Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2009 May 4;53(7):3147–3149. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00023-09

Emergence of Quinolone-Resistant Bordetella pertussis in Japan

Masayuki Ohtsuka 1,2, Ken Kikuchi 1,*, Kenichiro Shimizu 1, Namiko Takahashi 1, Yuka Ono 1, Takashi Sasaki 1, Keiichi Hiramatsu 1
PMCID: PMC2704657  PMID: 19414571

Abstract

Six Bordetella pertussis strains isolated from children in Japan from 2004 to 2006 showed high-level resistance to nalidixic acid (NAL; MIC, >256 μg/ml) and decreased susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones. All of the NAL-resistant strains had the same D87G mutation in gyrA.


Pertussis is an acute respiratory tract infection caused by Bordetella pertussis that is particularly serious for neonates and infants (2, 5, 19). Although the introduction of whole-cell and acellular vaccines caused a drastic decrease in the incidence of pertussis globally compared with that in the prevaccine era, developed countries have experienced a marked increase over the past 15 years (2). There has also been a recent shift in the age distribution of pertussis patients to adults and adolescents, an unrecognized but significant source of infection for neonates and infants (2, 5, 9, 19). Macrolides are widely used for antimicrobial treatment and postexposure prophylaxis of pertussis (2, 5). However, several erythromycin-resistant strains of B. pertussis have emerged in the United States (13, 14, 20) and alternative therapeutic agents are being sought to combat these strains. Several fluoroquinolones demonstrate excellent in vitro activity against B. pertussis (1, 3, 8, 11, 16, 22), and although contraindicated for children (1, 16), they might be candidate agents to treat adults with pertussis.

However, as we found six nalidixic acid (NAL)-resistant B. pertussis strains isolated from 2004 to 2006 in Japan by disk diffusion test (no inhibitory zone detected around a 30-μg NAL disk on Bordet-Gengou agar), the MICs of erythromycin, NAL, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and chloramphenicol were determined by Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) on Bordet-Gengou agar (7, 10). The quality control strains used were B. pertussis CCUG 30837T (= ATCC 9797T) and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 (10). Strains for which the MICs of erythromycin and NAL were less than or equal to 0.12 and 32 μg/ml were considered susceptible (4, 10). Whole sequences of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE of the NAL-resistant strains were determined by PCR and direct sequencing. To prepare template DNA, one loopful colony of each strain was resuspended in 100 μl of 20 mM Tris-2 mM EDTA buffer (pH 7.5), incubated at 100°C for 15 min, and then centrifuged for 5 min at 23,200 × g. The 50-μl reaction mixture contained 2 μl of the supernatant fluid, 25 pmol of each primer, a 0.4 mM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 2.5 U of TaKaRa LA-Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan), and LA-Taq GC buffer I (TaKaRa). After an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, amplification proceeded for 30 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min 30 s, with a final 10-min extension at 72°C. Following cleanup with a QIAquick PCR purification column (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), the PCR product was sequenced by using a Big Dye terminator (version 3.1; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The primers used for PCR and direct sequencing are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Primers used in this study

Target and primer Sequence (5′ to 3′) Positiona Direction
gyrA
    gyrA1b CTCGGGTTCATCCTTACATA −40 to −21 Forward
    gyrA2 GCATGGCCACCAACATTC 530 to 547 Forward
    gyrA3 ACTTCATCGCCATCATCA 1175 to 1192 Forward
    gyrA4 TGTACTGGCTGAAGGTGT 1829 to 1846 Forward
    gyrA5b CCGTGCCAGTCCAGCATTTC 2776 to 2757 Reverse
    gyrA6 ACACCTTCAGCCAGTACA 1846 to 1829 Reverse
    gyrA7 TGATGATGGCGATGAAGT 1192 to 1175 Reverse
    gyrA8 GAATGTTGGTGGCCATGC 547 to 530 Reverse
gyrB
    gyrB1b ATCTGATCCGCGACACAGAT −100 to −80 Forward
    gyrB2 ATCTTCACCAACATCGAG 556 to 573 Forward
    gyrB3 GCAAGAGCGTGCTGGAAG 1223 to 1240 Forward
    gyrB4 CGAACGCACCAAGGCATC 1878 to 1896 Forward
    gyrB5b CACGCGTATCGGCCAACGTC 2568 to 2539 Reverse
    gyrB6 GATGCCTTGGTGCGTTCG 1896 to 1878 Reverse
    gyrB7 CTTCCAGCACGCTCTTGC 1240 to 1223 Reverse
    gyrB8 CGCGATGTTGGTGAAGAT 573 to 556 Reverse
parC
    parC1b GTGATCATTCCCAAGCGCG −128 to −110 Forward
    parC2 TGCCCGTGATGCTGCTCA 518 to 535 Forward
    parC3 AAGAGTGGGTGGCGTTTC 1148 to 1165 Forward
    parC4 CACCACCATGATCGATCT 1806 to 1823 Forward
    parC5b GAACACACCGATGTTGACGA 2414 to 2395 Reverse
    parC6 AGATCGATCATGGTGGTG 1823 to 1806 Reverse
    parC7 GAAACGCCACCCACTCTT 1165 to 1148 Reverse
    parC8 TGAGCAGCATCACGGGCA 535 to 518 Reverse
parE
    parE1b ACTTGTCCGTAAAATGTCGG −47 to −28 Forward
    parE2 GACGTGATCGAAGCACTG 445 to 462 Forward
    parE3 CAAGGGCGTCAAGCTGCT 936 to 953 Forward
    parE4 GATCCACGATATTTCGGT 1410 to 1427 Forward
    parE5b GTACGCATAGGCGGTGAATG 2051to 2032 Reverse
    parE6 ACCGAAATATCGTGGATC 1427 to 1410 Reverse
    parE7 AGCAGCTTGACGCCCTTG 953 to 936 Reverse
    parE8 CAGTGCTTCGATCACGTC 462 to 445 Reverse
a

The position of each gene of B. pertussis Tohama I (GenBank accession number BX640422) is shown.

b

The primers were used for PCR of each gene.

The results are shown in Table 2. These six strains were erythromycin sensitive but showed high-level resistance to NAL (MIC, >256 μg/ml) and decreased susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones. All of the NAL-resistant strains showed the same mutation in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs; e.g., in Escherichia coli at positions 67 to 122) (18, 21) of gyrA from aspartic acid to glycine at position 87. gyrB, parC, and parE showed no mutations in the NAL-resistant strains (data not shown). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis (15) of XbaI-digested DNAs showed different patterns among the NAL-resistant strains tested (Fig. 1).

TABLE 2.

Quinolone susceptibilities and gyrA QRDR mutations of B. pertussis strains

Strain Date isolated (day/mo/yr) Patient
Location MIC (μg/ml)a
NAL resistanced Codon 87e of gyrA (amino acid)
Age (yr) Sex NAL NAL with PAβN NOR CIP SPX LVX GAT CHL
CCUG 30837T 2 0.25 0.125 0.032 0.016 0.016 0.008 0.5 S GAC(D); WTb
BP101 26/07/2005 6 Male Oita 2 NDc 0.032 0.016 0.008 0.016 0.008 0.25 S GAC(D); WT
BP106 13/10/2005 0 Male Oita 1 ND 0.064 0.008 0.004 0.008 0.004 0.25 S GAC(D); WT
BP109 12/12/2005 0 Unknown Oita 2 ND 0.064 0.008 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.125 S GAC(D); WT
BP111 06/01/2006 4 Unknown Oita 2 ND 0.064 0.016 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.25 S GAC(D); WT
BP112 22/01/2006 0 Male Oita 1 ND 0.064 0.008 0.004 0.008 0.004 0.25 S GAC(D); WT
BP113 08/02/2006 7 Male Oita 2 0.25 0.064 0.008 0.004 0.008 0.004 0.5 S GAC(D); WT
BP115 17/02/2006 8 Female Oita 1 ND 0.064 0.016 0.004 0.008 0.008 0.5 S GAC(D); WT
BP128 05/04/2007 0 Male Osaka 1 ND 0.064 0.016 0.008 0.016 0.008 0.25 S GAC(D); WT
BP58 24/04/2004 0 Male Osaka >256 64 1 0.125 0.125 0.064 0.032 0.5 R GGC(G)
BP99 06/07/2005 0 Male Oita >256 32 1 0.125 0.032 0.064 0.032 0.25 R GGC(G)
BP117 22/04/2006 0 Male Osaka >256 64 0.5 0.125 0.064 0.064 0.032 0.25 R GGC(G)
BP118 04/05/2006 4 Male Oita >256 64 0.5 0.125 0.064 0.064 0.032 0.5 R GGC(G)
BP121 16/05/2006 10 Female Fukuoka >256 32 1 0.125 0.064 0.064 0.032 0.25 R GGC(G)
BP122 17/05/2006 5 Male Fukuoka >256 32 1 0.125 0.064 0.064 0.032 0.25 R GGC(G)
a

NOR, norfloxacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; SPX, sparfloxacin; LVX, levofloxacin; GAT, gatifloxacin; CHL, chloramphenicol.

b

WT, wild type.

c

ND, not done.

d

S, susceptible; R, resistant.

e

In each case, the amino acid changed is underlined and the amino acid substituted for it is in parentheses.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of XbaI-digested DNAs of NAL-resistant (*) and NAL-sensitive B. pertussis strains.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of quinolone resistance in B. pertussis. All of the strains were isolated from children and were genetically and epidemiologically unrelated. Although fluoroquinolones are not usually prescribed for children, they are widely used to treat respiratory tract infections in adults (3). In the vaccination era, an increasing proportion of pertussis cases occur in adults and adolescents who have lost immunity to B. pertussis, and adult pertussis is a likely source of infant pertussis outbreaks (2, 5, 9, 19). Treatment of unrecognized adult pertussis with fluoroquinolones might, therefore, be important for selecting quinolone-resistant B. pertussis.

There are three different mechanisms of quinolone resistance: mutations in drug targets such as DNA gyrase or topoisomerase IV, reduced accumulation of quinolones, and the existence of products that protect the microorganism from the lethal effects of quinolones, such as Qnr (17). The most common mutation observed in quinolone-resistant E. coli is at position 83 of gyrA (18, 21). In our studies, glutamine at position 83 and serine at position 84 are found in B. pertussis strains tested instead of serine at position 83 and alanine at position 84 in E. coli (data not shown). Since these two amino acids are consistent with the gyrA sequences in both the NAL-susceptible and NAL-resistant strains, their amino acids may be conservative and do not affect quinolone resistance in B. pertussis. Substitution of aspartic acid at position 87 is the second most commonly observed mutation in clinical isolates of quinolone-resistant gram-negative and gram-positive microorganisms (18). In this study, aspartic acid to glycine at position 87 of gyrA is the only substitution observed in all of the six NAL-resistant strains compared to NAL-sensitive strains.

A few studies have examined the two remaining mechanisms of quinolone resistance in Bordetella and related genera. Kadlec et al. (12) demonstrated that efflux-mediated resistance to NAL in Bordetella bronchiseptica strains was due to a FloR or CmlB1 exporter that could also export chloramphenicol and be inhibited by the efflux pump inhibitor Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide (PAβN). This study found no differences in the MICs of chloramphenicol against both NAL-resistant and NAL-sensitive B. pertussis strains (Table 2). PAβN at 80 μg/ml (one-fourth of the MIC) could change the MIC of NAL against NAL-resistant strains but similarly decreased the MIC of NAL against NAL-sensitive strains. The presence of Qnr increases the MICs of fluoroquinolones by 16- to 125-fold but affects the MIC of NAL only 2- to 8-fold (17). These quinolone resistance patterns are quite different from those of our NAL-resistant strains. Therefore, the single QRDR mutation in gyrA may constitute the main mechanism of quinolone resistance among the strains tested here.

Once a single mutation of gyrA occurs in gram-negative bacteria, additional mutations in gyrA or parC occur more frequently than in wild-type bacteria (6), and such a stepwise accumulation of multiple mutations increases resistance to fluoroquinolones. Continued surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among B. pertussis strains is clearly needed to control and eradicate B. pertussis transmission.

Acknowledgments

We thank Y. Arakawa and K. Kamachi for useful suggestions about QRDR PCR.

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for 21st Century COE Research (13226114) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology of Japan.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 4 May 2009.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Appleman, M. E., T. L. Hadfield, J. K. Gaines, and R. E. Winn. 1987. Susceptibility of Bordetella pertussis to five quinolone antimicrobic drugs. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 8:131-133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bamberger, E. S., and I. Srugo. 2008. What is new in pertussis? Eur. J. Pediatr. 167:133-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bourgeois, N., J.-C. Ghnassia, and F. Doucet-Populaire. 2003. In vitro activity of fluoroquinolones against erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant Bordetella pertussis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:742-743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; eighteenth informational supplement. Document M100-S17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 5.Crowcroft, N. S., and R. G. Pebody. 2006. Recent development in pertussis. Lancet 367:1926-1936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Drlica, K., and X. Zhao. 2007. Mutant selection window hypothesis updated. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:681-688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Galanakis, E., J. A. Englund, P. Abe, and X. Qin. 2007. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bordetella pertussis isolates in the state of Washington. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 29:609-611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gordon, K. A., J. Fusco, D. J. Biedenbach, M. A. Pfealler, and R. N. Jones. 2001. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Bordetella pertussis from northern California: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3599-3600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hewlett, E. L., and K. M. Edwards. 2005. Pertussis—not just for kids. N. Engl. J. Med. 352:1215-1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hill, B. C., C. N. Baker, and F. C. Tenover. 2000. A simplified method for testing Bordetella pertussis for resistance to erythromycin and other antimicrobial agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1151-1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoppe, J. E., A. Dalhoff, and D. Pfründer. 1998. In vitro susceptibilities of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis to BAY 12-8039, trovafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1868. (Letter.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kadlec, K., C. Kehrenberg, and S. Schwarz. 2007. Efflux-mediated resistance to florfenicol and/or chloramphenicol in Bordetella bronchiseptica: identification of a novel chloramphenicol exporter. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59:191-196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Korgenski, E. K., and J. A. Daly. 1997. Surveillance and detection of erythromycin resistance in Bordetella pertussis isolates recovered from a pediatric population in the Intermountain West region of the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2989-2991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lewis, K., M. A. Saubolle, F. C. Tenover, M. F. Rudinsky, S. D. Barbour, and J. D. Cherry. 1995. Pertussis caused by an erythromycin-resistant strain of Bordetella pertussis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 14:388-391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mooi, F. R., H. Hallander, C. H. Wirsing von König, B. Hoet, and N. Guiso. 2000. Epidemiological typing of Bordetella pertussis isolates: recommendations for a standard methodology. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:174-181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mortensen, J. E., and G. L. Rodgers. 2000. In vitro activity of gemifloxacin and other antimicrobial agents against isolates of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45(Suppl. 1):47-49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Robicsek, A., G. A. Jacoby, and D. C. Hooper. 2006. The worldwide emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 6:629-640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ruiz, J. 2003. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alternations, decreased accumulation and DNA gyrase protection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:1109-1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Singh, M., and K. Lingappan. 2006. Whooping cough: the current scene. Chest 130:1547-1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wilson, K. E., P. K. Cassiday, T. Popovic, and G. N. Sanden. 2002. Bordetella pertussis isolates with a heterogeneous phenotype for erythromycin resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2942-2944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yoshida, H., M. Bogaki, M. Nakamura, and S. Nakamura. 1990. Quinolone resistance-determining region in the DNA gyrase gyrA gene of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1271-1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zackrisson, G., J.-E. Brorson, B. Björnegård, and B. Trollfors. 1985. Susceptibility of Bordetella pertussis to doxycycline, cinoxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, imipenem, mecillinam and rifampicin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 15:629-632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES