Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2009 Mar 23;53(6):2239–2247. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01531-08

Comparative Antipneumococcal Activities of Sulopenem and Other Drugs

Klaudia Kosowska-Shick 1, Lois M Ednie 1, Pamela McGhee 1, Peter C Appelbaum 1,*
PMCID: PMC2687188  PMID: 19307366

Abstract

For 297 penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant pneumococcal strains, the sulopenem MIC50s were 0.008, 0.06, and 0.25, respectively, and the sulopenem MIC90s were 0.016, 0.25, and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC50s of amoxicillin for the corresponding strains were 0.03, 0.25, and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively, and the MIC90s were 0.03, 1.0, and 8.0 μg/ml, respectively. The combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate gave MICs similar to those obtained with amoxicillin alone. The sulopenem MICs were similar to those of imipenem and meropenem. The MICs of ß-lactams increased with those of penicillin G, and among the quinolones tested, moxifloxacin had the lowest MICs. Additionally, 45 strains of drug-resistant type 19A pneumococci were tested by agar dilution and gave sulopenem MIC50s and MIC90s of 1.0 and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively. Both sulopenem and amoxicillin (with and without clavulanate) were bactericidal against all 12 strains tested at 2× MIC after 24 h. Thirty-one strains from 10 countries with various penicillin, amoxicillin, and carbapenems MICs, including those with the highest sulopenem MICs, were selected for sequencing analysis of the pbp1a, pbp2x, and pbp2b regions encoding the transpeptidase active site and MurM. We did not find any correlations between specific penicillin-binding protein-MurM patterns and changes in the MICs.


The incidence of pneumococci resistant to penicillin G and other ß-lactam and non-ß-lactam compounds has increased at an alarming rate worldwide, including the United States. The major foci of infections currently include South Africa, Spain, and Central and Eastern Europe (26, 27). A 1997 survey showed that 50.4% of 1,476 clinically significant pneumococcal isolates in the United States were not susceptible to penicillin (26). Of all strains tested, approximately 33% were macrolide resistant, with the highest rate of macrolide resistance being seen among penicillin-resistant strains, for which the MICs were ≥2.0 μg/ml (26). A later survey, conducted as part of the Alexander Project (27), reported that the worldwide prevalence of pneumococci isolated between 1998 and 2000 for which penicillin G MICs were ≥2 μg/ml was 18.2%, with the overall macrolide resistance rate being 24.6%. It is also important to note the higher rates of isolation of penicillin-intermediate and -resistant pneumococci (approximately 30%) in middle ear fluids from patients with refractory otitis media than from other isolation sites (4). Quinolone-resistant pneumococci have also been described (6, 22, 31). The problem of drug-resistant pneumococci is compounded by the ability of resistant clones to spread from country to country and from continent to continent (32, 34). In a recent paper, Pichichero and Casey (40) reported on the emergence in the United States of an otopathogenic strain of pneumococcus type 19A which is not covered by the current pediatric conjugate vaccine and which is resistant to all currently FDA-approved antibiotics for the treatment of acute otitis media in children. Another very recent study has shown that of 393 isolates of pneumococci collected from children in the United States between 2005 and 2006, 30.5% of all the isolates were serotype 19A; >50% of the serotype 19A strains showed multiresistant susceptibility patterns (9).

ß-Lactam resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is mediated by stepwise alterations of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) that result in decreased antibiotic affinities (21). Pneumococci contain a set of six PBPs. The decreased affinities of PBP 1A, 2X, and 2B for β-lactams have been reported to play an important part in resistance and to cause high-level penicillin G resistance (1, 2, 30, 41, 42, 51). Alterations in the conserved motifs in PBP 2B are associated with penicillin G resistance, and alterations in PBP 2X mediate low-level resistance to cephalosporins (1, 8, 11, 18). The region of PBP 2B from amino acids 538 to 642 also appears to be relevant for resistance, especially among strains with high amoxicillin MICs (5, 29). Additional alterations in PBP 1A raise the penicillin G and cefotaxime MICs (1, 35, 42, 47). These specific PBPs are thought to be the key to resistance to each antibacterial agent. Non-PBP-related resistance determinants are also essential for the development of high-level penicillin G and cephalosporin resistance in pneumococcal isolates. The mechanism used by non-PBP-related resistance determinants involves alterations in MurM, an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of branched-stem cell wall muropeptides (14).

The stated need for other ß-lactam and non-ß-lactam compounds active against resistant pneumococcal strains isolated from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections is as current as ever (17). Amoxicillin is currently the ß-lactam with the most potent activity against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. In combination with clavulanate, amoxicillin also provides excellent coverage against ß-lactamase-positive Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis strains (26, 27).

PF-03709270 is a novel oral prodrug of sulopenem, a parenteral penem antibiotic (Fig. 1) (16). The current study tested (i) the activities of penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, imipenem, meropenem, sulopenem, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, cefdinir, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against 297 pneumococci and 45 serotype 19A pneumococci resistant to all available oral agents (9, 40) by the agar dilution MIC determination method; (ii) the activities of amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, imipenem, meropenem, sulopenem, ertapenem, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, cefdinir, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, azithromycin, and telithromycin against 12 selected pneumococci by time-kill analysis; (iii) whether alterations in PBPs 2B, 2X, and 1A in combination with mutations in the murM gene and specific patterns of the PBP 2B region (amino acids 557 to 647) correlate with resistance to sulopenem and other ß-lactam antibiotics among selected pneumococcal strains; and (iv) the identities of the pneumococcal clones with the highest sulopenem MICs (1 μg/ml) by multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Sulopenem structure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred ninety-seven selected pneumococcal strains were tested by the agar dilution MIC method. These comprised 80 penicillin-susceptible strains (MICs, ≤0.06 μg/ml), 88 penicillin-intermediate strains (MICs, 0.125 to 1.0 μg/ml), and 129 penicillin-resistant strains (MICs, 2.0 to 16.0 μg/ml). Of these strains, 152 were macrolide resistant (azithromycin MICs, ≥1.0 μg/ml) and had defined macrolide resistance mechanisms. Additionally, 30 strains with levofloxacin MICs of ≥4.0 μg/ml and defined mutations in type II topoisomerase were tested. Strains were selected to include a majority which had penicillin G MICs of ≥2.0 μg/ml. Some strains were macrolide susceptible but penicillin resistant; this does not reflect the current situation in the United States. We also tested an additional 45 strains of drug-resistant type 19A pneumococci (provided by S. Brown and R. Jones) by the agar dilution MIC method. Among the 12 strains tested by time-kill analysis, 2 were penicillin susceptible, 5 were penicillin intermediate resistant, and 5 were penicillin resistant; 6 strains were macrolide resistant: 3 because of erm(B) mutations, 2 because of mef(A) mutations, and 1 because of an L4 ribosomal protein mutation. Two strains were also quinolone resistant and had defined changes in their quinolone resistance-determining region. Thirty-one isolates were selected from among the 297 strains on the basis of the following criteria: all strains with the highest sulopenem MIC of 1 μg/ml (n = 9), 8 strains with amoxicillin MICs equal to their penicillin G MICs, 8 strains with amoxicillin MICs greater than their penicillin G MICs, and 6 strains with penicillin G MICs greater than their amoxicillin MICs. This collection comprised 28 penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains (MICs, ≥2.0 μg/ml) and 3 penicillin-intermediate resistant S. pneumoniae strains (MICs, 1.0 μg/ml) (see Table 5). Identification of the strains as S. pneumoniae was based on optochin susceptibility, bile solubility, the presence of the lytA gene, and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (36). All 31 strains were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to determine clonal relatedness. MLST of all strains (n = 9) with sulopenem MICs of 1 μg/ml and one with an MIC of 0.25 μg/ml was performed as described previously (13).

TABLE 5.

MICs, PFGE types, and MLST types for strains tested for β-lactam resistancea

Strain no. Yr of isolation Country of isolation PFGE type MLST type MIC (μg/ml)
Pen Amox Imipen Meropen Sulopen Ceftriax Cefurox Cefpod Cefdinir Azithro Clarithro Cipro Levo Gati Moxi
24 Before 1998 South Africa A ND 4 2 0.25 0.5 0.5 2 2 2 4 >64 >64 1 1 0.5 0.25
33 Before 1998 United States Unique 41 4 2 0.5 1 1 1 4 4 8 0.125 0.03 2 1 0.5 0.25
37 Before 1998 South Africa A 1094 4 2 0.25 1 1 2 4 4 4 >64 >64 1 1 0.5 0.25
1055 Before 1998 UD I1 ND 2 4 0.25 0.5 0.25 1 4 2 8 >64 32 32 32 16 4
1146 Before 1998 UD C Unique 4 4 0.5 1 1 2 8 8 8 2 2 32 8 2 2
1147 Before 1998 UD C Unique 4 4 0.5 2 1 2 8 8 8 2 1 32 8 4 4
1384 1999 Slovakia D2 ND 4 4 0.125 0.25 0.25 2 4 4 8 >64 64 2 1 0.5 0.25
1394 1999 Slovakia D2 ND 4 8 0.25 0.5 0.5 4 16 8 8 >64 64 2 1 0.5 0.125
1397 1999 Slovakia D1 ND 2 4 0.25 0.5 0.5 4 8 4 4 >64 64 2 1 0.5 0.125
1424 1999 Slovakia D2 ND 2 8 0.25 0.5 0.5 4 16 4 8 >64 16 2 1 0.25 0.125
1564 1996 Romania Unique ND 16 4 0.125 0.125 0.5 >8 64 32 32 >64 32 1 1 0.5 0.25
2617 2000 Poland B ND 1 1 0.125 0.25 0.25 1 4 2 4 0.125 0.03 2 1 0.5 0.25
2686 2000 Poland Unique 610 4 8 0.25 0.5 1 2 16 8 8 >64 16 0.5 1 0.25 0.125
2688 2000 Poland Unique 568 8 16 0.25 0.5 1 4 32 32 16 >64 32 1 1 0.5 0.125
2874 2000 Russia E 663 8 0.5 0.25 1 1 2 8 4 8 >64 32 2 1 0.5 0.125
2880 2000 Russia E ND 4 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.5 0.5 4 2 4 >64 8 1 1 0.25 0.06
3260 2000 Romania F ND 4 8 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 4 2 8 >64 >64 0.5 0.5 0.125 0.06
3263 2000 Romania Unique ND 4 2 0.06 0.25 0.25 1 4 4 8 >64 >64 1 1 0.25 0.125
3275 2000 Slovakia Unique ND 1 1 0.03 0.125 0.125 0.25 2 1 2 >64 >64 1 1 0.25 0.125
3282 2000 Romania F ND 4 4 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.5 4 2 8 >64 >64 0.5 0.5 0.125 0.06
3346 2000 Romania F ND 4 8 0.25 0.25 0.5 1 4 4 8 >64 >64 0.5 0.5 0.125 0.06
3374 2000 Slovakia D1 ND 2 1 0.125 0.25 0.25 1 8 4 4 >64 32 1 1 0.25 0.125
3412 2000 Slovakia D1 ND 2 4 0.125 0.25 0.125 2 4 4 4 >64 32 2 1 0.25 0.125
3455 2000 Slovakia G 81 4 8 0.5 1 1 1 4 4 8 >64 >64 2 2 0.5 0.25
3458 2000 Slovakia G 81 4 8 0.5 1 1 1 8 4 8 >64 >64 2 2 0.5 0.25
3481 2000 Hungary H1 ND 8 8 0.125 0.25 0.25 2 8 4 4 >64 >64 2 1 0.25 0.125
3587 2000 Croatia B ND 2 1 0.125 0.5 0.25 1 8 4 8 >64 >64 2 1 0.25 0.125
3681 2000 Bulgaria B ND 1 2 0.125 0.25 0.25 1 4 4 8 0.125 0.03 1 1 0.5 0.25
3791 2001 Czech Republic I2 ND 2 2 0.125 0.25 0.25 1 8 4 8 >64 32 1 1 0.5 0.25
4747 2001 Lithuania H1 ND 4 8 0.125 0.25 0.25 2 8 2 4 >64 64 1 0.5 0.125 0.06
4755 2001 Hungary H2 ND 8 4 0.125 0.25 0.5 2 8 4 4 >64 >64 1 1 0.25 0.125
a

Abbreviations: Pen, penicillin G; Amox, amoxicillin; Imipen, imipenem; Meropen, meropenem; Sulopen, sulopenem; Ceftriax, ceftriaxone; Cefurox, cefuroxime; Cefpod, cefpodoxime; Azithro, azithromycin; Clarithro, clarithromycin; Cipro, ciprofloxacin; Levo, levofloxacin; Gati, gatifloxacin; Moxi, moxifloxacin; ND, not determined; UD, undetermined.

Fragments of the pbp1A gene (the region from nucleotides 870 to 1950) encoding 350 amino acids, the pbp2B gene (the region from nucleotides 655 to 2028) encoding 458 amino acids, and the pbp2X gene (the region from nucleotides 301 to 2034) encoding 578 amino acids were amplified from chromosomal DNA by PCR with the primers and under the conditions described previously and were directly sequenced (CEQ8000 genetic analysis system; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) (29). The sequences obtained were analyzed with the BLAST and ClustalW programs (46). The PBP alleles were identified by comparison with the sequences of the analyzed gene from strain R6 and named with a letter of the alphabet on the basis of the degree of homology to the strain R6 sequence; e.g., allele A has the highest degree of homology to the allele in the R6 sequence, and allele L has the lowest degree of homology to the allele in the R6 sequence. The murM gene was amplified from chromosomal DNA by PCR with the primers and under the conditions described previously and was directly sequenced (14). Subsequently, additional primers were designed for amplification of the murein protein variant 149193/50012, as follows: primers mur75up (5′-ATTACAAAGTAGTGCTTGGG) and mur608dn (5′-CGCTTCTCAGTTTTTTTCATCAA) or primers 1491mur135up (5′-CTATGAAGAGGGGAAGTTACTGGCTGTGGCT) and 1491mur549dn (5′-ACCAAATTGAATCTCTACACCCTTA) (43).

Sulopenem susceptibility powder was obtained from Pfizer Central Research, Groton, CT. The other antimicrobials were obtained from their respective manufacturers. The agar dilution method was performed with Mueller-Hinton agar (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) supplemented with 5% sheep blood and inocula of 104 CFU/spot, as previously described by our group (23, 37-39, 44, 45, 48, 49). Clavulanate was combined with amoxicillin in a 1:2 ratio. Standard quality control strains, including S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619, were included in each run of the agar dilution MIC determinations (7).

For the time-kill studies, methods previously described by our group were used (23, 48, 49). The medium was cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth containing 5% lysed horse blood, and the inocula were 5 × 105 to 5 × 106 CFU/ml. The suspensions were incubated at 35°C in a shaking water bath; and viability counts were done after 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h. Drugs were considered bactericidal if the original inoculum was reduced by ≥3 log10 CFU/ml (99.9%) at the lowest concentration tested during each of the time periods and bacteriostatic if the inoculum was reduced by 0 to <3 log10 CFU/ml. Drug carryover was addressed by dilution, as reported previously (23, 48, 49).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

All sequences of pbp1a, pbp2X, and pbp2B obtained were deposited in the GenBank database and had the following accession numbers: EU863659 to EU863689 for pbp2B, EU863690 to EU863720 for pbp2X, and EU863721 to EU863751 for pbp1A.

RESULTS

The results of the MIC testing of 297 strains can be seen in Table 1. For the 297 penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant pneumococcal strains, sulopenem gave MIC50s of 0.008, 0.06, and 0.25, respectively, and MIC90s of 0.016, 0.25, and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC50s of amoxicillin for the corresponding strains were 0.03, 0.25, and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively, and the MIC90s were 0.03, 1.0, and 8.0 μg/ml, respectively. The combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate gave MICs similar to those obtained with amoxicillin alone. The sulopenem MICs were similar to those of imipenem and meropenem. The sulopenem MICs were similar to those of imipenem and meropenem and lower than those of ceftriaxone. All oral cephalosporins tested had MICs higher than those of amoxicillin. The results for the 45 strains of drug-resistant type 19A pneumococci are presented in Table 2. The sulopenem MIC50s and MIC90s for these 45 strains were 1.0 and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively, and the amoxicillin MIC50s and MIC90s for these 45 strains were 8.0 and 8.0 μg/ml, respectively. As can be seen, these strains were highly resistant to all available oral antipneumococcal compounds approved for pediatric use.

TABLE 1.

Agar dilution MICs for 297 strains

Drug and strain phenotypea MIC (μg/ml)
Range 50% 90%
Penicillin
    Penicillin S 0.016-0.06 0.03 0.06
    Penicillin I 0.125-1.0 0.25 1.0
    Penicillin R 2.0-16.0 2.0 4.0
Amoxicillin
    Penicillin S ≤0.016-0.125 0.03 0.03
    Penicillin I ≤0.016-2.0 0.25 1.0
    Penicillin R 0.25-16.0 2.0 8.0
Amoxicillin-clavulanate
    Penicillin S ≤0.016-0.125 0.03 0.03
    Penicillin I 0.03-2.0 0.25 1.0
    Penicillin R 0.25-16.0 2.0 4.0
Imipenem
    Penicillin S ≤0.004-0.03 0.008 0.008
    Penicillin I 0.016-0.25 0.03 0.125
    Penicillin R 0.06-0.5 0.25 0.25
Meropenem
    Penicillin S 0.008-0.06 0.016 0.016
    Penicillin I 0.016-0.5 0.06 0.25
    Penicillin R 0.125-2.0 0.5 0.5
Sulopenem
    Penicillin S ≤0.004-0.06 0.008 0.016
    Penicillin I 0.03-0.25 0.06 0.25
    Penicillin R 0.125-1.0 0.25 0.5
Ceftriaxone
    Penicillin S 0.008-0.25 0.03 0.06
    Penicillin I 0.03-1.0 0.125 1.0
    Penicillin R 0.5->8.0 1.0 2.0
Cefuroxime
    Penicillin S 0.016-0.5 0.03 0.125
    Penicillin I 0.125-4.0 0.25 4.0
    Penicillin R 2.0-64.0 4.0 16.0
Cefpodoxime
    Penicillin S 0.03-0.5 0.03 0.06
    Penicillin I 0.06-4.0 0.25 2.0
    Penicillin R 1.0-32.0 4.0 8.0
Cefdinir
    Penicillin S 0.016-0.5 0.06 0.125
    Penicillin I 0.06-8.0 0.5 4.0
    Penicillin R 2.0-32.0 8.0 8.0
Ciprofloxacin
    Penicillin S 1.0->32.0 2.0 32.0
    Penicillin I 0.5-32.0 1.0 2.0
    Penicillin R 0.5->32.0 2.0 8.0
Levofloxacin
    Penicillin S 1.0-32.0 1.0 16.0
    Penicillin I 0.5-32.0 1.0 2.0
    Penicillin R 0.5-32.0 1.0 4.0
Gatifloxacin
    Penicillin S 0.25-8.0 0.5 4.0
    Penicillin I 0.125-16.0 0.25 0.5
    Penicillin R 0.125-16.0 0.5 1.0
Moxifloxacin
    Penicillin S 0.125-4.0 0.25 4.0
    Penicillin I 0.06-4.0 0.125 0.25
    Penicillin R 0.06-4.0 0.25 0.5
Azithromycin
    Penicillin S 0.03->64.0 2.0 >64.0
    Penicillin I ≤0.016->64.0 2.0 >64.0
    Penicillin R 0.06->64.0 0.125 >64.0
Clarithromycin
    Penicillin S ≤0.016->64.0 0.5 >64.0
    Penicillin I ≤0.016->64.0 1.0 >64.0
    Penicillin R ≤0.016->64.0 0.06 >64.0
a

S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant.

TABLE 2.

Agar dilution MICs for 45 drug-resistant type 19A pneumococci

Drug MIC (μg/ml)
Range 50% 90%
Penicillin 2.0-8.0 4.0 4.0
Amoxicillin 4.0-16.0 8.0 8.0
Amoxicillin-clavulanate 2.0-16.0 8.0 8.0
Imipenem 0.25-1.0 0.5 0.5
Meropenem 0.5-2.0 1.0 1.0
Sulopenem 0.25-2.0 1.0 2.0
Ceftriaxone 1.0-8.0 2.0 2.0
Cefuroxime 4.0-32.0 8.0 16.0
Cefpodoxime 2.0-32.0 8.0 8.0
Ciprofloxacin 0.5-8.0 2.0 2.0
Levofloxacin 1.0-4.0 2.0 2.0
Gatifloxacin 0.25-1.0 0.5 0.5
Moxifloxacin 0.125-0.25 0.25 0.25
Azithromycin 2.0->64.0 >64 >64
Clarithromycin 1.0->64.0 >64 >64

The MICs of the 12 strains tested by time-kill analysis are presented in Table 3, and the results of the time-kill analyses are presented in Table 4. As can be seen, all ß-lactams were bactericidal (99.9% killing) against all 12 strains tested at 2× MIC after 24 h and against 8 to 11 strains (the range for the different ß-lactams tested) at 2× MIC after 12 h. All four quinolones were bactericidal at 2× MIC against all 10 strains tested after 24 h; azithromycin was bactericidal against all 8 strains tested, and telithromycin at 2× MIC was bactericidal against 8 of 12 strains after 24 h.

TABLE 3.

MICs for 12 strains tested by time-kill analysis

Drug MIC (μg/ml) for strain:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Amoxicillin 0.03 0.03 0.5 2 8 0.25 2 2 0.25 0.06 2 1
Amoxicillin-clavulanate 0.03 0.03 0.5 2 8 0.25 2 2 0.25 0.06 2 1
Azithromycin >64 0.06 4 0.06 >64 0.06 >64 4 0.06 0.03 >64 0.12
Telithromycin 0.03 0.008 0.12 0.008 0.12 0.004 0.06 0.12 0.008 0.008 0.03 0.016
Imipenem 0.004 0.004 0.06 0.25 0.5 0.03 0.5 0.25 0.03 0.03 0.25 0.25
Sulopenem 0.008 0.008 0.12 0.5 1 0.12 1 1 0.12 0.06 1 0.5
Meropenem 0.016 0.008 0.25 0.5 2 0.12 1 1 0.12 0.06 1 0.5
Ertapenem 0.03 0.03 0.25 1 4 0.12 2 1 0.12 0.12 2 0.5
Ciprofloxacin >32 1 1 16 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1
Levofloxacin 16 1 1 16 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
Gatifloxacin 4 0.25 0.25 4 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25
Moxifloxacin 4 0.12 0.12 2 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.25 0.12 0.25 0.12
Ceftriaxone 0.03 0.016 0.25 4 4 0.12 2 2 0.12 0.12 4 1
Cefuroxime 0.03 0.016 1 16 16 0.5 4 8 0.25 0.25 4 4
Cefpodoxime 0.03 0.016 0.5 8 8 0.5 4 4 0.25 0.25 4 2
Cefdinir 0.12 0.06 0.5 16 8 1 4 16 1 0.25 4 4

TABLE 4.

Results of killing kinetics

Drug and MIC No. of strains against which killing activity was as indicated at the following timesa:
3 h
6 h
12 h
24 h
−1 −2 −3 −1 −2 −3 −1 −2 −3 −1 −2 −3
Amoxicillin
    4× MIC 10 6 1 12 9 5 12 12 11 12 12 12
    2× MIC 11 5 0 12 9 5 12 12 11 12 12 12
    MIC 11 4 0 12 7 3 12 12 10 11 11 10
Amoxicillin-clavulanate
    4× MIC 11 4 1 12 8 6 12 12 11 12 12 12
    2× MIC 11 4 0 12 8 6 12 12 11 12 12 12
    MIC 9 3 0 12 7 4 12 12 10 12 11 9
Azithromycinb
    4× MIC 1 1 0 5 2 1 8 7 3 8 8 8
    2× MIC 1 0 0 3 1 1 8 5 3 8 8 8
    MIC 1 0 0 3 1 1 5 3 1 8 5 2
Telithromycin
    4× MIC 8 1 0 10 4 2 11 8 4 11 10 9
    2× MIC 7 0 0 8 3 0 9 5 3 11 9 8
    MIC 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 4 2 5 4 3
Imipenem
    4× MIC 12 6 2 12 11 5 12 12 11 12 12 12
    2× MIC 12 5 2 12 9 4 12 12 11 12 12 12
    MIC 12 4 1 12 8 3 12 12 10 12 11 10
Sulopenem
    4× MIC 12 6 1 12 9 5 12 12 11 12 12 12
    2× MIC 10 5 1 12 9 4 12 12 11 12 12 12
    MIC 10 5 0 12 8 3 12 12 11 12 11 10
Meropenem
    4× MIC 12 3 0 12 10 2 12 12 10 12 12 12
    2× MIC 11 3 0 12 9 2 12 12 10 12 12 12
    MIC 10 3 0 12 6 2 12 12 10 12 10 10
Ertapenem
    4× MIC 11 3 0 12 8 3 12 12 10 12 12 12
    2× MIC 11 3 0 12 8 2 12 12 9 12 12 12
    MIC 9 3 0 12 8 2 12 12 9 11 10 9
Ciprofloxacinc
    4× MIC 10 5 1 10 7 3 10 10 9 10 10 10
    2× MIC 9 4 0 10 6 3 10 10 7 10 10 10
    MIC 8 0 0 9 4 1 10 8 5 7 5 4
Levofloxacinc
    4× MIC 10 6 0 10 7 4 10 10 9 10 10 10
    2× MIC 10 4 0 10 8 2 10 10 9 10 10 10
    MIC 9 2 0 10 5 1 10 10 5 8 8 7
Gatifloxacinc
    4× MIC 10 5 1 10 8 3 10 10 8 10 10 10
    2× MIC 10 2 0 10 8 1 10 10 7 10 10 10
    MIC 5 1 0 8 4 1 10 8 4 9 8 7
Moxifloxacinc
    4× MIC 10 3 1 10 7 2 10 10 7 10 10 10
    2× MIC 9 2 0 10 4 2 10 10 5 10 10 10
    MIC 4 0 0 9 2 1 9 8 2 8 6 5
Ceftriaxone
    4× MIC 10 3 0 12 8 2 12 12 9 12 12 12
    2× MIC 10 2 0 12 8 3 12 12 10 12 12 12
    MIC 7 2 0 11 5 2 12 11 6 11 8 8
Cefuroxime
    4× MIC 9 3 0 11 8 3 12 12 9 12 12 12
    2× MIC 9 3 0 11 7 2 12 12 9 12 12 12
    MIC 8 3 0 11 6 1 12 12 7 9 7 6
Cefpodoxime
    4× MIC 9 2 0 11 7 1 12 12 7 12 12 12
    2× MIC 9 2 0 11 7 1 12 12 8 12 12 12
    MIC 7 1 0 10 6 0 12 10 6 10 10 6
Cefdinir
    4× MIC 10 1 0 12 8 3 12 12 9 12 12 12
    2× MIC 8 1 0 12 7 2 12 12 9 12 12 12
    MIC 8 1 0 11 6 1 12 12 5 11 10 7
a

−1, 90% killing; −2, 99% killing; −3, 99.9% killing.

b

Four strains with azithromycin MICs >8 μg/ml were not tested.

c

Two strains with levofloxacin MICs >4 μg/ml were not tested.

Nine PFGE types (five types represented by 2 closely related strains, three types represented by 3 closely related strains, and one type represented by 6 closely related strains) were found among the 31 isolates characterized by PFGE, and 6 strains had unique patterns (Table 5). Eight sequence types (STs) were found among 10 selected isolates (9 with the highest sulopenem MIC [1 μg/ml] and 1 with the lowest sulopenem MIC [0.125 μg/ml] in the collection of 10 strains) (Table 5).

The amino acid alterations of the three conserved motifs of PBP 1A, 2X, and 2B are presented in Table 6. During sequence comparisons, we noticed that the sequence numbering for PBP 2B was off by 6 amino acids compared to the original sequence of S. pneumoniae R6 (GenBank accession number AE008520.1) (24).

TABLE 6.

Amino acid alterations of the three conserved motifs of PBPs 1A, 2X, and 2B in 31 tested strains compared to S. pneumoniae R6 sequence and MurM and PBP allele attributions

Strain no. Pen Ra MurM PBP 2B motif at 614KTGTA618b PBP 1A motif atc:
Alleled
370STMK373 428SRNVP432 PBP 1A PBP 2B PBP 2X
24 R 149193/5002 SSMK SRNVT D1 I2 H3
33 R MA SSMK SRNVT D1 K2 M3
37 R 149193/5002 SSMK SRNVT D1 I2 H3
1055 R MA SAMK SRNVT F1 A2 J3
1146 R MB6 KTGTG SSMK SRNVT E1 C2 L3
1147 R MB6 KTGTG SSMK SRNVT E1 C2 L3
1384 R MB6 KTGTG J1 D2 E3
1394 R 149193/5002 KTGTG J1 E2 G3
1397 R MB1 KTGTG J1 E2 G3
1424 R MB7 KTGTG J1 E2 G3
1564 R MA C1 J2 I3
2617 I MA SAMK SRNVT F1 A2 P3
2686 R MB6 KTGTG H1 C2 N3
2688 R MB4 KTGTG H1 E2 M3
2874 R MA SSMK SRNVT G1 K2 D3
2880 R MA SSMK SRNVT G1 K2 D3
3260 R MA KTGTG B1 F2 B3
3263 R MA C1 J2 B3
3275 I MA A1 L2 C3
3282 R MA KTGTG B1 F2 B3
3346 R MA KTGTG B1 F2 B3
3374 R MB6 J1 G2 A3
3412 R MB1 KTGTG J1 D2 E3
3455 R MB7 KTGTG SAMK SRNVT F1 B2 O3
3458 R MB4 KTGTG SAMK SRNVT F1 B2 O3
3481 R MB1 I1 H2 F3
3587 R MA SAMK SRNVT F1 A2 P3
3681 I MA SAMK SRNVT F1 A2 P3
3791 R MA SAMK SRNVT F1 A2 K3
4747 R MB1 I1 H2 F3
4755 R MB1 I1 H2 F3
a

Pen R, penicillin resistance; R, resistant; I, intermediate.

b

The 385SVVK388 motif was not changed and the 442SSNT445 motif was changed to 442SSNA445 in all PBP 2B proteins.

c

The 557KTG559 motif in PBP 1A was not changed.

d

On the basis of nucleotide sequences deposited in GenBank database.

Previous reports have described PBP 2B motifs which were off by the 6 amino acids described above, and because of that we have retained the old amino acid numbering to be able to correlate mutations (10, 12, 29, 41).

Analysis of PBP 1A showed that 7 strains (penicillin G MICs, 1 to 4 μg/ml; amoxicillin MICs, 1 to 8 μg/ml) had T371A substitutions in the 370STMK373 motif, 7 strains (penicillin G MICs, 2 to 8 μg/ml; amoxicillin MICs, 0.25 to 4 μg/ml) had T371S substitutions in the 370STMK373 motif, and 14 strains had P432T substitutions (accompanied by T371A in 2 strains and with a T371S mutation in 370STMK373 in all 14 strains) close to the 428SRN430 motif of PBP 1A. PBP 1A was present in 10 different variants (variants A1 to J1) (Table 6).

Ten isolates showed a single PBP 2X mutation, T338A, in the 337STMK340 motif and had penicillin G MICs of 1 to 16 μg/ml and amoxicillin of MICs 1 to 8 μg/ml, and 10 strains showed the T338P substitution and had penicillin G MICs of 1 to 8 μg/ml and amoxicillin MICs of 0.25 to 8 μg/ml. Eight strains had 338TM339338AF339 mutations and had penicillin G MICs of 2 to 8 μg/ml and amoxicillin MICs of 2 to 16 μg/ml. Fourteen of the 31 strains had an L546V substitution close to the 547KSG549 motif of PBP 2X (penicillin G MICs, 1 to 16 μg/ml; amoxicillin MICs, 1 to 8 μg/ml). No change in the 385SVVK388 motif of PBP 2X was noted. PBP 2X showed the presence of 16 different variants (variants A3 to P3) (Table 6).

All strains showed the same substitution T445A in the 442SSNT445 motif in PBP 2B and no change in the 385SVVK388 motif. Sequence analysis of PBP 2B yielded 12 different alleles (alleles A2 to L2) (Table 6). One strain (strain 3374) had an insertion 426YTQ427 (432YTQ433) in PBP 2B. The insertion of three amino acids (425WYT426) has been described previously, and authors have speculated that such alterations may have been responsible for the altered PBP 2B and may have been involved as one of the determinants of penicillin resistance (50).

Six groups were distinguished on the basis of the specific mutation patterns in 90 amino acid fragments from amino acid positions 557 to 647 (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Comparison of the sequence of PBP 2B (region from amino acid positions 557 to 647 of the deduced amino acid sequence) in all strains tested compared to the PBP 2B sequence from strain R6 of S. pneumoniae.

The murM gene was sequenced from 31 isolates and yielded six different alleles. The deduced amino acid sequences represented six previously published MurM variants: MurMA (14 strains), MurMB6 (5 strains), MurMB1 (5 strains), 149193/5002 (which has 98% homology to allele MurMB1; 3 strains), and MurMB7 and MurMB4 (2 strains each) (Table 6).

DISCUSSION

PF-03709270 is an oral prodrug of sulopenem, an experimental penem (16). In a study of the comparative activities of sulopenem and other drugs against a collection of recently isolated gram-positive and -negative organisms, the sulopenem MIC90s ranged from 0.03 to 1 μg/ml against all clinically significant bacterial species tested. This high in vitro potency was also confirmed by in vitro time-kill studies (25). Our studies confirm the activity of sulopenem against 114 pneumococci of various resistance phenotypes described previously (25) and expand on the information on the activity of sulopenem available.

The results of this study indicate that the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate did not influence the amoxicillin MICs against all pneumococcal groups, and among all oral ß-lactams tested, amoxicillin had the lowest MIC. Sulopenem, imipenem, meropenem, and ceftriaxone all had low MICs against the pneumococci tested, with the oral cephalosporins having higher MICs. Sulopenem in particular was very active, with the MICs ranging from ≤0.004 to 2.0 μg/ml, even against drug-resistant pneumococci with very high penicillin G and amoxicillin MICs. The MICs of the ß-lactams rose with those of penicillin G, and moxifloxacin was the most active quinolone tested (23, 37-39, 44, 45, 48, 49) Against the drug-resistant type 19A pneumococci, sulopenem had MICs lower than those of amoxicillin whether amoxicillin was tested with or without clavulanate. The MICs of sulopenem for these 45 strains were similar to those of imipenem and meropenem. Amoxicillin, with and without clavulanate, and sulopenem showed excellent killing kinetics relative to their MICs, with bactericidal activity against all 12 strains at 2× MIC being achieved after 24 h. Although azithromycin and telithromycin are commonly described to be bacteriostatic against pneumococci, they are, in reality, slowly bactericidal (as it is defined) at multiples of the MIC after 24 h (23, 48, 49). The clinical significance of this phenomenon awaits clarification.

Among the PBPs produced by S. pneumoniae, PBPs 1A, 2B, and 2X are the most important in the development of resistance. Other mechanisms, such as altered protein kinase CiaH and glycosyltransferase CpoA, have been described as potential mechanisms of resistance; but these aspects were not investigated in the current study (19, 20, 28).

Elevated sulopenem MICs have not previously been associated with any MLST pattern. We found that MLST analysis (10 strains) showed a correlation only between the ST and the country of origin. All defined STs, STs 41, 1094, 663 and 610, and 603 (isolated in the United States and South Africa, Russia, and Poland, respectively), have already been described in the MLST database and have previously been isolated in the countries mentioned above. ST81 represents global S. pneumoniae clone 23F-Spain, which has spread in many countries (33).

Among the PBP alleles analyzed, the most variable was PBP 2X, followed by PBP 2B and PBP 1A, with homologies at the protein level with the sequence of strain R6 of 95 to 87%, 96 to 90%, and 93 to 84%, respectively. A similar correlation has been described by Biçmen et al. (3) and del Campo et al. (10).

Altered stem peptide (mur) genes can also affect the activities of β-lactams (15, 43). Six types of MurM were detected in our study, but no correlation to the increased MICs of any antibiotic tested was detected. Each individual clonal group had the same MurM allele (the exceptions being strains 3455 and 3458). Our studies confirm that the role of murM in resistance cannot be explained at this time as a simple correlation between the presence of an altered MurM protein and resistance to ß-lactams: strains with high-level resistance to penicillin G had unaltered MurM proteins, and also, strains with identical PBP patterns but different MurM alleles had no changes in MICs. In general, our data support the hypothesis by du Plessis et al. that the involvement of MurM in penicillin resistance appears to be dependent on specific mutations in PBPs, especially in PBP 2B (12).

In our study, the region of PBP 2B from amino acids 557 to 647 appeared to be relevant for resistance, especially among strains with high amoxicillin MICs, which confirms previous findings (5, 12, 29).

All mutations previously reported to affect β-lactam resistance (e.g., PBP 1A with a T371A or S substitution within the 370STMK373 motif, a T338S or A substitution in PBP 2X, and a T445A substitution in the 442SSNT445 motif of PBP 2B) were found in all isolates tested in the current study, but we were unable to find a clear correlation between those alterations and specific patterns of resistance, including susceptibility to sulopenem (1, 8, 41, 42). This may suggest that at least one change in crucial PBP motifs may be required to develop β-lactam resistance.

The results of the present study indicate that sulopenem (administered either parenterally or as the oral prodrug) has a potential place in the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant pneumococci, including the drug-resistant nonvaccine type 19A phenotype (40), which is probably spreading throughout all countries in which the vaccine is available. The only current therapeutic options for the latter strains are linezolid or the respiratory quinolones. The clinical use of sulopenem must await the results of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses, as well as data from toxicological, safety, experimental animal, and clinical efficacy studies.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from Pfizer Central Research, Groton, CT.

We thank S. Brown (Clinical Microbiology Institute, Wilsonville, OR) and R. Jones (JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA) for the provision of drug-resistant type 19A strains.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 23 March 2009.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Asahi, Y., Y. Takeuchi, and K. Ubukata. 1999. Diversity of substitutions within or adjacent to conserved amino acid motifs of penicillin-binding protein 2X in cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1252-1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barcus, V. A., K. Ghanekar, M. Yeo, T. J. Coffey, and C. G. Dowson. 1995. Genetics of high level penicillin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 126:299-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Biçmen, M., Z. Gülay, D. Ramaswamy, M. Musher, and M. Gur. 2006. Analysis of mutations in the pbp genes of penicillin-non-susceptible pneumococci from Turkey. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:150-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Block, S., C. J. Harrison, J. A. Hedrick, R. D. Tyler, R. A. Smith, E. Keegan, and S. A. Chartrand. 1995. Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in acute otitis media: risk factors, susceptibility patterns and antimicrobial management. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 14:751-759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cafini, F., R. del Campo, L. Alou, D. Sevillano, M. I. Morosini, F. Baquero, and J. Prieto. 2006. Alterations of the penicillin-binding proteins and murM alleles of clinical Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with high-level resistance to amoxicillin in Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:224-229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen, D. K., A. McGeer, J. C. de Azavedo, and D. E. Low. 1999. Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones in Canada. N. Engl. J. Med. 22:233-239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A7, 7th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 8.Coffey, T. J., M. Daniels, L. K. McDougal, C. G. Dowson, F. C. Tenover, and B. G. Spratt. 1995. Genetic analysis of clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with high-level resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1306-1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Critchley, I. A., M. R. Jacobs, S. D. Brown, M. M. Traczewski, G. S. Tillotson, and N. Janjic. 2008. Prevalence of serotype 19A Streptococcus pneumoniae among isolates from U.S. children in 2005-2006 and activity of faropenem. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2639-2643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.del Campo, R., F. Cafini, M. I. Morosini, A. Fenoll, J. Linares, L. Alou, D. Sevillano, R. Canton, J. Prieto, and F. Baquero on behalf of the Spanish Pneumococcal Network. 2006. Combinations of PBPs and MurM protein variants in early and contemporary high-level penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:983-986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dowson, C. G., A. P. Johnson, E. Cercenado, and R. C. George. 1994. Genetics of oxacillin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae that are oxacillin resistant and penicillin susceptible. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:49-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.du Plessis, M., E. Bingen, and K. P. Klugman. 2002. Analysis of penicillin-binding protein genes of clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to amoxicillin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2349-2357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Enright, M., and B. G. Spratt. 1998. A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae: identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology 144:3049-3060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Filipe, S. R., E. Severina, and A. Tomasz. 2000. Distribution of the mosaic structured murM genes among natural populations of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 182:6798-6805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Filipe, S. R., and A. Tomasz. 2000. Inhibition of the expression of penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae by inactivation of cell wall muropeptide branching genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4891-4896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Forrest, A., A. Hazra, D. Girard, S. Finegan, J. O'Donnell, and K. Soma. 2008. Use of PK/PD analysis to select doses for PF-03709270 with and without probenecid (P), to be studied in phase 2b trials, abstr. A-034. Abstr. 48th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  • 17.Friedland, I. R., and G. H. McCracken, Jr. 1994. Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N. Engl. J. Med. 331:377-382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grebe, T., and R. Hakenbeck. 1996. Penicillin-binding proteins 2b and 2x of Streptococcus pneumoniae are primary resistant determinants for different classes of β-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:829-834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guenzi, E., A. M. Gasc, M. A. Sicard, and R. Hakenbeck. 1994. A two-component signal-transducing system is involved in competence and penicillin susceptibility in laboratory mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 12:505-515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hakenbeck, R., A. Konig, I. Kern, M. van der Linden, W. Keck, D. Billot-Klein, R. Legrand, B. Schoot, and L. Gutmann. 1998. Acquisition of five high-Mr penicillin-binding protein variants during transfer of high-level beta-lactam resistance from Streptococcus mitis to Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 180:1831-1840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hakenbeck, R. 1999. β-Lactam-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: epidemiology and evolutionary mechanism. Chemotherapy 45:83-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ho, P.-L., T.-L. Que, D . N. -C. Tsang, T. -K. Ng, K. -H. Chow, and W.-H. Seto. 1999. Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance among multiply resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Hong Kong. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1310-1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoellman, D. B., G. Lin, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1999. Anti-pneumococcal activity of gatifloxacin compared with other quinolone and non-quinolone agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:645-649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hoskins, J., W. E. Alborn, Jr., J. Arnold, L. C. Blaszczak, S. Burgett, B. S. DeHoff, S. T. Estrem, L. Fritz, D. J. Fu, W. Fuller, C. Geringer, R. Gilmour, J. S. Glass, H. Khoja, A. R. Kraft, R. E. Lagace, D. J. LeBlanc, L. N. Lee, E. J. Lefkowitz, J. Lu, P. Matsushima, S. M. McAhren, M. McHenney, K. McLeaster, C. W. Mundy, T. I. Nicas, F. H. Norris, M. O'Gara, R. B. Peery, G. T. Robertson, P. Rockey, P. M. Sun, M. E. Winkler, Y. Yang, M. Young-Bellido, G. Zhao, C. A. Zook, R. H. Baltz, S. R. Jaskunas, P. R. Rosteck, Jr., P. L. Skatrud, and J. I. Glass. 2001. Genome of the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae strain R6. J. Bacteriol. 183:5709-5717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huband, M. D., T. D. Gootz, M. A. Cohen, L. M. Mullins, S. P. McCurdy, L. A. Brennan, J. M. Duignan, P. J. Pagano, and R. W. Murray. 2008. In vitro antibacterial activity of sulopenem: a new oral penem antimicrobial versus recent bacterial isolates, abstr. F1-344. Abstr. 48th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  • 26.Jacobs, M. R., S. Bajaksouzian, A. Zilles, G. Lin, G. A. Pankuch, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1999. Susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae to 10 oral antimicrobial agents based on pharmacodynamic parameters: 1997 U.S. surveillance study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1901-1908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jacobs, M. R., D. Felmingham, P. C. Appelbaum, R. N. Grueneberg, and the Alexander Project Group. 2003. The Alexander Project 1998-2000: susceptibility of pathogens isolated from community-acquired respiratory tract infections to commonly used antimicrobial agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:229-246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Klimek, J. J., C. Nightingale, W. B. Lehmann, and R. Quintiliani. 1977. Comparison of concentrations of amoxicillin and ampicillin in serum and middle ear fluid of children with chronic otitis media. J. Infect. Dis. 135:999-1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kosowska, K., M. R. Jacobs, S. Bajaksouzian, L. Koeth, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2004. Alterations of penicillin-binding proteins 1A, 2X, and 2B in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates for which amoxicillin MICs are higher than penicillin MICs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4020-4022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Laible, G., B. G. Spratt, and R. Hakenbeck. 1991. Interspecies recombinational events during the evolution of altered PBP2X genes in penicillin-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 5:1993-2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liñares, J., A. G. Campa, and R. Pallares. 1999. Fluoroquinolone-resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. N. Engl. J. Med. 20:1546-1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McDougal, L. K., R. Facklam, M. Reeves, S. Hunter, J. M. Swenson, B. C. Hill, and F. C. Tenover. 1992. Analysis of multiply antimicrobial-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:2176-2184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McGee, L., L. McDougal, J. Zhou, B. G. Spratt, F. C. Tenover, R. George, R. Hakenbeck, W. Hryniewicz, J. C. Lefevre, A. Tomasz, and K. P. Klugman. 2001. Nomenclature of major antimicrobial-resistant clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae defined by the Pneumococcal Molecular Epidemiology Network. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2565-2571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Munoz, R., J. M. Musser, M. Crain, D. E. Briles, A. Marton, A. J. Parkinson, U. Sorensen, and A. Tomasz. 1992. Geographic distribution of penicillin-resistant clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae: characterization by penicillin-binding protein profile, surface protein A typing, and multilocus enzyme analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15:112-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Munoz, R., C. G. Dowson, M. Daniels, T. J. Coffey, C. Martin, R. Hakenbeck, and B. G. Spratt. 1992. Genetics of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 6:2461-2465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Neeleman, C., C. H. W. Klaassen, D. M. Klomberg, H. A. de Valk, and J. W. Mouton. 2004. Pneumolysin is a key factor in misidentification of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and is a putative virulence factor of S. mitis and other streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4355-4357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1994. Study of comparative antipneumococcal activities of penicillin G, RP 59500, erythromycin, sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin by using time-kill methodology. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:2065-2072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1995. Activity of CP99,219 compared with DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin and grepafloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:230-232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1995. Comparative activity of ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate and cefotaxime against 189 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:883-888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pichichero, M., and J. R. Casey. 2007. Emergence of a multiresistant serotype 19A pneumococcal strain not included in the 7-valent conjugate vaccine as an otopathogen in children. JAMA 298:1772-1778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Smith, A. M., and K. P. Klugman. 1995. Alterations in penicillin-binding protein 2B from penicillin-resistant wild-type strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:859-867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Smith, A. M., and K. P. Klugman. 1998. Alterations in PBP 1A essential for high-level penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1329-1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Smith, A. M., and K. P. Klugman. 2001. Alterations in MurM, a cell wall muropeptide branching enzyme, increase high-level penicillin and cephalosporin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2393-2396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Spangler, S. K., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1992. Susceptibilities of penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to RP 59500, vancomycin, erythromycin, PD 131628, sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, Win 57273, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:856-859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Spangler, S. K., M. R. Jacobs, G. A. Pankuch, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1993. Susceptibility of 170 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to six oral cephalosporins, four quinolones, desacetylcefotaxime, Ro 23-9424 and RP 67829. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 31:273-280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ubukata, K., T. Muraki, A. Igarashi, Y. Asahi, and M. Konno. 1997. Identification of penicillin and other beta-lactam resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae by polymerase chain reaction. J. Infect. Chemother. 3:190-197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Visalli, M. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1996. MIC and time-kill study of DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, cefotaxime, imipenem, and vancomycin against nine penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:362-366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Visalli, M. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1997. Antipneumococcal activity of BAY 12-8039, a new quinolone, compared with activities of three other quinolones and four ß-lactams. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2786-2789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yamane, A., H. Nakano, Y. Asahi, K. Ubukata, and M. Konno. 1996. Directly repeated insertion of 9-nucleotide sequence detected in penicillin-binding protein 2B gene of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1257-1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhao, G., T. I. Meier, J. Hoskins, and K. A. McAllister. 2000. Identification and characterization of the penicillin-binding protein 2a of Streptococcus pneumoniae and its possible role in resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1745-1748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES