Abstract
To investigate the molecular basis of PTEN-mediated tumor suppression, we introduced a null mutation into the mouse Pten gene by homologous recombination in embryonic stem (ES) cells. Pten−/− ES cells exhibited an increased growth rate and proliferated even in the absence of serum. ES cells lacking PTEN function also displayed advanced entry into S phase. This accelerated G1/S transition was accompanied by down-regulation of p27KIP1, a major inhibitor for G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Inactivation of PTEN in ES cells and in embryonic fibroblasts resulted in elevated levels of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5,-trisphosphate, a product of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase. Consequently, PTEN deficiency led to dosage-dependent increases in phosphorylation and activation of Akt/protein kinase B, a well-characterized target of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase signaling pathway. Akt activation increased Bad phosphorylation and promoted Pten−/− cell survival. Our studies suggest that PTEN regulates the phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5,-trisphosphate and Akt signaling pathway and consequently modulates two critical cellular processes: cell cycle progression and cell survival.
The tumor susceptibility gene encoding PTEN/MMAC1/TEP1 (1–3) is mutated at high frequency in many primary human cancers and several familial cancer predisposition disorders (4). PTEN contains the sequence motif that is highly conserved in the members of the protein tyrosine phosphatase family. PTEN has been shown in vitro to possess phosphatase activity on phosphotyrosyl, phosphothreonyl-containing substrates (3, 5) and more recently, on phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3), a product of phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3) kinase (6). Many cancer-related mutations have been mapped within the conserved catalytic domain of PTEN, suggesting that the phosphatase activity of PTEN is required for tumor suppressor function. In addition, wild-type PTEN, but not mutant derivatives lacking phosphatase activity, suppresses the growth of glioblastoma cells and their tumorigenecity in nude mice (7–9), confirming the functional relevance of the PTEN phosphatase domain for tumor suppression. Very recently, inactivation of PTEN in a mouse model has confirmed the role of PTEN as a bona fide tumor suppressor (10). However, the exact function of PTEN in regulation of cell growth and tumorigenesis remains unclear.
In this study, we have investigated the molecular basis underlying the tumor suppression function of PTEN by using a combination of molecular genetic, cell biological, and biochemical approaches. We have identified PIP3, a product of PI3 kinase, as an intracellular target of PTEN. Our studies suggest that PTEN acts as a negative regulator for the PI3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway, which controls and coordinates two major cellular processes: cell cycle progression and cell death.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Generation of Pten−/− Embryonic Stem (ES) and Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts (MEF) Cell Lines.
Genomic DNA clones corresponding to the Pten locus were isolated from an isogenic 129(J1) genomic library (11). The targeting vector, pKO-1, contains the PGKneopA cassette flanked by 8.0-kb KpnI–ApaI fragment (5′ arm) and 3-kb BamHI–XbaI fragment (3′ arm) in the backbone of pBluescript vector. Linearized pKO-1 plasmid (25 μg) was electroporated into 1 × 107 J1 ES cells as described (11). G418r ES clones were isolated and expanded. Genomic DNAs were prepared for Southern blot analysis. To obtain ES clones homozygous for the Pten deletion, heterozygous ES clones were subjected to a higher G418 selection (5 mg/ml). Homozygous deletion was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. ES cell clones homozygous for the Pten deletion were injected into BALB/c blastocysts. Chimeric embryos were collected at embryonic day 14–15 gestation. MEF cells were prepared and subjected to G418 (400 μg/ml) selection for 10 days to eliminate wild-type (WT) cells. Pten deletion then was further confirmed by Southern and Western blot analyses.
Colcemid Block and Mitotic Shake-Off.
ES cells were passaged twice without feeder support to remove Pten+/+ feeder cells. Mitotic cells were prepared according to Savatier et al. (12). An equal number of mitotic cells were seeded on gelatinized plates and incubated to allow synchronized cell cycle reentry. Cytospin of collected cells followed by Wright staining showed that this procedure yielded 90–95% mitotic cells (data not shown).
Antibodies, Western Blot Analysis, and Kinase Assay.
Cell lysate preparation, immunoprecipitation, Western blot analysis, and histone H1 kinase assay were carried out as described (9). Antibodies specific for p27KIP1 (sc-528), cyclin D1 (R-124), p21CIP1/WAF1 (sc-397), and mouse cyclin E (sc-481) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies specific for cyclin A, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK2) (13), and PTEN (9) have been described. Antibodies for Bad (B36420) and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (F15020) were from Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY. Antiphosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 and anti-p85 subunit of PI3 kinase antibody (06–195) were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology. Anti-Akt/protein kinase B (PKB) and anti-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) antibodies were from New England Biolabs.
Phospholipids Analysis.
Phospholipid extraction and TLC analysis were performed according to Trynor-Kaplan et al. (14). To prepare 32P-labeled molecular weight markers for phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate, phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate, and PIP3, PI3 kinase was immunoprecipitated from insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I)-stimulated 293 cells with anti-p85 antibody and used to phosphorylate the lipid substrates phosphatidylinositol (Sigma), phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PIP) (Boehringer Mannheim), or phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) (Boehringer Mannheim) in a reaction containing [32P]-γ-ATP as described (15). The in vitro 32P-labeled phosphoinositides, PIP2, and PIP3 then were used as standards for TLC analyses.
Terminal Deoxynucleotidyltransferase-Mediated UTP End Labeling (TUNEL) Assay.
Log-phase growing MEF cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells per 12-mm round coverslip (Fisher Scientific). After attachment, cells were cultured in medium without serum for 72 hr. Cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde/PBS, permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin (Molecular Probes) in 10% normal goat serum/PBS, followed by counterstaining with TUNEL reaction mixture (Boehringer Mannheim). Cells were visualized by using fluorescence microscopy.
RESULTS
Generation of Pten−/− ES Cells and Characterization of Their Growth Properties.
We introduced a null mutation into the mouse Pten gene by homologous recombination in ES cells. Fig. 1A shows the targeting vector, pKO-1, in which both transcriptional and translational initiation sites and exons 1–3 of the Pten gene were deleted. By using an external probe, an 8.5-kb band corresponding to the targeted allele (Fig. 1B, lane 2) was detected in six of 200 G418r colonies. To facilitate the study of PTEN function at the cellular level, we generated Pten−/− ES cells by selecting with a higher dose of G418 (Fig. 1B, lane 3). In each of the following experiments, results were repeated and confirmed by using several independent ES clones to avoid potential clonal variations.
In the process of culturing Pten+/+, Pten+/−, and Pten−/− ES cells, we noticed that the Pten−/− ES cells appeared to reach high cell density faster. To determine whether Pten−/− cells had altered growth properties, we performed a growth competition experiment. Equal numbers of Pten+/+ cells were mixed with Pten+/− or Pten−/− cells and cocultured. Cells were passed every 3 days to avoid growth saturation. During each passage, a fraction of the cell mix was harvested, and genomic DNA was prepared for Southern blot analysis to determine the representation of each cell type. As shown in Fig. 1B and quantified in Fig. 1C, the intensity of the 8.5-kb band, representing the Pten deletion allele (KO), increased significantly from passage 1 to passage 3 (Fig. 1B, lanes 5, 7, and 9) while the 23-kb fragment of the WT allele decreased correspondingly, indicating that the percentage of Pten−/− cells increased with each passage. At the end of the third passage (corresponding to 13–14 doublings of normal ES cells), the Pten−/− ES cells had outgrown the Pten+/+ cells, as revealed by a dramatic reduction of the WT DNA band (Fig. 1B, lane 9) from the final cell population. As a control, when Pten+/+ and Pten+/− cells were cocultured, the ratios between the KO and the WT alleles were largely unaltered during the consecutive passages (Fig. 1B, lanes 4, 6, and 8). Because under normal growth conditions, cell death is rare (< 1%), these results suggest that deletion of the Pten gene provides cells with a growth advantage, possibly by shortening the cell cycle time (see below).
Pten+/+, Pten+/−, and Pten−/− ES cells were compared for serum dependency. ES cells were cultured in parallel for 4 days in media containing reduced concentrations of serum. As shown in Fig. 1D, even in the medium without serum, Pten−/− ES cells were able to proliferate, and the total cell number was increased. In addition, Pten−/− ES cells survived better in reduced serum conditions. In serum-free medium, most of the Pten+/+ and Pten+/− ES cells lost their viability in 2–3 days and detached from feeder layers (Fig. 1E, a and b). However, approximately 80% of Pten−/− ES cells remained and proliferated to form small colonies (Fig. 1E, c and d). Thus, the sustained growth of Pten−/− cells in the absence of serum could reflect a combination of increased cell survival and enhanced cell proliferation of Pten−/− ES cells.
Advanced G1 Cell Cycle Progression in Pten−/− Cells Correlates With Down-Regulation of p27KIP1.
The ability of Pten−/− cells to proliferate under reduced serum conditions and their higher growth rate raised the possibility that deletion of the Pten gene may affect cell cycle progression. Our recent studies indicated that transient expression of the PTEN gene in a human glioblastoma cell line caused G1 cell cycle arrest, suggesting that PTEN may play a role in the G1/S transition (9). These observations prompted us to examine whether Pten−/− cells have an accelerated cell cycle progression from G1 into S phase.
ES cells are rapidly proliferating cells. Under normal growth conditions, we observed that about 60–70% of ES cells were in S phase. Because ES cells do not exhibit contact inhibition and respond poorly to serum deprivation, we used the mitotic shake-off method (12) for synchronization. Mitotic cells were collected after colcemid treatment and then released into fresh medium. S-phase entry was monitored by incorporation of [3H]thymidine. Consistent with a previous report (12), [3H]thymidine incorporation occurred about 3 hr after release from the mitotic block (Fig. 2A), suggesting that ES cells have a G1 phase of about 2–3 hr. Pten−/− cells reproducibly showed an earlier (approximately 0.5–1 hr advance) and more synchronized entry into S phase compared with Pten+/+ cells. Because the synchronized ES cells have a cell cycle time of approximately 9–10 hr, the advanced S-phase entry we observed in Pten−/− cells shortened the cell cycle time by 5–10%, which could have a significant impact on the growth rate of Pten−/− cells.
To determine the cause of early S-phase entry in PTEN-deficient cells, we examined the levels of G1 cell cycle regulators, including two major G1 CDK inhibitors, p21CIP1/WAF1 and p27KIP1. p21CIP1/WAF1 and p27KIP1 are involved in G1/S progression, and their levels are known to be regulated by extracellular stimuli (16). Consistent with previous reports (17), p21 was not detectable in ES cells (data not shown), suggesting that p21 is not the major G1 CDK inhibitor in ES cells. However, p27 was readily detectable in ES cells and its levels were oscillated in the cell cycle (Fig. 2B). In Pten+/+ cells, p27 levels were low during mitosis (0 hr), transiently increased as cells entered the G1 phase (2–3 hr), modestly reduced at the 4-hr time point, and returned to the basal level after 6 hr. In Pten−/− cells, however, both basal (0 hr) and induced levels of p27 during G1 phase (2 and 3 hr) were significantly reduced. In addition, down-regulation of p27 occurred more rapidly in Pten−/− cells. By 4 hr, nearly 75% reduction in the p27 level was observed. As a control, the levels of cyclin D1, a major G1 cyclin, were comparable in both Pten+/+ and Pten−/− cells and were relatively constant throughout the cell cycle (Fig. 2B).
The binding of p27 to the G1 cell cycle kinases, such as cyclin D/CDK4 or CDK6 and cyclin E/CDK2, leads to the inhibition of the activities of these kinases (16). To examine the effects of p27 reduction in Pten−/− cells on G1 cell cycle kinase activity, we compared the activities of cyclin E/CDK2 complexes isolated from the synchronized Pten+/+ and Pten−/− cells at various time points after mitotic shake-off. As shown in Fig. 2C and quantified in Fig. 2D, the loss of PTEN led to an increased level of cyclin E-associated kinase activity, which paralleled the decreased levels of p27 in the Pten−/− cells. These studies suggest that the down-regulation of p27 in Pten−/− cell may lead to enhanced activation of G1 cell cycle kinases, which in turn promote advanced S-phase entry.
We also examined the p27 level in asynchronously growing cells. In Pten−/− cells, there is a reduction of p27 level by 3- to 4-fold as compared with Pten+/+ cells (Fig. 2E). In contrast, the levels of other G1 cell cycle regulators, such as cyclin D1, cyclin E, cyclin A, CDK2, as well as cyclin E-associated CDK2 or cyclin A-associated CDK2, did not show significant alteration (Fig. 2E). These results suggest that p27 is a selective target for the signaling pathway regulated by the PTEN tumor suppressor.
To address the question of whether the down-regulation of p27 in Pten−/− cells occurs at transcriptional or posttranscriptional levels, we compared the 27 mRNA level in Pten+/+ and Pten−/− cells by Northern blot analysis. We found that the level of p27 mRNA was not affected by PTEN status (Fig. 2F), suggesting that p27 is modulated by PTEN-regulated signaling pathway at the posttranscriptional level. In addition, the mRNA levels of cyclin D, cyclin E, cyclin A, or CDK2 were not affected by the PTEN status (Fig. 2F). Together, these data indicate the loss of PTEN affects cell cycle progression, and one selective target for this process is the down-regulation of p27 at its protein level.
PTEN Down-Regulates PI3 Kinase Signaling by Controlling PIP3 Accumulation.
Several signaling pathways are required for cells to progress from G1 to S phase. Among them, PI3 kinase plays a major role (18). PI3 kinase regulates the production of PIP3, which acts as a second messenger of the PI3 kinase signaling pathway. PTEN can dephosphorylate PIP3 in vitro (6), and overexpression of the PTEN gene in human glioblastoma cells results in inhibition of Akt/PKB, a downstream target of PI3 kinase (9). These observations suggest that PTEN potentially may regulate the PI3 kinase signaling pathway.
By using genetically defined Pten−/− and Pten+/+ but otherwise isogenic cells, we examined the levels of PIP3 in cells that have been stimulated with IGF-I. Fig. 3A shows a representative result from three independent experiments. Pten+/+ cells were less sensitive to IGF-I stimulation, and their PIP3 levels were significantly lower than that of Pten−/− cells. Five minutes after IGF-I stimulation, only a modest increase in PIP3 level could be detected in Pten+/+ cells. However, an approximately 2-fold increase of PIP3 (Fig. 3B) over the Pten+/+ level could be detected in Pten−/− ES cells. Even 20 min after stimulation, the PIP3 level in Pten−/− ES cells was still very high. In contrast, the levels of PIP and PIP2 were largely unaffected by PTEN deficiency (Fig. 3A). The basal level (without IGF-I stimulation) of PIP3 is comparable in Pten+/+ and Pten−/− cells (data not shown). These results suggest that both the magnitude and duration of PIP3 accumulation after IGF-I stimulation were significantly higher in the Pten−/− ES cells. This increase in the PIP3 level in Pten−/− ES cells is quite reproducible and is comparable to the elevated PIP3 level induced by the overexpression of a constitutive active form of PI3 kinase (form p110*), as reported (19). These findings suggest that PIP3 is an intracellular target of PTEN.
Increased Phosphorylation and Activation of PKB/Akt in Pten−/− ES Cells Correlates with Cell Proliferation and Down-Regulation of p27KIP1.
PKB/Akt, a growth factor-regulated serine/threonine kinase, is one of the best-characterized downstream targets of PIP3. Akt is activated by its association with PIP3, which facilitates Akt phosphorylation and activation by the upstream kinases (PDK1 and PDK2) (20). We examined Akt phosphorylation in Pten+/+ and Pten−/− cells after IGF-I stimulation. In Pten+/+ ES cells, IGF-I induced a transient but modest phosphorylation of Akt on serine-473, which can be detected by a specific diagnostic antibody (Fig. 4A, Left). Akt phosphorylation reached its highest level around 20–40 min and subsequently was down-regulated by 90 min. In Pten−/− ES cells, both the basal level and the magnitude of Akt phosphorylation were significantly increased (Fig. 4A, Right). The duration of Akt phosphorylation also was prolonged, as no significant down-regulation of Akt phosphorylation could be observed in Pten−/− cells even 90 min after IGF-I stimulation. The sustained high level of Akt phosphorylation in Pten−/− cells suggests that the increase in PIP3 accumulation caused by PTEN deficiency is sufficient to induce the activation of Akt.
Because the selective growth advantage of Pten−/− ES cells was observed under normal culture conditions, we also examined whether the steady state of phosphorylated Akt is affected by the PTEN deficiency. As shown in Fig. 4B, we found that the level of Akt phosphorylation was very sensitive to the dosage of the Pten gene. The phosphorylated form of Akt could be detected in Pten+/+ cells. In Pten+/− cells, a noticeable increase in Akt phosphorylation was observed. In Pten−/− cells, this increase became even more dramatic (Fig. 4B). Such changes of Akt status occurred only at the level of phosphorylation and therefore its activation; no changes in the protein level of Akt could be detected in these assays (Fig. 4B). We further examined whether Akt phosphorylation correlated with the growth status of the cells. As shown in Fig. 4C, in the lysates prepared from actively growing cells, there was a significant increase of Akt phosphorylation in two independent Pten−/− ES clones as compared with Pten+/+ cells. This increase became less obvious when cells were harvested upon reaching confluence (Fig. 4C). In parallel, we also examined the level of p27KIP1. Similar to changes of phosphorylation of Akt, the difference of the p27 levels in Pten+/+ and Pten−/− cells was most pronounced in log-phase growing cells (Fig. 4C). As a control, the levels of cyclin D1 were independent of the PTEN status and the growth state of the cell (Fig. 4C). These observations raise the possibility that Akt, or other molecules activated by PIP3, may be involved in down-regulation of p27KIP1 and promoting cell proliferation.
To examine whether the increased PIP3 accumulation and Akt activation in Pten−/− cells is caused by up-regulation of PI3 kinase, we analyzed the tyrosine phosphorylation status of PI3 kinase itself in Pten−/−, Pten+/−, and Pten+/+ cells. The PI3 kinase, the p85/p110 heterodimer, is activated by tyrosine phosphorylation on the p85 regulatory subunit (18). No significant alteration on p85 tyrosine phosphorylation could be detected in Pten−/− cells (Fig. 4D). These results suggest that PTEN functions downstream of PI3 kinase and that the elevated PIP3 level in Pten−/− ES cells is likely caused by impaired dephosphorylation of PIP3 by loss of PTEN rather than increased production by PI3 kinase.
To determine whether PTEN deficiency affects signaling molecules other than Akt, we examined phosphorylation status of MAPK and FAK. Our experiment revealed that the tyrosine phosphorylation and thus the activated forms of MAPK were not affected by the Pten deletion (Fig. 4D). It was reported that FAK could interact with and be dephosphorylated by PTEN in cells overexpressing PTEN (21). However, no significant difference in FAK phosphorylation could be detected among Pten−/−, Pten+/−, and Pten+/+ cells (Fig. 4D). Thus, our studies suggest that PTEN selectively regulate the PIP3/Akt signaling pathway.
An Increased Akt Activation in Pten−/− MEF Cells Leads to Increased Phosphorylation of Bad and Cell Survival.
ES cells are stem cells and represent the most undifferentiated cell type with high proliferative potential. Because of the unique status of ES cells, we were interested in determining whether inactivation of PTEN produced similar effects (e.g., increased growth rate and activation of Akt) in more differentiated cell types such as MEF cells. To generate Pten−/− MEF cells, we injected several lines of Pten−/− ES cells into blastocysts, and Pten−/− MEF were obtained from embryonic day 14–15 chimeric embryos after G418 selection to eliminate WT MEF cells. Complete inactivation of PTEN was confirmed by both Southern (data not shown) and Western blot analyses (Fig. 5A). During the course of culturing Pten+/+ and Pten−/− MEF cells, we did not observe significant differences in the rate of growth, nor at the level of p27KIP1 (data not shown), possibly because of the differences in the cell cycle checkpoint control mechanism between ES and MEF cells (see Discussion).
Similar to Pten−/− ES cells, Pten−/− MEF cells contained a modest increase in PIP3 level (data not shown) and a significant enhancement in phosphorylation of Akt, as compared with their Pten+/+ counterparts. Again, the total protein level of Akt was not affected (Fig. 5A). In addition, no detectable changes were observed for the level and phosphorylation status of MAPK (data not shown).
To demonstrate the causal relationship between the loss of PTEN and activation of Akt, we reintroduced either the WT PTEN gene or its mutant derivative PTEN CS back into Pten−/− cells by the retrovirus-mediated expression system. The PTEN CS mutant contains a substitution of the cysteine 124 with serine at the phosphatase signature motif and is catalytically inactive (3). Although Akt phosphorylation in Pten−/− MEF cells was significantly decreased upon reintroduction of the WT PTEN gene, no difference could be detected when PTEN CS was overexpressed (Fig. 5A, Right). These data reinforce the idea that Akt phosphorylation level depends on the PTEN gene dosage and that the phosphatase activity of PTEN is required for Akt inactivation.
Activation of Akt is essential for cell survival after growth factor withdrawal (20). To determine whether the increased Akt activity by PTEN deletion is sufficient to trigger downstream events, especially the growth survival effect of Akt, we examined the phosphorylation status of Bad, a member of the Bcl2 family. Bad can be phosphorylated by Akt, and such phosphorylation causes the loss of pro-apoptotic activity of Bad (22, 23). As shown in Fig. 5B, Pten−/− cells contained higher levels of phosphorylated Bad as compared with its Pten+/+ counterparts, either in the presence or the absence of IGF-I stimulation. These data suggest that the Akt-controlled anti-cell death pathway is up-regulated and activated in Pten−/− cells.
To examine whether the increased phosphorylation of Akt and Bad affects MEF cell survival, we subjected Pten+/+ and Pten−/− MEF cells to serum withdrawal. At different time points during serum starvation, cells were harvested and analyzed by two different procedures. First, we stained cells with propidium iodide and determined cell viability by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. As summarized in Fig. 5C, the WT and Pten−/− MEF cells had significantly different survival rates in response to serum starvation. After serum starvation for 4 days, death occurred in more than 60% of WT cells, whereas fewer than 30% of Pten−/− cells underwent apoptosis. Second, TUNEL assays were performed to detect apoptotic cells by in situ staining. No significant cell death occurred in either population when cells were cultured under optimal growth conditions (Fig. 5D, a and b). However, 72 hr after serum withdrawal, a high incidence of apoptosis was observed in Pten+/+ but not in Pten−/− MEF cultures (Fig. 5D, c and d). These data suggest that inactivation of PTEN leads to up-regulation of the AKT pathway and prevents cells from apoptotic death.
DISCUSSION
By using a genetically defined system, we have demonstrated that PTEN negatively regulates PIP3 and Akt signaling pathway. Several lines of evidence suggest that accumulation of PIP3 in Pten−/− cells is caused by the loss of PTEN phosphatase activity. First, we have shown that the activity of PI3 kinase, the enzyme that specifically produces PIP3, was not altered in Pten−/− ES cells. Thus the observed higher PIP3 levels in Pten−/− cells is likely caused by the decreased dephosphorylation of PIP3. Second, we showed that by reintroducing the WT PTEN gene into Pten−/− MEF cells, we could reverse PIP3-dependent Akt activation. Such a reversion requires the phosphatase activity of PTEN, suggesting that PTEN is likely to be a bona fide phosphatase for PIP3. Our data are further supported by the results from previous experiments, which showed that PTEN could act as a specific phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase in vitro and overexpression of PTEN in 293 cells resulted in decreased PIP3 levels (6).
We have further demonstrated that Akt/PKB, a downstream target for PIP3 signaling, is up-regulated in PTEN-deficient cells. Akt phosphorylation and activation depend on the dosage as well as the phosphatase activity of the Pten gene product. In log-phase growing Pten−/− cells, the steady-state level of Akt phosphorylation is 3- to 4-fold higher than Pten+/+ cells. Moreover, Akt activation directly correlates with the proliferation state of the cells. A direct role of Akt in cell cycle progression has been suggested by the recent observation that expression of a constitutive activated Akt in mouse macrophage cells or rat fibroblasts can trigger S-phase entry in the absence of serum growth factors (24, 25). Together, these results indicate that Akt may be a critical molecule involved in the regulation of normal cell growth.
p27KIP1 has been proposed to prevent unscheduled activation of cyclin-CDK complexes in G1 phase (16). Several reports (9, 26–28) suggest that PI3 kinase signaling may be involved in the down-regulation of p27. In NIH 3T3 cells, expression of a dominant-negative form of Ras, probably through inhibition of PI3 kinase, can block cell cycle progression at mid or late G1 phase (26, 27). In aortic smooth muscle cells, treatment of cells with wortmannin, a pharmacologic inhibitor for PI3 kinase, also blocked G1 cell cycle progression (28). In both systems, the G1 cell cycle block was accompanied by failure to down-regulate p27 (26–28). We recently observed that in U87MG human glioblastoma cells transient expression of PTEN leads to significant up-regulation of p27 and G1 cell cycle arrest (9). However, it is unclear from these experiments whether the increased p27KIP1 level is the cause or the consequence of G1 cell cycle arrest.
In this study, we have provided in vivo evidence that p27KIP1 is a downstream target of the PIP3 signaling pathway and such regulation occurs at the posttranscriptional level. Our studies suggest that down-regulation of p27KIP1 is likely to be a critical or even a rate-limiting step during G1/S transition in ES cells. We have attempted to reintroduce the PTEN gene into PTEN−/− ES cells to rescue the cell-cycle regulation defect. However, we failed to obtain stable cell clones that expressed the exogenous PTEN gene (data not shown). This failure was likely caused by the growth suppression effect of overexpressed PTEN in these cells, a phenomenon similar to that observed in human glioblastoma cells (7–9). It is interesting to point out that down-regulation of p27KIP1 and advanced cell cycle progression are most notable in Pten−/− ES cells, but are less obvious in more differentiated MEF cells. Such differential cell responses may reflect the differences in intrinsic cell cycle control mechanisms between these two cell types. Down-regulation of p27KIP1 by PIP3 signaling may be sufficient for cell cycle progression in ES cells, whereas in MEF cells additional signaling processes may be required. This scenario is consistent with tumorigenesis in animals and humans. Mice lacking p27KIP1 suffer from multiple organ hyperplasia (29–31). A common feature among these organs is that their progenitor cells are undifferentiated and mitotically active. Many tumor cells also arise from undifferentiated progenitor cells, and the mutation in the PTEN gene in those cells may be sufficient to promote cell cycle progression. It is interesting to note that PTEN mutations frequently are observed in advanced human prostate cancer (32) and the levels of p27 inversely correlate with prognosis of prostate cancer (33). It is possible that the decreased p27KIP1 level in prostate cancer tissues occurs as a consequence of impaired PTEN function.
While this manuscript was under review, Stambolic et al. (34) reported that immortalized Pten3–5 (disruption of exons 3–5 of the murine Pten gene) MEF cells exhibited resistance to cell death stimuli, accompanied by increases of PIP3 level and Akt activation. Their conclusion that PTEN regulates apoptosis is consistent with part of the conclusion discussed in this paper. They also observed that a prominent feature in Pten−/− embryos was enhanced cell proliferation during early embryogenesis, although they had not provided a mechanistic explanation for this phenotype. Di Cristofano (10) et al. recently reported that PTEN is essential for embryonic development, and Pten+/− mice or chimaeric mice derived from Pten+/− ES cells show hyperplastic-dysplastic changes in prostate, skin, and colon, and the mice also develop germ cell, gonadostroma, thyroid, and colon tumors. These observations further highlight the importance of PTEN in regulation of cell proliferation, and our findings of PTEN deficiency having a profound effect on cell cycle progression provides a molecular basis for these phenotypes.
In summary, our studies reveal an insight into the mechanism by which PTEN functions as a tumor suppressor. By regulating PIP3 and Akt/PKB, PTEN modulates two fundamental cellular processes: cell cycle progression and cell survival. Alteration of either or both processes has long been implicated in the genesis of human cancer.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Harvey Herschman, Sam Chow, Des Smith, and Owen Witte and members of our laboratories for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Drs. Alexis Traynor-Kaplan and Andrew Morris for advice on the phospholipid analysis. R.L. was a Howard Hughes Postdoctoral Associate and currently is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and CapCure fund. D-M.L. was a recipient of the Leslie H. Warner Fellowship in Cancer Research. H.S. is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences. H.W. is an Assistant Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and V Foundation Scholar. This work was supported by grants from the Pew Charitable Trust and the Department of the Army (DAMD 17-98-1-8271) (H.S.), National Institutes of Health (CA72878) (H.Z.), and the V Foundation and CapCure Fund (H.W.).
ABBREVIATIONS
- ES
embryonic stem
- PIP
phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate
- PI3
phosphatidylinositol 3
- PIP2
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate
- PIP3
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5,-trisphosphate
- MEF
mouse embryonic fibroblasts
- WT
wild type
- CDK
cyclin-dependent kinase
- PKB
protein kinase B
- MAPK
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- IGF-I
insulin-like growth factor I
- TUNEL
terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated UTP end labeling
- FAK
focal adhesion kinase
References
- 1.Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, Podsypanina K, Bose S, Wang S I, Puc J, Miliaresis C, Rodgers L, McCombie R, et al. Science. 1997;275:1943–1947. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5308.1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steck P A, Pershouse M A, Jasser S A, Lin H, Yung W K A, Ligon A H, Langford L A, Baumgard M L, Hattier T, Davis T, et al. Nat Genet. 1997;15:356–363. doi: 10.1038/ng0497-356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li D-M, Sun H. Cancer Res. 1997;57:2124–2129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eng C. Int J Oncol. 1998;12:701–710. doi: 10.3892/ijo.12.3.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Myers M P, Stolarov J P, Eng C, Li J, Wang S I, Wigler M H, Parsons R, Tonks N K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:9052–9057. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maehama T, Dixon J E. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13375–13378. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.22.13375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Furnari F B, Lin H, Huang H J S, Cavenee W K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:12479–12484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheney I W, Johnson D E, Vaillancourt M T, Avanzini J, Morimoto A, Demers G W, Wills K N, Shabram P W, Bolen J B, Tavtigian S V, Bookstein R. Cancer Res. 1998;58:2331–2334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li D-M, Sun H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:15406–15411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Di Cristofano A, Pesce B, Cordon-Cardo C, Pandolfi P P. Nat Genet. 1998;19:348–355. doi: 10.1038/1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu H, Liu X, Jaenisch R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:2819–2823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Savatier P, Huang S, Szekely L, Wiman K G, Samarut J. Oncogene. 1994;9:809–818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang H, Kobayashi R, Galaktionov K, Beach D. Cell. 1995;82:915–925. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90271-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Traynor-Kaplan A E, Thompson B L, Harris A L, Taylor P, Omann G M, Sklar L A. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:15668–15673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Serunian L A, Auger K R, Cantley L C. Methods Enzymol. 1991;198:78–87. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)98010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hunter T, Pines J. Cell. 1994;79:573–582. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90543-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aladjem M I, Spike B T, Rodewald L W, Hope T J, Klemm M, Jaenisch R, Wahl G M. Curr Biol. 1998;8:145–155. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Toker A, Cantley L C. Nature (London) 1997;387:673–676. doi: 10.1038/42648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Klippel A, Reinhard C, Kavanaugh W M, Apell G, Escobedo M A, Williams L T. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:4117–4127. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.8.4117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Downward J. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998;10:262–267. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80149-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tamura M, Gu J, Matsumoto K, Aota S, Parsons R, Yamada K M. Science. 1998;280:1614–1617. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5369.1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Datta S R, Dudek H, Tao X, Masters S, Fu H, Gotoh Y, Greenberg M E. Cell. 1997;91:231–241. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80405-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.del Peso L, Gonzalez-Garcia M, Page C, Herrera R, Nunez G. Science. 1997;278:687–689. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ahmed N N, Grimes H L, Bellacosa A, Chan T O, Tsichlis P N. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3627–3632. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Klippel A, Escobedo M A, Wachowicz M S, Apell G, Brown T W, Giedlin M A, Kavanaugh W M, Williams L T. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:5699–5711. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.10.5699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Takuwa N, Takuwa Y. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:5348–5358. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.9.5348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aktas H, Cai H, Cooper G M. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:3850–3857. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.7.3850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bacqueville D, Casagrande F, Perret B, Chap H, Darbon J M, Breton-Douillon M. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;244:630–636. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fero M L, Rivkin M, Tasch M, Porter P, Carow C E, Firpo E, Polyak K, Tsai L H, Broudy V, Perlmutter R M, et al. Cell. 1996;85:733–744. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81239-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kiyokawa H, Kineman R D, Manova-Todorova K O, Soares V C, Hoffman E S, Ono M, Khanam D, Hayday A C, Frohman L A, Koff A. Cell. 1996;85:721–732. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81238-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nakayama K, Ishida N, Shirane M, Inomata A, Inoue T, Shishido N, Horii I, Loh D Y, Nakayama K. Cell. 1996;85:707–720. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81237-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cairns P, Okami K, Halachmi S, Halachmi N, Esteller M, Herman J G, Isaacs W B, Bova G S, Sidransky D. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4997–5000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cordon-Cardo C, Koff A, Drobnjak M, Capodieci P, Osman I, Millard S S, Gaudin P B, Fazzari M, Zhang Z F, Massague J, Scher H I. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1284–1291. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.17.1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stambolic V, Suzuki A, de la Pompa J L, Brothers G M, Mirtsos C, Sasaki T, Ruland J, Penninger J M, Siderovski D P, Mak T W. Cell. 1998;95:29–39. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81780-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]