Abstract
Cutaneous metastatic carcinoma, also known as carcinoma erysipeloides, is an unusual clinical finding. In women, it is most frequently found in association with breast cancer rather than other visceral malignancies. Breast cancer patients can present with cutaneous manifestations of breast disease at the time of their initial diagnosis; however, cutaneous metastases more often present well after the initial diagnosis and treatment of the breast disease. Prompt recognition of skin metastases by the plastic surgeon, especially during the delayed setting of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy, allows for earlier intervention in treating the systemic spread of the disease. A clinical case of carcinoma erysipeloides presenting in this delayed setting is outlined in the present report, along with a review of the literature.
Keywords: Breast cancer, Carcinoma erysipeloides, Cutaneous metastases
Abstract
Le carcinome cutané métastatique, ou carcinome érysipéloïde, est une observation clinique inhabituelle. Chez les femmes, il s’associe plutôt au cancer du sein qu’aux autres tumeurs malignes viscérales. Les patientes atteintes du cancer du sein peuvent présenter des manifestations cutanées de ce cancer au moment du diagnostic. Cependant, les métastases cutanées font beaucoup plus souvent leur apparition bien après le diagnostic initial et le traitement de la maladie cancéreuse. Un dépistage rapide des métastases cutanées par le chirurgien plastique, notamment dans le cadre reporté de la chirurgie reconstructive après une mastectomie, permet une intervention plus rapide pour éviter la propagation systémique de la maladie. Le présent rapport expose un cas clinique de carcinome érysipéloïde, de même qu’une analyse bibliographique dans un tel contexte.
Cutaneous metastatic carcinoma is an unusual clinical finding. Review of the literature indicates that the incidence of cutaneous metastases for all types of carcinomas ranges from 0.7% to 10.0% (1–3). Similarly, a more recent meta-analysis (4) demonstrated the overall incidence to be closer to 5.3%. Metastatic cutaneous lesions are more often found in women with breast cancer, than in those with other visceral malignancies, with an incidence exceeding 20% (3–6). Often, the cutaneous lesions do not become apparent until quite some time has passed from the initial treatment of the original carcinoma. In light of the current trend among plastic surgeons to perform breast reconstruction immediately following mastectomy, it becomes incumbent on clinicians caring for breast cancer patients to appreciate the incidence of cutaneous manifestations, and to be able to accurately and immediately identify this clinical entity in all its forms. Only with prompt recognition comes the opportunity to treat the systemic spread of the cancer in as early a stage as possible to improve survival rates.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 51-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of right-sided T3c N2 breast cancer underwent a modified radical mastectomy in March 2003 followed by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. She then underwent breast reconstruction with a delayed pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in October 2003. She returned to the plastic surgery clinic in February 2006 for evaluation for possible nipple areola complex reconstruction. The patient had done well in the three years following her previous surgeries, and was being followed regularly by her medical and surgical oncologists. Overall, she was very satisfied with her reconstruction and was eager to proceed with the secondary nipple procedure.
However, just before her planned surgery date, she had noticed the gradual onset of a macular-papular rash on her right chest that had slowly progressed over the previous month. She then went to see her surgical oncologist, who also noted the rash. No diagnosis was reached, and no further testing was prescribed. She was told that most likely the rash was a self-limited process, and she was instructed to simply observe its progress. The area of the rash was tender to palpation and swollen, but the patient denied any fevers or chills suggesting an infectious process.
During the February 2006 visit, on physical examination, the breast transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was noted to be soft and the incisions well healed. Along the upper inner quadrant of the native breast skin adjacent to the flap, a tender, erythematous macular-papular rash with induration was noted (Figure 1). The etiology of the rash was unclear. The more common infectious processes on the list of differential etiologies were considered unlikely given the acute time course and lack of systemic symptoms. The appearance of the rash was alarming enough, however, to warrant a referral to a dermatologist for further evaluation. On examination, an immediate skin biopsy was performed by the dermatologist.
Histological evaluation of the biopsy specimen was performed. Dysplastic cells were seen predominantly growing within superficial and deep dermal lymphatic vessels, with morphological features resembling those of inflammatory breast carcinoma (Figure 2). Pathological diagnosis was given as “recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma”.
With this diagnosis, the patient returned to her medical oncologist and was started on systemic chemotherapy, consisting of Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab. Follow-up at two months showed that her skin changes had significantly improved, with near eradication of the rash.
DISCUSSION
Breast cancer continues to be the second most common cancer among women, after nonmelanoma skin cancer, with a lifetime risk of 13% (7). Many women with breast cancer will elect to proceed with breast reconstruction following surgical removal of the diseased breast. Whether autologous tissue or implant reconstruction is performed, and whether done in an immediate or delayed fashion, these patients may be followed by a plastic surgeon for several years following their initial diagnosis. This is especially true if they pursue secondary aspects of their reconstruction such as nipple reconstruction, contralateral breast reduction, tattooing and so forth. Although the incidence of cutaneous metastases from all carcinomas is rare, it has been shown that it is mostly found among women with breast cancer. In an autopsy series of 7518 patients with visceral malignancy, 26.5% of women with breast cancer were found to have cutaneous metastases (3). A subsequent meta-analysis (4) confirmed this incidence of skin metastasis in breast cancer to be approximately 23.9%. These numbers are far in excess to those cited for other visceral malignancies. Therefore, the ability of reconstructive surgeons of the breast to identify cutaneous metastases accurately and immediately can result in earlier diagnosis and therefore earlier treatment for their patients.
The differential diagnoses of cutaneous lesions are varied. In a breast cancer patient, other possible etiologies besides cutaneous metastases include cutaneous change, either acute or chronic – secondary to radiation therapy – or other infectious processes such as erysipelas, cellulitis or candidiasis. A physician caring for breast cancer patients must be able to distinguish between these. In the present patient, an infectious process was considered, but the clinical picture and history did not completely support this diagnosis. In general, specific clinical features such as lack of a febrile response, absence of leukocytosis and prolonged presence of the lesion (weeks to months) without response to antibiotics should alert the physician to the possibility of cutaneous metastasis (8).
Inflammatory breast carcinoma is an unusual but distinct form of cutaneous metastases. It was originally described in 1924 in a review of 28 cases of breast cancers associated with inflammatory skin changes (9). These skin changes, characterized by red induration with distinctly marginated borders associated with skin metastases, were later described as “carcinoma erysipelatoides” by Rasch in 1931 (10) for their similarity to the infectious skin condition erysipelas (Figure 3). Thus, both terms, inflammatory carcinoma and carcinoma erysipeloides, have been used interchangeably when describing skin metastases with inflammatory skin changes and histological invasion of dermal lymphatics (6,8,11–15).
In a recent retrospective review by Mordenti et al (2), 164 cases of skin metastases specifically from breast carcinoma were examined to determine the most common clinical and histopathological presentations. Skin papules and/or nodules were found in 80% of patients, telangiectatic carcinomas in 11%, erysipeloid carcinomas in 3%, ‘en cuirasse’ carcinomas in 3%, alopecia neoplastica in 2% and a zosteriform type in 0.8% (2).
Clinical features were also evaluated in a retrospective study of 89 patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma. Clinical features included erythema in 51%, a palpable breast mass in 51%, breast enlargement in 43% and, less frequently, increased warmth, edema, nipple retraction and itching. The inflammatory skin changes started, on average, 10 weeks before diagnosis (16).
Other clinical and pathological varieties of cutaneous metastases from breast carcinoma also exist. Nodular metastatic carcinomas can present as firm, solitary or multiple skin masses or lumps (17,18). This form can also be accompanied by pigmentation or irregular borders, which is suggestive of melanoma or pigmented basal cell carcinoma (17). Histologically, they appear as atypical neoplastic cells arranged in small nests, islands or cords in single-file within the collagen bundles of the dermis (15). En cuirasse metastatic carcinoma is rare, and usually begins as scattered, firm, lenticular papulonodules over an erythematous or red-blue smooth cutaneous surface. The nodules form a sclerodermoid plaque with no inflammatory changes (17). Another form, telangiectatic metastatic carcinoma, is characterized by its purple colour due to blood in the dilated vascular channels. The lesions are papulovesicles appearing over an erythematous surface similar to inflammatory metastatic carcinoma. Patients often complain of intense pruritis (17). Alopecia neoplastica is believed to be caused by hematogenous spread and appear as circular areas of alopecia on the scalp. The firm area of scalp skin associated with hair loss can be confused with alopecia areata; however, on palpation, alopecia neoplastica has marked induration (17).
When planning reconstructive options for breast cancer patients, the chest, abdomen and back regions are important areas for evaluation by the plastic surgeon. These exact areas correspond to and mirror the locations where cutaneous breast metastases of all types are most commonly seen (2,4–6). Therefore, it is often the plastic surgeon following the breast cancer patient during the reconstructive phases of their treatment plan, long after the initial treatment of their breast disease, who is in the best position to identify and initiate early treatment of cutaneous metastases.
REFERENCES
- 1.Lookingbill DP, Spanger N, Helm KF. Cutaneous metastases in patients with monastic carcinoma: A retrospective study of 4020 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29:228–36. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(93)70173-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mordenti C, Peris K, Concetta Fargnoli M, Cerroni L, Chimenti S. Acta dermatovenerologica. 2000. Cutaneous metastatic breast carcinoma; p. 9. < wwwmfuni-ljsi/acta-apa/acta-apa-00-4/mordenti.html> (Verson current at July 21, 2008) [Google Scholar]
- 3.Spencer PS, Helm TN. Skin metastases in cancer patients. Cutis. 1987;39:119–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krathen RA, Orengo IF, Rosen T. Cutaneous metastasis: A meta-analysis of data. South Med J. 2003;96:164–7. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000053676.73249.E5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brownstein MH, Helwig EB. Metastatic tumors of the skin. Cancer. 1972;29:1298–307. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197205)29:5<1298::aid-cncr2820290526>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brownstein MH, Helwig EB. Patterns of cutaneous metastases. Arch Dermatol. 1972;105:862–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2005–2006 . Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc; [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hazelrigg DE, Rudolph AH. Inflammatory metastatic carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:69–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee BJ, Tannenbaum NE. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: A report of twenty-eight cases from the breast clinic of the Memorial Hospital. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1924;39:580. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rasch C. Carcinoma erysipelatoides. Br J Dermatol Syph. 1931;43:351–4. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ruiz De Erenchum F, Vazquez Doval J, Valerdiz S, Serna MJ, Quintanilla E. Inflammatory metastatic carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991;17:784–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1991.tb03260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cox SE, Cruz PD. A spectrum of inflammatory metastasis to skin via lymphatics: Three cases of carcinoma erysipeloides. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;30:304–7. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(94)70028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lever LR, Holt PJA. Carcinoma erysipeloides. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124:279–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb00574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Finkel LJ, Griffiths CE. Inflammatory breast carcinoma (carcinoma erysipeloides): An easily overlooked diagnosis. Br J Dermatol. 1993;129:324–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb11855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Healey PM, Malott IK, Chalet MD. Cancers metastatic to the skin. In: Friedman RJ, Rigel DS, Harris MN, Baker D, editors. Cancer of the Skin. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1991. pp. 347–63. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haagensen CD, editor. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1971. pp. 576–84. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schwartz RA. Cutaneous metastatic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:161–82. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(95)90231-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pakula A. Recognizing malignant skin changes following breast cancer. Am Fam Physician. 1992;45:1287–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]