Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1991 Feb;29(2):393–394. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.393-394.1991

Spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation for the in vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.

A Espinel-Ingroff 1, T M Kerkering 1
PMCID: PMC269774  PMID: 2007647

Abstract

Homogeneous inoculum suspensions of 29 isolates of clinically important filamentous fungi were adjusted with a spectrophotometer (530 nm) to obtain standardized preparations containing 1 x 10(6) to 5 x 10(6) CFU/ml. Colony counts (CFU per milliliter) of 1 x 10(6) to 5 x 10(6) were achieved on three different days for isolates of Aspergillus spp., Pseudallescheria boydii, and Sporothrix schenckii (80% +/- 2% transmission), and colony counts of 7 x 10(5) to 2.9 x 10(6) (70% +/- 2% transmission) were achieved for Mucor spp. and Rhizopus spp.

Full text

PDF
393

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Block E. R., Jennings A. E., Bennett J. E. Variables influencing susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to 5-fluorocytosine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Oct;4(4):392–395. doi: 10.1128/aac.4.4.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coleman T., Madassery J. V., Kobayashi G. S., Nahm M. H., Little J. R. New fluorescence assay for the quantitation of fungi. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Sep;27(9):2003–2007. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.2003-2007.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eng C., Valenstein P. Standardization of yeast inocula with an electronic impedance counter. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2397–2399. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2397-2399.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Galgiani J. N., Reiser J., Brass C., Espinel-Ingroff A., Gordon M. A., Kerkering T. M. Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Sep;31(9):1343–1347. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.9.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Galgiant J. N., Stevens D. A. Turbidimetric studies of growth inhibition of yeasts with three drugs: inquiry into inoculum-dependent susceptibility testing, time of onset of drug effect, and implications for current and newer methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):249–254. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pfaller M. A., Burmeister L., Bartlett M. S., Rinaldi M. G. Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1437–1441. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pfaller M. A., Rinaldi M. G., Galgiani J. N., Bartlett M. S., Body B. A., Espinel-Ingroff A., Fromtling R. A., Hall G. S., Hughes C. E., Odds F. C. Collaborative investigation of variables in susceptibility testing of yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Sep;34(9):1648–1654. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES