Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1986 Mar;23(3):640–642. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.3.640-642.1986

Comparison of a yellow latex reagent with other agglutination methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

W J Brown
PMCID: PMC268714  PMID: 3958152

Abstract

A new commercial yellow latex agglutination reagent (Bacto-Staph) was compared with the slide and tube coagulase tests and three other commercial reagents for the identification of 283 Staphylococcus aureus and 54 non-S. aureus staphylococcal strains. Test sensitivities for the identification of S. aureus were as follows: tube coagulase, 99.6%; slide coagulase, 98.6%; Bacto-Staph, 99.6%; Staphylatex, 98.6%; Sero STAT Staph, 98.2%; and Staphyloslide, 97.5%. No false-positive reactions were observed with any of the commercial reagents.

Full text

PDF
640

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldridge K. E., Kogos C., Sanders C. V., Marier R. L. Comparison of rapid identification assays for Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 May;19(5):703–704. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.5.703-704.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett S. P. Rate of isolation of Staphylococcus aureus strains possessing coagulase or clumping factor. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;2(5):475–476. doi: 10.1007/BF02013908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown W. J. Variations in the vaginal bacterial flora: a preliminary report. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jun;96(6 Pt 2):931–934. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidson S. K., Keller K. F., Doyle R. J. Differentiation of coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative staphylococci by lectins and plant agglutinins. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):547–553. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.547-553.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doern G. V. Evaluation of a commercial latex agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):416–418. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.416-418.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Essers L., Radebold K. Rapid and reliable identification of Staphylococcus aureus by a latex agglutination test. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Nov;12(5):641–643. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.5.641-643.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Facklam R. R., Smith P. B. The gram positive cocci. Hum Pathol. 1976 Mar;7(2):187–194. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(76)80022-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Forsgren A. Significance of protein a production by staphylococci. Infect Immun. 1970 Nov;2(5):672–673. doi: 10.1128/iai.2.5.672-673.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harrington B. J., Gaydos J. M. Five-hour novobiocin test for differentiation of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):279–280. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.279-280.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones R. N., Thornsberry C., Barry A. L., Gavan T. L. Evaluation of the Sceptor microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing system: a collaborative investigation. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):184–194. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.184-194.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kloos W. E., Wolfshohl J. F. Identification of Staphylococcus species with the API STAPH-IDENT system. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):509–516. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.509-516.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maxim P. E., Mathews H. L., Mengoli H. F. Single-tube mixed agglutination test for the detection of staphylococcal protein A. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Nov;4(5):418–422. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.5.418-422.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Myrick B. A., Ellner P. D. Evaluation of the latex slide agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):275–277. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.275-277.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pennell D. R., Rott-Petri J. A., Kurzynski T. A. Evaluation of three commercial agglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):614–617. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.614-617.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Phillips W. E., Jr, Kloos W. E. Identification of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus hyicus subsp. hyicus isolates from veterinary clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Dec;14(6):671–673. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.6.671-673.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pourshadi M., Klaas J. Evaluation of latex agglutination and microtube coagulase tests for detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Sep;2(4):287–291. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90059-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Selepak S. T., Witebsky F. G. Inoculum size and lot-to-lot variation as significant variables in the tube coagulase test for Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Nov;22(5):835–837. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.835-837.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Winblad S., Ericson C. Sensitized sheep red cells as a reactant for Staphylococcus aureus protein A. Methodology and epidemiology with special reference to weakly reacting methicillin-resistant strains. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1973 Feb;81(1):150–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES