Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1987 Nov;25(11):2209–2210. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.11.2209-2210.1987

Three rapid methods compared with a conventional method for detection of urease production in anaerobic bacteria.

C K Mills 1, B Y Grimes 1, R L Gherna 1
PMCID: PMC269443  PMID: 3320087

Abstract

Three rapid methods (spot test, disk, and tube) for detecting urease production in anaerobic bacteria yielded results faster than the conventional method. The results were more consistent with the disk and tube methods than with the spot test. Blood agar plate growth gave more consistent results than growth from chopped-meat slants.

Full text

PDF
2209

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Bernsohn K. L., Thrupp L. D. Four-hour urease test for distinguishing between Klebsiella and Enterobacter. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Aug;18(2):156–158. doi: 10.1128/am.18.2.156-158.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Qadri S. M., Zubairi S., Hawley H. P., Ramirez E. G. Simple spot test for rapid detection of urease activity. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1198–1199. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1198-1199.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wozny M. A., Bryant M. P., Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. Urease assay and urease-producing species of anaerobes in the bovine rumen and human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1097–1104. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1097-1104.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES