Summary
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an enteric hormone that stimulates insulin secretion and improves glycaemia in type 2 diabetes. Although GLP-1-based treatments are clinically available, alternative strategies to increase endogenous GLP-1 release from L cells are hampered by our limited physiological understanding of this cell type. By generating transgenic mice with L cell-specific expression of a fluorescent protein, we studied the characteristics of primary L cells by electrophysiology, fluorescence calcium imaging, and expression analysis and show that single L cells are electrically excitable and glucose responsive. Sensitivity to tolbutamide and low-millimolar concentrations of glucose and α-methylglucopyranoside, assessed in single L cells and by hormone secretion from primary cultures, suggested that GLP-1 release is regulated by the activity of sodium glucose cotransporter 1 and ATP-sensitive K+ channels, consistent with their high expression levels in purified L cells by quantitative RT-PCR. These and other pathways identified using this approach will provide exciting opportunities for future physiological and therapeutic exploration.
Keywords: HUMDISEASE
Introduction
Enteroendocrine L cells secrete a number of physiologically important peptides, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2), peptide YY (PYY) and oxyntomodulin. Each of these hormones is under evaluation for potential therapeutic applications in humans. GLP-1 mimetics and inhibitors of GLP-1 degradation are already licensed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, exploiting the important role of GLP-1 in the stimulation and maintenance of insulin release from pancreatic β cells and in the control of appetite (Drucker and Nauck, 2006; Holst, 2007). GLP-2, by contrast, enhances regeneration and repair of the intestinal epithelium (Estall and Drucker, 2006), whereas PYY and oxyntomodulin reduce food intake in rodents and humans (Wynne and Bloom, 2006). Targeting secretion from the L cell, therefore, provides exciting new therapeutic opportunities, and a more detailed characterization of the molecular and cellular physiology of this cell type is urgently needed to fuel the future progress of this research field.
L cells form a component of the diffuse enteroendocrine system, which includes a variety of endocrine cell types scattered along the length of the intestinal epithelium. To date, the dispersed nature of enteroendocrine cells has largely precluded their interrogation by single-cell physiological techniques. Histamine-producing enterochromaffin-like cells, which can be partially purified and maintained in short-term culture, are regulated by voltage-dependent calcium entry but are not believed to be electrically active, as they lack voltage-gated sodium currents (Bufler et al., 1998). For most other enteroendocrine cell types, single-cell characterization has been restricted to the study of model cell lines. GLUTag, STC-1, and NCI-H716 cells secrete GLP-1 (Drucker et al., 1994; Abello et al., 1994; Reimer et al., 2001) but exhibit different nutrient sensitivities and are incompletely validated as accurate models of the native L cell. While GLP-1 release has also been studied in primary cultures of fetal rat intestinal cells (Brubaker and Vranic, 1987), establishing cultures from adult intestinal tissue has presented more of a challenge.
GLP-1 release is triggered by ingestion of carbohydrates, fats, and protein and is believed to reflect, at least in part, the direct sensing of luminal nutrients by the apical processes of the L cells. In GLUTag cells, we previously identified two distinct pathways that couple GLP-1 secretion to glucose exposure, one involving the classical glucose-sensing machinery employed by the pancreatic β cell, mediated through glucose metabolism and closure of ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels, and the other exploiting the electrogenic nature of Na+-coupled glucose uptake by sodium glucose cotransporters (SGLTs) (Reimann and Gribble, 2002; Gribble et al., 2003). However, subunits of the taste receptor pathway (Tas1 receptors and α-gustducin) have also been detected in intestinal cells, including some cells that coexpress GLP-1 (Sutherland et al., 2007), and recent evidence suggests that they may contribute to the stimulation of GLP-1 release and the upregulation of intestinal SGLT1 expression following sugar ingestion (Jang et al., 2007; Margolskee et al., 2007).
To enable a molecular and single-cell characterization of GLP-1 secretory mechanisms, we made a transgenic mouse model in which cells expressing proglucagon were labeled by the yellow fluorescent protein, Venus (Nagai et al., 2002). This was used to interrogate components of the stimulus-secretion coupling pathways underlying GLP-1 release, using electrophysiological recordings and fluorescence-based calcium measurements from identified adult murine L cells in primary culture and supported by expression analysis and measurements of hormone secretion from primary intestinal cultures.
Results
Pronuclear injection of BAC constructs containing the Venus sequence in the place of the coding region of proglucagon (described in Supplemental Experimental Procedures and Figure S1 available online) resulted in the generation of five founder mice with 1 to 12 copies of the transgene, as assessed by quantitative PCR. Sporadic yellow fluorescent cells were observed in freshly harvested tissue from the gastrointestinal tract, pancreatic islets, and brainstem of the transgenic mice, coinciding with the known locations of GLP-1 and glucagon expression (Larsson et al., 1975; Larsen et al., 1997). As we observed no differences between the strains in the global pattern of Venus expression in the gut and pancreas, the five strains were used interchangeably for the remainder of the study.
In the gut, Venus-positive cells increased in density along the intestinal axis from the duodenum to the colon in agreement with previous descriptions of GLP-1-positive cells identified by immunohistochemistry (Larsson et al., 1975). The cells were located in both crypts and villi and were frequently observed to have thin processes extending to the gut lumen. In all strains, Venus fluorescence in the intestine coincided with immunofluorescence staining for proglucagon (Figure 1A). Proglucagon gene expression was 11,000-fold higher, and GLP-1 protein content was >7000-fold higher in Venus-positive cells (Lpos) purified by FACS (Figure 1B) than in nonfluorescent cells collected in parallel (Lneg), thus confirming the cell specificity of expression of the fluorescent transgene (Figures 1C and 1D). Consistent with previous reports, Lpos cells in the gut also produced PYY, detectable at the mRNA and protein levels as well as by immunofluorescence staining (Figures 1C, 1D, and S1B). GIP mRNA (data not shown) and protein (Figure 1D) was found in L cells from the small intestine only, although their GIP protein content was 6-fold lower than that of K cells purified by a similar method (F.R., unpublished data). These results are compatible with previous reports that GIP is detectable by immunostaining in a subset of small intestinal L cells (Mortensen et al., 2003).
In pancreatic islets, Venus fluorescence colocalized with proglucagon immunostaining, confirming the identity of the labeled cells as glucagon-producing α cells (Figure S2A). Islet cells from the transgenic mice could be separated by flow cytometry into relatively pure populations of α and β cells and a mixed population of δ and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) cells, as assessed by their hormone expression profiles measured by quantitative RT-PCR (Figures S2B and S2C).
Primary Intestinal Cultures
As FACS-sorted single L cells did not survive in culture, we generated mixed primary cultures from adult mouse small intestine or colon, which could be maintained for up to 2 weeks. Venus-positive cells in the cultures were immunopositive for glucagon and PYY (Figure S1D). Cell proliferation, assessed by EdU incorporation, was evident in the nonfluorescent cell population, but not in the 154 Lpos cells examined (Figure S1E). In 8-day-old colonic cultures, forskolin plus isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX, 10 μM of each) enhanced GLP-1 release 9-fold and PYY release 6-fold (n = 3 of each, data not shown), indicating that the L cells in culture were functionally viable.
Electrical Activity in Colonic L Cells
L cells were readily distinguishable in culture by their Venus fluorescence (Figure 2A). In perforated patch recordings, they were electrically excitable and exhibited an increase in action potential frequency following addition of glucose or the sulphonylurea tolbutamide (Figures 2B and 2C). Conventional whole-cell recordings with a low pipette ATP concentration (0.3 mM) revealed a tolbutamide-sensitive current that developed over the course of 2–5 min, confirming the presence of functional KATP channels in primary L cells (Figure 2D).
Calcium Responses in Colonic L Cells
Cultured L cells, identified by their Venus fluorescence, exhibited intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) elevations (Figures 2E, 2F, and 2G) in response to glucose (10 mM), α-methylglucopyranoside (αMG, 10 mM), tolbutamide (100 μM), KCl (30 mM), forskolin/IBMX (10 μM of each), or bombesin (100 nM), but not to the artificial sweetener sucralose (1 mM or 20 mM). Lneg cells were significantly less responsive than L cells to glucose, tolbutamide, KCl, and bombesin, and a proportion of Lneg cells, but not Lpos cells, responded to sucralose. The significantly greater effects of glucose and tolbutamide on Lpos cells than on Lneg cells suggest that glucose responsiveness originates in the L cells themselves.
GLP-1 Secretion from Primary Cultures
Although glucose-triggered GLP-1 release has been well documented in vivo, as well as in whole intestinal preparations and GLUTag cells (Herrmann et al., 1995; Plaisancié et al., 1995; Reimann and Gribble, 2002), a lack of glucose responsiveness of fetal rat intestinal cultures and primary cultured canine L cells (Brubaker and Vranic, 1987; Damholt et al., 1998) has led to doubts about whether L cells are themselves glucose sensitive. In primary cultures of small intestine and colon, however, GLP-1 secretion was glucose dependent, with EC50s of 4 mM and 0.7 mM, respectively (not significantly different, Figures 3A and 3B). To examine the relative roles of SGLT1 and KATP channels in L cells, we measured GLP-1 responses to the SGLT1 substrate, αMG, or to tolbutamide (Figures 3C and 3D). GLP-1 release was triggered by αMG with a measured EC50 in the small intestine of 0.2 mM (data not shown), not significantly different than that for glucose and similar to the Km for SGLT1 of 0.3 mM (Díez-Sampedro et al., 2000). Secretion was also stimulated by tolbutamide, confirming a functional role for KATP channels. By contrast, GLP-1 secretion was not triggered by 1 mM sucralose or 2 mM acesulfame K, agents that specifically target sweet taste receptors (Figures 3C and 3D). At a higher concentration of 20 mM, sucralose increased GLP-1 release from colonic cultures, but not small intestinal cultures, an effect that was additive with glucose and therefore likely to act via an independent pathway (Figure S3). Overnight pretreatment of colonic cultures with 20 mM sucralose did not affect either basal GLP-1 release or the subsequent response to 10 mM glucose (Figure S3).
Expression of Candidate Glucose-Sensing Machinery in Purified L and Islet Cells
To confirm the identity and expression of candidate glucose-sensing components in L cells, FACS-sorted Lpos and Lneg cells were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR, using probe sets against KATP channel subunits (Kir6.2, Sur1), glucokinase (Gck), facilitative glucose transporters (Glut1, 2, 3, and 5), sodium-coupled glucose transporter 1 (Sglt1), taste receptor subunits (Tas1R1, R2, and R3), and α-gustducin. Comparisons were made with expression levels in GLUTag and STC-1 cells, different islet cell populations, and tongue epithelium (Figure 4 and Table S1).
KATP Channels and Glucokinase
L cells expressed Kir6.2, SUR1, and glucokinase (Gck) at levels that were enhanced several hundred-fold compared with Venus-negative controls and with no apparent differences along the intestinal axis. Expression levels were comparable with those found in pancreatic α, β, and δ/PP cells. Kir6.2 expression was lower even in STC-1 cells than in GLUTag cells (p = 0.002), consistent with a previous report that hormone secretion from an STC-1 subclone was KATP channel independent (Wang et al., 2003).
Facilitative Glucose Transporters
Glut1 expression was similar in Lpos and Lneg cells and increased from the midsmall intestine to colon, whereas Glut2 expression was highest proximally and decreased along the gut axis in both Lpos and Lneg cells. Glut5 was abundant in small intestinal Lneg cells and all Lpos cell populations examined but was 70-fold lower in colonic Lneg than colonic Lpos cells. In pancreatic islets, Glut2 expression was 1200-fold higher and Glut5 5-fold higher in β than α cells, whereas both Glut1 and Glut3 were expressed at similar low levels in both cell types.
Sodium-Coupled Glucose Transporters
Sglt1 was highly expressed in both Lpos and Lneg cells from the small intestine, consistent with its known role in epithelial glucose absorption, whereas, in the colon, we observed a 9-fold lower level of expression in Lneg than Lpos cells (p = 0.002). Immunofluorescence staining localized SGLT1 to the apical membrane of ileal enterocytes and L cells (Figure S1C), and, in colonic cultures, the predominance of SGLT1 in Lpos compared with Lneg cells was also evident by immunostaining (Figure S1F). Sglt1 expression was barely detectable in the islets.
Sweet Taste Receptors
The taste receptor subunit Tas1R3 was expressed at low levels in both the intestine and islets with no apparent difference between Lpos and Lneg cells (Table S1). Tas1R2 expression was generally lower but could be detected in colonic and lower small intestinal Lpos cells as well as pancreatic α cells. α-Gustducin expression was detectable in pancreatic α cells and colonic Lpos cells but was below the detection limit in most other cell preparations tested. Although low, the expressions of the Tas1 receptors and α-gustducin are comparable with those measured in the tongue epithelium, which is known to include a limited proportion of taste-responsive cells.
Expression and Function of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Pathways in L Cells
The ability of elevated cAMP or bombesin (Gq coupled) to increase [Ca2+]i in L cells was shown above. These pathways were also examined by measuring GLP-1 secretion from primary cultures (Figure 3E). GLP-1 release was triggered by forskolin/IBMX or bombesin and was further enhanced by glucose, indicating a potential synergistic interaction between depolarizing stimuli and signaling pathways activated by G protein-coupled receptors.
Lipids have been reported recently to stimulate L cells via G protein-coupled receptors. The Gαs-coupled receptor GPR119 is an orphan G protein coupled receptor responsive to the natural ligand oleoylethanolamide (Overton et al., 2006) and is under evaluation as a therapeutic target in L cells (Chu et al., 2008). The long chain fatty acid receptors GPR120 and GPR40 and the bile acid receptor TGR5 have also been shown to play functional roles in enteroendocrine cell lines (Hirasawa et al., 2005; Katsuma et al., 2005). mRNAs for all of these GPCRs were strongly expressed in FACS-sorted L cells (Figure 4).
Discussion
By fluorescently labeling cells that express proglucagon in a transgenic mouse, we show that primary L cells are electrically excitable and directly nutrient responsive. The fluorescently tagged L cells are suitable for patch clamping, single-cell dynamic calcium imaging, and cell sorting, providing a range of new and powerful techniques to interrogate the function of this enteroendocrine cell type. Our results support the idea that certain nutrients like glucose can directly stimulate L cells by triggering a cascade of membrane depolarization, action potential firing, and voltage-dependent Ca2+ entry. Furthermore, as the electrical activity and glucose responsiveness of primary mouse L cells mimicked our previous findings on the GLUTag cell line (Reimann and Gribble, 2002), our data support the validity of using this cell line as a model for the native L cell.
The low millimolar EC50 for glucose-triggered GLP-1 release from primary intestinal cultures (0.7–4 mM) is similar to that of GLUTag cells (0.2 mM) (Gribble et al., 2003) and close to the reported Km for SGLT1 of 0.3 mM (Díez-Sampedro et al., 2000). Indeed, the finding that the nonmetabolizable glucose analog αMG also triggered GLP-1 release with an EC50 of 0.2 mM suggests that SLGT1 is itself an L cell glucose sensor. By contrast, GLUTag cells were only responsive to αMG at 100 mM, consistent with the 11-fold lower expression of Sglt1 mRNA in the cell line compared with small intestinal Lpos cells. SGLT1 activity underlies a major component of apical membrane glucose uptake in small intestinal enterocytes, utilizing the inwardly directed sodium gradient to drive glucose influx even at low luminal glucose concentrations. Our results support previous reports that the ability of luminal sugars to stimulate GLP-1 release was both sodium dependent and matched the sugar specificity of the intestinal glucose uptake pathway (Herrmann et al., 1995; Ritzel et al., 1997). By contrast, the function of facilitative glucose transporters in L cells remains unclear, although mice lacking GLUT2 had a lower intestinal GLP-1 content and reduced plasma GLP-1 concentrations after an oral glucose tolerance test (Cani et al., 2007). If localized on the basolateral surface as in enterocytes, they could provide an important glucose efflux pathway as well as a potential route to respond to plasma glucose changes. Although GLP-1 release is not stimulated by intravenous glucose administration in fasting human subjects, it was strongly influenced by the plasma glucose concentration in a perfused porcine ileum preparation with a constant flow of luminal glucose (Hansen et al., 2004).
L cells express glucokinase and have functional KATP channels, supporting a recent observation that Kir6.2 was detected in human L cells by immunostaining (Nielsen et al., 2007). The role of KATP channels in L cells is unclear, but it is possible that they might be modulated by basolateral glucose and/or neuronal inputs. As SGLT1-associated currents are relatively small, their effectiveness would be determined by the magnitude of other plasma membrane currents. Alterations of KATP channel activity by metabolism or neurotransmitters might, therefore, provide a route to regulate the sensitivity of an L cell to luminal glucose.
Although recent reports suggest that sweet taste receptor activation stimulates GLP-1 secretion and increases intestinal SGLT1 expression (Jang et al., 2007; Margolskee et al., 2007), this is unlikely to explain our finding that GLP-1 release from primary cultures was triggered by submillimolar glucose concentrations, as sweet taste receptors are typically activated by 30–1000 mM glucose and by low millimolar concentrations of sucralose and acesulfame K (Damak et al., 2003). We were unable to demonstrate an effect of 1 mM sucralose on either GLP-1 release or [Ca2+]i in L cells, consistent with a recent report that sweeteners do not stimulate GLP-1 release in vivo in rats (F. Fujita et al., 2008, American Diabetes Association, abstract). GLP-1 release from colonic cultures was, however, triggered by a relatively high concentration of sucralose (20 mM), an effect that was additive with glucose. Although we are unable to conclude whether the action of the higher concentration of the sweetener is mediated by the sweet taste receptor pathway, colonic Lpos cells did have detectable levels of Tas1R2, Tas1R3, and α-gustducin expression, in agreement with previous reports that a small subpopulation of GLP-1-positive cells also express α-gustducin (Sutherland et al., 2007; Jang et al., 2007). In taste buds, the coupling of sweet taste receptors to α-gustducin and phospholipase Cβ2 results in elevated [Ca2+]i and/or cAMP (Margolskee, 2002). The lack of responsiveness of [Ca2+]i in cultured L cells to sucralose does not appear to reflect a defect in potential downstream signaling pathways, as rapid [Ca2+]i changes in L cells and GLP-1 secretion were triggered by forskolin/IBMX or bombesin.
Glucose-triggered GLP-1 release was amplified by forskolin/IBMX and additive with the response to bombesin. The potent effects of elevated cAMP and Gq-coupled receptor activation, together with the L cell-specific expression of receptors such as Gpr40, Gpr120, Gpr119, and Tgr5 in the intestine, make these pathways exciting targets for the future development of therapeutic L cell secretagogues. The availability of transgenic mice with fluorescently labeled L cells paves the way for a new wave of exploration into the mechanisms underlying GLP-1 and PYY release, with the potential to identify targets in L cells that could be exploited therapeutically for the treatment of diabetes and obesity.
Experimental Procedures
Constructs
BAC constructs containing the sequence of Venus driven by the rat and mouse proglucagon promoters were made by the RedEt technique (Zhang et al., 2000). For further details, see the Supplemental Data.
Intestinal Epithelial Cell Isolation
All animal procedures were approved by the local ethical committee and conformed to Home Office regulations. The 2- to 6-month-old Venus-expressing transgenic mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the gut collected into ice-cold Leibovitz-15 (L-15) medium (PAA, UK). The small intestine (from the stomach to ileocaecal junction) was divided either into thirds (top, mid, and lower) or into halves, as indicated in the text, and colonic samples consisted of gut tissue distal to the ileocolic junction. The intestine was opened, rinsed in L-15, and chopped into 1–2 mm pieces. For flow cytometry, tissue was digested twice for 30 min with 1 mg/ml Collagenase-XI in calcium-free Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) at 37°C. Resulting cell suspensions were filtered through 70 μm nylon cell strainers (BD Falcon, UK), centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min, and pellets resuspended in L-15 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). For culture, tissue was digested with 0.4 mg/ml Collagenase XI, centrifuged at 300 × g, and resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (25 mM glucose) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin. Aliquots were plated on matrigel-coated 24-well plates, 35 mm plastic dishes, or glass-bottom culture dishes (Mattek Corporation, USA) for secretion, electrophysiology, and imaging studies, respectively, and incubated for 1–12 days at 37°C, 5% CO2.
Flow Cytometry
A MoFlo Beckman Coulter Cytomation sorter (488 nm excitation) was used to separate populations of > 95% pure Venus-positive or -negative cells. Settings: 90 μm nozzle, 38–40 psi, 58–60 kHz, plates charged with 3200 V. Single cells were selected by their side and forward scatter and pulse width. Venus-positive cells were selected by their relative fluorescence at 530 and 580 nm, and Venus-negative cells by a gate that excluded Venus fluorescence. Cells were sorted at numbers of up to 30,000 into either RNAlater (Ambion, UK) or lysis buffer for protein extraction (see below).
RNA Extraction and Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA from FACS-sorted cells was isolated using a micro scale RNA isolation kit (Ambion) and reverse transcribed according to standard protocols. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed with 7900 HT Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The PCR reaction mix consisted of first-strand cDNA template, primer pairs (for details, see Supplemental Data), 6-carboxyfluorescein/quencher probes (Bioresearch Technologies, CA and Applied Biosystems), and PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems). In all cases, expression was compared with that of β-actin measured on the same sample in parallel on the same plate, giving a CT difference (ΔCT) for β-actin minus the test gene. CTs for β-actin ranged from 20–25 in the different samples, and reactions in which the test gene was undetectable were assigned a CT value of 40. A ΔCT value of −12 to −15 is, therefore, close to the detection limit of the assay. Mean, standard error, and statistics were performed on the ΔCT data and only converted to relative expression levels (2ˆΔCT) for presentation in the figures.
Hormone Secretion
Secretion studies were performed 24–36 hr after plating using tissue from either transgenic or nontransgenic mice, as preliminary experiments showed that the transgene had no effect on GLP-1 secretion (data not shown). Cultures were incubated with test reagents in bath solution (see below) containing 0.1% fatty acid-free BSA for 2–4 hr at 37°C. Media was collected and centrifuged to remove contaminating cells. Cells were then treated with lysis buffer containing: 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% IGEPAL-CA 630, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, and one tablet of complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) to extract intracellular peptides. GLP-1 was assayed in supernatants and cell extracts using an active GLP-1 ELISA-kit (Millipore, USA); PYY was assayed using a total peptide YY ELISA kit (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc., USA) and GIP by a rodent GIP total ELISA kit (Millipore, USA). Hormone secretion was expressed as a fraction of the total of that hormone measured in each well and normalized, as indicated, to the basal secretion measured in parallel on the same day.
Calcium Imaging
Experiments were performed on 3- to 12-day-old cultures. Cells were loaded in 7 μM fura2-AM (Invitrogen, UK) and 0.01% pluronic F127 and incubated in standard bath solution containing 10 mM glucose and 300 μM eserine for 30 min at 37°C. Experiments were performed using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Eclipse TE2000, Nikon, UK) with a 40× oil-immersion objective. Fura2 was excited at 340 and 380 nm and Venus at 475 nm using a 75 W xenon arc lamp and a monochromator (Cairn Research, Faversham, UK) controlled by MetaFluor software (Molecular Devices, UK). Emission was recorded with a QuantEM CCD camera (Photometrics, Roper Scientific, UK). Fura2 fluorescence measurements were taken every 2 s, background corrected, and expressed as the 340/380 nm ratio. Solutions were perfused at ∼1 ml/min, and test agents were added for 2–5 min. Average fluorescence ratios were determined over 20 s periods under control conditions (before addition of and after washout of the test agent) and at the time of the maximum response during application of the agent.
Electrophysiology
Experiments were performed on 3- to 12-day-old colonic cultures at 22–25°C using techniques and pipette solutions described previously for the study of GLUTag cells (Reimann and Gribble, 2002; Simpson et al., 2007). Slope conductance was calculated for the linear part of the current-voltage relationship between −70 to −50 mV.
Solutions
Standard bath solution contained (mM) 4.5 KCl, 138 NaCl, 4.2 NaHCO3, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 2.6 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.4, NaOH). All chemicals were supplied by Sigma Aldrich (Poole, UK) unless otherwise stated.
Immunohistochemistry
See Supplemental Data.
Data Analysis
Comparisons involving multiple conditions were performed initially either by ANOVA or regression analysis and, subsequently, by Student's two-sample or one-sample t tests (Microsoft Excel), as indicated, with a threshold for significance of p = 0.05. Dose-response curves for glucose-triggered GLP-1 release were fit with a logistic equation and compared using a comparison of fits analysis using Microcal Origin software.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Wellcome Trust, MRC, Lister Institute, and St John's College, Cambridge for funding. We are grateful to Simon McCallum, who advised on and performed FACS sorting, Atsushi Miyawaki (Riken Institute, Japan) for the gift of Venus-containing plasmid, George Kellett (York) for the gift of SGLT1 antibody, GlaxoSmithKline (Durham, NC) for the gift of quantitative RT-PCR primers, and Daniel Drucker (Toronto) for the GLUTag cell line.
Published: December 2, 2008
Footnotes
The Supplemental Data for this article include Supplemental Experimental Procedures, three figures, and three tables and can be found with this article at http://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/S1550-4131(08)00354-9.
Supplemental Data
References
- Abello J., Ye F., Bosshard A., Bernard C., Cuber J.C., Chayvialle J.A. Stimulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion by muscarinic agonist in a murine intestinal endocrine cell line. Endocrinology. 1994;134:2011–2017. doi: 10.1210/endo.134.5.8156901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brubaker P.L., Vranic M. Fetal rat intestinal cells in monolayer culture: a new in vitro system to study the glucagon-like immunoreactive peptides. Endocrinology. 1987;120:1976–1985. doi: 10.1210/endo-120-5-1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bufler J., Choi G.C., Franke C., Schepp W., Prinz C. Voltage-gated Ca2+ currents in rat gastric enterochromaffin-like cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1998;274:C424–C429. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.2.C424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cani P.D., Holst J.J., Drucker D.J., Delzenne N.M., Thorens B., Burcelin R., Knauf C. GLUT2 and the incretin receptors are involved in glucose-induced incretin secretion. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2007;276:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chu Z.L., Carroll C., Alfonso J., Gutierrez V., He H., Lucman A., Pedraza M., Mondala H., Gao H., Bagnol D. A role for intestinal endocrine cell-expressed g protein-coupled receptor 119 in glycemic control by enhancing glucagon-like Peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic Peptide release. Endocrinology. 2008;149:2038–2047. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damak S., Rong M., Yasumatsu K., Kokrashvili Z., Varadarajan V., Zou S., Jiang P., Ninomiya Y., Margolskee R.F. Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. Science. 2003;301:850–853. doi: 10.1126/science.1087155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damholt A.B., Buchan A.M., Kofod H. Glucagon-like-peptide-1 secretion from canine L-cells is increased by glucose-dependent-insulinotropic peptide but unaffected by glucose. Endocrinology. 1998;139:2085–2091. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.4.5921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Díez-Sampedro A., Lostao M.P., Wright E.M., Hirayama B.A. Glycoside binding and translocation in Na+-dependent glucose cotransporters: comparison of SGLT1 and SGLT3. J. Membr. Biol. 2000;176:111–117. doi: 10.1007/s00232001081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drucker D.J., Jin T., Asa S.L., Young T.A., Brubaker P.L. Activation of proglucagon gene transcription by protein kinase-A in a novel mouse enteroendocrine cell line. Mol. Endocrinol. 1994;8:1646–1655. doi: 10.1210/mend.8.12.7535893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drucker D.J., Nauck M.A. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368:1696–1705. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69705-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Estall J.L., Drucker D.J. Glucagon-like Peptide-2. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2006;26:391–411. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.26.061505.111223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen L., Hartmann B., Mineo H., Holst J.J. Glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion is influenced by perfusate glucose concentration and by a feedback mechanism involving somatostatin in isolated perfused porcine ileum. Regul. Pept. 2004;118:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2003.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gribble F.M., Williams L., Simpson A.K., Reimann F. A novel glucose-sensing mechanism contributing to glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from the GLUTag cell line. Diabetes. 2003;52:1147–1154. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.5.1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrmann C., Göke R., Richter G., Fehmann H.C., Arnold R., Göke B. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulin-releasing polypeptide plasma levels in response to nutrients. Digestion. 1995;56:117–126. doi: 10.1159/000201231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirasawa A., Tsumaya K., Awaji T., Katsuma S., Adachi T., Yamada M., Sugimoto Y., Miyazaki S., Tsujimoto G. Free fatty acids regulate gut incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion through GPR120. Nat. Med. 2005;11:90–94. doi: 10.1038/nm1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holst J.J. The physiology of glucagon-like peptide 1. Physiol. Rev. 2007;87:1409–1439. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jang H.J., Kokrashvili Z., Theodorakis M.J., Carlson O.D., Kim B.J., Zhou J., Kim H.H., Xu X., Chan S.L., Juhaszova M. Gut-expressed α-gustducin and taste receptors regulate secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:15069–15074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706890104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katsuma S., Hirasawa A., Tsujimoto G. Bile acids promote glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion through TGR5 in a murine enteroendocrine cell line STC-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;329:386–390. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsen P.J., Tang-Christensen M., Holst J.J., Orskov C. Distribution of glucagon-like peptide-1 and other preproglucagon-derived peptides in the rat hypothalamus and brainstem. Neuroscience. 1997;77:257–270. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00434-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsson L.I., Holst J., Håkanson R., Sundler F. Distribution and properties of glucagon immunoreactivity in the digestive tract of various mammals: an immunohistochemical and immunochemical study. Histochemistry. 1975;44:281–290. doi: 10.1007/BF00490364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margolskee R.F. Molecular mechanisms of bitter and sweet taste transduction. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:1–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R100054200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margolskee R.F., Dyer J., Kokrashvili Z., Salmon K.S., Ilegems E., Daly K., Maillet E.L., Ninomiya Y., Mosinger B., Shirazi-Beechey S.P. T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of Na+-glucose cotransporter 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:15075–15080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706678104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mortensen K., Christensen L.L., Holst J.J., Orskov C. GLP-1 and GIP are colocalized in a subset of endocrine cells in the small intestine. Regul. Pept. 2003;114:189–196. doi: 10.1016/s0167-0115(03)00125-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagai T., Ibata K., Park E.S., Kubota M., Mikoshiba K., Miyawaki A. A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002;20:87–90. doi: 10.1038/nbt0102-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen L.B., Ploug K.B., Swift P., Ørskov C., Jansen-Olesen I., Chiarelli F., Holst J.J., Hougaard P., Pörksen S., Holl R. Co-localisation of the Kir6.2/SUR1 channel complex with glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotrophic polypeptide expression in human ileal cells and implications for glycaemic control in new onset type 1 diabetes. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2007;156:663–671. doi: 10.1530/EJE-06-0756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Overton H.A., Babbs A.J., Doel S.M., Fyfe M.C., Gardner L.S., Griffin G., Jackson H.C., Procter M.J., Rasamison C.M., Tang-Christensen M. Deorphanization of a G protein-coupled receptor for oleoylethanolamide and its use in the discovery of small-molecule hypophagic agents. Cell Metab. 2006;3:167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plaisancié P., Dumoulin V., Chayvialle J.A., Cuber J.C. Luminal glucagon-like peptide-1(7–36) amide-releasing factors in the isolated vascularly perfused rat colon. J. Endocrinol. 1995;145:521–526. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1450521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reimann F., Gribble F.M. Glucose-sensing in glucagon-like peptide-1-secreting cells. Diabetes. 2002;51:2757–2763. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.9.2757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reimer R.A., Darimont C., Gremlich S., Nicolas-Métral V., Rüegg U.T., Macé K. A human cellular model for studying the regulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion. Endocrinology. 2001;142:4522–4528. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.10.8415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritzel U., Fromme A., Ottleben M., Leonhardt U., Ramadori G. Release of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) by carbohydrates in the perfused rat ileum. Acta Diabetol. 1997;34:18–21. doi: 10.1007/s005920050059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simpson A.K., Ward P.S., Wong K.Y., Collord G.J., Habib A.M., Reimann F., Gribble F.M. Cyclic AMP triggers glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from the GLUTag enteroendocrine cell line. Diabetologia. 2007;50:2181–2189. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0750-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland K., Young R.L., Cooper N.J., Horowitz M., Blackshaw L.A. Phenotypic characterization of taste cells of the mouse small intestine. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrpomtest. Liver Physiol. 2007;292:G1420–G1428. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00504.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S.Y., Chi M.M., Li L., Moley K.H., Wice B.M. Studies with GIP/Ins cells indicate secretion by gut K cells is KATP channel independent. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;284:E988–E1000. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00398.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wynne K., Bloom S.R. The role of oxyntomodulin and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY) in appetite control. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006;2:612–620. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Muyrers J.P., Testa G., Stewart A.F. DNA cloning by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000;18:1314–1317. doi: 10.1038/82449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.