Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 16;135(3):827–833. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1052

Table 2.

Application of Network Concepts to Public Health Problems in Critical Care

Public Health Problem Network Concept Testable Hypothesis
Will regionalization of adult critical care services improve outcomes? Centralization: networks quantitatively differ in the extent to which relationships are concentrated in a few nodes. Regions of the country with more centralized referral networks have improved risk-adjusted population outcomes from selected critical illnesses.
Which patients should be transferred? The benefits of network position may be a function of characteristics of the individual who occupies that position. The benefits of a transfer will result from an interaction between characteristics of the patient, the sending hospital and the receiving hospital.
Does health insurance limit a patient's treatment options for critical illness? Network regression allows statistical comparison of different networks. Transfer networks for different insurers will be statistically indistinguishable.
Do for-profit hospitals “cream skim” patients? Individual hospital characteristics can be statistically correlated with quantitative measures of network position. Hospital for-profit status will not be associated with position in the network.