Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1987 Sep;25(9):1623–1625. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.9.1623-1625.1987

Comparison of Du Pont Isolator and Roche Septi-Chek for detection of fungemia.

L Guerra-Romero 1, R S Edson 1, F R Cockerill 3rd 1, C D Horstmeier 1, G D Roberts 1
PMCID: PMC269294  PMID: 3308947

Abstract

The rapid detection of fungemia in hospitalized patients is imperative, particularly for those who are immunocompromised. Our laboratory compared the Roche Septi-Chek with the Du Pont Isolator for the recovery of fungi from blood. Of 23,586 matched pairs of blood cultures, 199 were positive. The Isolator detected 178 (89.4%) and the Septi-Chek detected 119 (59.7%) of all positive isolates. The mean recovery time for the Isolator and Septi-Chek was 2.2 and 4.9 days, respectively. The Isolator detected fungemia earlier than the Septi-Chek did and was the only culture system positive in 83% of 53 patients, whereas the Septi-Chek system yielded the same results in only 13% of the patients. The Isolator provides a more rapid and sensitive method for the recovery of fungi from blood.

Full text

PDF
1623

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bille J., Edson R. S., Roberts G. D. Clinical evaluation of the lysis-centrifugation blood culture system for the detection of fungemia and comparison with a conventional biphasic broth blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):126–128. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.126-128.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bille J., Roberts G. D., Washington J. A., 2nd Retrospective comparison of three blood culture media for the recovery of yeasts from clinical specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Feb;2(1):22–25. doi: 10.1007/BF02019918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bille J., Stockman L., Roberts G. D., Horstmeier C. D., Ilstrup D. M. Evaluation of a lysis-centrifugation system for recovery of yeasts and filamentous fungi from blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):469–471. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.469-471.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blazevic D. J., Stemper J. E., Matsen J. M. Effect of aerobic and anaerobic atmospheres on isolation of organisms from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Feb;1(2):154–156. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.154-156.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gantz N. M., Medeiros A. A., Swain J. L., O'Brien T. F. Vacuum blood-culture bottles inhibiting growth of Candida and fostering growth of Bacteroides. Lancet. 1974 Nov 16;2(7890):1174–1176. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90813-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harkness J. L., Hall M., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd Effects of atmosphere of incubation and of routine subcultures on detection of bacteremia in vacuum blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Oct;2(4):296–299. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.4.296-299.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Roberts G. D., Horstmeier C., Hall M., Washington J. A., 2nd Recovery of yeast from vented blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jul;2(1):18–20. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.1.18-20.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roberts G. D., Washington J. A., 2nd Detection of fungi in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):309–310. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.309-310.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES