Abstract
The photosynthetic bacterial reaction center (RC) is a membrane protein complex. The RC performs the photochemical electron transfer from the bacteriochlorophyll dimer through a series of electron donor and acceptor molecules to a secondary quinone, QB. QB accepts electrons from a primary quinone, QA, in two sequential electron transfer reactions. The second electron transfer to QB is coupled to the uptake of two protons from the cytoplasmic side, leading to the formation of the dihydroquinone QBH2 that diffuses out of the RC. The proton uptake pathway in the RC remains unclear, but it has been suggested that water molecules are protonated upon the quinone reduction by the IR continuum bands around 2800-2600 cm−1 [Breton, J., and Nabedryk, E. (1998) Photosyn. Res. 55, 301–307]. In order to detect structural changes of water molecules upon the reduction of quinones, the wild-type (WT) RC and the site-directed mutants from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were measured by means of FTIR spectroscopy in the O-H and O-D stretching regions. In order to investigate the involvement of water molecules to proton uptake, QB-/QB spectra of WT RC, EQ-L212, DN-L213 and SA-L223 mutants were compared, whose amino acid residues are crucial for the uptake of protons into QB. Water stretching vibrations were assigned by use of H218O. The spectra of DN-L213 and SA-L223 look similar to that of WT, whereas the water bands were influenced for EQ-L212. This result suggests that the water molecule(s) is located near Glu-L212. Such structural changes of water molecules are involved in the rearrangement of hydrogen-bonding network around QB and Glu-L212, which may play an important role in proton transfer to QB-. On the other hand, the continuum bands in the 2800-2600 cm−1 region do not originate from water molecules in the QA- and QB- states. There are no protonated water molecules in the QA- and QB- states. The bands at 2800-2600 cm−1 may originate from N-H stretches which form strong hydrogen bonds. Possible candidate and the hydrogen-bonding environment will be discussed.
The photosynthetic bacterial reaction center (RC)1 is a membrane protein complex with redox components. The RC of purple bacteria works as a proton pump from cytoplasmic side to the periplasmic side in cooperation with cytochrome bc1 complex. The RC performs the photochemical electron transfer from the bacteriochlorophyll dimer, P870, through a series of electron donor and acceptor molecules to the secondary quinone, QB. QB accepts electrons from the primary quinone QA in two sequential electron transfer reactions. The second electron transfer to QB is coupled to the uptake of two protons from the cytoplasmic side, leading to the formation of the dihydroquinone QBH2 that diffuses out of the RC (reviewed in refs 1, 2). The formation of the proton gradient across membranes is essential process for ATP synthesis. In the photosynthetic RC of purple bacteria, QB is buried in the protein and it is suggested that amino acid side chains and internal water molecules are involved in the proton uptake process from the cytoplasmic side.
The pathway of protons must exist from the cytoplasm to the QB binding site because QB is buried inside the protein and not exposed in the cytoplasmic side. Site-directed mutant studies revealed that three amino acid residues, Glu-L212 (3–5), Asp-L213 (4, 6, 7) and Ser-L223 (8, 9) play an essential role in donation of protons to reduced QB of Rhodobacter (Rb.) sphaeroides. The crystal structure of the RC shows that there are hydrophilic pathways which contain protonatable amino acid residues and water molecules from the cytoplasm to the QB binding site (10, 11). It is thought that protons are transported through protonation/deprotonation of these amino acid side chains to QB. Actually, when mutations are introduced into amino acids (Asp-M17, Asp-L210, His-H126 and His-H128), the rates of proton uptake and accompanying electron transfer from QA- to QB (and QB-) are reduced (12, 13) (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Structure of QB binding site of the reaction center of Rb. sphaeroides in the P+QB-state (PDB entry: 1DV3 (11)). Peptide backbones are shown as ribbons, where L, M and H subunits are colored yellow, blue and orange, respectively. Quinone and amino acid side chains are shown as stick drawings. Green shares represent water molecules. Dotted lines show putative hydrogen bonds.
Protonation states of carboxylic acid side chains have been studied by light induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy because the infrared signals are sensitive to the protonation states of glutamic acid and aspartic acid, whose C=O stretch of protonated carboxylic acid side chain appear in the 1770-1700 cm−1 region. However, the pathway of protons from cytoplasmic side to the inside of the RC remains unclear because the signal of protonation is not observed except for Glu-L212 upon the reduction of QB (14–18). Moreover, the protonation signal of the acid amino acid residue side chain is not observed in the RC of Blastochloris viridis (19). Is proton uptake into the protein carried out without passing through the amino acid side chains?
One possibility is that water molecules which form hydrogen-bonding network from cytoplasm to QB site mediates proton transfer upon the quinone reduction (Figure 1). Breton and Nabedryk insist water protonation because the IR signals appear in 2800-1900 cm−1 region and are H/D exchangeable (20). Hermes et al. observed similar signals in DN-L210 mutant by time-resolved FTIR studies (21). Indeed, in bacteriorhodopsin, a light-driven proton pump, protonation of internal water molecule (Zundel cation, H5O2+) has been proposed as a proton release group detected in the 2000-1900 cm−1 region (22, 23). However, those bands do not originate from the protonated water just because it appears in such low frequency region. In bacteriorhodopsin, the O-H stretching vibration of the water molecule that bridges positive and negative charges appears at 2800 cm−1 (24–26). Isotope water in the oxygen atom must be used in order to prove water signals.
We are interested in hydrogen bonding environment of internal water molecules upon the uptake of protons in the bacterial RC as well as water protonation, for our group has been shown the importance of internal water molecules in the proton transfer processes of bacteriorhodopsin by means of FTIR spectroscopy (24–26, reviewed in refs 27, 28 and references therein). FTIR spectroscopy is a powerful tool to detect changes of hydrogen-bond environment as well as the protonation state of carboxylic residues. We researched with the aim of detecting structural changes in internal water molecules accompanied by the reduction of quinones in the RC.
In this study, we confirmed that dry-hydrated films work almost normally as in the solution by FTIR spectroscopy. The changes of water O-H stretches were detected upon the reduction of QA and QB, respectively in 3700-3500 cm-1 region. Mutational measurement suggested that water molecules existed in the neighborhood of Glu-L212. On the other hand, continuum bands in the 3000-2600 cm−1 region did not show spectral shifts by H218O isotope, suggesting that these bands do not originate from (protonated) water. These suggest the possibility to be the N-H group(s) which forms strong hydrogen bonds.
Materials and Methods
The construction of the site-directed mutant EQ-L212, DN-L213 and SA-L223 was previously reported (3, 7, 8). The purification of RCs was carried out as is in ref 7. RCs were dialyzed against dialysis buffer (10 mM Tris·HCl (pH8), 0.1 mM EDTA·2Na, 5 mM NaCl, and 0.02 % (w/v) dodecyl maltopyranoside). 15 μL of RC (70–100 μM) and 5 μL of reducing reagents mixture (10 mM sodium ascorbate, 20 mM 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-p-phenylendiamine in 10 mM Tris·HCl (pH8), 1 mM EDTA·2Na, 0.025% (w/v) N,N-dimethyldodecylamine N-oxide) were mixed. For QA measurement, terbutryn was added to a final concentration of 100 μM. For QB measurement, 10 μL of ubiquinone-10 (1 mg/mL in ethanol) was added the RC mixture. The RC mixtures were put on a BaF2 window and dried by aspiration. The RC films were rehydrated by placing ~1 μL of 20% (v/v) glycerol/water (H2O or H218O) aside.
H/D exchange was carried out by diluting the RC sample with dialysis buffer prepared in D2O and concentrating by Amicon YM-30 device (Millipore) for three times. The RC in D2O buffer was incubated for 16 hours at 293 K according to the ref 13. For QA and QB measurements, the same reagents were added as D2O-treated samples and dried on a BaF2 window. The RC films were rehydrated by 20% (v/v) glycerol-(OD)3/water (D2O or D218O).
Light-induced QA-/QA difference spectra were measured at 283 K under continuous illumination of >700 nm light (R69 and C40B, Asahi Thechno Glass) with a 1 kW tungsten lump (29). Light intensity was decreased to 0.5% by the use of ND filters for QB-/QB measurements (30). For FTIR spectra, 256 interferograms at 2 cm−1 resolution were recorded during and before illumination, after and during illumination. By subtracting difference spectra after and during illumination from difference spectra during and before illumination, baseline drift was efficiently eliminated. 80–100 recordings were averaged.
Results
The Q−/Q difference FTIR spectra of the rehydrated RC films
Figure 2a and b show the QA-/QA and QB-/QB difference spectra of the WT RC films in the 1800-1200 cm−1 region, respectively. In Figure 2a, a characteristic positive band at 1467 cm−1 is observed in the QA-/QA spectrum, which comes from C1
O stretch (31) or C4
O stretch (32) of semiquinone. The bands at 1735 (-)/1729 (+) cm−1 are reported to the 10a-ester C=O stretch of bacteriopheophytin (33). The negative band at 1670 cm−1 is assigned to amide-I C=O stretch (31). These are characteristic to QA-/QA spectrum previously reported (28, 30–32). Similarly, a positive peak at 1478 cm−1 for the QB-/QB spectrum comes from C
O/C
C stretch of semiquinone (34, 35). The negative peak at 1641 cm−1 originates from C=O groups of neutral QB (34, 35). The positive band at 1728 cm−1 comes from C=O group of protonated carboxylic acid side chain of Glu-L212 (14). Thus, the dry-hydrated films work almost normally as in the solution. We are able to investigate higher frequency region.
Figure 2.
Light-induced Q−/Q difference FTIR spectra of Rb. Sphaeroides RCs in the 1800-1200 cm−1 region. QA-/QA spectrum of WT (a), QB-/QB spectra of WT (b), SA-L223 (c), DN-L213 (d) and EQ-L212 (e) are shown. One division of the y-axis corresponds to 0.002 absorbance unit.
The Q−/Q difference FTIR spectra in the 3700-3490 cm−1 region
Figure 3a shows QA-/QA spectrum of the WT RC in the 3700-3490 cm−1 region. QA-/QA spectrum hydrated with H2O (red line) has peaks at 3664 (+), 3657 (−), 3622 (−), 3587 (−) and 3501 (+) cm−1. Of those, the bands at 3664 (+), 3657 (−), 3622 (−) and 3587 (−) cm−1 spectral shifts by 10–11 cm−1 by the hydration of H218O (blue line), indicating that these bands originate from water stretching vibrations upon the formation of QA-. The band at 3664 (+) cm−1 remains in the H218O-hydrated sample. This is probably because multiple signals appear in the same frequency region and an exchangeable water molecule shows downshift, or because the efficiency of substitution to H218O was low. If the band at 3664 (+) cm−1 is attributed to remaining H216O, the contribution should be subtracted by use of H216O spectrum. The black line in Figure 3b shows the calculated spectrum so that the band at 3664 (+) cm−1 was disappeared. Contribution of 16O-H stretch was estimated to be 50%, that is, the efficiency of H218O replacement was 50% in this experiment.
Figure 3.
Light-induced QA-/QA and QB-/QB difference FTIR spectra of Rb. Sphaeroides WT RCs in the 3700-3490 cm−1 region. (a) QA-/QA difference spectra hydrated with H2O (red line) or H218O (blue line). (b) QA-/QA difference spectra hydrated with H2O (red line, same as panel a) and calculated QA-/QA difference spectrum of pure H218O-hydration (black line). (c) QB-/QB difference spectra hydrated with H2O (red line) or H218O (blue line). (d) QB-/QB difference spectra hydrated with H2O (red line, same as panel c) and calculated QB-/QB difference spectrum of pure H218O-hydration (black line). Frequencies labeled in green correspond to those identified as water stretching vibrations. One division of the y-axis corresponds to 0.0002 absorbance unit.
Similarly, QB-/QB spectrum hydrated with H2O has peaks at 3632 (+), 3618 (−) and 3543 (+) cm−1 and show H218O isotope shift at 3618 (−) and 3543 (+) cm−1 (Figure 3c). The shifted bands originate from water stretch vibrations. On the other hand, the band at 3632 (+) cm−1 looks unshifted, but reduced by H218O hydration. We supposed that the enough shift was not observed because the substitution efficiency of H218O was low as well as the QA-/QA spectrum, and the contribution of H216O was deducted (black line in Figure 3d). In the case of QB-/QB spectrum, the substitution efficiency of H218O was estimated as 45%.
The signals appearing in this region represent weakly hydrogen-bonded X-H groups. It shows that the water molecules are located in the hydrophobic environment, or that they are in hydrophilic environment but the O-H stretch does not form hydrogen bond. Those water molecules are expected to be inside protein. The substitution efficiency of the water 18O whose O-H stretch appears in such an environment is approximately 50% by the operation of hydration.
IR spectra could be detected water molecules around quinones whose environment of is different from each other. We can distinguish both Q-/Q spectra in this frequency region clearly as well as in the 1800-1200 cm−1 region. The band at 3501 (−) cm−1 in the QA-/QA spectra, which did not show isotope shift by H218O, probably comes from O-H or N-H stretch of apoprotein.
Mutational Effect for QB-/QB spectra in the 3700-3490 cm−1 region
Next, we measured QB-/QB spectra of SA-L223, DN-L213 and EQ-L212 mutants. In the 1800-1200 cm−1 region, difference spectrum of SA-L223 has smaller changes in the amide I region compared with that of WT (Figure 2c) (36). Difference spectrum of DN-L213 has a new peak at 1490 cm−1, where the WT spectrum has only a shoulder of the band at 1479 cm−1 (Figure 2d) (14, 16). In the difference spectrum of EQ-L212, the band at 1728 (+) cm−1 disappeared and smaller bands at 1739 (−)/1731 (+) cm−1 remain (Figure 2e). The band at 1728 (+) cm−1 is assigned as C=O stretch of protonated Glu-L212 side chain (14). These spectra reproduce as previously reported spectra measured in solution. Thus, those spectra obtained by dry-hydrated films were similar as those previously reported in the 1800-1200 cm−1 region.
Figure 4a–c shows QB-/QB spectra of SA-L223, DN-L213 and EQ-L212 in the 3700-3490 cm−1 region, respectively. All spectra have one negative and two positive peaks (Figure 4a–c, red lines). They were assigned as water O-H stretches because the bands showed downshift by the hydration of H218O (Figure 4a–c, blue lines). The overall spectral shapes look similar between WT and mutants, the peak frequencies of EQ-L212 are different from those of WT. Figure 4d-f compares mutant spectra with WT spectrum. Water bands appear at 3632 (+), 3618 (−) and 3543 (+) cm−1 for SA-L223, which are identical with WT (Figure 4d). These water bands are not influenced by the mutation at Ser-L223, suggesting that these water molecules are not located near Ser-L223. The spectrum of DN-L213 has peaks at 3632 (+), the bands at 3619 (−) and 3543 (+) cm−1 (Figure 4e). Though a negative band showed 1 cm−1 shift compared with that of WT, it suggests that those water molecules are not influenced by the mutation at Asp-L213. On the other hand, the in the positive bands of EQ-L212 spectrum has obvious shifts to the higher frequency by 5 cm−1 compared with WT spectrum (Figure 4f). The negative peak showed 2 cm−1 shift to higher frequency. Because these bands were influenced of the mutation at Glu-L212, the water molecules which showed structural changes suggest that the water molecules are located near Glu-L212.
Figure 4.
Light-induced QB-/QB difference FTIR spectra of Rb. Sphaeroides mutant RCs in the 3700-3490 cm−1 region. (a–c) QB-/QB spectra of SA-L223 (a), DN-L213 (b) and EQ-L212 (c) hydrated with H2O (red lines) or H218O (blue lines). (d–f) QB-/QB spectra of SA-L223 (d), DN-L213 (e) and EQ-L212 (f) (solid lines) are compared with the spectrum of WT (dotted lines). The samples are hydrated with H2O. One division of the y-axis corresponds to 0.0002 absorbance unit. Labeled frequencies correspond to those identified as water stretching vibrations.
Hermes et al. reported the existence of a band of water at 3681 cm−1 for the DN-L210 mutant (21), but we could not find any bands in the 4000-3700 cm−1 region for the RCs used in this study (data not shown). This may be specific to the DN-L210 mutant.
Continuum bands in the 2900-2200 cm−1 region
Figure 5a and b shows QA-/QA and QB-/QB difference FTIR spectra of WT RC in the 2900-2200 cm−1 region. In the QA-/QA spectrum of WT, there are positive peaks at 2818, 2756, 2709, 2611 and 2559 cm−1 (Figure 5a). Similarly, QB-/QB spectrum of WT has a main peak at 2613 cm−1 and small peaks at 2831, 2764, 2691 and 2559 cm−1 (Figure 5b). The broad bands were reproduced previously reported spectra (20, 37), which originate from O-H stretches of protonated water molecules. Recently, the same group proposed that some part of the band in the QA-/QA spectrum originates from strongly hydrogen-bonded Nπ-H group of His-M219 (38). Anyway, if the bands originate from protonated water molecules, spectral shifts should be observed by the hydration of H218O. The expected downshifts at 2611 (2613) cm−1 by H218O is ~8.5 cm−1, calculated from the square root of reduced mass ratio between 16O-H and 18O-H. The broad bands in the 2600 cm−1 region did not show any shift by hydration of H218O water (blue lines in Figure 5a, b).
Figure 5.
(a, b) Light-induced Q-/Q difference FTIR spectra of Rb. Sphaeroides RCs in the 2950-2200 cm−1 region. (a) QA-/QA and (b) QB-/QB spectra of WT. Samples are hydrated with H2O (red line) or H218O (blue line). (c–e) Simulation of the continuum bands of QB-/QB spectra. (c) (red dotted line) WT QB-/QB spectrum. (red solid line) The Gaussian function whose position and half maximum full width are 2596.7 cm−1 and 320 cm−1, respectively. (black line) The difference spectrum between red dotted spectrum and red solid spectrum. (blue line) The Gaussian function whose position and half maximum full width are 2588.2 cm−1 and 320 cm−1, respectively. Red and blue solid lines mimic H2O and H218O bands, respectively, and black line mimics the bans which are not originate from water, such as N-H stretch (38). (d) (red line) WT QB-/QB spectrum (sum of red solid line and black line in panel c). (blue line) Sum of black spectrum, 50% of blue spectrum and 50% of red spectrum in panel c. (e) 10 times expanded double difference spectra between QB-/QB spectra in H2O and H218O. (black line) Double difference spectra between measured spectra shown in panel b. (red line) Double difference spectra of simulated spectra shown in panel d.
Are spectral shifts really observed for such broad bands by comparison of H2O-hydrated and H218O hydrated spectra in this experiment? If the half of the signal does not come from O-H stretches of water molecules as is proposed (38), the apparent shift width by H218O hydration may become smaller. Furthermore, the band shift may not be detected for the H2O/H218O exchange when the substitution efficiency of H2O/H218O in the higher frequency region is 50% is taken into account (Figure 3). However, the substitution efficiency of the water molecules observed at higher frequencies is 50% and expects that it are substituted for the high efficiency more as for the water molecules in the more hydrophilic environment (Figure 1).
In order to investigate whether the spectral shifts are observed for the QB-/QB spectra, the following calculation was carried out (Figure 5c–e). We supposed that a half of the band originates from water stretch vibrations and the rest does not. The water signal was simulated by gauss function. We assumed that the gauss function covers the whole region of the band whose peak position and half maximum full width are 2596.7 cm−1 and 320 cm−1, respectively (Figure 5c, red solid line). The difference spectrum corresponds to the signal which does not originate from water (Figure 5c, black line). The H218O spectrum downshifts by 8.5 cm−1, that is, it has a peak at 2588.2 cm−1 (Figure 5c, blue line). Because the substitution efficiency of H218O is 50%, the simulated H218O-hydrated spectrum is the sum of black spectrum, 50% of blue spectrum and 50% of red spectrum (Figure 5d, blue line). When the simulated spectra (Figure 5d) are compared with the measured spectra (Figure 5b), the difference of the both spectra is hardly observed. Figure 5e shows the double difference spectra of the H2O and the H218O spectra. Black and red lines in Figure 5e show the double-difference spectra of measured spectra Figure 5b and simulated spectra in Figure 5d, respectively. The result of the simulation cannot be distinguished from the difference in noise level of the measurement. Is it unacceptable to prove that experimentally?
Therefore, hydration by D2O/D218O was carried out. The difference in O-D stretching vibration of D2O and D218O is expected ~15 cm−1, which is larger than O-H stretches. Figure 6a and b shows the QA-/QA and QB-/QB spectra hydrated with D2O (red lines) and D218O (blue lines). The broad bands were observed which has peak of 2138 cm−1 in the QA-/QA (Figure 6a) and 2085 cm−1 in the QB-/QB (Figure 6b) spectra. However, it does not seem that these bands shift by the D218O hydration. It was simulated whether the shifts are observed in the case of D2O hydration as well as in the case of H2O hydration for the QB-/QB spectra.
Figure 6.
(a, b)Light-induced Q-/Q difference FTIR spectra of Rb. Sphaeroides RCs in the 2300-1800 cm−1 region incubated in D2O buffer. QA-/QA spectra (a) and QB-/QB spectra (b) of WT. Samples are hydrated with D2O (red line) or D218O (blue line). (c–e) Comparison of observed and simulated QB-/QB spectra of WT Rb. sphaeroides RCs in D2O and in D218O. (c) (red solid line) The Gaussian function whose position and half maximum full width are 2060 cm−1 and 133 cm−1, respectively. (black line) The difference spectrum between red dotted spectrum and red solid spectrum. (blue line) The Gaussian function whose position and half maximum full width are 2045 cm−1 and 133 cm−1, respectively. (d) (red line) WT QB-/QB spectrum (sum of red solid line and black line in panel c). (blue line) Sum of black spectrum, 50% of blue spectrum and 50% of red spectrum in panel c. (e) 10 times expanded double difference spectra between QB-/QB spectra in D2O and D218O. (black line) Double difference spectra between measured spectra shown in panel b. (red line) Double difference spectra of simulated spectra shown in panel d.
The same simulation was carried out for D2O-hydrated spectra as well as H2O-hydrated ones for the QB-/QB spectra. The band at 2085 cm−1 is expected to the downshift by 15 cm−1 by the hydration of D218O. We assumed that a part of the band originates from water and the rest does not. Water band was simulated as a gauss function whose peak and half width full maximum are 2060 cm−1 and 133 cm−1, respectively (Figure 6c, red line). The difference spectrum corresponds to the signal which does not originate from water (Figure 6c, black line). The D218O spectrum downshifts by 15 cm−1, that is, it has a peak at 2045 cm−1 (Figure 6c, blue line). The simulated D218O-hydrated spectrum is the sum of black spectrum, 50% of blue spectrum and 50% of red spectrum. Figure 6d shows the calculated spectra. The difference of the spectra is observed better than H218O (Figure 5d). Though the definite shift of a position of the peak was not observed, two spectra do not correspond as much as the simulation of H2O. Black and red lines in Figure 6e show the differences of measured and simulated spectra, respectively. In this case, the difference of simulated spectra of D2O and D218O is observed clearly, while signal is not observed as for the difference in the measured spectra of D2O and D218O.
The situation was the same as for the QA-/QA spectrum (data not shown). Therefore, we concluded that this band does not originate from water O-D stretches. In both QA- and QB- stated, it is unlikely that the continuum bands in the 2800-2400 cm−1 region originate from protonated water molecules.
Mutational Influence of the Continuum Bands at Ser-L223, Asp-L213 and Glu-L212
In the QB-/QB spectra of SA-L223, DN-L213 and EQ-L212 mutants, the continuum bands were observed (Figure 7). The bands showed almost identical peaks as that of WT and no shift by H218O hydration. This indicated that the band does not originate from water stretch vibrations. The spectrum of SA-L223 corresponds to that of WT well (Figure 7a). This means that there was no influence of the mutation at Ser-L223 position. On the other hand, spectra of DN-L213 and EQ-L212 had difference in comparison with WT (Figure 7b, c). The drift of the baseline was seen though peak positions were unchanged. The disappearance of negative charges at the position of Asp-L213 (in the neutral and reduced QB states) or Glu-L212 (in the neutral QB state) may influence the bands. However, we concluded that the influence of these mutations was not taken about because the shift of the bands was not observed. The element which is the cause of this signal is not in the neighborhood of Ser-L223 but may be near Asp-L213 and/or Glu-L212.
Figure 7.
Light-induced QB-/QB difference FTIR spectra of Rb. Sphaeroides mutant RCs in the 2950-2200 cm−1 region. QB-/QB spectra of SA-L223 (a), DN-L213 (b) and EQ-L212 (c) are shown. Samples are hydrated with H2O (red line) or H218O (blue line). Dotted lines in a–c show the QB-/QB spectra of WT. One division of the y-axis corresponds to 0.0003 absorbance unit.
Discussion
Assignment of water molecules that formed weak hydrogen bonds
In this report, the structural changes of water molecules were detected around QA and QB upon the reduction of quinones in the reaction centers from Rb. sphaeroides. IR spectra could be detected water molecules around quinones whose environment of is different from each other. The change of hydrogen bonds of water molecules was observed around Glu-L212, which is involved in the proton donation into QB. Because the mutation of Asp-L213, which is next to Glu-L212, did not influence the structural changes of water molecules, the changed water molecules must be located in the neighborhood of Glu-L212. It may be reasonable that SA-L223 mutant does not affect the water structural changes upon the formation of QB-because Ser-L223 is not involved in the first proton uptake pathway (2 and references therein).
The X-ray crystarography analysis shows that QB is located in the distal and proximal sides from His-L190 in the neutral and reduced states, respectively (10). This does not correspond to the result shown by FTIR study, and this is the problem under debate that the QB location in the distal side is specific in the crystal (39). Figure 8 shows the structure of RC of Rb. sphaeroides in the QA and QB binding regions in the charge neutral state (10).
Figure 8.
Structure of quinone binding sites of the reaction center of Rb. sphaeroides in the dark state (PDB entry: 1AIJ (10)). Peptide backbones are shown as ribbons, where L and M subunits are colored yellow, blue, respectively. Quinone and amino acid side chains are shown as stick drawings. Green shares represent water molecules. Dotted lines show putative hydrogen bonds.
Comparing Figure 8 with Figure 1, there are water molecules in the neighborhood of Glu-L212 under in both neutral QB and QB- states (water2, 5, 118 and 391). However, we cannot conclude that they are the identical water molecules because the rearrangement of water molecules takes place upon the QB movement from “distal side” to “proximal side” from His-L190. And regardless of the correctness of this model, the rearrangement of the water molecules can happen because measurements are carried out at 283 K. The side chain of Glu-L212 is protonated under the QB- state. Water molecules are influenced of the disappearance of negative charge at Glu-L212, and change the hydrogen-bonding environment. These water molecules may be involved in the stabilization of QB- state and of the protonation of Glu-L212 by changing the hydrogen-bonding environment.
On the other hand, there is smaller number of water molecules in the neighborhood of QA. Water molecules exist in the region surrounded by Ala-M249, Asn-M259, Thr-M261 and Phe-L5 (water 82, 409 and 410) (Figure 8). These water molecules are primary candidates which appear in 3700-3500 cm−1 region because they are under the hydrophobic environment and possibly influenced by the QA-formation.
The structural changes of water molecules that form weak hydrogen bond upon the reduction of quinones
The broad bands in the 2800-2400 cm−1 region do not originate from water molecules in the QA- and QB- states. There are no protonated water molecules in the QA- and QB- states.
The bands at 2800-2400 cm−1 may originate from N-H stretches which form strong hydrogen bonds. It was previously assigned that the N-H stretch of protonated Schiff base in bacteriorhodopsin in the ground state appear at 2800 cm−1 with broad bandwidth (40). This is characteristic to the strongly hydrogen-bonded N-H groups. And in the QA-/QA FTIR difference spectra of photosystem II, multiple peaks in the 3000-2600 cm−1 originate from strongly hydrogen-bonded histidines (41). Taking those observations and the result of Breton et al. (38) into account, all band observed in the QA-/QA spectrum could originate from the strongly hydrogen-bonded Np-H group of His-M219 (Figure 8). Similar peaks are also observed in the QB-/QB spectrum to that of QA-/QA. We assume that the bands originate from N-H group which is positively charged or which forms strongly hydrogen bonds with negatively charged groups. Possible candidate is His-L190 (strongly hydrogen-bonded with negatively charged QB-) (Figure 1). Such a strong hydrogen bond could be involved in the proton donation from Glu-L212 as well as the rearrangement of water molecules.
The distance between Nπ atom of His-L190 and carboxyl oxygen atom of Glu-L212 and between His-L190 and Asp-L213 are 6.0 (6.3) and 9.8 (10.3) Å in the unphotolyzed (charge separated) state, respectively (Figures 9 and 1). Because the charged QA- or QB- can influence the structural change in the position at Asp-L210, whose distances are 25 and 10.5 Å, respectively (37), it may be possible that (the loss of) the negative charge at the position of Glu-L212 or Asp-L213 influences Nπ-H group of His-L190.
Iron-substituted RCs (42) and site-directed mutants would be useful for the identification of those bands. IR spectra in the higher frequency region would give us much more information about hydrogen-bonding environment of charge separated states in RCs as well as of intermediates in bacteriorhodopsin.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: RC, reaction center; QA, primary quinone; QB, secondary quinone; Rb., Rhodobacter; FTIR, Fourier transform infrared;
References
- 1.Okamura MY, Feher G. PROTON TRANSFER IN REACTION CENTERS FROM PHOTOSYNTHETIC BACTERIA. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:861–896. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.004241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Okamura MY, Paddock ML, Graige MS, Feher G. Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1458:148–163. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(00)00065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Paddock ML, Rongey SH, Feher G, Okamura MY. Pathway of proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers: Replacement of glutamic acid 212 in the L subunit by glutamine inhibits quinone (secondary acceptor) turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:6602–6606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.17.6602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Takahashi E, Wraight CA. Proton and Electron Transfer in the Acceptor Quinone Complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Reaction Centers: Characterization of Site-Directed Mutants of the Two Ionizable Residues, GluL212 and AspL213, in the QB Binding Site. Biochemistry. 1992;31:855–866. doi: 10.1021/bi00118a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shinkarev VP, Takahashi E, Wraight CA. Flash-induced electric potential generation in wild type and L212EQ mutant chromatophores of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: QBH2 is not released from L212EQ mutant reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1142:214–216. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takahashi E, Wraight CA. A crucial role of AspL213 in the proton transfer pathway to the secondary quinone of reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1020:107–111. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paddock ML, Rongey SH, McPherson PH, Juth A, Feher G, Okamura MY. Pathway of Proton Transfer in Bacterial Reaction Centers: Role of Aspartate-L213 in Proton Transfers Associated with Reduction of Quinone to Dihydroquinone. Biochemistry. 1994;33:734–745. doi: 10.1021/bi00169a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paddock ML, McPherson PH, Feher G, Okamura MY. Pathway of proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers: Replacement of serine-L223 by alanine inhibits electron and proton transfers associated with reduction of quinone to dihydroquinone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:6803–6807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paddock ML, Feher G, Okamura MY. Pathway of Proton Transfer in Bacterial Reaction Centers: Further Investigations on the Role of Ser-L223 Studied by Site-Directed Mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 1995;34:15742–15750. doi: 10.1021/bi00048a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stowell MHB, McPhillips TM, Rees DC, Soltis SM, Abresch E, Feher G. Light-Induced Structural Changes in Photosynthetic Reaction Center: Implications for Mechanism of Electron-Proton Transfer. Science. 1997;276:812–816. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5313.812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Axelrod HL, Abresch EC, Paddock ML, Okamura MY, Feher G. Determination of the binding sites of the proton transfer inhibitors Cd2+ and Zn2+ in bacterial reaction centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:1542–1547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Paddock ML, Äderloth P, Chang C, Abresch EC, Feher G, Okamura MY. Identification of the Proton Pathway in Bacterial Reaction Centers: Cooperation between Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 Facilitates Proton Transfer to the Secondary Quinone (QB) Biochemistry. 2001;40:6893–6902. doi: 10.1021/bi010280a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Äderloth P, Paddock ML, Tehrani A, Beatty T, Feher G, Okamura MY. Identification of the Proton Pathway in Bacterial Reaction Centers: Decrease of Proton Transfer Rate by Mutation of Surface Histidines at H126 and H128 and Chemical Rescue by Imidazole Identifies the Initial Proton Donors. Biochemistry. 2001;40:14538–14546. doi: 10.1021/bi011585s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nabedryk E, Breton J, Hienerwadel R, Fogel C, Paddock ML, Okamura MY. Fourier Transform Infrared Difference Spectroscopy of Secondary Quinone Acceptor Photoreduction in Proton Transfer Mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry. 1995;34:14722–14732. doi: 10.1021/bi00045a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nabedryk E, Breton J, Okamura MY, Paddock ML. Proton Uptake by Carboxylic Acid Groups upon Photoreduction of the Secondary Quinone (QB) in Bacterial Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: FTIR Studies on the Effects of Replacing Glu H173. Biochemistry. 1998;37:14457–14462. doi: 10.1021/bi981139d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nabedryk E, Breton J, Okamura MY, Paddock ML. Direct evidence of structural changes in reaction centers of Rb. sphaeroides containing suppressor mutations for Asp L213 -> Asn: A FTIR study of QB photoreduction. Photosyn Res. 1998;55:293–299. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nabedryk E, Breton J, Okamura MY, Paddock ML. Simultaneous Replacement of Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn Increases Proton Uptake by Glu-L212 upon First Electron Transfer to QB in Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry. 2001;40:13826–13832. doi: 10.1021/bi011423w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nabedryk E, Breton J, Okamura MY, Paddock ML. Identification of a Novel Protonation Pattern for Carboxylic Acids upon QB Photoreduction in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Reaction Center Mutants at Asp-L213and Glu-L212 Sites. Biochemistry. 2004;43:7236–7243. doi: 10.1021/bi049342y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Breton J, Nabedryk E, Mioskowski C, Boullais C. Protein-quinone interactions in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers investigated by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy. In: Michel-Beyerle M-E, editor. The Reaction Center of Photosynthetic Bacteria, Structure and Dynamics. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1996. pp. 381–394. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Breton J, Nabedryk E. Proton uptake upon quinone reduction in bacterial reaction centers: IR signature and possible participation of a highly polarizable hydrogen bond network 1998 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hermes S, Stachink JM, Onidas D, Remy A, Hofmann E, Gerwert K. Proton Uptake in the Reaction Center Mutant L210DN from Rhodobacter sphaeroides via Protonated Water Molecules. Biochemistry. 2006;45:13741–13749. doi: 10.1021/bi060742q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Le Courte J, Tittor J, Oesterhelt D, Gerwert K. Experimental evidence for hydrogen-bonded network proton transfer in bacteriorhodopsin shown by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy using azide as catalyst. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:4962–4966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Garczarek F, Wang J, El-Sayed MA, Gerwert K. The Assignment of the Different Infrared Continuum Absorbance Changes Observed in the 3000-1800-cm−1 Region during the bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle. Biophys J. 2004;87:2676–2682. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.046433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kandori H, Shichida Y. Direct Observation of the Bridged Water Stretching Vibrations Inside a Protein. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:11745–11746. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shibata M, Tanimoto T, Kandori H. Water Molecules in the Schiff Base Region of bacteriorhodopsin. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:13312–13313. doi: 10.1021/ja037343s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shibata M, Kandori H. FTIR Studies of Internal Water Molecules in the Schiff base Region of Bacteriorhodopsin. Biochemistry. 2005;44:7406–7413. doi: 10.1021/bi050122+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kandori H. Role of internal water molecules in bacteriorhodopsin. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2000;1460:177–191. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(00)00138-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Furutani Y, Shibata M, Kandori H. Strongly hydrogen-bonded water molecules in the Schiff base region of rhodopsins. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2005;4:661–666. doi: 10.1039/b416698a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Breton J, Thibodeau DL, Berthomieu C, Mäntele W, Verméglio A, Nabedryk E. Probing the primary quinone environment in photosynthesis bacterial reaction centers by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy. FEBS Lett. 1991;278:257–260. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80129-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Breton J, Berthomieu C, Thibodeau DL, Nabedryk E. Probing the secondary quinone (QB) environment in photosynthesis bacterial reaction centers by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy. FEBS Lett. 1991;288:109–113. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)81014-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Breton J, Boullais C, Burie J-R, Nabedryk E, Mioskowski C. Binding Sites of Quinones in Photosynthetic Bacterial Reaction Centers Investigated by Light-Induced FTIR Difference Spectroscopy: Assignment of the Interactions of Each Carbonyl of QA in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Using Site-Specific 13C-labeled Ubiquinone. Biochemistry. 1994;33:14378–14386. doi: 10.1021/bi00252a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brudeler R, de Groot HJM, van Liemt WBS, Steggrerda WF, Esmeijer R, Gast P, Hoff AJ, Lugtenburg J, Gerwert K. Asymmetric binding of the 1- and 4-C=O groups of QA in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centers monitored by Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy using site-specific isotopically labeled ubiquinone-10. EMBO J. 1994;13:5523–5530. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06889.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Breton J, Nabedryk E, Allen JP, Williams JC. Electrostatic Influence of QA Reduction on the IR Vibrational Mode of the 10a-Ester C=O of HA Demonstrated by Mutations at Residues Glu L104 and Trp L100 in Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry. 1997;36:4515–4525. doi: 10.1021/bi962871k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Breton J, Boullais C, Berger G, Mioskowski C, Nabedryk E. Binding Sites of Quinones in Photosynthetic Bacterial Reaction Centers Investigated by Light-Induced FTIR Difference Spectroscopy: Symmetry of the Carbonyl Interactions and Close Equivalence of the QB Vibrations in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodopseudomonas viridis Probed by Isotope Labeling. Biochemistry. 1995;34:11606–11616. doi: 10.1021/bi00036a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brudler R, de Groot HJM, van Liemt WBS, Gast P, Hoff AJ, Lugtenburg J, Gerwert K. FTIR spectroscopy shows weak symmetric hydrogen bonding of the QB carbonyl groups in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres. FEBS Lett. 1995;370:88–92. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00805-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nabedryk E, Paddock ML, Okamura MY, Breton J. An Isotope-Edited FTIR Investigation of the Role of Ser-L223 in Binding Quinone (QB) and Semiquinone (QB-) in the Reaction Center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry. 2005;44:14519–14527. doi: 10.1021/bi051328d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Breton J. Steady-State FTIR Spectra of the Photoreduction of QA and QB in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Reaction Centers Provide Evidence against the Presence of a Proposed Transient Electron Acceptor X between the Two Quinones. Biochemistry. 2007;46:4459–4465. doi: 10.1021/bi700297b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Breton J, Lavergne J, Wakeham MC, Nabedryk E, Jones MR. The Unusually Strong Hydrogen Bond between the Carbonyl of QA and His M219 in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides Reaction Center Is Not Essential for Efficient Electron Transfer from QA- to QB. Biochemistry. 2007;46:6468–6476. doi: 10.1021/bi700057f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Breton J, Boullais C, Mioskowski C, Sebban P, Baciou L, Nabedryk E. Vibrational Spectroscopy Favors a Unique QB Binding Site at the Proximal Position in Wild-Type Reaction Centers and in the Pro-L209 -> Tyr Mutant from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry. 2002;41:12921–12927. doi: 10.1021/bi026565k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kandori H, Belenky M, Heltzfeld J. Vibrational Frequency and Dipolar Orientation of the Protonated Schiff Base in Bacteriorhodopsin before and after Photoisomerization. Biochemistry. 2002;41:6026–6031. doi: 10.1021/bi025585j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Noguchi T, Inoue Y, Tang X-S. Hydrogen Bonding Interaction between the Primary Quinone Acceptor QA and a Histidine Side Chain in Photosystem II as Revealed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1999;38:399–403. doi: 10.1021/bi982294v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Debus RJG, Feher RJ, Okamura MY. Iron-Depleted Reaction Centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26.1: Characterization and Reconstitution with Fe2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ Biochemistry. 1986;25:2276–2287. doi: 10.1021/bi00356a064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]








