Skip to main content
BMC Microbiology logoLink to BMC Microbiology
. 2009 May 7;9:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-83

piggyBac is an effective tool for functional analysis of the Plasmodium falciparum genome

Bharath Balu 1, Chitra Chauhan 1, Steven P Maher 1, Douglas A Shoue 2, Jessica C Kissinger 3,4, Malcolm J Fraser Jr 2, John H Adams 1,
PMCID: PMC2686711  PMID: 19422698

Abstract

Background

Much of the Plasmodium falciparum genome encodes hypothetical proteins with limited homology to other organisms. A lack of robust tools for genetic manipulation of the parasite limits functional analysis of these hypothetical proteins and other aspects of the Plasmodium genome. Transposon mutagenesis has been used widely to identify gene functions in many organisms and would be extremely valuable for functional analysis of the Plasmodium genome.

Results

In this study, we investigated the lepidopteran transposon, piggyBac, as a molecular genetic tool for functional characterization of the Plasmodium falciparum genome. Through multiple transfections, we generated 177 unique P. falciparum mutant clones with mostly single piggyBac insertions in their genomes. Analysis of piggyBac insertion sites revealed random insertions into the P. falciparum genome, in regards to gene expression in parasite life cycle stages and functional categories. We further explored the possibility of forward genetic studies in P. falciparum with a phenotypic screen for attenuated growth, which identified several parasite genes and pathways critical for intra-erythrocytic development.

Conclusion

Our results clearly demonstrate that piggyBac is a novel, indispensable tool for forward functional genomics in P. falciparum that will help better understand parasite biology and accelerate drug and vaccine development.

Background

Malaria is a leading infectious disease that affects 400–600 million people, causing 2–3 million deaths, every year [1]. Out of the four Plasmodium species that cause malaria, Plasmodium falciparum is responsible for much of the mortality associated with the disease primarily due to lethal infections in young children of sub-Saharan Africa. A continuous rise in parasite drug-resistance has further hindered malaria control strategies and resulted in increased number of deaths in the last few years [2].

The current post-genome era has witnessed a progression of functional genomics studies accomplished in P. falciparum, providing valuable information about parasite biology [3-8]. Despite these enormous efforts, Plasmodium genomes continue to be perplexing with more than 50% of the genes coding for hypothetical proteins with limited homology to model organisms. High throughput methods for identification of gene functions are imperative to better understand parasite biology and develop effective disease control strategies. However, generating gene disruptions through classic reverse genetic approaches is a complex and inefficient process in P. falciparum, due to an extremely low parasite transfection efficiency and the parasite's ability to maintain transfected plasmids as episomes, resulting in only less than 1% of the total annotated genes knocked out thus far [9,10].

Insertional mutagenesis approaches are widely used in prokaryotes and eukaryotes for genome characterizations. Specifically, transposon-mediated mutagenesis has emerged as a powerful molecular genetic tool for eukaryotic transgenesis [11-14] and is extensively used to create gene disruptions, trap promoters and enhancers, and generate gene fusions in model organisms such as Drosophila and yeast [12,14]. However, the lack of such advanced genetic approaches in Plasmodium is a major impediment to elucidating the parasite genome.

piggyBac is a 'cut-and-paste' transposon that inserts into TTAA target sequences in the presence of a piggyBac transposase [15,16]. piggyBac has gained recent acclamation as a genetic tool due to its functionality in various organisms [17-19] and ability to integrate more randomly into genomes [20]. Moreover, piggyBac's insertion preference for transcription units [17,20] enhances its efficacy in large-scale mutagenesis studies to identify gene functions. We had earlier reported the development of an efficient, piggyBac-based system for genetic manipulation of P. falciparum [21]. In this study, we improved efficiency of the piggyBac transposition system for P. falciparum and evaluated its application in whole-genome functional analysis of this most lethal human malaria parasite.

Results

Plasmid design, generation of mutant P. falciparum clones and insertion site analyses

piggyBac insertions into the P. falciparum genome were obtained by co-transfection of parasite erythrocytic stages with a transposon plasmid and a transposase-expressing helper plasmid as described previously [21]. To optimize the piggyBac system for maximum efficiency, several transposon and transposase plasmids were tested in P. falciparum (Fig. 1). The transposon plasmids tested contained different regulatory elements and drug selectable markers, which, however, resulted in similar transformation efficiencies (interpreted as the number of piggyBac insertions obtained per transfection). As piggyBac transposase is the functional enzyme catalyzing the integration event, we hypothesized that increased expression of the transposase with a stronger promoter would result in increased transformation efficiency. The hsp86 promoter in the helper plasmid, pHTH [21], was therefore replaced with a previously described dual Plasmodium promoter, containing 5' calmodulin and 5' dhfr-ts regions in head to head orientation [22]. Corroborating our theory, significantly higher transformation efficiencies (an average of 3.1 × 10-6) were obtained using the dual promoter for transposase expression as compared to using pHTH (an average of 1.6 × 10-6) in approximately 40 transfections each (χ2 test, df 1, P = 0.015).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Plasmid design for piggyBac mutagenesis of P. falciparum. A summary of different transposon and transposase plasmids tested in P. falciparum. Maximum transformation efficiency was obtained while using a dual promoter for transposase expression.

Following transfection with piggyBac plasmids, drug resistant parasite populations were established rapidly, within 2–3 weeks and the total number of piggyBac insertions obtained per transfected parasite population varied from 1 to 14. Through 81 independent transfections, we generated 177 unique mutant clones of P. falciparum with piggyBac insertions in their genomes. Southern blot hybridization analysis of parasite clones, derived by limiting dilution of drug-resistant populations, revealed single piggyBac insertions in all except two clones that had two insertions each (data not shown). Also, none of the mutant clones retained the piggyBac plasmid as episomes indicating highly efficient transposition events (data not shown). Out of the 179 piggyBac insertions identified, 165 could be mapped unambiguously on the P. falciparum genome by performing BLAST searches using NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/seq/BlastGen/BlastGen.cgi?taxid=5833 and PlasmoDB [23] databases. The remaining 14 insertions either mapped to telomeric repetitive elements or could not be mapped to a chromosomal location through BLAST searches of public databases. The identified piggyBac insertion sites were distributed throughout the genome in all 14 P. falciparum chromosomes (Fig. 2a) with no bias for any particular chromosome (Fig. 2b). All piggyBac insertions were obtained in the expected TTAA target sequences except two that integrated into TTAT and TTAG sequences. As in other organisms [17,20], piggyBac preferentially inserted into predicted transcribed units of P. falciparum genome (Fig. 3a), affecting 178 transcription units. Thirty-six of the insertions resulted in direct disruption of open reading frames (ORFs) and 3 insertions were mapped to introns. A vast majority of insertions (119) occurred in 5' untranslated regions (UTRs) whereas only a few (22) were obtained in 3' UTRs (Additional file 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution of piggyBac insertion sites in the P. falciparum genome. (a) A representation of the 14 P. falciparum chromosomes with piggyBac insertion loci (represented by red vertical lines) shows extensive distribution of piggyBac insertions through out the parasite genome. (b) Comparison of chromosomal distribution of piggyBac insertions to the percent genome content of each chromosome shows unbiased insertions into P. falciparum genome. Plot and curve fits of percent piggyBac insertions and percent chromosome size are depicted in the inset.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

piggyBac insertions in the genome are random but preferentially occur in 5' untranslated regions. (a) Genomic transcription units were defined to include 2 kb of 5' UTR, the coding sequence, the introns and 0.5 kb of 3' UTR, based on previous studies in Plasmodium [48,49]. (b) Comparison of gene functions of all annotated genes in the genome (outer circle) to genes in piggyBac-inserted loci (inner circle) shows an equivalent distribution confirming random insertions in the parasite genome. (c) Comparison of stage-specific expression of all annotated genes (outer circle) to those in piggyBac-inserted loci (inner circle) validates the ability of piggyBac to insert in genes expressed in all parasite life cycle stages. (d) A comparison of piggyBac-inserted TTAA sequences to TTAA sequences randomly selected from the genome showed preferential insertion of piggyBac into 5' UTRs of genes (asterisk- χ2 test, df 1, P = 1.5 × 10-12) whereas a significantly lower number of insertions were observed in CDS and introns (double asterisks- χ2 test, df 1, P = 1.09 × 10-13).

piggyBac inserts randomly into all categories of genes with a strong preference for 5' untranslated regions

Obtaining unbiased insertions into the genome is critical for whole-genome mutagenesis and other large-scale analyses. Hence, we evaluated the randomness of piggyBac insertions into the P. falciparum genome by comparing the functional categories of genes with piggyBac insertions to all annotated genes in the genome. An identical functional distribution of genes was seen in both piggyBac insertion loci and the genome (Fig. 3b) except for fewer insertions in genes involved in DNA metabolism/DNA-binding and invasion/pathogenesis (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.038 and P = 0.04, respectively). Since the parasite erythrocytic stages were used for piggyBac transformation, we further investigated the bias for piggyBac insertions in erythrocytic stage genes relative to genes expressed in other stages of development. By utilizing the gene expression profiling data for P. falciparum [3], we classified all annotated genes based on their expression in different parasite life cycle stages and confirmed unbiased piggyBac insertions in genes expressed in all parasite stages (Fig. 3c). A separate comparison of genes with piggyBac insertions in coding sequences only to all genes also revealed no significant insertion bias for any functional category or stage of expression (data not shown).

Even though transposon-mediated mutagenesis is a relatively random process, preferential insertion into genomic hotspots is characteristic of some transposons [20]. In our studies, we observed a significantly higher number of piggyBac insertions in 5' UTRs and a significantly lower number in coding sequences, relative to a distribution of 214 randomly selected genomic TTAA sequences (Fig. 3d).

A putative motif for piggyBac insertion in the P. falciparum genome

Previous studies in other organisms had observed some AT-richness around piggyBac insertion sites [17,24]. However, it was somewhat surprising that our analysis of a 100 bp flanking region showed a significantly higher AT-content around piggyBac inserted TTAA sequences (average AT content of 85.56%) as compared to random TTAA sequences (average AT content of 80.24%), in the already AT-rich P. falciparum genome (two-tailed t-test, P = 2.95 × 10-13). A closer look at the piggyBac insertion sites revealed their presence in the middle of an AT-rich core of 10 nucleotides predominantly with 'T's upstream and 'A's downstream (Fig. 4a, upper panel). No such signature motif was present around the randomly selected TTAA sequences either from the genome (Fig. 4a, lower panel). Even when only analyzing the genomic 5' UTRs, a similar bias in the insertion site selection existed (Fig. 4b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

piggyBac inserts into AT-rich regions of the P. falciparum genome. (a) Nucleotide composition analysis of the flanking sequences showed that piggyBac inserted TTAA sites preferentially occur in the middle of an AT-rich core of 10 nucleotides predominantly with 'T's upstream (χ2 test, df 1, P = 6.3 × 10-5) and 'A's downstream (χ2 test, df 1, P = 2.07 × 10-8) as compared to randomly selected genomic TTAA sequences. (b) A comparison of nucleotide composition of flanking sequences only in the 5' untranslated regions (UTRs) of piggyBac inserted and randomly selected TTAA sequences further confirms the specificity of piggyBac for AT-rich target sites.

Validation of a phenotypic screen in P. falciparum

The preferential insertion of piggyBac into transcription units prompted us to investigate the feasibility of forward genetic studies in P. falciparum that have been completely lacking thus far. Little is known about what metabolic pathways and processes are essential for parasite growth and survival in the blood of the vertebrate host, and therefore we screened the erythrocytic stages of P. falciparum mutant clones for attenuated growth phenotypes. We first screened for mutant clones that appeared to have aberrant growth rate by standard light microscopy methods and then studied them further by performing more precise growth assays. The mutant clones selected for growth analysis contained single piggyBac insertions in their genomes in either coding sequences or 5' UTRs and were associated with several metabolic pathways (Fig. 5a). To confirm that piggyBac insertion into the genome alone does not affect growth, additional mutant clones were included as controls. An exponential growth curve was generated for each mutant clone by estimating parasitemias every 24 hrs for 7 days using flow cytometry as described before [25,26] with some modifications. Four mutant clones (A5, B7, E6 and F3) displayed significantly reduced growth rate as compared to five other insertional mutants (B3, B4, F10, G1, and H11) and the wild type (WT) clones (Fig. 5b). The experiment was performed three times, with two sub-clones for each mutant and similar results were obtained in all experiments (data not shown). The parasite exponential growth curve was further used to estimate the individual doubling times of the mutant clones as described previously [26] that confirmed the observed attenuated phenotypes (Table 1, See Fig. S1 in Additional file 2). Knock out of gene expression was confirmed in clones with insertions in coding sequences by RT-PCR (See Fig. S2 in Additional file 3). Clones A5 and F3 with insertions in the coding sequences of PFF0770c and MAL8p1.104, respectively, were the most affected with an approximate growth rate of only 30% as compared to the WT clones (Fig. 5c). The attenuated growth rates observed in these mutant clones substantiate their significance in intra-erythrocytic development of the parasite, though additional studies are required to characterize the attenuation mechanisms.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A phenotype screen for attenuated blood-stage growth. (a) A schematic of mutant P. falciparum clones selected for growth rate analysis. Black vertical and horizontal arrows indicate the insertion site and orientation of the piggyBac transposon, respectively. The gene schematic, description and expression stages were all obtained from the PlasmoDB database at http://www.plasmodb.org. (b) Growth curves of 9 insertional mutant clones, were obtained by plotting parasite fold change against time. For the wild type (WT), an average of fold changes from three different NF54 clones was used. The order of samples, from top to bottom, indicates a decrease in parasite fold changes. (c) A bar-graph of fold changes in parasite numbers after 7 days of growth revealed a spectrum of attenuated growth phenotypes in several mutant clones when compared to the wild type clones. The error bars in (b) and (c) represent standard deviation from the mean of 3 measurements.

Table 1.

Doubling time estimation of P. falciparum mutant clones

Clone ID Doubling time estimate (hours) Standard error 95% CI P value t value df
A5 22.07 0.26 21.53 22.60 0.00007 7.4656 7
B3 17.89 0.06 17.77 18.00 0.97376 -2.3316 7
B4 18.45 0.10 18.25 18.66 0.41380 0.2261 7
B7 19.70 0.17 19.34 20.06 0.00368 3.7297 7
E6 19.28 0.12 19.04 19.52 0.00565 3.4086 7
F3 21.98 0.17 21.64 22.33 0.00001 10.5459 7
F10 17.83 0.09 17.64 18.03 0.97735 -2.4318 7
G1 18.17 0.08 18.02 18.33 0.83353 -1.0400 7
H11 18.03 0.11 17.80 18.26 0.89928 -1.4098 7
WT 18.39 0.06 18.26 18.52 N/A: WT is reference

Doubling times for mutant parasite clones were estimated using their respective best-fit growth curves (See Fig. S1 in Additional file 2). Simple two-tailed t-test was then used to test the significance of differences in doubling time of mutant clones with wild type (WT) P. falciparum clones (average of three NF54 clones) as the reference. Significant P values, based on alpha = 0.05, are highlighted in bold.

Discussion

Persistent problems with drug resistance and the critical need to identify novel targets for therapeutic intervention creates a continuing need to improve our understanding of what is important for growth and development of malaria parasites. A major barrier in experimental malaria research has been a limited ability to manipulate P. falciparum genes to determine their functions and associated pathways of interactions within the parasite. Large-scale mutagenesis screens are vital for improving our understanding of Plasmodium biology and functional analysis of its genome. Random transposon mutagenesis is a powerful approach to identify critical biological processes in an organism and is an approach successfully applied in numerous eukaryotes [11-13]. In particular, piggyBac has become widely used to manipulate genomes and is currently the preferred vector of choice for gene discovery and validation of gene function in Drosophila and the laboratory mouse [17,20,27-30]. We therefore evaluated piggyBac as a novel genetic tool for the functional analysis of the P. falciparum genome.

Several transposon and transposase plasmids were created and tested in P. falciparum for maximum transformation efficiency. All the plasmids tested transformed with similar efficiencies except for the helper plasmid, pDCTH, with the double promoter that almost doubled the transformation efficiency. There were no apparent differences in integration specificities of the various plasmids as insertions in the genome were randomly distributed in all cases. The presence of different selectable markers, hDHFR and BSD, in plasmids pLBacII-HDH and pLBacII-HBH respectively, allows re-transformation and complementation of previously transformed drug-resistant P. falciparum clones. The plasmids pLBacII-HDH-GFP and pLBacII-HDH-eGFP can trap promoters in the genome if inserted in the right orientation downstream to an endogenous promoter as shown previously [31]. These plasmids can also be modified for stable transgene expression with or without GFP tag. Parasites transformed with pLBacII-HDGH, with hDHFR-GFP fusion as selectable marker, display high levels of fluorescence and are amenable to sorting by Fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS). Transformation with the plasmid pLBacII-HDH-KanOri inserts the kanamycin resistance gene and a pUC origin of replication into the parasite genome that allows for plasmid rescue from the genome for easy identification of insertion sites.

The genome-wide integration of piggyBac into genes in all functional categories, expressed in all parasite life cycle stages, validates its application in whole-genome mutagenesis of P. falciparum. Almost all mutant P. falciparum clones generated had single piggyBac insertions in their genomes, which will aid in easy correlation of mutant phenotypes to their respective genotypes. The increased number of insertions obtained in 5' UTRs of genes indicates either active changes in chromatin structure allow easy access for piggyBac to the genomic DNA or the affinity of the transposase for chromatin associated factors unique to these regions. Alternatively, this skewed distribution could simply be the inability to recover mutants with insertions in coding sequences of essential genes, whereas insertions in 5' UTRs of essential genes may not completely abolish gene expression and hence may not be lethal.

From whole-genome mutagenesis perspectives, insertions in 5' UTRs may have a varied effect on neighbouring gene expression. Insertions in 5' UTRs could either increase gene expression, possibly due to better recruitment of transcription machinery, or decrease gene expression by blocking transcription. A meaningful approach would therefore be to subject all 5' UTR mutants to phenotypic analyses as either increased or decreased gene expression can significantly alter intracellular activities. Such a scenario might be particularly beneficial in identifying essential genes that cannot be knocked out in the parasite. Nevertheless, 22% of the insertions were obtained in coding sequences generating 39 gene knockouts, which almost equal the number of unique gene knockouts generated in P. falciparum thus far until a recent large-scale study achieving 53 gene knockouts [32], using conventional methods [10]. Such high propensity to create gene disruptions and the ability to rapidly generate stable lines of mutant clones, warrants the use of piggyBac in large-scale mutagenesis studies not only to identify gene functions, but also to discriminate the essential and dispensable regions of the parasite genome that will further confine the search for potent drug targets.

The most significant application of random mutagenesis is the ability to perform forward genetic screens to select mutants of a desired phenotype. Our limited phenotypic screen for attenuated parasite growth confirmed the feasibility of such approaches in P. falciparum by identifying several genes and pathways critical for blood-stage development. One of the most severely affected mutant parasites identified in our screen is a knockout of MAL8P1.104 (clone F3), which is the Plasmodium orthologue of yeast Caf1 (CCR4-associated factor 1) [33]. In yeast, CAF1 is a component of CCR4-NOT complex that is a global regulator of gene expression, controlling chromatin remodelling, transcriptional regulation, mRNA stability and protein degradation [34]. Experimental protein interaction data indicates a similar functional complex exists in P. falciparum [7] and with a scarcity of known transcription factors or identifiable conserved regulatory elements in Plasmodium, deadenylation may be extremely significant in controlling gene expression through regulating mRNA abundance by degradation [35].

The significance of protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in regulating parasite cellular activities is also clearly demonstrated by the attenuated growth phenotype of our knockout of PFF0770c (clone A5), which encodes one of the 12 type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2C) found in Plasmodium [36]. PP2Cs carry out a wide range of functions in higher eukaryotes including intracellular signalling and providing cell cycle and developmental check points [37-39]. Two PP2Cs, in the closely related apicomplexan Toxoplasma, were recently shown to be involved in parasite motility and host cell modulation [40,41].

Another mutant clone displaying attenuated growth was a knockout of PF10_0350 (clone E6) that codes for a hypothetical protein unique to Plasmodium species and attests to the theory that such unique Plasmodium genes need to be investigated further as antimalarial targets. piggyBac insertion in the 5' UTRs of PFC0271c and PFC0275w, coding for glutaredoxin and glycerol-3 phosphate dehydrogenase, respectively, resulted in increased levels of both transcripts in the mutant clone B7 as seen by quantitative RT-PCR (data not shown), indicating that optimal expression of genes is essential for normal parasite growth.

Several other phenotypic screens such as those for virulence, drug resistance, gametocytogenesis and transmissibility of infection to mosquito hosts can now be accomplished in P. falciparum that will contribute immensely to our current understanding of parasite biology.

Apart from its application in whole-genome mutagenesis and phenotype screens, piggyBac is also a powerful tool for stable transgene expression in P. falciparum as any parasite strain or clone of interest can be transformed. We have confirmed the functionality of piggyBac system in three different strains of P. falciparum thus far, including, NF54, 3D7, and HB3, and have obtained genomic insertions of up to 7 kb of DNA (including the drug selection cassette) with no reduction in transformation efficiency (Balu and Adams, unpublished data) [42]. The ability to express transgenes stably from the genome offers numerous possibilities to study various biological aspects of the parasite such as, coordinated gene expression, phenotypic effects of copy number variations and protein trafficking.

Conclusion

Despite years of efforts, Plasmodium biology remains puzzling due to its complexity and refractoriness to routine genetic analyses. By using the piggyBac transposable element in P. falciparum, we have clearly demonstrated the possibility of whole-genome mutagenesis and forward functional genomics in this lethal malaria parasite that will drastically advance our understanding of Plasmodium's parasitic and pathogenic abilities and quicken the search for new drug targets and vaccine candidates.

Methods

Plasmid constructs

piggyBac plasmids used for transfections were derived from previously reported plasmids pXL-BACII-DHFR and pHTH [21].

pLBacII-HDH-pXL-BacII-DHFR was digested with XhoI and the site was removed by filling in the overhangs with klenow and religation to yield pLBacII-DHFR. The human DHFR selection cassette in pLBacII-DHFR was then replaced with a different human DHFR drug selection cassette from the plasmid pHD22Y [43] using EcoRI/BamHI to yield pLBacII-HDH.

pLBacII-HDH-GFP- The gfp coding sequence along with 3' Pbdhfr was amplified as a single fragment from the vector pHH2 [44] by PCR with extensions for restriction sites SpeI and ApaI using primers F-ACTAGTGCGGCCGCCTACCCT and R-GGGCCCGGTACCCTCGAGATCTTAGAATGAAGATCTTATTAC. The PCR product was then cloned into pGEM-Teasy vector (Promega) and sub-cloned into pLBacII-HDH using ApaI and SpeI.

pLBacII-HDH-eGFP- A 200 bp region of 5' eba-175 was amplified from the P. falciparum genome using primers F-ATCGATGAATATAATTGATTGATTGTAATAAAAAGTG and R-GGGCCCTGTATGCACATTGAATATATTTATATGTTATTATC and cloned into pLBacII-HDH-GFP as a ClaI/ApaI fragment.

pLBacII-HDH-KanOri- The kanamycin resistance gene and pUC origin of replication were amplified as a single fragment by PCR from the vector pEGFP-C1 (Clontech) using primers F-ATGATGATGGGATCCAAATGTGCGCGGAACCCC and R-ATGATGATGGGATCCGCAAAAGGCCAGCAAAAGG and cloned into pGEM-Teasy vector (Promega). The fragment was then sub-cloned into the plasmid pLBacII-HDH as a BamHI fragment.

pLBacII-HBH- The hDHFR coding sequence was first cut out from the vector pHD22Y using NsiI and HindIII and replaced with the blasticidin-S-deaminase (BSD) coding sequence that was cut out from the vector pCBM-BSD [45] using NsiI and HindIII. The BSD selection cassette in pHD22Y was then moved as an EcoRI/BamHI fragment into the vector pL-BacII-DHFR to yield pLBacII-HBH.

pLBacII-HDGH- The hDHFR-GFP fusion gene was cut out from the vector pHDGFP2 [46] using NsiI and HindIII and cloned into pHD22Y replacing the human DHFR coding sequence. The whole selection cassette was then moved as an EcoRI/BamHI fragment into the vector pLBacII-DHFR to yield pLBacII-HDGH.

pDCTH- The plasmid with a dual promoter for transposase expression was created by PCR amplifying 5' Pcdhfr-ts and 5' calmodulin as an EcoRI fragment from the plasmid pHC1-CAT [22] using primers F-ATGATGGAATTCCCTGATATATTTCTATTAGGTATTTATTA; R-ATGATGGAATTCTTTGTAAGTTTTAGGTGTGTGTAT and swapping it with the 5' hsp86 region in the helper plasmid, pHTH.

Parasite culture and transfection

P. falciparum clone NF54 was cultured in human erythrocytes at 5% hematocrit in RPMI1640 medium containing 0.5% Albumax II, 0.25% sodium bicarbonate and 0.01 mg/ml gentamicin. Transfections were performed using red blood cells as described previously [21]. Briefly, mature blood-stage parasites were purified on a MACS magnetic column (Miltenyi Biotec) and 1 million purified parasites were added to erythrocytes loaded with 100 μg of the transposon plasmid and 50 μg of the transposase plasmid to start a 5 ml parasite culture. Individual mutant clones were obtained by limiting dilution of parasites post-drug selection.

Identification of piggyBac insertion sites

Genomic DNA (2 μg) extracted from transformed parasites was digested with 10 units of either Dra I or Rsa I and used either in inverse PCR [21] or vectorette PCR reactions according to manufacturer's instructions (UVS1 Vectorette™ Genomic Systems, Sigma). The amplified PCR products were sequenced with primers in piggyBac inverted terminal repeats [21] and analyzed using MACVECTOR software (MacVector, Inc.). Insertion sites were identified by performing BLAST searches using NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/seq/BlastGen/BlastGen.cgi?taxid=5833 and PlasmoDB databases [23].

Parasite growth assays, flowcytometry and estimation of doubling times

Growth assays were performed by maintaining asynchronous cultures of P. falciparum wild type and mutant clones at parasitemias 0.5–2% in 96-well plates by diluting every 48 hrs. Parasite cultures were plated in triplicates for each time point and samples were taken every 24 hrs for 7 days and fixed in 0.05% glutaraldehyde after removal of culture medium. Flow cytometry was used to estimate parasitemia as described before [25,47] by staining parasites with Ethidium bromide and analyzing using FACSCanto™ II flowcytometry system (Becton, Dickinson and Company) in a high throughput format. A total of 20,000 cells were counted for each sample. The data were analyzed using FACSDIVA™ software (Becton, Dickinson and Company). Growth rate (defined as the change in parasite numbers every 24 hrs over a period of 7 days) analyses were performed using SAS (9.1). The total number of parasites (y) (parasitemia × dilution factor), was plotted against time (×) and fitted to the exponential growth curve

graphic file with name 1471-2180-9-83-i1.gif

where, D is the intrinsic parasite doubling time and m0 is the theoretical parasite number at time 0. To compare directly the growth rate of parasite clones with slightly different starting parasitemias, the -fold increase of the parasite number, normalized to have a single theoretical parasite for each culture at time 0, was used for graphing the growth curve [26]. One hundred parameter initiation values ranging from 5 to 105 were tested and the best converging model with the smallest Sum Square of Error (SSE) was chosen for estimation of doubling time.

Authors' contributions

BB, SM and DAS performed the transfections. BB, CC and SM performed the growth rate experiments. BB, CC, JCK, and JHA analyzed the insertions data. BB, CC, SM and JHA analyzed the growth rate data. CC, JCK and MJF contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. BB, CC and JHA drafted the manuscript. BB, MJF and JHA conceived and designed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1

List of piggyBac insertion loci in the P. falciparum genome. Complete list of piggyBac insertion loci identified thus far is provided along with the mutant name and insertion position relative to the coding sequences of the genome.

Click here for file (33KB, xls)
Additional file 2

Best-fit growth curve models for doubling time estimation of mutant clones. The predicted best-fit and observed growth curves for each parasite clone is shown.

Click here for file (200.5KB, pdf)
Additional file 3

Lack of gene expression in mutant P. falciparum clones with insertions in the coding sequences. RT-PCR analysis confirms the knockout of gene expression in mutant clones, selected for growth assays, with insertions in coding sequences.

Click here for file (157.1KB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Bharath Balu, Email: bbalu@health.usf.edu.

Chitra Chauhan, Email: cchauhan@health.usf.edu.

Steven P Maher, Email: smaher@health.usf.edu.

Douglas A Shoue, Email: dshoue@nd.edu.

Jessica C Kissinger, Email: jkissing@uga.edu.

Malcolm J Fraser, Jr, Email: fraser.1@nd.edu.

John H Adams, Email: jadams3@health.usf.edu.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. C. Szekeres and Dr. R. Chen at USF Health core facilities for help with flow cytometry and statistical analyses, respectively. We thank B. White, B. Wisler and Y. Xi at the University of Notre Dame for their technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to J.H.A.

References

  1. Snow RW, Guerra CA, Noor AM, Myint HY, Hay SI. The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2005;434(7030):214–217. doi: 10.1038/nature03342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yamey G. Roll Back Malaria: a failing global health campaign. Bmj. 2004;328(7448):1086–1087. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Le Roch KG, Zhou Y, Blair PL, Grainger M, Moch JK, Haynes JD, De La Vega P, Holder AA, Batalov S, Carucci DJ. Discovery of gene function by expression profiling of the malaria parasite life cycle. Science. 2003;301(5639):1503–1508. doi: 10.1126/science.1087025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bozdech Z, Llinas M, Pulliam BL, Wong ED, Zhu J, DeRisi JL. The Transcriptome of the Intraerythrocytic Developmental Cycle of Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Biol. 2003;1(1):5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Florens L, Washburn MP, Raine JD, Anthony RM, Grainger M, Haynes JD, Moch JK, Muster N, Sacci JB, Tabb DL. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature. 2002;419(6906):520–526. doi: 10.1038/nature01107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lasonder E, Ishihama Y, Andersen JS, Vermunt AM, Pain A, Sauerwein RW, Eling WM, Hall N, Waters AP, Stunnenberg HG. Analysis of the Plasmodium falciparum proteome by high-accuracy mass spectrometry. Nature. 2002;419(6906):537–542. doi: 10.1038/nature01111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LaCount DJ, Vignali M, Chettier R, Phansalkar A, Bell R, Hesselberth JR, Schoenfeld LW, Ota I, Sahasrabudhe S, Kurschner C. A protein interaction network of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2005;438(7064):103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature04104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Date SV, Stoeckert CJ Jr. Computational modeling of the Plasmodium falciparum interactome reveals protein function on a genome-wide scale. Genome Res. 2006;16(4):542–549. doi: 10.1101/gr.4573206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Donnell RA, Freitas-Junior LH, Preiser PR, Williamson DH, Duraisingh M, McElwain TF, Scherf A, Cowman AF, Crabb BS. A genetic screen for improved plasmid segregation reveals a role for Rep20 in the interaction of Plasmodium falciparum chromosomes. Embo J. 2002;21(5):1231–1239. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.5.1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenbaum DC. Is chemical genetics the new frontier for malaria biology? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29(2):51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlson CM, Frandsen JL, Kirchhof N, McIvor RS, Largaespada DA. Somatic integration of an oncogene-harboring Sleeping Beauty transposon models liver tumor development in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(47):17059–17064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502974102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. St Johnston D. The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(3):176–188. doi: 10.1038/nrg751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grimm S. The art and design of genetic screens: mammalian culture cells. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(3):179–189. doi: 10.1038/nrg1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayes F. Transposon-based strategies for microbial functional genomics and proteomics. Annu Rev Genet. 2003;37:3–29. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cary LC, Goebel M, Corsaro BG, Wang HG, Rosen E, Fraser MJ. Transposon mutagenesis of baculoviruses: analysis of Trichoplusia ni transposon IFP2 insertions within the FP-locus of nuclear polyhedrosis viruses. Virology. 1989;172(1):156–169. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90117-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fraser MJ, Brusca JS, Smith GE, Summers MD. Transposon-mediated mutagenesis of a baculovirus. Virology. 1985;145(2):356–361. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90172-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding S, Wu X, Li G, Han M, Zhuang Y, Xu T. Efficient transposition of the piggyBac (PB) transposon in mammalian cells and mice. Cell. 2005;122(3):473–483. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lobo NF, Fraser TS, Adams JA, Fraser MJ Jr. Interplasmid transposition demonstrates piggyBac mobility in vertebrate species. Genetica. 2006;128(1–3):347–357. doi: 10.1007/s10709-006-7165-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morales ME, Mann VH, Kines KJ, Gobert GN, Fraser MJ Jr, Kalinna BH, Correnti JM, Pearce EJ, Brindley PJ. piggyBac transposon mediated transgenesis of the human blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni. Faseb J. 2007;21(13):3479–3489. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8726com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thibault ST, Singer MA, Miyazaki WY, Milash B, Dompe NA, Singh CM, Buchholz R, Demsky M, Fawcett R, Francis-Lang HL. A complementary transposon tool kit for Drosophila melanogaster using P and piggyBac. Nat Genet. 2004;36(3):283–287. doi: 10.1038/ng1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Balu B, Shoue DA, Fraser MJ Jr, Adams JH. High-efficiency transformation of Plasmodium falciparum by the lepidopteran transposable element piggyBac. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(45):16391–16396. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504679102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Crabb BS, Triglia T, Waterkeyn JG, Cowman AF. Stable transgene expression in Plasmodium falciparum. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 1997;90:131–144. doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(97)00143-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kissinger JC, Brunk BP, Crabtree J, Fraunholz MJ, Gajria B, Milgram AJ, Pearson DS, Schug J, Bahl A, Diskin SJ. The Plasmodium genome database. Nature. 2002;419(6906):490–492. doi: 10.1038/419490a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li X, Harrell RA, Handler AM, Beam T, Hennessy K, Fraser MJ Jr. piggyBac internal sequences are necessary for efficient transformation of target genomes. Insect Mol Biol. 2005;14(1):17–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2004.00525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Persson KE, Lee CT, Marsh K, Beeson JG. Development and optimization of high-throughput methods to measure Plasmodium falciparum-specific growth inhibitory antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(5):1665–1673. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1665-1673.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu J, Gluzman IY, Drew ME, Goldberg DE. The role of Plasmodium falciparum food vacuole plasmepsins. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(2):1432–1437. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409740200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ryder E, Russell S. Transposable elements as tools for genomics and genetics in Drosophila. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2003;2(1):57–71. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/2.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lobo NF, Hua-Van A, Li X, Nolen BM, Fraser MJ Jr. Germ line transformation of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, mediated by transpositional insertion of a piggyBac vector. Insect Mol Biol. 2002;11(2):133–139. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tamura T, Thibert C, Royer C, Kanda T, Abraham E, Kamba M, Komoto N, Thomas JL, Mauchamp B, Chavancy G. Germline transformation of the silkworm Bombyx mori L. using a piggyBac transposon-derived vector. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(1):81–84. doi: 10.1038/71978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Grossman GL, Rafferty CS, Fraser MJ, Benedict MQ. The piggyBac element is capable of precise excision and transposition in cells and embryos of the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2000;30(10):909–914. doi: 10.1016/S0965-1748(00)00092-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Balu B, Adams JH. Functional genomics of Plasmodium falciparum through transposon-mediated mutagenesis. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8(10):1529–1536. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00776.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maier AG, Rug M, O'Neill MT, Brown M, Chakravorty S, Szestak T, Chesson J, Wu Y, Hughes K, Coppel RL. Exported proteins required for virulence and rigidity of Plasmodium falciparum-infected human erythrocytes. Cell. 2008;134(1):48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Coulson RM, Hall N, Ouzounis CA. Comparative genomics of transcriptional control in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Genome Res. 2004;14(8):1548–1554. doi: 10.1101/gr.2218604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Collart MA. Global control of gene expression in yeast by the Ccr4-Not complex. Gene. 2003;313:1–16. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00672-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shock JL, Fischer KF, DeRisi JL. Whole-genome analysis of mRNA decay in Plasmodium falciparum reveals a global lengthening of mRNA half-life during the intra-erythrocytic development cycle. Genome Biol. 2007;8(7):R134. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Aravind L, Iyer LM, Wellems TE, Miller LH. Plasmodium biology: genomic gleanings. Cell. 2003;115(7):771–785. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01023-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Luan S. Protein phosphatases in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:63–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Saito H, Tatebayashi K. Regulation of the osmoregulatory HOG MAPK cascade in yeast. J Biochem. 2004;136(3):267–272. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvh135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Heideker J, Lis ET, Romesberg FE. Phosphatases, DNA Damage Checkpoints and Checkpoint Deactivation. Cell Cycle. . 2007;6(24):3058–3064. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.24.5100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Delorme V, Cayla X, Faure G, Garcia A, Tardieux I. Actin dynamics is controlled by a casein kinase II and phosphatase 2C interplay on Toxoplasma gondii Toxofilin. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14(5):1900–1912. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-08-0462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gilbert LA, Ravindran S, Turetzky JM, Boothroyd JC, Bradley PJ. Toxoplasma gondii targets a protein phosphatase 2C to the nuclei of infected host cells. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6(1):73–83. doi: 10.1128/EC.00309-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Bhattacharjee S, van Ooij C, Balu B, Adams JH, Haldar K. Maurer's clefts of Plasmodium falciparum are secretory organelles that concentrate virulence protein reporters for delivery to the host erythrocyte. Blood. 2008;111(4):2418–2426. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-115279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fidock DA, Wellems TE. Transformation with human dihydrofolate reductase renders malaria parasites insensitive to WR99210 but does not affect the intrinsic activity of proguanil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(20):10931–10936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wickham ME, Rug M, Ralph SA, Klonis N, McFadden GI, Tilley L, Cowman AF. Trafficking and assembly of the cytoadherence complex in Plasmodium falciparum-infected human erythrocytes. Embo J. 2001;20(20):5636–5649. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.20.5636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Mamoun CB, Gluzman IY, Goyard S, Beverley SM, Goldberg DE. A set of independent selectable markers for transfection of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(15):8716–8720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kadekoppala M, Kline K, Akompong T, Haldar K. Stable expression of a new chimeric fluorescent reporter in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Infect Immun. 2000;68(4):2328–2332. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.4.2328-2332.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Li Q, Gerena L, Xie L, Zhang J, Kyle D, Milhous W. Development and validation of flow cytometric measurement for parasitemia in cultures of P. falciparum v itally stained with YOYO-1. Cytometry A. 2007;71(5):297–307. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Myrick A, Munasinghe A, Patankar S, Wirth DF. Mapping of the Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance gene 5'-upstream region, and evidence of induction of transcript levels by antimalarial drugs in chloroquine sensitive parasites. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49(3):671–683. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Golightly LM, Mbacham W, Daily J, Wirth DF. 3' UTR elements enhance expression of Pgs28, an ookinete protein of Plasmodium gallinaceum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000;105(1):61–70. doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(99)00165-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1

List of piggyBac insertion loci in the P. falciparum genome. Complete list of piggyBac insertion loci identified thus far is provided along with the mutant name and insertion position relative to the coding sequences of the genome.

Click here for file (33KB, xls)
Additional file 2

Best-fit growth curve models for doubling time estimation of mutant clones. The predicted best-fit and observed growth curves for each parasite clone is shown.

Click here for file (200.5KB, pdf)
Additional file 3

Lack of gene expression in mutant P. falciparum clones with insertions in the coding sequences. RT-PCR analysis confirms the knockout of gene expression in mutant clones, selected for growth assays, with insertions in coding sequences.

Click here for file (157.1KB, pdf)

Articles from BMC Microbiology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES