Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Mar 7;49(6):2549–2556. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1658

Cataracts Are Caused by Alterations of a Critical N-Terminal Positive Charge in Connexin50

Bettina C Thomas 1,2, Peter J Minogue 1, Virginijus Valiunas 3, Giedrius Kanaporis 3, Peter R Brink 3, Viviana M Berthoud 1, Eric C Beyer 1
PMCID: PMC2694449  NIHMSID: NIHMS45776  PMID: 18326694

Abstract

PURPOSE

To elucidate the basis of the autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataracts caused by the connexin50 mutant, CX50R23T, by determining its cellular distribution and functional behavior and the consequences of substituting other amino acids for arginine-23.

METHODS

Connexin50 (CX50) mutants were generated by PCR and transfected into HeLa or N2a cells. Expressed CX50 protein was detected by immunoblot analysis and localized by immunofluorescence. Intercellular communication was assessed by microinjection of neurobiotin or by double whole-cell patch-clamp recording.

RESULTS

HeLa cells stably transfected with CX50R23T or wild-type CX50 produced immunoreactive CX50 bands of identical electrophoretic mobility. Whereas HeLa cells stably expressing CX50 contained abundant gap junction plaques, CX50R23T localized predominantly in the cytoplasm. HeLa cells expressing wild-type CX50 showed large gap junctional conductances and extensive transfer of neurobiotin, but those expressing CX50R23T did not show significant intercellular communication by either assay. Moreover, CX50R23T inhibited the function of coexpressed wild-type CX50. Three CX50R23 substitution mutants (CX50R23K, CX50R23L, and CX50R23W) formed gap junction plaques, whereas two mutant substitutions with negatively charged residues (CX50R23D, CX50R23E) did not form detectable plaques. Only the mutant with a positive charge substitution (CX50R23K) allowed neurobiotin transfer at levels similar to those of wild-type CX50; none of the other mutants induced transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that replacement of amino acid 23 in CX50 by any residue that is not positively charged would lead to cataract formation.


Cataracts are a major cause of impaired vision and blindness throughout the world.1 Congenital cataracts are responsible for 10% of childhood blindness and are a common treatable cause of childhood visual impairment.2 A substantial fraction of isolated (nonsyndromic) childhood cataracts are inherited. Inheritance is most commonly autosomal dominant, although autosomal recessive and X-linked forms have also been reported. Hereditary congenital cataracts have been linked to mutations of several different genes, including the gap junction proteins connexin46 (CX46) and connexin50 (CX50).3-17

Maintenance of a transparent lens depends on gap junction-mediated communication between its cells. Gap junctions are plasma membrane specializations containing clusters of intercellular channels. These channels allow intercellular transfer of ions and molecules of ≤1000 Da. Within the lens, gap junction channels form a network of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate exchange of water, ions, nutrients, and metabolites, especially between fiber cells.18,19

A gap junction channel contains 12 subunit proteins (connexins) distributed among two coaxially aligned hexameric hemichannels located in the plasma membranes of the apposing cells. Lens fiber cells primarily express CX5020 and CX46,21 whereas the lens epithelial cells mainly express connexin43 (CX43).22,23 Large numbers of gap junction channels may cluster together within the appositional membranes to form plaques.

Genetic data from rodents have also emphasized the importance of alterations of the lens fiber connexins in cataractogenesis. Several strains of mice or rats that develop cataracts harbor mutations of the Gja3 (CX46) or Gja8 (CX50) genes.24-28 Targeted ablation of the murine Gja3 (CX46)29 or Gja8 (CX50)30,31 genes also causes cataracts. In fact, not only loss of CX50, but also its overexpression, can result in cataracts.32

Investigators in several previous studies have examined the behavior of cataract-associated mutant connexins in expression systems, to elucidate cellular and physiological abnormalities that may lead to cataract formation. Some lens connexin mutants exhibit loss of function-for example, small or no gap junction conductances were detected when they were expressed in paired Xenopus oocytes.17,28,33,34 When coexpressed with wild-type connexins, some mutants exert a dominant-negative effect abolishing conductance,15,35,36 whereas some other mutants do not eliminate coupling, but may affect channel gating properties.37 Several mutants do not form gap junction plaques.15,36 In one of these cases a unique sequence in the mutant protein (generated by a frame shift) impairs trafficking to the plasma membrane.38

The human mutation, CX50R23T (which leads to the substitution of a threonine for arginine-23), was first described in members of an Iranian family with autosomal dominant, bilateral, congenital nuclear cataract that progressed to cause visual impairment by the second decade of life.9 The mechanisms responsible for the development of this cataract are not understood. However, this mutation affects a critical position within the connexin molecule at the predicted interface between the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain and the first transmembrane domain (Fig. 1). Structural models suggest the importance of this residue for maintaining associations of transmembrane domains.39 Substitutions of this amino acid have been identified in the mutant forms of at least three other connexins associated with other diseases.40-44 The present experiments were designed to elucidate the mechanism of cataract formation in patients carrying the mutation CX50R23T by examining the cellular distribution and physiological function of the CX50R23T mutant and of site-directed mutants containing other amino acid substitutions at this position.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Diagram of the membrane topology of human CX50 showing the position of the R23T substitution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Generation of Connexin Mutants

CX50 mutants were generated by PCR using DNA polymerase (Phusion High-Fidelity polymerase; New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) and human CX50 wild-type DNA in pcDNA3.1(+) or pcDNA3.1/Hygro(+) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as a template. The primers were designed and mutagenesis was performed according to the strategy used previously by Minogue et al.38 Primers facing opposite directions and spanning the DNA region encoding amino acids 14 to 35 were designed to amplify the sequence of the full construct (including the vector sequence); the plasmid was regenerated by re-ligation of the PCR product. All mutations were produced using the same sense primer (encoding amino acids 25-35): 5′-TGGCTCACCGTGCTTTTCATCTTCCGGATCCTC-3′.

The antisense primers encoded amino acids 14 to 24 and contained the mutated codon 23 (designated in bold): 5′-GACTGT-GCCGATGACGGTGGAGTGCTCATTCAC-3′ (CX50R23T); 5′-GAC-GTCGCCGATGACGGTGGAGTGCTCATTCAC-3′ (CX50R23D); 5′-GACTTCGCCGATGACGGTGGAGTGCTCATTCAC-3′ (CX50R23E); 5′-GACTTTGCCGATGACGGTGGAGTGCTCATTCAC-3′ (CX50R23K); 5′-GACTAAGCCGATGACGGTGGAGTGCTCATTCAC-3′ (CX50R23L); 5′-GACCCAGCCGATGACGGTGGAGTGCTCATTCAC-3′ (CX50R23W).

The DNA sequences coding for the CX50 mutants were fully sequenced at the Cancer Research Center DNA Sequencing Facility of the University of Chicago, to ensure that PCR amplification did not introduce additional unwanted mutations.

Chemicals

All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise specified.

Cell Culture and Transfections

All cell culture media and supplements were obtained from Invitrogen, unless otherwise noted. HeLa and Neuro-2a (N2a) cells were grown in MEM supplemented with 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 10% fetal bovine serum (US Bio-Technologies Inc., Pottstown, PA), 2 mM glutamine, 10 U/mL penicillin G, and 10 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate. Transfections were performed with transfection reagents (Lipofectin and PLUS Reagent) used according to the manufacturer's instructions. For stable transfections of CX50R23T in pcDNA3.1(+), clones were selected by their resistance to geneticin (1 mg/mL). Generation of HeLa cells stably transfected with human CX50 (HeLaCx50) has been described.36

Antibodies

Rabbit polyclonal anti-CX50 antibodies were characterized previously.36 Mouse monoclonal anti-CX50 IgM antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen. Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, Cy2-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA).

Immunoblot Analysis

Cells were grown to 90% to 100% confluence in 100-mm dishes and harvested in PBS supplemented with EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Complete Mini; Roche, Indianapolis, IN), 1 mM EDTA, and 2 mM PMSF. Harvested cells were sonicated and cell homogenates were stored at -20°C until subjected to electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis. Aliquots from cell homogenates were mixed with loading dye and boiled. The proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-containing polyacrylamide gels and transferred to membranes (Immobilon P; Milli-pore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.4) for at least 30 minutes at room temperature and incubated in rabbit polyclonal anti-CX50 antibodies overnight at 4°C. After they were rinsed in TBS and TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, the membranes were incubated in HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies for 30 minutes at room temperature, followed by more washes in TBS. The detection of bound HRP-conjugated antibodies was performed with enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) and exposure of blots to blue biofilm (Denville Scientific, South Plainfield, NJ).

Immunofluorescence

Cells plated on four-well chamber slides (Lab Tek; Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL) or glass coverslips were allowed to reach 80% to 90% confluence and subjected to immunofluorescence staining, as described previously.38 Briefly, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4), blocked and permeabilized in 4% normal goat serum with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS and incubated in primary antibodies, either overnight at 4°C or for 2 hours at room temperature. The cells were then rinsed with PBS and incubated in Cy2- and/or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies for 30 to 45 minutes at room temperature. After the cells were rinsed with PBS, the coverslips were mounted using 2% n-propylgallate in PBS/glycerol (1:1).

Specimens were studied by microscopy with a ×40 objective (Plan Apochromat in an Axioplan 2 microscope; (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Munich, Germany). The images were captured with a digital camera (Axiocam; Carl Zeiss Meditec) using Zeiss AxioVision software. Overlap images were generated with one of two image-analysis software programs (Image J (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ developed by Wayne Rasband and provided in the public domain by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD; or Adobe Photoshop; Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA).

Microinjection of Gap Junction Tracers

Cells cultured on glass coverslips (80%-90% confluence) were transferred to F-12 medium (Invitrogen) buffered with 15 mM HEPES. Individual cells were impaled and injected for 3 minutes with a picospritzer (model PLI-188; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and a micropipette filled with 5% Lucifer yellow (charge = -2, Mr = 457; Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) and 4% neurobiotin (charge = +1, Mr = 322.8; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA).

After injection, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 to 30 minutes and then permeabilized with methanol/acetone (1:1) for 2 minutes at room temperature. The neurobiotin tracer was detected by staining the cells with Cy3-streptavidin conjugate (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The extent of intercellular transfer of both tracers was determined by counting the number of adjacent cells containing the tracer. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test.

For injections of transiently transfected cells, the cells were cotransfected with a eukaryotic expression vector that produces GFP (GTX-EMD-pcDNA3.1neo, courteously provided by John Kyle, University of Chicago), and clusters of transfected cells were identified by their green fluorescence.

Electrophysiological Methods

Experiments were performed on cell pairs. Junctional currents from cell pairs were recorded using the double whole-cell, patch-clamp technique, as described previously.45,46 Briefly, glass coverslips with adherent cells were transferred to an experimental chamber mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope (model IX71; Olympus, Lake Success, NY). The chamber was perfused with bath solution containing 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 5 mM glucose, 2 mM CsCl, and 2 mM BaCl2. Patch pipettes were pulled from glass capillaries (code GC150F-10; Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) with a horizontal puller (DMZ-Universal, Zeitz-Instrumente, Munich, Germany). The patch pipettes were filled with solution containing 120 mM Kaspartate, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgATP, 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), and 10 mM EGTA (pCa ~8) that had been filtered through 0.22-μm pores. When filled, the resistance of the pipettes measured 1 to 5 MΩ.

RESULTS

Predominantly Cytoplasmic Distribution of CX50R23T

To examine the cellular behavior of CX50R23T, HeLa cells were stably transfected with the mutant (HeLaCX50R23T) and compared with HeLa cells that stably expressed wild-type CX50 (HeLaCX50).

The presence of CX50 and CX50R23T protein in the transfected cells was verified by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 2A). A band of the expected size (Mr ~62 kDa) was detected in both cell lines. CX50 immunoreactivity was absent from homogenates of untransfected cells (not shown).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Expression levels and immunolocalization of wild-type CX50 and CX50R23T proteins in stably transfected HeLa cells. (A) Immunoblot analysis of HeLaCX50 and HeLaCX50R23T with polyclonal anti-CX50 antibodies revealed similar levels of immunoreactive CX50 protein of identical electrophoretic mobility. Left: migration positions of the molecular mass standards. (B-D) Immunofluorescence localization of wild-type CX50 (B) and CX50R23T (C, D). The wild-type CX50 formed abundant gap junction plaques (B, arrows). CX50R23T localized predominantly in the cytoplasm (C), but it also showed very rare formation of small gap junction plaques (D, arrows). Bar: (B)20 μm; (C)16 μm; (D)12 μm.

The cellular distribution pattern of CX50 and CX50R23T in stable transfectants was determined by immunofluorescence. Wild-type CX50 immunoreactivity was detected at appositional membranes and in a perinuclear cytoplasmic location in HeLaCX50 cells (Fig. 2B). Gap junction plaques were frequent, and many large plaques were observed. In contrast, the mutant CX50R23T was predominantly located in the cytoplasm (Figs. 2C, 2D). No gap junction plaques were present between most cells (Fig. 2C). However, in rare cases, CX50R23T was found at appositional membranes; the very few plaques that could be observed were small (Fig. 2D).

Formation of Functional Gap Junction Channels

To test the ability of CX50R23T to form functional gap junction channels, we microinjected individual cells within monolayers of HeLaCX50 or HeLaCX50R23T cells with the gap junction tracers Lucifer yellow and neurobiotin and quantified intercellular communication by counting the number of tracer-containing neighbors (Fig. 3A). Neither cell line allowed significant transfer of Lucifer yellow (Fig. 3B), consistent with the lack of permeability of CX50 channels to this dye.47 The HeLaCX50 cells showed extensive intercellular transfer of neurobiotin (19.54 ± 3.40 coupled cells; n = 39); in contrast, the cells expressing CX50R23T showed almost no transfer of neurobiotin (0.37 ± 0.10 coupled cells, n = 38; Fig. 3B).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Intercellular transfer of microinjected gap junction permeant tracers in stably transfected HeLa cells. (A) Photomicrographs obtained after microinjection of a solution containing Lucifer yellow (LY) and neurobiotin (NB) into HeLa cells expressing CX50 (wt) or CX50R23T (R23T). Neither cell line showed significant intercellular transfer of Lucifer yellow; this yellow dye allows identification of the injected cell. Cells expressing wild-type CX50 displayed extensive transfer of neurobiotin, whereas those expressing CX50R23T did not allow significant intercellular passage of this tracer. Bar: (top)40 μm; 50 μm(bottom). (B) The number of HeLaCX50 (wt) or HeLaCX50R23T (R23T) cells receiving Lucifer yellow (■) or neurobiotin (■) from the injected cell. Bars represent the mean ± SEM; n = 39 (wt), n = 38 (R23T); *P < 0.0001, Student's t-test.

To examine the effects of the mutant on conductance of current-carrying ions, gap junctional coupling in pairs of HeLaCX50 or HeLaCX50R23T cells was also studied using the double whole-cell, patch-clamp technique (Table 1). The HeLaCX50 cells were well coupled, with 100% of cell pairs studied showing coupling. These cell pairs had a mean total junctional conductance of 18.71 nS. In contrast, most pairs of HeLaCX50R23T cells were not coupled; moreover, the few cell pairs that were coupled had a mean total junctional conductance of only 0.50 nS.

Table 1.

Gap Junction Conductances Induced by Wild-Type CX50 or CX50R23T in Transfected HeLa and N2a Cells

Cell Type Connexin Total Cell Pairs (n) Coupled Cell Pairs (n) Uncoupled Cell Pairs (n) Conductance (Mean nS ± SEM)
HeLa CX50 10 10 0 18.71 ± 2.91
CX50R23T 19 5 14 0.50 ± 0.21
CX50+CX50R23T 18 12 6 0.20 ± 0.25
N2a CX50 12 12 0 16.1 ± 4.5
CX50R23T 19 0 19 0.0 ± 0.0

Representative examples of gap junction currents (Ij)recorded between HeLaCX50 and HeLaCX50R23T cell pairs are shown in Figure 4A (left and right, respectively). Currents elicited from HeLaCX50 cells using a symmetrical bipolar pulse protocol (5s, from ±10 to ±110 mV) showed voltage and time-dependent current deactivation. In the cases in which HeLaCX50R23T cells were coupled, junctional currents were of much lower amplitudes (as exemplified in Fig 4A, right); they resembled currents recorded from cells expressing CX45 (i.e., they were consistent with endogenous channels present in HeLa cells).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Macroscopic and single-channel properties of CX50 gap junctions. (A) Gap junction currents (Ij) elicited by a bipolar pulse protocol from HeLa cell pairs transfected with wild-type CX50 (left) and CX50R23T (right). (B) Summary plot of normalized steady state gj versus Vj from five HeLaCX50 cell pairs. The continuous line represents the best fit of the data to the Boltzman equation with Vj,0 = -53 mV/+55 mV and gj,min= 0.26/0.22, for negative/positive Vj, respectively. (C) Pulse protocol (V1 and V2) and associated single-channel current (I2) recorded from a N2aCX50 cell pair during maintained Vj of ± 50 mV. Dashed line: zero current level. The all-points current histograms revealed conductances of 194 and 200 pS for negative and positive Vj, respectively.

The summary plot of normalized steady state conductances (gss) versus transjunctional voltage (Vj) from five HeLaCX50 cell pairs is shown in Figure 4B. The data were best fitted to the Boltzman equation with the following parameters: Vj,0 = -53 mV/+55 mV and normalized gjmin = 0.26/0.22 for negative/positive Vj, respectively.

In the HeLaCX50 and N2aCX50cells, channels were observed with unitary conductances of ~200 pS, consistent with the single-channel sizes previously observed for CX50 channels.47,48 Figure 4C illustrates single-channel currents obtained from a poorly coupled N2aCX50 cell pair. Voltage steps of Vj = ±50 mV revealed associated unitary channel conductances of 194 and 200 pS for negative and positive Vj, respectively. In contrast, the few channels detected in coupled pairs of HeLa CX50R23T cells had single channel conductances of <40pS, consistent with endogenous channels that have been detected in HeLa cells49 (data not shown).

To confirm that CX50R23T did not form low-conductance channels, CX50 and CX50R23T were transiently transfected into N2a cells, a cell line devoid of endogenous connexin channels. All the pairs of N2a cells expressing CX50 exhibited junctional conductances that were similar to those determined in the HeLaCX50 cell pairs (i.e., 16.2 nS). In contrast, none of the pairs of cells expressing CX50R23T were coupled (Table 1).

Because the cataracts are inherited as an autosomal dominant trait in the family where CX50R23T was discovered,9 we also examined the consequences of coexpression of CX50R23T with its wild-type counterpart by transiently transfecting the HeLaCX50 cells with CX50R23T. We found very low gap junctional conductances in many of these cell pairs (indistinguishable from those in HeLaCX50R23T cells), and we found that some (6/18) of these cell pairs were totally uncoupled (Table 1).

Taken together, these data indicate that CX50R23T does not form functional channels allowing passage of either gap junction-permeant tracers (neurobiotin) or current-carrying ions, and it acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor of wild-type CX50.

Effect of Substitution of Other Amino Acid Residues for R23

To study the importance of R23 in determining the ability of CX50 to produce gap junction plaques and to form functional channels, we generated several other CX50R23 substitution mutants. The mutants were chosen to replace amino acids that differed in charge, size, and/or polarity. R23 in CX50 was replaced with the negatively charged glutamate (E) or aspartate (D), positively charged lysine (K), bulky and nonpolar tryptophan (W), or nonpolar leucine (L). All these mutants, as well as wild-type CX50 and CX50R23T, were transiently transfected into HeLa cells and analyzed for plaque formation by immunofluorescence. As expected, the wild-type CX50 formed plaques (Fig. 5A), whereas CX50R23T had a cytoplasmic distribution (Fig. 5B). Detectable plaques failed to form in the negatively charged substitution mutants CX50R23D and CX50R23E (Figs. 5C, 5D). All other mutants (CX50R23K, CX50R23L, and CX50R23W) showed plaque formation (Figs. 5E-G).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Cellular localization of CX50R23 substitution mutants. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with wild-type CX50 (A), CX50R23T (B), CX50R23D (C), CX50R23E (D), CX50R23K (E), CX50R23L (F), or CX50R23W (G), and CX50 immunoreactivity was detected by immunofluorescence microscopy. Only CX50R23K, CX50R23L, and CX50R23W formed gap junction plaques (arrows). CX50R23D and CX50R23E failed to form plaques. Bar: (A, B, E, G)20 μm; (C)17 μm; (D)13 μm.

To test whether functional gap junction channels would form in these mutants, the constructs were transiently transfected into HeLa cells, and intercellular communication was assessed after microinjection of the gap junction tracers Lucifer yellow and neurobiotin. Similar to the results obtained with the stably transfected cells, we found no evidence of Lucifer yellow transfer among cells expressing wild-type CX50. (None of the R23 substitution mutants allowed Lucifer yellow transfer, either.) As in the stably transfected cells, cells transiently transfected with wild-type CX50 showed extensive intercellular transfer of neurobiotin (Fig. 6). Among the plaque-forming mutants, only the positively charged substitution CX50R23K exhibited neurobiotin transfer at levels comparable to those in cells expressing wild-type CX50 (Fig. 6); the number of coupled cells for CX50R23K (12.05 ± 2.97, n = 20) was not significantly different from those observed for CX50 (13.05 ± 2.85, n = 19). None of the other mutants, including the plaque-forming substitution mutants CX50R23L and CX50R23W, produced levels of neurobiotin transfer that were significantly different from those observed in untransfected (parental) HeLa cells (Fig. 6).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Intercellular transfer of neurobiotin in HeLa cells expressing CX50R23 substitution mutants. Shown are the number of coupled cells that received the tracer from the injected cell. Only CX50R23K, the mutant containing the positive charge substitution, allowed neurobiotin transfer at levels similar to wild-type CX50. None of the other mutants induced intercellular transfer of neurobiotin at levels that differed significantly from those observed in nontransfected (parental) HeLa cells. Bars represent the mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05 compared with untransfected HeLa cells, Student's t-test.

Because CX50R23L and CX50R23W formed gap junction plaques but did not allow transfer of neurobiotin, they were also tested for electrical coupling by double whole-cell, patch-clamp recording after transient transfection. When expressed by themselves in N2a cells, we never observed coupling (n = 15 and 18 for CX50R23L and CX50R23W, respectively). Moreover, each of these mutants acted as a dominant-negative inhibitor of wild-type CX50, abolishing conductances when transfected into HeLaCX50 cells. For HeLaCX50 transfected with CX50R23L, 11 of 11 cell pairs tested were uncoupled. For HeLaCX50 transfected with CX50R23W, 10 of 11 cell pairs were uncoupled, whereas one cell pair had a conductance of 2.8 nS. Control HeLaCX50 cells studied in parallel had a mean conductance of 27.5 nS (n = 4).

DISCUSSION

The results suggest two abnormalities of the cataract-associated human mutant CX50R23T: (1) It is severely impaired in trafficking and formation of gap junction plaques, and (2) it is nonfunctional. The loss of function (and dominant-negative inhibition of the function of coexpressed wild-type CX50) may explain the development of cataract in affected patients, since cataract also develops in mice with deletion of CX50.30

The mutation R23T is located at the boundary between the cytoplasm and the predicted beginning of the first transmembrane domain of CX50. It replaces a positively charged amino acid with an uncharged, polar amino acid. All connexins contain a positively charged amino acid (either arginine [R] or lysine [K]) at the corresponding position. Thus, it may not be surprising that we found no cellular or functional consequence of substituting lysine for arginine in CX50R23K.

Positively charged amino acids in the hydrophilic intracellular domains of membrane proteins are thought to play an important role in the orientation and insertion of hydrophobic transmembrane elements.50 Of the six substitutions for amino acid R23 in CX50 that we tested, three readily formed gap junction plaques when transiently transfected into HeLa cells (R23K, R23L, R23W); only the two that contained negatively charged amino acids (R23D and R23E) completely failed to form plaques. Thus, a complete reversal of the positive charge may lead to removal of a membrane anchor disrupting connexin membrane topology (leading to the observed absence of gap junction plaques).

The importance of this positively charged residue is further emphasized by the identification of mutations of this residue in other connexins associated with other hereditary diseases including X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CX32R22G, CX32R22P, CX32R22E, CX32R22Q),40,41,44 erythrokeratodermia variabilis (CX30.3R22H),42 and oculodentodigital dysplasia (CX43K23T).43 Substitutions for R23 may have additional structural consequences, since Fleishman et al.39 have hypothesized that this amino acid may play a critical role in stabilizing the interactions of the connexin transmembrane helices by forming a salt bridge with a negatively charged amino acid at the cytoplasmic end of the fourth transmembrane domain.

The N-terminal connexin domain appears to be critical for several aspects of connexin function. Site-directed mutagenesis studies have shown that residues in this region influence various physiological properties including transjunctional voltage-dependent gating, unitary conductance, sensitivity to regulation by polyamines, and permeability.51-57 In addition to R23, many of the other N-terminal amino acids (especially charged or polar ones) are altered in connexin-associated diseases such as sensorineural deafness (CX26, CX30, and CX31 http://davinci. crg.es/deafness/) or X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CX32 http://www.molgen.ua.ac.be/CMTMutations/). In addition, a mutation of the neighboring amino acid residue, G22, in the murine CX50, CX50G22R, causes semidominant cataract in the Lop10 mouse; CX50G22R fails to form plaques and functional gap junction channels by itself.26

Our results demonstrate that plaque formation by a connexin variant does not ensure gap junction function. Among our CX50R23 mutants, three (R23K, R23L, and R23W) exhibited proper plasma membrane trafficking and gap junction plaque formation, but only one, CX50R23K, produced functional channels. A discrepancy between plaque formation and function has also been observed for disease-causing mutations within the N-terminal regions of CX26 and CX43. CX26S19T forms plaques, but does not allow intercellular transfer of Lucifer yellow.58 CX43Y17R and CX43G21R localize within gap junction plaques but do not induce junctional conductances in transfected N2a cells.59

Individuals carrying the CX50R23T mutation have congenital nuclear cataracts that progress with age.9 We have shown that CX50R23T is nonfunctional and can completely inhibit the function of wild-type CX50. Thus, even though affected individuals are heterozygous, the expression of the mutant allele would render them effectively null for CX50 function. Therefore, we hypothesize that this mutant leads to cataracts through loss of CX50 mediated intercellular communication. Mice that are homozygous for the targeted disruption of CX50 develop irregular, nuclear pulverulent lens opacities30,31; the lenses of these mice exhibit morphologic changes as early as postnatal day 7 and show particulate precipitates within the nucleus at 6 months of age.30 Thus, the phenotype and progression of cataracts in humans carrying the CX50R23T mutation seem reasonably similar to those in CX50-null mice.

In summary, replacement of a positively charged arginine by an uncharged polar threonine at position 23 in CX50 leads to impaired gap junction plaque formation and loss of function. Our current data demonstrate that the positive charge at position 23 is critical for normal CX50 function. We hypothesize that the replacement of amino acid residue 23 by amino acids that are not positively charged is likely to lead to formation of cataract.

Acknowledgments

Supported by a fellowship within the Postdoctoral Program of the German Academic Exchange Service (BCT) and by National Eye Institute Grant EY08368 (ECB) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL59199 (ECB, PRB).

Footnotes

Disclosure: B.C. Thomas, None; P.J. Minogue, None; V. Valiunas, None; G. Kanaporis, None; P.R. Brink, None; V.M. Berthoud, None; E.C. Beyer, None

References

  • 1.Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:844–851. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reddy MA, Francis PJ, Berry V, Bhattacharya SS, Moore AT. Molecular genetic basis of inherited cataract and associated phenotypes. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004;49:300–315. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shiels A, Mackay D, Ionides A, Berry V, Moore A, Bhattacharya S. A missense mutation in the human connexin50 gene (GJA8) underlies autosomal dominant “zonular pulverulent” cataract, on chromosome 1q. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:526–532. doi: 10.1086/301762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berry V, Mackay D, Khaliq S, et al. Connexin 50 mutation in a family with congenital “zonular nuclear” pulverulent cataract of Pakistani origin. Hum Genet. 1999;105:168–170. doi: 10.1007/s004399900094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mackay D, Ionides A, Kibar Z, et al. Connexin46 mutations in autosomal dominant congenital cataract. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:1357–1364. doi: 10.1086/302383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rees MI, Watts P, Fenton I, et al. Further evidence of autosomal dominant congenital zonular pulverulent cataracts linked to 13q11 (CZP3) and a novel mutation in connexin 46 (GJA3) Hum Genet. 2000;106:206–209. doi: 10.1007/s004390051029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Polyakov AV, Shagina IA, Khlebnikova OV, Evgrafov OV. Mutation in the connexin 50 gene (GJA8) in a Russian family with zonular pulverulent cataract. Clin Genet. 2001;60:476–478. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.600614.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jiang H, Jin Y, Bu L, et al. A novel mutation in GJA3 (connexin46) for autosomal dominant congenital nuclear pulverulent cataract. Mol Vis. 2003;9:579–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Willoughby CE, Arab S, Gandhi R, et al. A novel GJA8 mutation in an Iranian family with progressive autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract. J Med Genet. 2003;40:e124. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.11.e124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bennett TM, Mackay DS, Knopf HL, Shiels A. A novel missense mutation in the gene for gap-junction protein α3(GJA3) associated with autosomal dominant “nuclear punctate” cataracts linked to chromosome 13q. Mol Vis. 2004;10:376–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Burdon KP, Wirth MG, Mackey DA, et al. A novel mutation in the connexin 46 gene causes autosomal dominant congenital cataract with incomplete penetrance. J Med Genet. 2004;41:e106. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.018333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li Y, Wang J, Dong B, Man H. A novel connexin46 (GJA3) mutation in autosomal dominant congenital nuclear pulverulent cataract. Mol Vis. 2004;10:668–671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Devi RR, Reena C, Vijayalakshmi P. Novel mutations in GJA3 associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in the Indian population. Mol Vis. 2005;11:846–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ma Z, Zheng J, Yang F, et al. Two novel mutations of connexin genes in Chinese families with autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1535–1537. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.075184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arora A, Minogue PJ, Liu X, et al. A novel GJA8 mutation is associated with autosomal dominant lamellar pulverulent cataract:further evidence for gap junction dysfunction in human cataract. J Med Genet. 2006;43:e2. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.034108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Devi RR, Vijayalakshmi P. Novel mutations in GJA8 associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract and microcornea. Mol Vis. 2006;12:190–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arora A, Minogue PJ, Liu X, et al. A novel connexin50 mutation associated with congenital nuclear pulverulent cataract. J Med Genet. 2008;45:155–160. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.051029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Goodenough DA. The crystalline lens:a system networked by gap junctional intercellular communication. Semin Cell Biol. 1992;3:49–58. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4682(10)80007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Donaldson P, Kistler J, Mathias RT. Molecular solutions to mammalian lens transparency. News Physiol Sci. 2001;16:118–123. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.2001.16.3.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.White TW, Bruzzone R, Goodenough DA, Paul DL. Mouse Cx50, a functional member of the connexin family of gap junction proteins, is the lens fiber protein MP70. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:711–720. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.7.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paul DL, Ebihara L, Takemoto LJ, Swenson KI, Goodenough DA. Connexin46, a novel lens gap junction protein, induces voltage-gated currents in nonjunctional plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1991;115:1077–1089. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.4.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Beyer EC, Kistler J, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. Antisera directed against connexin43 peptides react with a 43-kD protein localized to gap junctions in myocardium and other tissues. J Cell Biol. 1989;108:595–605. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Musil LS, Beyer EC, Goodenough DA. Expression of the gap junction protein connexin43 in embryonic chick lens:molecular cloning, ultrastructural localization, and post-translational phosphorylation. J Membr Biol. 1990;116:163–175. doi: 10.1007/BF01868674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Steele ECJ, Lyon MF, Favor J, Guillot PV, Boyd Y, Church RL. A mutation in the connexin 50 (Cx50) gene is a candidate for the No2 mouse cataract. Curr Eye Res. 1998;17:883–889. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.17.9.883.5144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Graw J, Loster J, Soewarto D, et al. Characterization of a mutation in the lens-specific MP70 encoding gene of the mouse leading to a dominant cataract. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73:867–876. doi: 10.1006/exer.2001.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chang B, Wang X, Hawes NL, et al. A Gja8 (Cx50) point mutation causes an alteration of α3 connexin (Cx46) in semi-dominant cataracts of Lop10 mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:507–513. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.5.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yoshida M, Harada Y, Kaidzu S, Ohira A, Masuda J, Nabika T. New genetic model rat for congenital cataracts due to a connexin 46 (Gja3) mutation. Pathol Int. 2005;55:732–737. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xia CH, Cheung D, Derosa AM, et al. Knock-in of α3 connexin prevents severe cataracts caused by an α8 point mutation. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:2138–2144. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gong X, Li E, Klier G, et al. Disruption of α3 connexin gene leads to proteolysis and cataractogenesis in mice. Cell. 1997;91:833–843. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80471-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.White TW, Goodenough DA, Paul DL. Targeted ablation of connexin50 in mice results in microphthalmia and zonular pulverulent cataracts. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:815–825. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.3.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rong P, Wang X, Niesman I, et al. Disruption of Gja8 (α8 connexin) in mice leads to microphthalmia associated with retardation of lens growth and lens fiber maturation. Development. 2002;129:167–174. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chung J, Berthoud VM, Novak L, et al. Transgenic overexpression of connexin50 induces cataracts. Exp Eye Res. 2007;84:513–528. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu X, Ebihara L. Characterization of a mouse Cx50 mutation associated with the No2 mouse cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1844–1850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pal JD, Liu X, Mackay D, et al. Connexin46 mutations linked to congenital cataract show loss of gap junction channel function. Am J Physiol. 2000;279:C596–C602. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.3.C596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pal JD, Berthoud VM, Beyer EC, Mackay D, Shiels A, Ebihara L. Molecular mechanism underlying a Cx50-linked congenital cataract. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:C1443–C1446. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1999.276.6.C1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berthoud VM, Minogue PJ, Guo J, et al. Loss of function and impaired degradation of a cataract-associated mutant connexin50. Eur J Cell Biol. 2003;82:209–221. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-00316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Derosa AM, Xia CH, Gong X, White TW. The cataract-inducing S50P mutation in Cx50 dominantly alters the channel gating of wild-type lens connexins. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:4107–4116. doi: 10.1242/jcs.012237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Minogue PJ, Liu X, Ebihara L, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM. An aberrant sequence in a connexin46 mutant underlies congenital cataracts. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:40788–40795. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504765200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fleishman SJ, Sabag AD, Ophir E, Avraham KB, Ben Tal N. The structural context of disease-causing mutations in gap junctions. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:28958–28963. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605764200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ionasescu VV, Searby C, Ionasescu R. Point mutations of the connexin32 (GJB1) gene in X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:355–358. doi: 10.1093/hmg/3.2.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ressot C, Latour P, Blanquet-Grossard F, et al. X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy (CMTX):new mutations in the connexin32 gene. Hum Genet. 1996;98:172–175. doi: 10.1007/s004390050183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Richard G, Brown N, Rouan F, et al. Genetic heterogeneity in erythrokeratodermia variabilis:Novel mutations in the connexin gene GJB4 (Cx30.3) and genotype-phenotype correlations. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120:601–609. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12080.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Paznekas WA, Boyadjiev SA, Shapiro RE, et al. Connexin 43 (GJA1) mutations cause the pleiotropic phenotype of oculodentodigital dysplasia. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:408–418. doi: 10.1086/346090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang HL, Chang WT, Yeh TH, Wu T, Chen MS, Wu CY. Functional analysis of connexin-32 mutants associated with X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2004;15:361–370. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Valiunas V, Gemel J, Brink PR, Beyer EC. Gap junction channels formed by coexpressed connexin40 and connexin43. Am J Physiol. 2001;281:H1675–H1689. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.281.4.H1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gemel J, Valiunas V, Brink PR, Beyer EC. Connexin43 and connexin26 form gap junctions, but not heteromeric channels in co-expressing cells. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:2469–2480. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Srinivas M, Costa M, Gao Y, Fort A, Fishman GI, Spray DC. Voltage dependence of macroscopic and unitary currents of gap junction channels formed by mouse connexin50 expressed in rat neuroblastoma cells. J Physiol (Lond) 1999;517:673–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0673s.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xu X, Berthoud VM, Beyer EC, Ebihara L. Functional role of the carboxyl terminal domain of human connexin 50 in gap junctional channels. J Membr Biol. 2002;186:101–112. doi: 10.1007/s00232-001-0139-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Eckert R, Dunina Barkovskaya A, Hulser DF. Biophysical characterization of gap-junction channels in HeLa cells. Pflugers Arch. 1993;424:335–342. doi: 10.1007/BF00384361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sipos L, Heijne G. Predicting the topology of eukaryotic membrane proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1993;213:1333–1340. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Verselis VK, Ginter CS, Bargiello TA. Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins. Nature. 1994;368:348–351. doi: 10.1038/368348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Oh S, Abrams CK, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA. Stoichiometry of transjunctional voltage-gating polarity reversal by a negative charge substitution in the amino terminus of a connexin32 chimera. J Gen Physiol. 2000;116:13–32. doi: 10.1085/jgp.116.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Purnick PE, Oh S, Abrams CK, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA. Reversal of the gating polarity of gap junctions by negative charge substitutions in the N-terminus of connexin 32. Biophys J. 2000;79:2403–2415. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76485-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Musa H, Fenn E, Crye M, Gemel J, Beyer EC, Veenstra RD. Amino terminal glutamate residues confer spermine sensitivity and affect voltage gating and channel conductance of rat connexin40 gap junctions. J Physiol. 2004;557:863–878. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tong JJ, Liu X, Dong L, Ebihara L. Exchange of gating properties between rat cx46 and chicken cx45.6. Biophys J. 2004;87:2397–2406. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.039594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tong JJ, Ebihara L. Structural determinants for the differences in voltage gating of chicken Cx56 and Cx45.6 gap-junctional hemichannels. Biophys J. 2006;91:2142–2154. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.082859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dong L, Liu X, Li H, Vertel BM, Ebihara L. Role of the N-terminus in permeability of chicken connexin45.6 gap junctional channels. J Physiol. 2006;576:787–799. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.113837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.D'Andrea P, Veronesi V, Bicego M, et al. Hearing loss:frequency and functional studies of the most common connexin26 alleles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;296:685–691. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)00891-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shibayama J, Paznekas W, Seki A, et al. Functional characterization of connexin43 mutations found in patients with oculodentodigital dysplasia. Circ Res. 2005;96:e83–e91. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000168369.79972.d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES