et al. 2000). Alkaline p-nitrophenylphosphate phosphatase (pNPPase) from the halophilic archaeobacterium Halobacterium salinarum exhibits behavior typical of extreme halophilic proteins in aqueous medium (Bonet et al. 1991), and requires high salt concentrations (greater than 0.6 M KCl or 1.2 M NaCl) to attain maximum activity. In the absence of salt, the residual activity is only about 15% of the maximum (Bonet et al. 1991). However, p-NPPase encapsulated in reverse micelles of the cationic surfactant hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) with 0.85 M NaCl (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2000a) maintained its catalytic properties and was found to be more stable in the reverse micellar system than in aqueous medium (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2001a).
The phenomenon of enzyme catalysis in non-polar organic media, within reverse micelles, is currently the focus of intense research (Luisi et al. 1988, Dordick et al. 1998, Tuena de Gómez-Puyou and Gómez-Puyou 1998, Carvalho and Cabral 2000). Reverse micelles consist of three components: amphiphilic surfactant molecules, water and a non-polar organic solvent. The polar heads of the surfactant molecules are directed toward the interior of a water-containing sphere, whereas the aliphatic tails are oriented toward the non-polar organic phase. The water structure within the reverse micelles may resemble that of water adjacent to biological membranes (Boicelli et al. 1982), and it has been suggested that the reverse micellar system reliably mimics the microenvironment that enzymes encounter in the intracellular milieu (Nicot et al. 1985, Luisi et al. 1988, O’Connor and Wiggins 1988, Faeder and Ladanyi 2000).
One of the most important factors determining enzyme behavior in reverse micelles is the water/surfactant molar ratio (w0 = [H2O]/[surfactant]), because there is a direct relationship between w0 and the size of the reverse micelles (Martinek et al. 1986). Kabanov et al. (1988) proposed a kinetic model based on the optimum size of the micelles. The structure of water molecules within the micelle is determined by micellar size; if w0 increases, the amount of “free” water (water molecules not bound to the surfactant polar heads), relative to the amount of “bound” water, also increases (Luisi et al. 1988). Therefore, micellar size may affect the local aqueous environment, which in turn may affect the catalytic properties of the enzyme in that environment (Bru et al. 1989). Other studies suggest that water has a uniform structure within the interior of the reverse micelle (Novaki and El Seoud 1998). Evidently, the uncertainty about the structure of water within reverse micelles hinders the interpretation of results (Faeder and Ladanyi 2000).
The influence of protein concentration on the catalytic properties of an enzyme within reverse micelles has not been studied as extensively as that of other parameters, such as w0, pH and surfactant concentration. However, the importance of this parameter on enzyme activity in reverse micelles was demonstrated by Han et al. (1990): as the enzyme concentration increased, the bell-shaped profile of the relationship between enzyme activity and w0 flattened out and the optimum w0 value increased. Han et al. (1990) also found that the initial velocity of the reaction increased proportionally with enzyme concentration for all w0 values studied. However, the relationship between enzyme activity and enzyme concentration varied depending on w0, being linear at low w0 values and nonlinear at high w0 values (Han et al. 1990).
The main objective of this work was to study the influence of the reverse micellar system on the catalytic activity of pNPPase from H. salinarum at low salt concentrations. The behavior of this extremely halophilic enzyme has been investigated because of the potential biotechnological application of halophilic enzymes in reverse micelles as catalysts in organic solvents (Dordick et al. 1998). In such a case, reverse micelles can be considered micro-reactors whose physical properties can be readily altered. The physical properties of this milieu can be continuously modulated and possibly tailored to the characteristics of the reaction taking place in the water pool.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
p-Nitrophenylphosphate ( pNPP) (disodium salt) was supplied by Boehringer-Mannheim (Germany). All salts were analytical grade chlorides. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was obtained from Fluka (Switzerland), and organic solvents (cyclohexane and 1-butanol) were purchased from Merck (Germany).
Purification and catalytic activity of pNPPase from Halobacterium salinarum
p-Nitrophenylphosphate phosphatase from H. salinarum (a colorless mutant, NRC 36014) was purified 440-fold according to the method of Bonet et al. (1991). The molecular size of the protein was 24 kDa (Bonet et al. 1991) and the isoelectric point was about 4. The purified pNPPase was dialyzed for 24 h at 4 °C against 200 volumes of 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.5, containing 4 M NaCl, 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 5 mM MnCl2, and its concentration determined by the Bradford method (Bradford 1976). Activity of pNPPase was assayed according to Bonet et al. (1991). One unit of activity (U) was defined as the formation of 1 nmol of p-nitrophenol (pNP) from pNPP per minute per gram of protein under standard assay conditions. The molar absorption coefficient (e) of pNP at 400 nm was taken to be 18,300 M–1 cm–1.
Preparation of reverse micelles containing pNPPase
Purified pNPPase from H. salinarum was concentrated by centrifugation at 3000 g using Centricon 10 ultrafiltration membranes (Amicon, Danvers, MA) with a molecular weight cutoff of 10 kDa. Reverse micelles were prepared by the injection method (i.e., aqueous solution was added to a solution of surfactant in organic solvent; see Luisi et al. 1988). Controlled amounts of buffer without NaCl (buffer A: 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 5 mM MnCl2) and buffered enzyme solution (enzyme in buffer A with 4 M NaCl) were added to a mixture of 1 M 1-butanol and 0.2 M CTAB in cyclohexane. For a w0 value of 9.72, 9 µl of buffered enzyme solution and 341 µl of buffer A were added to 10 ml of cyclohexane/1-butanol/CTAB, and the mixture was stirred until completely transparent. Reverse micellar systems with different w0 values or different salt concentrations were generated by altering the volume of buffer A injected into the cyclohexane mixture or the NaCl concentration in the buffered enzyme solution, respectively. At w0 = 9.72, the final concentration of NaCl and enzyme in the aqueous core of the reverse micelles was 100 mM and 0.6 µg ml–1, respectively. The water concentration was determined with a Mettler DL18 Karl Fischer Titrator (Zurich).
Assays for pNPPase activity in reverse micelles
Mixing of reverse micelles containing enzyme or substrate
The pNPPase reaction was initiated by mixing 1 ml of reverse micelles containing pNPPase from H. salinarum with 1 ml of reverse micelles containing different concentrations of pNPP (final concentration in the aqueous core ranged from 5.33 to 106.7 mM) dissolved in buffer A. The salt concentration in the reverse micelles containing enzyme was the same as that in the reverse micelles containing substrate (0.048 M, 0.100 M or 0.85 M NaCl). Reverse micelles containing the enzyme and those containing pNPP had the same w0 values. To generate reverse micelles containing pNPP with a w0 value of 9.72, 350 µl of pNPP solution was added to 10 ml of 1 M 1-butanol and 0.2 M CTAB in cyclohexane. Higher w0 values were obtained by increasing the amount of pNPP solution injected into the cyclohexane mixture.
Microinjection of substrate
Initiation of the pNPPase reaction by injection of substrate solution into reverse micelles containing enzyme was performed as follows. For reverse micelles with a w0 value of 8.3, 5.6 µl of enzyme solution (enzyme in buffer A with 1 M NaCl) and 52.4 µl of buffer A (with or without 1 M NaCl) were added to 2.5 ml of 1 M 1-butanol and 0.2 M CTAB in cyclohexane. The mixture was stirred until complete transparency was achieved, and then 18 µl of 716 mM pNPP in buffer equivalent to that in the aqueous core of the reverse micelles (buffer A with 0.075 M or 1 M NaCl) was added. Reformation of the reverse micellar system after injection of substrate was considered complete when absolute transparency was obtained by stirring. The final concentration of pNPP in the aqueous core of reverse micelles with a w0 value of 8.3 was 172 mM.
Hydrolysis of pNPP was followed at 40 °C by monitoring the increase in absorbance at 400 nm with a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) UV-160 spectrophotometer. The molar extinction coefficient (e) for pNP at 40 °C in CTAB reverse micelles was 11.3 × 103 M–1 cm–1 (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2000a). All kinetic measurements were performed in triplicate.
Determination of enzyme kinetic parameters
The reaction kinetics were examined by fitting data to the Michaelis-Menten equation: v = Vmax[S]/(Km + [S]). The values of Vmax and Km were determined by nonlinear regression analysis of the corresponding Michaelis-Menten curves (v versus [pNPP]) by the algorithm of Marquardt-Levenberg with SigmaPlot (Version 1.02, Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA). The [S], Vmax and Km values were determined in the aqueous solution volume of the system because the hydrolysis of pNPP took place in this phase (Bru et al. 1995).
Results
Activity of pNPPase in reverse micelles: effect of salt concentration
The kinetics of pNPPase activity in reverse micelles were determined at both high (0.85 M) and low (0.048 M) NaCl concentrations. The results are shown in Figure 1. The kinetic parameters of the purified pNPPase in aqueous medium were: Vmax = 27.7 ± 0.2 U and Km = 0.43 ± 0.02 mM. When reverse micelles containing enzyme were mixed with reverse micelles containing substrate, the kinetic parameters at 0.85 and 0.048 M NaCl were similar: Vmax = 19.4 ± 0.4 U and Km = 31.2 ± 2.3 mM at 0.85 M NaCl, and Vmax = 17.5 ± 1.0 U and Km = 38.9 ± 6.4 mM at 0.048 M NaCl. The hydrolysis of pNPP in reverse micelles appeared to follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Plots of pNPPase activity in reverse micelles at low salt concentration (0.048 M NaCl; open squares) and at high salt concentration (0.85 M NaCl; filled squares). Final conditions: aqueous buffer 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5 containing 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 5 mM MnCl2 with 0.048 or 0.85 M NaCl; w0 = 10.27 at 40 °C, with different concentrations ofpNPP ranging from 2.5 to 418 mM. Protein concentration was 0.6 µg m l–1.
Influence of w0 on pNPPase activity
The activity of pNPPase was assessed at various reverse micellar water contents (i.e., w0 values). Figure 2 shows the dependence of enzyme activity on w0 at 1 and 0.075 M NaCl. The reaction conditions were as described in Materials and methods (microinjection of substrate), but in this particular experiment the substrate concentration in the aqueous core of the micelle was held constant at 150 mM. At 1 M NaCl, the optimum w0 value was about 9, whereas the optimum w0 value at 0.075 M NaCl was about 14. The bell-shaped dependence of activity (v) on w0 was much sharper with 1 M NaCl than with 0.075 M NaCl (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Effect of micellar water content (w0 = [H2O]/[surfactant]) on activity of pNPPase from H. salinarum in reverse micelles (0.2 M CTAB and 1 M 1-butanol in cyclohexane) with 1 M NaCl (open circles) or 0.075 M NaCl (filled circles). The reaction was initiated by microinjection of substrate into reverse micelles containing enzyme. Reaction conditions: [pNPP] = 172 mM in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.5, containing 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 5 mM MnCl2; temperature = 40 °C; protein concentration = 0.6 µg m l–1.
The influence of w0 on pNPPase activity in reverse micelles at low salt concentration (100 mM NaCl) is shown in Figures 3–5. In Figures 3 and 4, the relationship between Vmax and w0 exhibited a bell-shaped curve, and the optimum w0 value varied depending on the concentration of Mn2+ in the aqueous phase. At 5 mM MnCl2, the optimum w0 value was approximately 15 (Figure 3), whereas at 2 mM MnCl2, the optimum w0 value was approximately 13 (Figure 4). In Figures 3 and 4, the overall enzyme concentration ([E]ov) was held constant, so that as the water concentration increased, the enzyme concentration within the reverse micelles (i.e., within the water pool; [E]wp) decreased. In Figure 5, [E]ov was varied (from 0.056 to 0.088 µg ml–1) to maintain [E]wp at 1.6 µg ml–1 at all w0 values. When [E]wp was held constant at 1.6 µg ml–1, Vmax decreased with increasing w0, and the relationship between Vmax and w0 did not exhibit a bell-shaped profile. The optimum w0 value at a constant [E]wp of 1.6 µg ml–1 was about 12.5 (Figure 5).
Figure 3.
Effect of micellar water content (w0 = [H2O]/[surfactant]) on the kinetic parameters of pNPPase from H. salinarum in reverse micelles (0.2 M CTAB and 1 M 1-butanol in cyclohexane): Vmax (filled circles) and Km (open circles). The reaction was initiated by mixing reverse micelles containing pNPPase with reverse micelles containing substrate (pNPP). The buffer in the water pool was 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, containing 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 5 mM MnCl2. Temperature of the reaction was 40 °C. Enzyme concentration was 0.6 µg m l–1.
Figure 4.
Effect of micellar water content (w0 = [H2O]/[surfactant]) on the kinetic parameters of pNPPase from H. salinarum in reverse micelles (0.2 M CTAB and 1 M 1-butanol in cyclohexane): Vmax (open circles) and Km (filled circles). The reaction was initiated by mixing reverse micelles containing enzyme with reverse micelles containing substrate. The buffer in the water pool was 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, containing 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 2 mM MnCl2. Temperature of the reaction was 40 °C. Protein concentration was 0.6 µg m l–1.
Figure 5.
Effect of water content on the kinetic parameters of pNPPase from H. salinarum (Vmax) in reverse micelles (0.2 M CTAB and 1 M 1-butanol in cyclohexane): Vmax (filled circles) and Km (open circles). The enzyme concentration in the water pool ([E]wp) was held constant at 1.6 µg m l–1. The reaction was initiated by mixing reverse micelles containing enzyme with reverse micelles containing substrate. The buffer in the water pool was 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, containing 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 2 mM MnCl2. Temperature of the reaction was 40 °C.
Discussion
A previous study examining the activity of the halophilic enzyme pNPPase in aqueous medium showed that the activity in the absence of salts was only about 15% of the maximum activity achieved in the presence of NaCl concentrations greater than 1.2 M (Bonet et al. 1991). In this study, the enzyme was able to maintain its catalytic properties when encapsulated in reverse micelles in a medium containing a low salt concentration. The kinetic behavior and parameters were similar at both 0.85 and 0.048 M NaCl when the reaction was initiated by mixing reverse micelles containing enzyme with reverse micelles containing substrate (Figure 1). When the reaction was initiated by microinjection of substrate into reverse micelles containing enzyme (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2000a), it followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics at high salt concentration (0.85 M NaCl), but not at low salt concentration (0.048 M NaCl) (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2001b).
After microinjection of substrate, the reverse micelles containing enzyme were momentarily destroyed, but reformed after a few seconds of vigorous vortexing. Destruction of the micellar system does not occur if reverse micelles containing enzyme are mixed with reverse micelles containing substrate. During reformation of the reverse micellar system following microinjection of substrate, different components of the system, i.e., enzyme, surfactant or organic solvent, may come into contact with each other (Khmelnitsky et al. 1993). These interactions may cause partial denaturation of the enzyme or may modify its catalytic properties (Khmelnitsky et al. 1993).
Our results indicate that it is possible to work with an extreme halophilic enzyme, like pNPPase from H. salinarum, in organic solvents, and that the reaction follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics when the reaction is initiated by mixing reverse micelles containing enzyme and reverse micelles containing substrate (Figure 1). The difference in enzymatic activity in the presence of high and low salt concentrations was only about 10% (Vmax = 19.4 ± 0.4 U at 0.85 M NaCl and Vmax = 17.5 ± 1.0 U at 0.048 M NaCl, for mixing of reverse micelles). However, in aqueous medium, the difference was approximately 85% (Bonet et al. 1991), indicating that the reverse micellar system has a stabilizing effect on the halophilic enzyme (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2001a).
The profile of pNPPase activity as a function of w0 exhibited the typical bell-shaped curve, and the optimum w0 value varied depending on the NaCl concentration employed (Figure 2). The optimum w0 value at 0.075 M NaCl (14) was higher than at 1 M NaCl (w0 = 9). The difference between the maximum activity of pNPPase in reverse micelles with 1 M NaCl and with 0.075 M NaCl was approximately 20% (Figure 2). A two-phase system in which a reverse micellar microemulsion is in equilibrium with a conjugate aqueous phase containing NaCl can be prepared with sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl)sulfosuccinate (AOT) (Fletcher and Parrot 1988). Under these conditions, the size of the reverse micelles can be varied systematically by altering the aqueous phase NaCl concentration (Fletcher and Parrot 1988). For the same w0 value, if there is no aqueous phase in equilibrium with the reverse micellar phase, the system is monodispersed and the droplet size should be similar at 1 and 0.075 M NaCl.
The difference in ionic strength between 1 and 0.075 M NaCl can modify the structure of the water inside the reverse micelles as well as the structure of the reverse micelle itself. When the salt concentration increased, the stability of the reverse micellar system decreased and the range of w0 values narrowed (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2000a). Reverse micelles formulated with CTAB destabilized at NaCl concentrations above 1 M. In aqueous medium, the presence of salt causes restructuring of the hydrogen-bonded network of water molecules as salt ions become hydrated. The effect of high salt concentrations on the structure of water molecules may be critical to the stability of extreme halophilic enzymes (Madern et al. 2000). In reverse micelles, cationic surfactants such as CTAB can disrupt hydrogen bonds between water molecules in the same way that high salt concentrations do. Within the reverse micelle, two regions with different water structures may exist (Bru et al. 1995). One region consists of water structured around the polar heads of the surfactant, whereas the other region consists of free water in the center of the water pool within the micelle (Bru et al. 1995). At low w0 values, all water is structured (i.e., arranged around the polar heads of surfactant molecules) and the stability of the enzyme increases (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2001a). When w0 is increased, the structure of the water in the reverse micelles changes and the activity of the encapsulated enzyme increases (Tuena de Gómez-Puyou and Gómez-Puyou 1998, Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2000b) until high w0 values are reached, at which point the proportion of free water increases and enzyme stability and activity decrease (Bru et al. 1995). The increase in the relative amount of free water at 0.075 M NaCl may be the cause of the decrease in enzyme activity as w0 increases (Figure 2). On the other hand, at 1 M NaCl, the water is structured by the high salt concentration and this should result in an increase in or the maintenance of the enzyme activity as w0 increases. However, the relationship between enzyme activity and w0 at 1 M NaCl also has a bell-shaped profile, i.e., the enzyme activity decreases at higher w0 values (Figure 2). This decrease in enzyme activity at 1 M NaCl with increasing w0 may be a result of the instability of the reverse micelles at higher w0 values. When substrate was microinjected into reverse micelles at 1 M NaCl, the ternary system required more vigorous vortexing (about 30 s) at higher w0 values to reform the reverse micellar system. During this time, the possibility of contact between the enzyme and other components of the system (i.e., surfactant and organic solvent), which may modify the catalytic properties of the enzyme, increased.
To avoid possible denaturation of the enzyme by contact with the surfactant or the organic solvent, the reactions shown in Figures 3 and 4 were initiated by mixing reverse micelles containing enzyme with reverse micelles containing substrate. Bell-shaped curves of Vmax as a function of w0 were obtained at low salt concentration (0.100 M NaCl) with 2 mM Mn2+ (Figure 3) or 5 mM Mn2+ (Figure 4). The bell-shaped curves (i.e., the decrease in Vmax at higher w0 values) may be explained by the halophilic nature of the pNPPase, because these bell-shaped profiles were not observed at a higher salt concentration (0.85 M NaCl) when mixing of reverse micelles was used to initiate the reaction (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2000b). In this experiment, Vmax increased with water content until the limit of thermodynamic stability was reached (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2000b).
It is known that halophilic enzymes such as pNPPase from H. salinarum contain a higher proportion of acidic amino acid residues (the isoelectric point of pNPPase was about 4) than their non-halophilic homologs (Lanyi 1974). Statistical analysis of 26 soluble proteins confirmed the acidic nature of the halophilic enzymes and showed that they contained a significantly lower Lys residue content, a greater proportion of small hydrophobic residues (Gly, Ala, Val) and a lower proportion of aliphatic residues (Madern et al. 1995). In addition, a high glutamate content in halophilic enzymes may be favorable, as glutamate has the greatest water binding capacity of all the amino acids, thus facilitating the maintenance of a hydration shell. In our experiments and in our discussion, we have considered the halophilic pNPPase to be negatively charged.
p-Nitrophenylphosphate phosphatase exhibits behavior typical of halophilic enzymes, requiring high salt concentrations for maximal activity (Bonet et al. 1991). The activity in the absence of salts was about 15% of the maximum activity achieved with 1.6 M NaCl (Bonet et al. 1991). High cation concentrations within the cell may, in part, be required to shield the negative charges on the protein surface. High salt concentrations help maintain weak hydrophobic interactions (Lanyi 1974) and may, therefore, help preserve the structural stability of halophilic enzymes despite their low hydrophobic residue content. Accordingly, most enzymes of haloarchaea, like pNPPase, denature when suspended in solutions containing salt concentrations less than 1 to 2 M (Bonet et al. 1991, Eisenberg et al. 1992). A thermodynamic “solvation–stabilization hypothesis” has been formulated to explain the stabilization of halophilic proteins by salt in terms of protein–solvent interactions (Ebel et al. 1999). According to this model, the stability of the folded protein depends on a network of hydrated ions associated with acidic residues at the protein surface.
The cationic polar heads of CTAB molecules can modify the aqueous microenvironment of the enzyme, and thus at low w0 values, because of the small size of the reverse micelles, could play the same role as cations in the cytoplasm of halophilic archaea. p-Nitrophenylphosphate phosphatase was more stable in reverse micelles with CTAB than in aqueous medium (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2001a), and this stabilizing effect of reverse micelles was improved at lower w0, even at low salt concentration (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2001a). As the w0 value increases, the size of the micellar interior increases, and the enzyme encapsulated within the micelle is less likely to come into contact with the cationic heads of the surfactant molecules (Marhuenda-Egea et al. 2000b). According to the “solvation–stabilization hypothesis” (Ebel et al. 1999), at high w0 values, the local environment of the enzyme is characterized by low salt concentration and more “free water,” i.e., the conditions would be the same as those in aqueous medium at low salt concentration.
The relationships between Vmax and w0 exhibited similar bell-shaped profiles whether the enzyme concentration within the micelles ([E]wp) was held constant (Figure 5) or decreased (i.e., the enzyme concentration within the system ([E]ov) was held constant; Figures 2–4) as w0 increased. Although it is reasonable to assume that the bell-shaped profiles (i.e., the decrease in Vmax with increasing w0) in Figures 2–4 are attributable to the decrease in enzyme concentration within the micelles, the results shown in Figure 5, where the enzyme concentration was held constant, strongly suggest that the bell-shaped dependence of Vmax on w0 is instead a result of the physical structure of the reverse micelles and the halophilic nature of pNPPase, as discussed above.
In conclusion, these results demonstrate the feasibility of performing studies with halophilic proteins at very low salt concentrations and of exploiting the tremendous synthetic potential of extreme halophilic enzymes for biocatalysis in low water or nonaqueous environments (Dordick et al. 1998). Furthermore, this system can be used to study the contributions of water, salts and metallic ions to the stability and catalytic properties of halophilic enzymes.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by funds from the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (CICYT-BT 87-0033) and the European Commission’s Generic Project “Biotechnology of Extremophiles” (Contract BIO-CT93-02734).
References
- R1.Boicelli C.A., Conti F., Giomini M., Guiliani A.M. The influence of phosphate buffers on the 31P longitudinal relaxation time in inverted micelles. Spectrochim. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 1982;38A:299–300. [Google Scholar]
- R2.Bonet M.L., Llorca F.I., Cadenas E. Purification and some properties of an atypical alkaline p-nitrophenylphosphate phosphatase activity from Halobacterium halobium . Int. J. Biochem. 1991;23:1445–1451. doi: 10.1016/0020-711x(92)90022-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R3.Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R4.Bru R., Sánchez-Ferrer A., García-Carmona F. A theoretical study on the expression of enzymatic activity in reversed micelles. Biochem. J. 1989;259:355–361. doi: 10.1042/bj2590355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R5.Bru R., Sánchez-Ferrer A., García-Carmona F. Kinetics models in reversed micelles. Biochem. J. 1995;310:721–739. doi: 10.1042/bj3100721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R6.Carvalho C.M.L., Cabral J.M.S. Reverse micelles as reaction media for lipase. Biochimie. 2000;82:1063–1085. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(00)01187-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R7.Dordick J.S., Khmelnitsky Y.L., Sergeeva M.V. The evolution of biotransformation technologies. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1998;1:311–318. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(98)80035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R8.Ebel C., Faou P., Franzetti B., Kernel B., Madern D., Pascu M., Pfister C., Richard S., Zaccai G. Molecular interactions in extreme halophiles: the solvation–stabilization hypothesis for halophilic proteins. In: Oren A., editor. Microbiology and Biogeochemistry of Hypersaline Environments. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1999. pp. 227–237. [Google Scholar]
- R9.Eisenberg H., Maverech M., Zaccai G. Biochemical, structural, and molecular genetic aspects of halophilism. Adv. Protein Chem. 1992;43:1–62. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60553-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R10.Faeder J., Ladanyi B.M. Molecular dynamics simulations of the interior of aqueous reverse micelles. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000;104:1033–1046. [Google Scholar]
- R11.Fletcher P.D.I., Parrot D. The partitioning of proteins between water-in-oil microemulsions and conjugate aqueous phase. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I. 1988;84:1131–1144. [Google Scholar]
- R12.Han D., Walde P., Luisi P.L. Dependence of lipase activity on water content and enzyme concentration in reversed micelles. Biocatal. Biotransform. 1990;4:153–161. [Google Scholar]
- R13.Kabanov A., Levashov A.V., Klyachko N.L., Namyotkin S.N., Pshezhetsky A.V., Martinek K. Enzymes entrapped in reversed micelles of surfactants in organic solvents: A theorical treatment of the catalytic activity regulation. J. Theor. Biol. 1988;133:327–343. [Google Scholar]
- R14.Khmelnitsky Y.L., Hilhorst R., Visser A.J.W.G., Veeger C. Enzyme inactivation and protection during entrapment in reversed micelles. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993;211:73–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb19871.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R15.Lanyi J.K. Salt-dependent properties of proteins from extremely halophilic bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 1974;38:272–290. doi: 10.1128/br.38.3.272-290.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R16.Luisi P.L., Giomini M., Pileni M.P., Robinson B.H. Reversed micelles as hosts for proteins and small molecules. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1988;947:209–246. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(88)90025-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R17.Madern D., Pfister C., Zaccai G. A single acidic amino acid mutation enhances the halophilic behaviour of malate dehydrogenase from Haloarcula marismortui . Eur. J. Biochem. 1995;230:1088–1095. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R18.Madern D., Ebel C., Zaccai G. Halophilic adaptation of enzymes. Extremophiles. 2000;4:91–98. doi: 10.1007/s007920050142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R19.Marhuenda-Egea F.C., Piera-Velázquez S., Cadenas C., Cadenas E. Kinetic studies of an extremely halophilic enzyme entrapped in reversed micelles. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2000;18:201–222. [Google Scholar]
- R20.Marhuenda-Egea F.C., Piera-Velázquez S., Cadenas C., Cadenas E. Enzymatic activity of an extremely halophilic phosphatase from the Archaea Halobacterium salinarum in reversed micelles. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2000;10:555–563. [Google Scholar]
- R21.Marhuenda-Egea F.C., Piera-Velázquez S., Cadenas C., Cadenas E. Stability of an extreme halophilic alkaline phosphatase from Halobacterium salinarum in non-conventional medium. J. Biotechnol. 2001;87:255–261. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(01)00250-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R22.Marhuenda-Egea F.C., Piera-Velázquez S., Cadenas C., Cadenas E. Kinetic regulation of an alkaline p-nitrophenylphosphate phosphatase from Halobacterium salinarum in low water system by Mn2+ and monovalent cations. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001;198:111–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10627.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R23.Martinek K., Levashov A., Klyachko N., Khmelnitski Y., Berezin I. Micellar enzymology. Eur. J. Biochem. 1986;155:453–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R24.Nicot C., Vacher M., Vincent M., Gallay J., Waks M. Membrane proteins in reverse micelles: Myelin basic protein in a membrane-mimetic environment. Biochemistry. 1985;24:7024–7032. doi: 10.1021/bi00345a041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R25.Novaki L.P., El Seoud O.A.J. A Fourier transform infrared study on the structure of water solubilized by reverse aggregates of sodium and magnesium bis(2-ethilhexyl)sulfosuccinates in organic solvents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;202:391–398. [Google Scholar]
- R26.Tuena de Gómez-Puyou M., Gómez-Puyou A. Enzymes in low water systems. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. 1998;33:53–89. doi: 10.1080/10409239891204170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R27.Wiggins P.M. Ordered water structure and enhanced reactivity. Biocatal. Biotransform. 1988;1:249–256. [Google Scholar]
- R28.Zaccai G., Eisenberg H. Halophilic proteins and influence of solvent on protein stabilization. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1990;15:333–337. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90068-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





