Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
letter
. 2009 May 12;106(21):E53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902462106

Longevity of Indy mutant Drosophila not attributable to Indy mutation

Janne M Toivonen 1, David Gems 1, Linda Partridge 1,1
PMCID: PMC2688976  PMID: 19435842

In their recent study in PNAS, Neretti et al. (1) identify mitochondrial defects in male Drosophila melanogaster that are heterozygous for the mutation Indy206. This allele lowers the expression of Indy, which encodes a Krebs cycle intermediate transporter and was previously proposed to increase adult fly lifespan (2). The authors propose an interesting model in which mitochondria work at lower rate but are present in greater density. This model results in unchanged ATP levels but less ROS production, potentially accounting for the longevity of this strain.

Although this model may be correct, the role of the Indy gene in these effects on lifespan is highly doubtful. Although males of the mutant strain Neretti et al. used (Indy206 in the Canton-S genetic background) are verifiably long-lived (2,3), we previously demonstrated that the longevity of this strain does not segregate with the Indy mutation (3). Instead, it largely depends on the presence of a tetracycline-dependent agent (probably Wolbachia), plus some other X-chromosomal locus (or loci) (3). Regrettably, it seems that Neretti et al. have attempted to brush these inconvenient facts under the rug, and we feel that we should draw attention to this. Clearly, if mutation of Indy does not slow aging, then the mitochondrial defects in the Indy strain are either not caused by Indy or, if they are, they do not cause the longevity.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Neretti N, et al. Long-lived Indy induces reduced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production and oxidative damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:2277–2282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812484106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rogina B, et al. Extended life-span conferred by cotransporter gene mutations in Drosophila. Science. 2000;290:2137–2140. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5499.2137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Toivonen JM, et al. No influence of Indy on lifespan in Drosophila after correction for genetic and cytoplasmic background effects. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e95. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES