Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1986 Dec;24(6):922–928. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.6.922-928.1986

Dip slide culture of intraoperative peritoneal irrigation fluid for prediction of septic complication in elective colorectal surgery.

B E Claesson, D E Holmlund
PMCID: PMC269071  PMID: 3537004

Abstract

A controlled prospective study of a simplified technique, the dip slide culture method, for assessment of bacterial concentration in peritoneal irrigation fluid at the end of an elective colorectal operation is presented. The prediction of postoperative surgical infection based on intraoperative culture was compared between this method and a standard streak-plate technique in 190 patients. One gram of metronidazole was given intravenously as prophylaxis on induction of anesthesia and 12 h postoperatively. Intraoperative growth of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae or Staphylococcus aureus was strongly correlated to infection (P less than 0.001). By using this finding as a single criterion for the prediction of sepsis, sensitivity and specificity for the dip slide method were 70.8 and 94.3%, respectively, compared with 79.2 and 94.6%, respectively, for the streak-plate method. Of the 24 infections, 20 (83.3%) were correctly predicted when a combination of the two methods was used. An increasing number of Enterobacteriaceae or S. aureus in the dip slide culture resulted in a steady rise in the rate of infections from 5.7% at 0 CFU to 57% at greater than or equal to 80 CFU compared with 4.1% at 0 CFU/ml and 45.4% at greater than or equal to 800 CFU/ml with the streak-plate method. The differences were statistically significant at the greater than or equal to 5 CFU level with regard to wound infection (P less than 0.001) and deep surgical infection (P less than 0.01). It is concluded that the dip slide is a simple, rapid, and reliable method for the routine assessment of bacterial contamination in colorectal operations.

Full text

PDF
922

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartlett J. G., Condon R. E., Gorbach S. L., Clarke J. S., Nichols R. L., Ochi S. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Operations: impact of oral antibiotic regimen on colonic flora, wound irrigation cultures and bacteriology of septic complications. Ann Surg. 1978 Aug;188(2):249–254. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197808000-00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Claesson B., Brandberg A., Brevinge H. Selected postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in colo-rectal surgery on the basis of bacterial concentration in the operative field. Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(4):289–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Claesson B., Brandberg A., Nilsson L. O., Kock N. G. Quantitative recovery of contaminating bacteria at operation and the relation to postoperative infection in intestinal surgery. Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(4):285–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen S. N., Kass E. H. A simple method for quantitative urine culture. N Engl J Med. 1967 Jul 27;277(4):176–180. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196707272770403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ericsson H. M., Sherris J. C. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1971;217(Suppl):1+–1+. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guttmann D., Naylor G. R. Dip-slide: an aid to quantitative urine culture in general practice. Br Med J. 1967 Aug 5;3(5561):343–345. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5561.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mackey J. P., Sandys G. H. Laboratory diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract in general practice by means of a dip-inoculum transport medium. Br Med J. 1965 Nov 27;2(5473):1286–1288. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5473.1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McAllister T. A., Arneil G. C., Barr W., Kay P. Assessment of plane dipslide quantitation of bacteriuria. Nephron. 1973;11(2):111–122. doi: 10.1159/000180224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pollock A. V. Surgical wound sepsis. Lancet. 1979 Jun 16;1(8129):1283–1286. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92239-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scheibel J. H., Lykkegaard Nielsen M., Wamberg T. Septic complications in colo-rectal surgery after 24 hours versus 60 hours of preoperative antibiotic bowel preparation. II. Significance of bacterial concentrations in the bowel for contamination of the operation field and subsequent wound infection. Acta Chir Scand. 1978;144(7-8):527–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Simchen E., Shapiro M., Sacks T. G., Michel J., Durst A., Eyal Z. Determinants of wound infection after colon surgery. Ann Surg. 1984 Mar;199(3):260–265. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198403000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Törnqvist A., Ekelund G., Forsgren A., Leandoer L., Olson S., Ursing J. Single dose doxycycline prophylaxis and peroperative bacteriological culture in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 1981 Aug;68(8):565–568. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800680814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Willis A. T., Ferguson I. R., Jones P. H., Phillips K. D., Tearle P. V., Fiddian R. V., Graham D. F., Harland D. H., Hughes D. F., Knight D. Metronidazole in prevention and treatment of bacteroides infections in elective colonic surgery. Br Med J. 1977 Mar 5;1(6061):607–610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6061.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES