Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1990 Mar;28(3):608–609. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.3.608-609.1990

Interpretive criteria for disk diffusion susceptibility testing of mupirocin, a topical antibiotic.

P C Fuchs 1, R N Jones 1, A L Barry 1
PMCID: PMC269673  PMID: 2108997

Abstract

Five hundred gram-positive clinical bacterial isolates were tested for susceptibility to mupirocin by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods (5- and 10-micrograms disks). All but 1 of 330 staphylococci (including 100 oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) were susceptible to less than or equal to 1.0 micrograms of mupirocin per ml. With a susceptible MIC breakpoint of less than or equal to 2.0 micrograms/ml, the corresponding zone diameter breakpoints were greater than or equal to 14 mm for 5-micrograms disks and greater than or equal to 16 mm for 10-micrograms disks. With either disk potency, susceptible staphylococci were effectively separated from more resistant gram-positive species such as the enterococci and gram-positive bacilli.

Full text

PDF
608

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Casewell M. W., Hill R. L. Elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin ('pseudomonic acid')--a controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Mar;17(3):365–372. doi: 10.1093/jac/17.3.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Casewell M. W., Hill R. L. In-vitro activity of mupirocin ('pseudomonic acid') against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 May;15(5):523–531. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.5.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dacre J. E., Emmerson A. M., Jenner E. A. Nasal carriage of gentamicin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with topical pseudomonic acid. Lancet. 1983 Oct 29;2(8357):1036–1036. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frank U., Lenz W., Damrath E., Kappstein I., Daschner F. D. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus treated with topical mupirocin (pseudomonic acid) in a children's hospital. J Hosp Infect. 1989 Feb;13(2):117–120. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(89)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fuller A. T., Mellows G., Woolford M., Banks G. T., Barrow K. D., Chain E. B. Pseudomonic acid: an antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Nature. 1971 Dec 17;234(5329):416–417. doi: 10.1038/234416a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rode H., Hanslo D., de Wet P. M., Millar A. J., Cywes S. Efficacy of mupirocin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus burn wound infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug;33(8):1358–1361. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.8.1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sutherland R., Boon R. J., Griffin K. E., Masters P. J., Slocombe B., White A. R. Antibacterial activity of mupirocin (pseudomonic acid), a new antibiotic for topical use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Apr;27(4):495–498. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.4.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES