Abstract
A rapid, simple lysostaphin lysis susceptibility test to differentiate the genera Staphylococcus and Micrococcus was evaluated. Of 181 strains from culture collections, 95 of 95 Staphylococcus strains were lysed, and 79 of 79 Micrococcus strains were not lysed. The seven Planococcus strains were resistant. Clinical isolates (890) were tested with lysostaphin and for the ability to produce acid from glycerol in the presence of erythromycin. Overall agreement between the methods was 99.2%. All clinical Micrococcus strains (43) were resistant to lysostaphin, and all clinical Staphylococcus strains (847) were susceptible. Seven of the Staphylococcus strains did not produce acid from glycerol in the presence of erythromycin. This lysostaphin test provides results in 2 h. It is easier to perform than previously described lysostaphin lysis methods. It is also more rapid and accurate than the glycerol-erythromycin test.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker J. S. Comparison of various methods for differentiation of staphylococci and micrococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):875–879. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.875-879.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feltham R. K. A taxonomic study of the Micrococcaceae. J Appl Bacteriol. 1979 Oct;47(2):243–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1979.tb01751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gunn B. A., Singleton F. L., Peele E. R., Colwell R. R., Keiser J. K., Kapper C. O. Comparison of methods for identifying Staphylococcus and Micrococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Aug;14(2):195–200. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.2.195-200.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lachica R. V., Hoeprich P. D., Genigeorgis C. Nuclease production and lysostaphin susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and other catalase-positive cocci. Appl Microbiol. 1971 May;21(5):823–826. doi: 10.1128/am.21.5.823-826.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parisi J. T. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and the epidemiological typing of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiol Rev. 1985 Jun;49(2):126–139. doi: 10.1128/mr.49.2.126-139.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SCHINDLER C. A., SCHUHARDT V. T. LYSOSTAPHIN: A NEW BACTERIOLYTIC AGENT FOR THE STAPHYLOCOCCUS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Mar;51:414–421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.3.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schleifer K. H., Kloos W. E. A simple test system for the separation of staphylococci from micrococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):337–338. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.337-338.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zygmunt W. A., Browder H. P., Tavormina P. A. Susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci to lysostaphin and other antibiotics. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Aug;16(8):1168–1173. doi: 10.1128/am.16.8.1168-1173.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]