Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1986 Feb;23(2):298–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.298-301.1986

Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B.

D L Calhoun, G D Roberts, J N Galgiani, J E Bennett, D S Feingold, J Jorgensen, G S Kobayashi, S Shadomy
PMCID: PMC268630  PMID: 3517051

Abstract

In a survey of 350 laboratories, 41 of 210 respondents indicated that they performed antifungal susceptibility tests. Two-thirds performed 20 or fewer tests per year, and most used a broth dilution method to test amphotericin B and flucytosine activity against Candida albicans. The broth dilution procedure of S. Shadomy and A. Espinel-Ingroff (p. 647-653, in E.H. Lennette, ed., Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 3rd ed., 1980) was the method most frequently cited, and therefore this method was used to test the susceptibility of five isolates of C. albicans and one of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to amphotericin B and flucytosine in seven research laboratories. Agreement among replicates performed on the same day by each laboratory was excellent for both drugs, all values being within 1 twofold drug dilution. Precision from week to week for each laboratory was also good, with 95 and 92% of values being within 1 drug dilution for amphotericin B and flucytosine, respectively. Interlaboratory precision, however, was poor. For amphotericin B, values varied 8- to 32-fold, and for flucytosine, they varied 32- to greater than 512-fold. We conclude that antifungal susceptibility testing is currently being performed in small volumes by numerous laboratories in the United States and that results from one laboratory may not agree with results from another. Improved standardization of fungal susceptibility tests is necessary before their results can be generally applied to clinical situations.

Full text

PDF
298

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aerts F., De Brabander M., van den Bossche H., van Cutsem J., Borgers M. The activity of ketoconazole in mixed cultures of fungi and human fibroblasts. Mykosen. 1980 Feb;23(2):53–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1980.tb02581.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bannatyne R. M., Cheung R. Susceptibility of Canadida albicans to miconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jun;13(6):1040–1041. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.6.1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Block E. R., Jennings A. E., Bennett J. E. Variables influencing susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to 5-fluorocytosine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Oct;4(4):392–395. doi: 10.1128/aac.4.4.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brass C., Shainhouse J. Z., Stevens D. A. Variability of agar dilution-replicator method of yeast susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Jun;15(6):763–768. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.6.763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calhoun D. L., Galgiani J. N. Analysis of pH and buffer effects on flucytosine activity in broth dilution susceptibility testing of Candida albicans in two synthetic media. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Sep;26(3):364–367. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.3.364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dick J. D., Merz W. G., Saral R. Incidence of polyene-resistant yeasts recovered from clinical specimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Jul;18(1):158–163. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.1.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galgiani J. N., Stevens D. A. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of yeasts: a turbidimetric technique independent of inoculum size. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):721–728. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Galgiant J. N., Stevens D. A. Turbidimetric studies of growth inhibition of yeasts with three drugs: inquiry into inoculum-dependent susceptibility testing, time of onset of drug effect, and implications for current and newer methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):249–254. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoeprich P. D., Finn P. D. Obfuscation of the activity of antifungal antimicrobics by culture media. J Infect Dis. 1972 Oct;126(4):353–361. doi: 10.1093/infdis/126.4.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoeprich P. D., Huston A. C. Effect of culture media on the antifungal activity of miconazole and amphotericin B methyl ester. J Infect Dis. 1976 Oct;134(4):336–341. doi: 10.1093/infdis/134.4.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holt R. J. Laboratory tests of antifungal drugs. J Clin Pathol. 1975 Oct;28(10):767–774. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.10.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holt R. J., Newman R. L. Laboratory assessment of the antimycotic drug clotrimazole. J Clin Pathol. 1972 Dec;25(12):1089–1097. doi: 10.1136/jcp.25.12.1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson B., White R. J., Williamson G. M. Factors influencing the susceptibility of Candida albicans to the polyenoic antibiotics nystatin and amphotericin B. J Gen Microbiol. 1978 Feb;104(2):325–333. doi: 10.1099/00221287-104-2-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mazens M. F., Andrews G. P., Bartlett R. C. Comparison of microdilution and broth dilution techniques for the susceptibility testing of yeasts to 5-fluorocytosine and amphotericin B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):475–477. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.3.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Minagawa H., Kitaura K., Nakamizo N. Effects of pH on the activity of ketoconazole against Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Jan;23(1):105–107. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Odds F. C. Interactions among amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, ketoconazole, and miconazole against pathogenic fungi in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov;22(5):763–770. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.5.763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Polak A., Grenson M. Interference between the uptake of pyrimidines and purines in yeasts. Pathol Microbiol (Basel) 1973;39(1):37–38. doi: 10.1159/000162618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ryley J. F., Wilson R. G., Barrett-Bee K. J. Azole resistance in Candida albicans. Sabouraudia. 1984;22(1):53–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shadomy S. In vitro antifungal activity of clotrimazole (Bay b 5097). Infect Immun. 1971 Aug;4(2):143–148. doi: 10.1128/iai.4.2.143-148.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shadomy S., Kirchoff C. B., Ingroff A. E. In vitro activity of 5-fluorocytosine against Candida and Torulopsis species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Jan;3(1):9–14. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shadomy S., Paxton L., Espinel-Ingroff A., Shadomy H. J. In vitro studies with miconazole and miconazole nitrate. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1977 Mar;3(2):147–152. doi: 10.1093/jac/3.2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stiller R. L., Bennett J. E., Scholer H. J., Wall M., Polak A., Stevens D. A. Correlation of in vitro susceptibility test results with in vivo response: flucytosine therapy in a systemic candidiasis model. J Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;147(6):1070–1077. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.6.1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stiller R. L., Bennett J. E., Scholer H. J., Wall M., Polak A., Stevens D. A. Susceptibility to 5-fluorocytosine and prevalence of serotype in 402 Candida albicans isolates from the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Sep;22(3):482–487. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.3.482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Utz C. J., Shadomy S. Antifungal activity of 5-fluorocytosine as measured by disk diffusion susceptibility testing. J Infect Dis. 1977 Jun;135(6):970–974. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.6.970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Utz C. J., White S., Shadomy S. New medium for in vitro susceptibility studies with amphotericin B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):776–777. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Den Bossche H., Willemsens G., Van Cutsem J. M. The action of miconazole of the growth of Candida albicans. Sabouraudia. 1975 Mar;13(Pt 1):63–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES