Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1991 Mar;29(3):436–438. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.436-438.1991

Comparison of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of herpes simplex virus antigen.

B Gonik 1, M Seibel 1, A Berkowitz 1, M B Woodin 1, K Mills 1
PMCID: PMC269795  PMID: 1645366

Abstract

Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for herpes simplex virus (HSV) detection were compared with culture in a prospective, blinded study with 153 patients with suspected recurrent oral or genital HSV. A subset of 15 of these subjects were studied daily until symptom resolution during a single episode of recurrent HSV. Direct-site specimens were collected and either placed in viral transport media (for Ortho ELISA and fresh inoculation into primary rabbit kidney cells) or frozen in ELISA collection media (DuPont). One hundred eighty-six culture-ELISA comparisons were analyzed. On the basis of culture positivity, the DuPont and Ortho ELISAs differed substantially with regard to sensitivity (93 versus 35%) but had similar specificities (95 versus 100%) and positive (85 versus 100%) and negative (98 versus 85%) predictive values. There were seven DuPont ELISA-positive, culture-negative samples which were confirmed positive for HSV by blocking antibody test (revised specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%). Six of these discrepant samples were from previously culture-positive subjects. These results demonstrate that currently available ELISA kits vary substantially as to their sensitivities in detecting HSV antigen from direct-site specimens. In addition, antigen detection, by ELISA technology, is not always synonymous with state of viral infectivity as judged by tissue culture cytopathic effect.

Full text

PDF
436

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker D. A., Gonik B., Milch P. O., Berkowitz A., Lipson S., Verma U. Clinical evaluation of a new herpes simplex virus ELISA: a rapid diagnostic test for herpes simplex virus. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;73(3 Pt 1):322–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayton A. L., Roberts C., Godley M., Best J. M., Chantler S. M. Herpes simplex virus detection by ELISA: effect of enzyme amplification, nature of lesion sampled and specimen treatment. J Med Virol. 1986 Sep;20(1):89–97. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890200111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dascal A., Chan-Thim J., Morahan M., Portnoy J., Mendelson J. Diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infection in a clinical setting by a direct antigen detection enzyme immunoassay kit. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Apr;27(4):700–704. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.4.700-704.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dascal A., Chan-Thim J., Morahan M., Portnoy J., Mendelson J. Replacement of special enzyme immunoassay transport medium by a standard viral transport medium in the Herpcheck herpes simplex virus antigen detection test. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Nov-Dec;12(6):473–475. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90080-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tada A., Sekine N., Toba M., Yoshino K. An analysis of factors influencing the isolation rate of herpes simplex virus. Microbiol Immunol. 1977;21(4):219–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1977.tb00283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Warford A. L., Levy R. A., Rekrut K. A. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of herpes simplex virus antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):490–493. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.490-493.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES