Abstract
We explore the different local symmetries in colloidal glasses beyond the standard pair correlation analysis. Using our newly developed X-ray cross correlation analysis (XCCA) concept together with brilliant coherent X-ray sources, we have been able to access and classify the otherwise hidden local order within disorder. The emerging local symmetries are coupled to distinct momentum transfer (Q) values, which do not coincide with the maxima of the amorphous structure factor. Four-, 6-, 10- and, most prevalently, 5-fold symmetries are observed. The observation of dynamical evolution of these symmetries forms a connection to dynamical heterogeneities in glasses, which is far beyond conventional diffraction analysis. The XCCA concept opens up a fascinating view into the world of disorder and will definitely allow, with the advent of free electron X-ray lasers, an accurate and systematic experimental characterization of the structure of the liquid and glass states.
Keywords: coherent X-ray diffraction, higher-order correlations, structure
Disordered matter, such as glasses and liquids, does not exhibit translational symmetry and in turn is able to accommodate different local symmetries in the same system, among them the icosahedral local order, which belongs to the forbidden motifs in periodic structures. This mysterious and so far experimentally inaccessible localized order within disorder has been fascinating scientists for many decades (1–5), because it is held responsible for the undercooling of liquids and the existence of the glass state. Similarly, nonperiodic materials have always attracted the attention of materials scientists, because they do carry—through these structural degrees of freedom—a unique potential to display novel smart functions (6–8).
The microscopic understanding of the structure and properties of crystals has advanced rapidly during the last decades. The translational invariance of the crystalline state allowed the introduction of the Brillouin Zone concept, thus enabling an elegant and powerful theoretical description of the thermal, electronic and magnetic properties. At the same time, crystal diffraction has continuously been developed to such a fine art that even complex biological structures can be solved today with atomic resolution (when forced to form a crystal). In severe contrast to this, the local microscopic structure of disordered matter has remained a challenge and a mystery (1–3). Our lack of knowledge on the local order within disorder constrains the development of a better understanding of the properties of liquids and glasses (9). In turn, the open question of how the structure of the liquid and amorphous states can be accessed experimentally has become one of the holy grails in condensed matter science (10).
The fundamental limits of conventional (X-ray, neutron, electron) diffraction from disordered materials are accountable for this situation, because such techniques only allow to extract the pair distribution function g(r) = n0−2〈ρ(0)ρ(r)〉 of the single particle density ρ(r) = Σmδ(r − Rm) averaged over the illuminated sample area. Here, and in the rest of the article, Rm denotes the positions of the particles, n0 the average particle density and r the interparticle distance. The associated structure factor 〈S(Q)〉 = 1 + n0∫(g(r) − 1) eiQrdr, which gives the scattering intensity I(Q), depends on the momentum transfer Q. 〈S(Q)〉 shows rather similar features for all disordered structures (see Fig. 1B), thus carrying a quite limited information, i.e., the probability to find another atom in a certain distance from a given “average atom.” In particular, 〈S(Q)〉 provides no direct answer on the local symmetries in the system (11), which are intimately related to the local bonding and to bonding angles.
Our experimental and theoretical approach to solve this age-old problem has followed the guiding principle that the intrinsic spatial (and temporal) averaging mechanism performed in conventional (i.e., partially coherent) diffraction has to be eliminated experimentally. Then, a properly defined higher-order angular correlation function has to be devised and applied to data in order to disclose the hidden local symmetries of disordered matter. The first results obtained from different colloidal glasses deliver a new realm of structural details, which already shed a fascinating new light on the origin of glasses and on the glass forming mechanism.
Configurational averaging can be avoided if the coherence volume of a partially coherent X-ray beam is equal to the illuminated sample volume (12, 13). In case of extreme forward scattering only the transverse coherence is relevant (14). Additionally, temporal averaging can be neglected for exposure times shorter than the onset time for speckle dynamics (15). Modern high-brilliance synchrotron radiation facilities and—in the future, even more so—free electron X-ray laser facilities deliver sufficient coherent X-ray flux for carrying out (nonaveraging) coherent diffraction experiments from disordered matter that produce the well-known laser speckle patterns on a 2D-detector (14–16) (see Fig. 1A). By applying a temporal correlator to one selected speckle spot associated with a fixed Q-vector, the Q-dependent temporal relaxation behavior of colloidal glasses has been extracted (14) [X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS)] (see for example Fig. 2A).
Results and Discussion
Colloidal glasses can be studied with commercially available 2D-detectors, whereas suitable 2D-detectors, which cover the Q-range required to study molecular or metallic glasses yet have to be developed. Here, we use a similar experimental setup as for XPCS (Fig. 3A): The coherent X-ray beam prepared at station ID10A of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) hits a colloidal glass sample and produces a full 2π speckle pattern at the 2D-detector covering a Q-range up to 0.2 nm−1. A typical dataset displays the expected isotropic granular “intensity rings” that are mediated by the random local order within the system (Fig. 1A). The deduced angular averaged structure factor shows the standard radial intensity distribution (Fig. 1B).
To transcend this information, we must unravel correlations in the angular distribution of the X-ray speckles. At first sight this is not evident at all, because the angular variation of the intensity exhibits an isotropic distribution as anticipated for amorphous systems (Fig. 1A). However, as we shall show, this is possible by considering the generic intensity-intensity cross correlation
and the associated 4-point correlation function.
where 〈…〉 means a statistical average.
Angular Cross Correlation Function.
Here, we introduce a first simple subset of these new types of higher-order correlations, i.e., the instantaneous local angular correlations with respect to a given azimuth Δ.* They are found by performing the average in Eq. 1 over ϕ with the vectors Q and Q′ separated by Δ on the intensity ring with modulus Q (see Fig. 3B) and t = t′. We define the normalized angular 4-point cross-correlation function CQ(Δ),
with
Fig. 1C shows the result after applying CQ(Δ) (Eq. 3) to data in Fig. 1A for selected Q values. Most fascinating is that CQ(Δ) clearly reveals a very pronounced anisotropy with 5-fold symmetry specifically for the intensity ring associated with |Q| = 0.04 nm−1 (marked in black in Fig. 1A), which points to a so far hidden local symmetry in the colloidal system. The other Q values shown in Fig. 1C present a CQ(Δ), which most closely resembles 4-fold and 10-fold symmetry; and 6-fold symmetry can also be found (Fig. 2B). The fluctuations of the data points are (mostly) due to its speckle origin and not due to counting statistics (see numerical simulation results below). The solid lines are only guides to the eye to point out the dominant symmetry in CQ(Δ).
Encouraged by this discovery, we have systematically evaluated the speckle patterns of many different colloidal systems, which all produced pronounced features in CQ(Δ). We focus in this report on a hard sphere polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) system with radius of 117 nm. Details on the sample preparation can be found in Materials and Method.
We have made several systematic observations in all colloidal glass systems. The emerging local symmetries are coupled to distinct Q values, which do not coincide with the maxima of the amorphous structure factor. The most prevailing symmetry is 5-fold.† For a basic understanding of these observations we assume our sample to consist of locally-favored structures with icosahedral symmetry embedded randomly in disordered regions (19). Then, CQ(Δ) (Eq. 3) has the simple form
with ρQi(ϕ) as the structure amplitude of the ith LFS. Eq. 6 shows that CQ(Δ) is a superposition of the angular intensity-autocorrelation function of individual local structures, each contributing an intensity pattern |ρQi(ϕ)|2 as the one in Fig. 4B. In the coherent speckle pattern produced by the random ensemble of such clusters, this pattern becomes completely obscured. Only the application of XCCA recovers its symmetries. In the SI we present a straightforward discussion of the Q-dependent behavior of CQ(Δ) based on an analytical derivation of the structure factor of icosahedral clusters (20–22). We note that angular correlations between local clusters, so called medium-range correlations, are also accessible by XCCA. This requires a different 4-point correlator in Eq. (3), which takes Q-vectors with |Q′| ≠ |Q| into account.
We have performed calculations of the full expression (Eq. 3) for 8000 randomly oriented icosahedra (Fig. 4C) on a cubic lattice. The resulting correlation patterns confirm very nicely the local angular symmetries of our experiment (Fig. 4A) and show that the sprinkle of the data points is due to the coherent scattering process (speckles).
Dynamical Heterogeneity.
A further most fascinating observation is associated with the temporal relaxation behavior of CQ(Δ) (Fig. 2B). Our new 4-point correlator unveils a continuous change of the locally-favored structures within the first 600 s from initially 6-fold symmetry to 5-fold symmetry, with no obvious symmetry in between. Apparently, icosahedral clusters reorganize in different orientations, form either out of local nanocrystals (hexagonal/fcc) or disorder, all of which involves a breaking and forming of bonds. Such behavior is known from molecular dynamics simulations as “dynamical heterogeneity” (19). Within the observed time frame, the temporal autocorrelation drops below 30% (see Fig. 2A). This new X-ray cross-correlation analysis concept reveals now that the processes, which are responsible for these relaxations, are accompanied by distinct changes of the local structure. These cooperative processes are the β-relaxation at shorter and α-relaxation at longer time scales (23), where the β-relaxation describes the rattling of individual particles trapped in transient cages formed by their neighbors and the α-relaxation the structural rearrangement of these cages (24). In future, this technique can be used to interrogate the time dependence of the local structures in glassy and supercooled states and new local structural motifs in strong and fragile glass formers by employing even more sophisticated cross-correlators between intensities at different times.
Conclusions
We have introduced and applied a particularly simple 4-point cross correlator that enables us to unveil otherwise hidden symmetries in a colloidal glass. Our approach is general enough to accommodate many more complex cross correlators derived from Eq. 1. In particular, the orientational pair–pair correlations will allow access to midrange order. Preliminary yet promising calculations employing a mode-coupling ansatz and an appropriate atomic potential (25) show a dominant instability for 6- and 5-fold symmetry (associated with close-packed structures) and a multitude of incommensurate wave vector instabilities (associated with random arrangements). This should enable to extract in the future the relevant interaction potentials from experimental datasets.
The availability of short-pulse XFEL radiation in the 0.1-nm regime and with 100-fs pulse length will open up the fascinating option to analyze the local structure of liquids (in particular also water) by applying the new concept of X-ray cross correlation analysis (XCCA) to single laser shot speckle diffraction pattern. The combination of short-pulse XFEL radiation and large 2D-detector arrays will also open up the window for the study of nano-powders and transient complex molecular structures in solution.
Materials and Methods
Samples.
The colloidal particles were synthesized via a polymerization method for preparing lattices of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with a covalently surface linked stabilizer of poly(12-hydroxy-stearic-acid) (PHSA) following the method of Antl et al. (26). These fluorescent PMMA particles are obtained by copolymerization of methyl methacrylate, methacrylic acid and the fluorescent monomer, 7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-methyl methacrylate (NBD-dyed) (27). To obtain highly concentrated, glassy systems, particle suspensions of ≈20–30% in volume were filled into quartz-glass capillaries of 1 mm and centrifuged at 1,360 × g for ≈2 days. The supernatant decalin has been removed and the capillaries sealed.
Data Treatment.
The dark images were averaged and subtracted from the data. The colloidal form factor fS(Q) has been obtained from a diluted PMMA sample. The form factor allowed to deduce the static structure factor S(Q) of the concentrated sample presented in this work. A multispeckle temporal intensity autocorrelation analysis yielded the dynamic correlation function of the sample. The dynamical correlation function, which relates to the diffusive motion of the colloidal particles, shows no decay within the first 100 s. Therefore, for the XCCA analysis we averaged 50–100 CCD images. Rings of intensity with constant Q and 1- to 2-pixel widths have been extracted and an unbiased cross correlation function according to Eq. 3 has been calculated.
Note also that a diffraction pattern obtained via a 2D detector (i.e., mapping an Ewald sphere) will not satisfy Friedel's law at higher momentum transfers (see SI).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank M. Rauscher for discussions. Samples were synthesized by A. Schofield. This work was supported by the A. v. Humboldt Foundation (A.D.O.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0905337106/DCSupplemental.
A formalism, which is applicable only to highly diluted solutions studied with incoherent radiation, was developed in refs. 17 and 18 (see also ref. 10).
The observation of odd symmetries appears to be in conflict with Friedel's law (I(−Q) = I(Q)), which holds for any plane in reciprocal space that intersects the origin. The observation of odd symmetries in our scheme is due to the deviation from the far-field (Fraunhofer) limit (13), because the sample is located as close as 20 cm to the 10-μm entrance slit, thereby adding an imaginary part to the phase factor of each particle.
References
- 1.Frank FC. Supercooling of liquids. Proc Roy Soc London Ser A. 1952;215:43–46. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bernal JD. Geometry of the structure of monatomic liquids. Nature. 1960;185:68–70. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Steinhardt PJ, Nelson DR, Ronchetti M. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys Rev B. 1983;28:784–805. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nelson DR, Spaepen F. Polytetrahedral order in condensed matter. Sol Stat Phys. 1989;42:1–90. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reichert H, et al. Observation of five-fold local symmetry in liquid lead. Nature. 2000;408:839–841. doi: 10.1038/35048537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Salmon PS. Amorphous materials: Order within disorder. Nat Mat. 2002;1:87–88. doi: 10.1038/nmat737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hufnagel TC. Amorphous materials: Finding order within disorder. Nat Mat. 2004;3:666–667. doi: 10.1038/nmat1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Martin JD, Goettler SJ, Fossé N, Iton L. Designing intermediate-range order in amorphous materials. Nature. 2002;419:381–384. doi: 10.1038/nature01022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kivelson SA, Tarjus G. In search of a theory of supercooled liquids. Nat Mat. 2008;7:831–833. doi: 10.1038/nmat2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Treacy MMJ, Gibson JM, Fan L, Paterson DJ, McNulty I. Fluctuation microscopy: A probe of medium range order. Rep Prog Phys. 2005;68:2899–2944. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schenk T, Holland-Moritz D, Simonet V, Bellissent R, Herlach DM. Icosahedral short-range order in deeply undercooled metallic melts. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;89 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.075507. 075507-1-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lengeler B. Coherence in X-ray physics. Naturwissenschaften. 2001;88:249–260. doi: 10.1007/s001140100221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sinha SK, Tolan M, Gibaud A. Effects of partial coherence on the scattering of X-rays by matter. Phys Rev B. 1998;57:2740–2758. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grübel G, Zontone F. Correlation spectroscopy with coherent X-rays. J Alloys Comp. 2004;362:3–11. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sutton M, et al. Observation of speckle by diffraction with coherent X-rays. Nature. 1991;352:608–610. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grübel G, Stephenson GB, Gutt C, Sinn H, Tschentscher Th. XPCS at the european X-ray free electron laser facility. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B. 2007;262:357–367. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kam Z, Koch MHJ, Bordas J. Fluctuation X-ray scattering from biological particles in frozen solution by using synchrotron radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1981;78:3559–3562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kam Z. Determination of macromolecular structure in solution by spatial correlation of scattering fluctuations. Macromolecules. 1977;10:927–934. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shintani H, Tanaka H. Frustration on the way to crystallization in glass. Nat Phys. 2006;2:200–206. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chow PC, et al. Synchrotron X-ray study of orientational order in single crystal C60 at room temperature. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;69:2943–2946. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Axe JD, Moss SC, Neumann DA. Structure and dynamics of crystalline C60. Sol Stat Phys. 1994;48:149–224. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Michel KH, Parlinski K. Symmetry properties, normal modes, and free energy of orientationally disordered crystals. Phys Rev B. 1985;31:1823–1835. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.31.1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weeks ER, Crocker JC, Levitt AC, Schofield A, Weitz DA. Three-dimensional direct imaging of structural relaxation near the colloidal glass transition. Science. 2000;287:627–631. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5453.627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Götze W, Sjögren L. Relaxation processes in supercooled liquids. Rep Prog Phys. 1992;55:241–376. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jin YM, Khachaturyan AG. Atomic density function theory and modeling of microstructure evolution at the atomic scale. J Appl Phys. 2006;100 013519. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Antl L, et al. The preparation of poly (methyl methacrylate) lattices in non-aqueous media. Coll Surf. 1986;17:67–78. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jardine RS, Bartlett P. Synthesis of non-aqueous fluorescent hard-sphere polymer colloids. Colloid and Surface Physicochem Eng Aspect. 2002;211:127–132. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.