Skip to main content
Communicative & Integrative Biology logoLink to Communicative & Integrative Biology
. 2008 Oct-Dec;1(2):172–174. doi: 10.4161/cib.1.2.7143

Endoplasmic reticulum continuity in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica

Evolutionary implications and a cautionary note

Archana Vaithilingam 1, Jose E Teixeira 1, Christopher D Huston 1,2,
PMCID: PMC2686013  PMID: 19704884

Abstract

Entamoeba histolytica has been described as an early branching eukaryotic parasite based on the lack of organelles such as mitochondria and peroxisomes, and on morphologic studies that concluded it possesses a vesicular endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi complex. However, a recent study from our laboratory showed that the E. histolytica ER is continuous by using an ER-targeted green fluorescent protein fusion protein and photobleaching experiments. We proposed that the vesicular ER seen earlier was likely an artifact of fixation. We now report data using an alternative fixation protocol that preserves the continuous ER morphology. These data confirm that the vesicular ER reported earlier was indeed a fixation artifact; furthermore, since we observed the same ER structure when staining for the native antigen HSP-70 in wild-type amebae, the data provide direct evidence that the continuous ER morphology we reported is correct. This work has important implications for cell biologists studying E. histolytica virulence, emphasizes the frequent need to reassess assumptions based on published data, and provides additional evidence that E. histolytica actually diverged relatively late in evolution and that many of its unusual features are likely due to loss of features during adaptation to its ecological niche.

Key words: amebiasis, entamoeba, endoplasmic reticulum, evolution, FLIP, green fluorescent protein


Entamoeba histolytica is the intestinal protozoan parasite that causes amebiasis, a disease characterized by dysentery that may affect 50 million people annually.1,2 The role of secreted proteins in virulence and their effect on host cells has been studied extensively;3,4 however, E. histolytica's secretory pathway is yet to be understood. Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites lack mitochondria and peroxisomes.5 Furthermore, based on several morphologic studies that used transmission electron microscopy and confocal microscopy to examine fixed amebae, typical Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) structures have been believed to be absent from E. histolytica trophozoites.69 Based on these morphologic features, some consider E. histolytica to be a “living fossil” that diverged from other eukaryotes prior to development of these organelles.10 However, this belief runs contrary to accumulating data that suggest E. histolytica diverged from the main eukaryotic lineage relatively recently, including studies demonstrating remnants of mitochondrial DNA in E. histolytica (suggesting secondary loss of mitochondria rather than divergence prior to acquisition), results of small subunit ribosomal RNA sequencing, and identification of several features of a more typical secretory pathway including secretion of glycosylated proteins, presence of a homologue to the ER retention receptor Erd2, and the results of the E. histolytica genome projects.5,1114

In a recent paper, we demonstrated that E. histolytica in fact has a continuous ER network like that of other eukaryotic cells.15 Using E. histolytica trophozoites expressing a FLAG-epitope tagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) that was targeted to the ER by fusion to the ER retention sequence KDEL at the carboxyl terminus and the amino terminal signal sequence of a galactose/N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (Gal/GalNAc) specific E. histolytica surface lectin, we were able to observe the ER morphology in living amebic trophozoites for the first time. The ER-targeted GFP fusion protein was distributed in what appeared to be a continuous network reminiscent of the ER in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The GFP-KDEL protein was excluded from pseudopodia, suggesting presence within a membrane bound compartment, and three-way junctions characteristic of the ER in other eukaryotes were readily visible (Fig. 1 and ref. 15). To test the continuity of this network experimentally, we used the method of fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP). The live trophozoites were overlayed with soft agar to restrict parasite movement and a portion of the cell was bleached by a high beam laser. GFP fluorescence diminished rapidly from the entire cell while neighboring control cells were minimally bleached, indicating that the ER-targeted GFP fusion was freely diffusible within a single, continuous compartment. We concluded that the vesicular ER observed earlier was likely a result of fixing artifacts and, contrary to published data, that E. histolytica possesses a continuous ER.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Endoplasmic reticulum continuity in E. histolytica trophozoites. (A) ER phenotype observed is dependent on the fixation method. Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites (strain HM-1:IMSS) expressing a FLAG-epitope tagged ER-targeted GFP fusion protein (GFP-KDEL) were fixed with either 3% or 4% paraformaldehyde as indicated for 20 minutes at room temperature, and labeled with an anti-FLAG mouse monoclonal antibody and an anti-mouse IgG-Alexa Fluor 488 (green) conjugated secondary antibody. A higher concentration of paraformaldehyde preserved the continuous ER phenotype observed in living cells. (B and C) show co-localization of GFP-KDEL with the native ER protein HSP-70 or with the Gal/GalNAc lectin within the secretory pathway, respectively. In either case, the GFP-KDEL protein was stained as above. HSP-70 (B) or the Gal/GalNAc lectin (C) was stained with rabbit polyclonal anti-sera followed by an anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa 568 (red) conjugate. (D) Distribution of HSP-70 in wild-type E. histolytica trophozoites fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were fixed and stained for HSP-70 as above. Slides were examined using a Zeiss 510 Meta laser scanning confocal microscope. 10 µm scale bars are shown.

One concern with our approach was that the reticular network observed might have resulted from overexpression of the GFP-KDEL fusion protein, a possibility we were unable to exclude completely. For example, this might be possible if protein overexpression induces so-called tubular transport intermediates (TTI's) in E. histolytica, which are linear expansions of the vesicular transport apparatus that have been observed in mammalian cells following protein overexpression.16 We have sought to examine localization of native ER proteins to exclude this possibility. Since using fixed cells for immunofluorescent staining of native ER proteins is unavoidable, we first needed a fixation method that would preserve the ER phenotype seen in living trophozoites. Figure 1 shows new data using an altered fixation protocol that preserves the continuous ER morphology. Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites expressing the FLAG-tagged GFP-KDEL protein were fixed with either 3% or 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, and labeled with a monoclonal anti-FLAG mouse antibody and an anti-mouse IgG Alexa 488 conjugated goat antibody. As previously described, the ER-targeted GFP protein appeared to be distributed in vesicles when fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde; simply increasing the paraformaldehyde concentration to 4% preserved the continuous ER phenotype seen in living trophozoites (Fig. 1A). Using the new fixation protocol, co-staining of the FLAG-GFP-KDEL protein with either the representative ER protein HSP-70 or with the Gal/GalNAc specific lectin, a type I integral membrane protein present on the cell surface and within the secretory pathway, demonstrated excellent co-localization of these native proteins with GFP-KDEL in the ER compartment (Fig. 1B and C, respectively). Interestingly, HSP-70 was typically more abundant in the peripheral ER, while the GFP-KDEL fusion protein was distributed more homogenously, hinting at the likelihood of specialized regions within the E. histolytica ER (Fig. 1B and data not shown). To further exclude the possibility that the continuous ER network could be induced by protein overexpression, we next used this fixation protocol to examine the distribution of HSP-70 in wild-type E. histolytica trophozoites. Again, a reticular network was observed, indicating that this phenotype was not an artifact of protein overexpression (Fig. 1D).

By providing direct evidence that the vesicular E. histolytica ER reported in earlier studies was a result of fixation artifacts and demonstrating that the continuous ER phenotype is observed in cells fixed by an alternate protocol and stained for native proteins, these data confirm and extend our previous report which concluded that the E. histolytica ER is continuous.15 These data are important for several reasons. First, presence of a continuous ER in E. histolytica adds to the accumulating evidence that E. histolytica diverged relatively late in evolution and that many of its unusual features are likely due to reductive evolution during adaptation to its unique ecological niche.17 This observation is also important to cell biologists studying E. histolytica. Others and we have identified endoplasmic reticulum proteins in purified phagosomes while other investigators have found no ER proteins in the E. histolytica phagosome.1821 Given this and conflicting reports regarding ER-dependent macrophage phagocytosis, we want to determine if E. histolytica uses ER-dependent phagocytosis under some circumstances.22,23 Using this alternative fixation protocol, the role of the ER in E. histolytica pathogenesis and phagocytosis can now be studied. Finally, these data stress the frequent need to reconsider assumptions based on published studies that by necessity were dependent on older technologies, and should serve as a cautionary note for cell biologists by emphasizing the importance of using the best available methods.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 AI072021 and P20 RR021905 to Christoper D. Huston. We are grateful to Tomoyoshi Nozaki (Gunma University, Gunma, Japan) and to William A. Petri, Jr. (University of Virginia, Chalottesville, VA) for gifts of the HSP-70 and Gal/GalNAc lectin rabbit anti-sera, respectively.

Abbreviations

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

GFP

green fluorescent protein

FLIP

fluorescence loss in photobleaching

HSP-70

heat shock protein 70

Gal/GalNAc

galactose/N-acetyl-D-galactosamine

Addendum to: Teixeira JE, Huston CD. Evidence of a continuous endoplasmic reticulum in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Eukaryot Cell. 2008;7:1222–1226. doi: 10.1128/EC.00007-08.

Footnotes

Previously published online as a Communicative & Integrative Biology E-publication: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/cib/article/7143

References

  • 1.Walsh JA. Prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica infection. In: Ravdin JI, editor. Amebiasis: Human Infection by Entamoeba histolytica. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1988. pp. 93–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO/PAHO/UNESCO report. A consultation with experts on amoebiasis. Mexico City, Mexico 28–29 January, 1997. WHO Epidemiol Bull. 1997;18:13–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bracha R, Nuchamowitz Y, Leippe M, Mirelman D. Antisense inhibition of amoebapore expression in Entamoeba histolytica causes a decrease in amoebic virulence. Mol Microbiol. 1999;34:463–472. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reed SL, Keene WE, McKerrow JH. Thiol proteinase expression correlates with pathogenicity of Entamoeba histolytica. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2772–2777. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.12.2772-2777.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clark CG, Roger AJ. Direct evidence for secondary loss of mitochondria in Entamoeba histolytica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:6518–6521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenbaum RM, Wittner M. Ultrastructure of bacterized and axenic trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica with particular reference to helical bodies. J Cell Biol. 1970;45:367–382. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.El-Hashimi W, Pittman F. Ultrastructure of Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites obtained from the colon and from in vitro cultures. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1970;19:215–226. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1970.19.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lowe CY, Maegraith BG. Electron microscopy of an axenic strain of Entamoeba histolytica. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1970;64:293–298. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1970.11686694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ghosh SK, Field J, Frisardi M, Rosenthal B, Mai Z, Rogers R, Samuelson J. Chitinase secretion by encysting Entamoeba invadens and transfected Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites: localization of secretory vesicles, endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi apparatus. Infect Immun. 1999;67:3073–3081. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.6.3073-3081.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bakker-Grunwald T, Wostmann C. Entamoeba histolytica as a model for the primitive eukaryotic cell. Parasitol Today. 1993;9:27–31. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(93)90161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Silberman JD, Clark CG, Diamond LS, Sogin ML. Phylogeny of the genera Entamoeba and Endolimax as deduced from small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis. Molec Biol Evol. 1999;16:1740–1751. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mann BJ, Torian BE, Vedvick TS, Petri WA., Jr Sequence of the cysteine-rich heavy subunit of the galactose lectin of Entamoeba histolytica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:3248–3252. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sanchez-Lopez R, Gama-Castro S, Ramos MA, Merino E, Lizardi PM, Alagon A. Cloning and expression of the Entamoeba histolytica ERD2 gene. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998;92:355–359. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(98)00017-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Loftus B, Anderson I, Davies R, Alsmark UC, Samuelson J, Amedeo P, et al. The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Nature. 2005;433:865–868. doi: 10.1038/nature03291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Teixeira JE, Huston CD. Evidence of a continuous endoplasmic reticulum in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Eukaryot Cell. 2008;7:1222–1226. doi: 10.1128/EC.00007-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Simpson JC, Nilsson T, Pepperkok R. Biogenesis of Tubular ER-to-Golgi Transport Intermediates. Molec Biol Cell. 2006;17:723–737. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Clark CG. The evolution of Entamoeba, a cautionary tale. Res Microbiol. 2000;151:599–603. doi: 10.1016/s0923-2508(00)90127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boettner DR, Huston CD, Linford AS, Buss SN, Houpt E, Sherman NE, Petri WA. Entamoeba histolytica phagocytosis of human erythrocytes involves PATMK, a member of the transmembrane kinase family. PLoS Pathogens. 2008;4:122–133. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marion S, Laurent C, Guillen N. Signalization and cytoskeleton activity through myosin IB during the early steps of phagocytosis in Entamoeba histolytica: a proteomic approach. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:1504–1518. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okada M, Huston CD, Mann BJ, Petri WA, Kita K, Nozaki T. Proteomic analysis of phagocytosis in the enteric protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4:827–831. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.4.827-831.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okada M, Huston CD, Oue M, Mann BJ, Petri WA, Kita K, et al. Kinetics and strain variation of phagosome proteins of Entamoeba histolytica by proteomic analysis. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2006;145:171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gagnon E, Duclos S, Rondeau C, Chevet E, Cameron PH, Steele-Mortimer O, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum-mediated phagocytosis is a mechanism of entry into macrophages. Cell. 2002;110:119–131. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00797-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Touret N, Paroutis P, Terebiznik M, Harrison RE, Trombetta S, Pypaert M, et al. Quantitative and dynamic assessment of the contribution of the ER to phagosome formation. Cell. 2005;123:157–170. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Communicative & Integrative Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES