Abstract
Accurate evaluation of bacterial colonization as a predictive index for wound sepsis has relied on a quantitative culture technique that provides exact colony counts per gram of tissue by culture of five serial dilutions of biopsy tissue homogenate. The method, while useful to the physician, is both labor intensive and expensive. In this study 78 eschar biopsies were cultured by a semiquantitative technique that involved the use of 0.1- and 0.01-ml samples of inocula and by the serial dilution method. Exact colony counts from the semiquantitative culture method were available only from cultures containing 10(4) to 10(6) CFU/g of tissue. Other colony counts were reported as less than 10(4) or greater than 10(6) CFU/g. Agreement by category of colony counts between the two methods was 96%. For prediction of wound sepsis, the semiquantitative procedure had a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 93.7%. This method also resulted in an approximately 30% reduction of work units (as defined by the College of American Pathologists) and a 60% reduction in the amount of media for specimen processing. Therefore, this semiquantitative culture technique provides accurate information to the physician while saving both time and materials.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cooney W. P., 3rd, Fitzgerald R. H., Jr, Dobyns J. H., Washington J. A., 2nd Quantitative wound cultures in upper extremity trauma. J Trauma. 1982 Feb;22(2):112–117. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198202000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heggers J. P., Robson M. C., Doran E. T. Quantitative assessment of bacterial contamination of open wounds by a slide techniue. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1969;63(4):532–534. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(69)90043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine N. S., Lindberg R. B., Mason A. D., Jr, Pruitt B. A., Jr The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds. J Trauma. 1976 Feb;16(2):89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loebl E. C., Marvin J. A., Heck E. L., Curreri P. W., Baxter C. R. The method of quantitative burn-wound biopsy cultures and its routine use in the care of the burned patient. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jan;61(1):20–24. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magee C., Haury B., Rodeheaver G., Fox J., Edgerton M. T., Edlich R. F. A rapid technic for quantitating wound bacterial count. Am J Surg. 1977 Jun;133(6):760–762. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90174-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robson M. C., Shaw R. C., Heggers J. P. The reclosure of postoperative incisional abscesses based on bacterial quantification of the wound. Ann Surg. 1970 Feb;171(2):279–282. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197002000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider M., Vildozola C. W., Brooks S. Quantitative assessment of bacterial invasion of chronic ulcers. Statistical analysis. Am J Surg. 1983 Feb;145(2):260–262. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shires G. T., Dineen P. Sepsis following burns, trauma, and intra-abdominal infections. Arch Intern Med. 1982 Oct 25;142(11):2012–2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shulman G., Petro J. A., Hallgren E. H. Quantitative bacteriology in wound care. Am Surg. 1979 Jun;45(6):374–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TEPLITZ C., DAVIS D., MASON A. D., Jr, MONCRIEF J. A. PSEUDOMONAS BURN WOUND SEPSIS. I PATHOGENESIS OF EXPERIMENTAL PSEUDOMONAS BURN WOUND SEPSIS. J Surg Res. 1964 May;4:200–216. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(64)80026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volenec F. J., Clark G. M., Mani M. M., Humphrey L. J. Burn wound biopsy bacterial quantitation: a statistical analysis. Am J Surg. 1979 Nov;138(5):695–697. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90351-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woolfrey B. F., Fox J. M., Quall C. O. An evaluation of burn wound quantitative microbiology. I. Quantitative eschar cultures. Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Apr;75(4):532–537. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/75.4.532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]