Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1987 Sep;25(9):1741–1746. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.9.1741-1746.1987

Comparison of agar disk diffusion, microdilution broth, and agar dilution for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

J A Smith 1, D A Henry 1, A M Bourgault 1, L Bryan 1, G J Harding 1, D J Hoban 1, G B Horsman 1, T Marrie 1, P Turgeon 1
PMCID: PMC269319  PMID: 3654944

Abstract

A collection of 120 oxacillin-susceptible and 120 oxacillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) from six tertiary care hospital laboratories were tested by agar disk diffusion, three microdilution broth systems (Sensititre, Dynatech, and Alpkem), and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for comparison with reference agar dilution results. The antimicrobial agents tested were oxacillin, cefazolin, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, cefamandole, fusidic acid, rifampin, and vancomycin. Incubation was at 30 or 35 degrees C for 24, 48, and 72 h. The broth media were supplemented with 2% NaCl for some antimicrobial agents, and the agar dilution method was used with and without the addition of 4% NaCl. The CNS were identified to species by the method of Kloos and Schleifer. The results showed a lack of concordance between two hospitals with respect to oxacillin susceptibility testing by agar dilution with no NaCl supplement. The reasons are not clear but may be related to variations in media. The 4% NaCl supplement or extended incubation to 48 h eliminated this difference. The cefazolin and cefotaxime susceptibility results in the agar disk diffusion test were unreliable if accepted at face value. Cefamandole testing correlated well with the reference method regardless of the method used, and salt supplementation is not recommended. Most of the oxacillin-resistant CNS were resistant to the other beta-lactam drugs except cefamandole. Of 22 CNS resistant to cefamandole, 21 were S. haemolyticus.

Full text

PDF
1741

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Frongillo R. F., Donati L., Federico G., Martino P., Moroni M., Ortona L., Palumbo M., Pasticci B. M., Pizzigallo E., Privitera G. Clinical comparative study on the activity of cefamandole in the treatment of serious staphylococcal infections caused by methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 May;29(5):789–796. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.5.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hindler J. A., Inderlied C. B. Effect of the source of Mueller-Hinton agar and resistance frequency on the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;21(2):205–210. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.205-210.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Karchmer A. W., Archer G. L., Dismukes W. E. Staphylococcus epidermidis causing prosthetic valve endocarditis: microbiologic and clinical observations as guides to therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Apr;98(4):447–455. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-98-4-447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kloos W. E., Schleifer K. H. Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):82–88. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.82-88.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Larson E. L., McGinley K. J., Foglia A. R., Talbot G. H., Leyden J. J. Composition and antimicrobic resistance of skin flora in hospitalized and healthy adults. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Mar;23(3):604–608. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.3.604-608.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Slama T. G., Sklar S. J., Misinski J., Fess S. W. Randomized comparison of cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime prophylaxis in open-heart surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 May;29(5):744–747. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.5.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thornsberry C., Gavan T. L., Sherris J. C., Balows A., Matsen J. M., Sabath L. D., Schoenknecht F., Thrupp L. D., Washington J. A., 2nd Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):466–480. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.4.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Varaldo P. E., Cipriani P., Focá A., Geraci C., Giordano A., Madeddu M. A., Orsi A., Pompei R., Prenna M., Repetto A. Identification, clinical distribution, and susceptibility to methicillin and 18 additional antibiotics of clinical Staphylococcus isolates: nationwide investigation in Italy. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):838–843. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.838-843.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Woods G. L., Hall G. S., Rutherford I., Pratt K. J., Knapp C. C. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Sep;24(3):349–352. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.349-352.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES