Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease logoLink to International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
. 2006 Jun;1(2):99–106. doi: 10.2147/copd.2006.1.2.99

The role for N-acetylcysteine in the management of COPD

PNR Dekhuijzen 1,✉, WJC van Beurden 2
PMCID: PMC2706612  PMID: 18046886

Abstract

Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of COPD. Both reactive oxidant species from inhaled cigarette smoke and those endogenously formed by inflammatory cells constitute an increased intrapulmonary oxidant burden. Structural changes to essential components of the lung are caused by oxidative stress, contributing to irreversible damage of both parenchyma and airway walls. The antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a glutathione precursor, has been applied in these patients to reduce symptoms, exacerbations, and the accelerated lung function decline. This article reviews the available experimental and clinical data on the antioxidative effects of NAC in COPD, with emphasis on the role of exhaled biomarkers.

Keywords: COPD, N-acetylcysteine, oxidative stress, inflammation, lung function, exhaled biomarkers

Introduction

Inflammation and oxidative stress play an important role in the pathogenesis of many chronic inflammatory lung disorders such as COPD, asthma, bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis (CF). A complex interplay between the specific cause of the disease, host characteristics, and the type and intensity of inflammation and oxidative stress results in the clinical picture and likelihood of progression of that specific disease. Noninvasively obtained biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress have been identified, and, ideally, should represent the intensity of the ongoing pathological processes within the lungs. This review focuses on the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of COPD and the ability of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to attenuate this process. Specific attention is paid to the role of biomarkers that follow the course of the disease and the effect of antioxidant interventions.

Oxidants and antioxidants in the lungs of patients with COPD

Several reviews have summarised the available data on the presence and consequences of oxidative stress in the lungs of “healthy” smokers and smokers with COPD (Repine et al 1997; MacNee and Rahman 1999; Rahman and MacNee 1999; Barnes 2000; MacNee 2000) (see Table 1). Cigarette smoke is a major source of oxidants in the lungs, eg, free radicals, nitric oxide (NO), semiquinone radicals, hydroxyl radicals, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (MacNee and Rahman 1999). Furthermore, cigarette smoke promotes the influx and activation of neutrophils and macrophages. Leukocytes from smokers release more oxidants like superoxide anion (O2−) and H2O2 than leukocytes from nonsmokers (Morrison et al 1999). The alveolar macrophages of smokers contain increased amounts of iron and release more free iron than those of nonsmokers Mateos et al (1998). The presence of free iron facilitates the generation of very reactive hydroxyl radicals.

Table 1.

Indices of increased oxidative stress in COPD. Modified after Rahman and MacNee (1999)

Biochemical marker
Elevated breath hydrogen peroxide and 8-isoprostane levels
Decreased plasma antioxidant capacity
Elevated plasma lipid peroxides (TBARs) levels
Plasma protein sulhydryl oxidation
Increased exhaled carbon monoxide
Release of ROS from peripheral blood neutrophils and alveolar macrophages
Increased urinary isoprostane F2-alpha-III levels
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: TBARs, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances.

An important part of the pulmonary antioxidant defense is located in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF). Vitamin C and vitamin E levels in ELF are depleted in smokers, but glutathione (GSH) levels are increased (Cantin et al 1987; Rahman and MacNee 1996; Morrison et al 1999). These effects depend on the time-course of exposure to tobacco smoke. Acute exposure markedly depletes antioxidants in plasma (Rahman et al 1996, 1997), intracellular GSH of erythocytes (Maranzana and Mehlhorn 1998), and GSH levels in ELF (Cantin et al 1987; Morrison et al 1999).

Alterations in the lung caused by oxidative stress

Both in vitro and in vivo experiments have demonstrated that oxidative stress may cause alterations in essential components of the lung, contributing to pathological abnormalities and functional changes (Table 2) (Rahman and MacNee 1996; Warren et al 1997).

Table 2.

Alterations in components of the lung caused by oxidative stress. Modified after Rahman and MacNee (1996), Warren et al (1997), and Dekhuijzen (2004)

Airway wall Contraction of airway smooth muscle
Impairment of Beta-adrenoceptor function
Stimulation of airway secretion
Pulmonary vascular smooth-muscle relaxation or contraction
Activation of mast cells
Alveolar epithelial cell layer > Permeability by detachment
< Adherence
> Cell lysis
Lung matrix < Elastin synthesis and fragmentation
< Collagen synthesis and fragmentation
Depolymerisation of proteoglycans
Antiproteases Inactivation of alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor
Inactivation of secretory leukoprotease inhibitor
Pulmonary microcirculation > Permeability
PMN sequestration
> PMN adhesion to endothelium of arterioles and venules
Transcription factors Switch-on of genes for TNF-alpha, inter- leukin-8, other inflammatory proteins
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte; TNF-alpha, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Increased numbers of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to reduce the synthesis of elastin and collagen (Laurent et al 1983; Cantin and Crystal 1985). ROS may also affect the structure of components of the extracellular matrix, such as hyaluronate (Warren et al 1997). Depolymerisation of the proteoglycans in the lung reduces the viscosity of the extracellular matrix. Oxidative stress may also initiate or amplify alterations in the airway wall. Lipid peroxidation may initiate the release of arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids, in this way leading to release of prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Increased levels of ROS may also increase interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-8 production in several cell systems (Ghezzi et al 1991; Metinko et al 1992). Other effects include changes in protein structure leading to altered antigenicity and thus immune responses, contraction of smooth muscle, impairment of beta-adrenoceptor function, stimulation of airway secretion, pulmonary vascular smooth muscle relaxation or contraction, and activation of mast cells (Warren et al 1997). ROS may inactivate antiproteases such as alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor and secretory leukoprotease inhibitor (Abboud et al 1985). Changes in the alveolar epithelial cell layer occur both as a direct result of inhaled ROS and through the aforementioned alterations (Cotgreave and Moldeus 1987). Sequestration of neutrophils may occur in the lung microcirculation, initiated by inhaled tobacco smoke (MacNee et al 1989). The increased and prolonged presence of these inflammatory cells contributes to, for example, the cycle of locally increased ROS production and attraction of new inflammatory cells. Finally, oxidative stress activates the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa-beta (NF-kb), which switches on the genes for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), IL-8, and other inflammatory proteins (Barnes 2000; Rahman and MacNee 2000), in this way enhancing inflammation.

Taken together, these data strongly suggest that oxidative stress is an important pathogenetic factor in the alterations in the lungs of patients with COPD. Attenuation of oxidative stress would be expected to result in reduced pulmonary damage and a decrease of local infections, in this way contributing to attenuation of the progression of COPD. At present the only antioxidant widely available for the treatment in patients with COPD is NAC.

Antioxidant therapy with NAC in COPD

Antioxidant properties

NAC has direct and indirect antioxidant properties. Its free thiol group is capable of interacting with the electrophilic groups of ROS (Moldeus et al 1986; Aruoma et al 1989). This interaction with ROS leads to an intermediate formation of NAC thiol, with NAC disulfide as a major end product (Cotgreave 1997). NAC also exerts an indirect antioxidant effect related to its role as a GSH precursor. GSH is a tripeptide made up of glutamic acid, cysteine, and glycine. It serves as a central factor in protecting against internal toxic agents (such as cellular aerobic respiration and metabolism of phagocytes) and external agents (such as NO, sulfur oxide, and other components of cigarette smoke, and pollution). The sulfydryl group of cysteine neutralises these agents. In vitro, NAC acts as a precursor of GSH as it can penetrate cells easily and is subsequently deacylated to deliver cysteine (Moldeus et al 1986).

Clinical pharmacology

NAC is rapidly absorbed after oral administration (Sheffner et al 1966; Rodenstein et al 1978; Borgstrom et al 1986). Maximum plasma concentration after oral administration is reached after 2–3 hours (Bridgeman et al 1991) and plasma half-life is 6.3 hours. NAC undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism, resulting in a low bioavailability of about 10% of the unchanged molecule. Cysteine and GSH levels are increased transiently in plasma (Cotgreave et al 1987; Bridgeman et al 1991) and lung (Bridgeman et al 1991) after oral administration of NAC 600 mg once daily. In patients with COPD, 600 mg three times daily increased plasma GSH levels (Bridgeman et al 1994). With this dose, administered for 5 days to patients who underwent lung resection surgery, cysteine and GSH levels were increased by ~50% compared with untreated patients. These data suggest that there is a transient dose-dependent effect of NAC on lung cysteine and GSH levels.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects

The efficacy of NAC as a precursor of GSH synthesis has been studied in isolated mouse lungs (Moldeus et al 1986). Cigarette smoke administered directly to the lung through the trachea caused a dose-dependent reduction in total pulmonary GSH. Administering NAC together with cigarette smoke prevented the loss of pulmonary GSH and abolished the effects of cigarette smoke. NAC reduced H2O2-induced damage to epithelial cells in vitro (Cotgreave and Moldeus 1987) and NF-kb activation in some cells (Schreck et al 1992). In addition, NAC treatment reduced cigarette smoke-induced abnormalities in polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) (Bridges 1985), alveolar macrophages, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells in vitro (Moldeus et al 1985; Voisin 1987; Linden et al 1988; Drost et al 1991). Treatment with NAC also attenuated rat secretory cell hyperplasia induced by tobacco smoke (Jeffery et al 1985) and prevented hypochlorous acid (HOCl)-mediated inactivation of alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor in vitro (Borregaard 1987). In a rat model of cigarette smoke-induced alterations in small airways, NAC prevented thickening of the airway wall and improved distribution of ventilation (Rubio et al 2000).

Treatment with NAC in humans alters the pulmonary oxidant–antioxidant imbalance. NAC 600 mg/day given orally increased lung lavage GSH levels (Bridgeman et al 1991), reduced O2− production by alveolar macrophages (Linden et al 1988), and decreased bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) chemiluminescence in vitro (Jankowska et al 1993). NAC 600 mg/day in COPD patients also reduced sputum eosinophilic cation protein (ECP) concentrations and the adhesion of PMNs (Sadowska et al 2005). In vitro, NAC lowered adhesion of H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae to oropharyngeal epithelial cells (Riise et al 2000).

Effects on cigarette smoke-induced changes

Three studies have investigated the effects of NAC 600 mg/ day p.o. on parameters of inflammation in BAL fluid of “healthy” smokers (Bergstrand et al 1986; Eklund et al 1988; Linden et al 1988). NAC resulted in a tendency towards normalization of the cell composition with an increase in lymphocyte concentration (Linden et al 1988). In addition, improvements were observed in phagocytic activity of alveolar macrophages (Linden et al 1988) and an increase in the secretion of leukotriene B4 (Linden et al 1988). NAC also reduced the stimulated production of superoxide radicals (Bergstrand et al 1986). Finally, markers of inflammatory activity, such as eosinophil cationic protein, lactoferrin, and antichymotrypsin (p < 0.05) were reduced after administration of NAC (Eklund et al 1988).

Effects on elastase activity

NAC treatment considerably reduced elastase activity, both in the bronchoalveolar cavity and in the plasma, which is related to its property to scavenge HOCl (Aruoma 1989).

Modulatory effect on genes

Redox signalling forms part of the fundamental mechanisms of inflammation, such as cytokine induction, proliferation, apoptosis, and gene regulation for cell protection. Oxidants act as mediators of signal transduction, eg, activation of NF-kb and activator protein-1 (AP-1). NAC has been shown to inhibit activation of NF-kb, which controls the cellular genes for intracellular adhesion molecules in intact cells (Schreck et al 1992). In addition, NAC has been shown to inhibit the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in human endothelial cells (Marui et al 1993).

Effects on oxidative stress induced by viruses

Oxidant production in respiratory cells rises when they become infected with pathogenic viruses and this is accompanied by increased production of a variety of inflammatory mediators. NAC has been shown to have a protective role by increasing the resistance of mice to influenza virus (Streightoff et al 1966). Influenza virus increased the production of ROS in epithelial cells, and activated NF-kb (Knobil et al 1998). Pretreatment with NAC attenuated virus-induced NF-kb and IL-8 release. Mice infected intranasally with influenza virus APR/8 showed high BAL levels of xanthine oxidase, TNF, and IL-6 as early as 3 days after infection (Akaike et al 1990). Xanthine oxidase was also elevated in serum and lung tissue. Administration of oral NAC 1 g/kg daily significantly reduced the mortality of the infected mice (p < 0.005). Rhinoviruses also stimulated increased production of H2O2 and oxidative stress of human respiratory epithelial cells (Biagioli et al 1999). Oxidative stress, in turn, caused activation of NF-kb and release of IL-8 and this effect was blocked by NAC in a dose-dependent manner.

Exhaled biomarkers of oxidative stress

Clinically, physicians may expect that exhaled markers reveal insight into the pathophysiology, have a role in the assessment of the severity of inflammation–oxidative stress, predict lung function deterioration, and provide individual guidance during (pharmaco)therapy. Some biomarkers cannot be measured directly in exhaled air, but have to be measured in exhaled breath condensate (EBC), because they are not gaseous. The principle is to cool the exhaled air to a temperature around 0°C, so that the warm air condensates. The most common approach is to ask the subject to breathe tidally via a mouthpiece through a non-rebreathing valve in which inspiratory and expiratory air are separated. During expiration the exhaled air flows trough a condenser, which is cooled to 0°C by, for example, melting ice, and breath condensate is then collected into a collection vessel. Several markers can be measured in exhaled breath condensate, including H2O2, isoprostanes, NO metabolites, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARs).

Hydrogen peroxide

In both asthma and COPD, airway inflammation is the most prominent characteristic. Activated inflammatory cells respond with a “respiratory burst”, which results in the production of ROS. Naturally occurring free radicals have an oxygen- or nitrogen-based unpaired electron. Classical examples are superoxide anion (O2−), hydroxyl radical (OH−), and NO. O2− is formed from oxygen. Reaction of O2−and H2O2 in the presence of transition metal produces OH. When catalyzed by neutrophil myeloperoxidase, H2O2 and a chloride form HOCl. H2O2 acts as a central precursor. H2O2 levels reflect the underlying state of oxidative stress in the lungs. The level of exhaled H2O2 significantly depends on expiratory flow rate, indicating that the exhaled H2O2 is at least partially produced within the airways (Schleiss et al 2000).

Methods of H2O2 measurement in breath condensate are based on the ability of H2O2 to react with suitable substrates leading to the release of colour, light, or fluorescence. Two methods of analysis have been used most: the spectrophoto-metrical method and the fluorimetrical method.

The concentration in normal individuals is almost undetectable and in many diseases the levels found are at the lower limit of detection of the assays employed. In COPD patients, the exhaled H2O2 shows a circadian rhythm and significant variability over a period of one day and several weeks (Jeffery 2002). The concentration of H2O2 in EBC is increased in stable COPD patients with a further increase during exacerbations (Dekhuijzen et al 1996).

Increased levels of H2O2 in EBC have been shown in stable COPD patients, with a further increase during exacerbations (Dekhuijzen et al 1996). Treatment with NAC 600 mg once daily for 12 months reduced the concentration of H2O2 in EBC compared with placebo in stable COPD patients (FEV1 ~60%–70% of predicted) (Kasielski and Nowak 2001). This effect was observed in the second 6 months of the treatment period. A higher dose of NAC (1.2 g once daily) reduced the concentration of H2O2 in EBC within 30 days, suggesting that there is a dose-dependent effect on this marker of oxidative stress (De Benedetto et al 2005).

Isoprostanes

Oxygen radicals such as O2 and O2− react with unsaturated bonds of arachidonic acid, leading to the formation of bicycloendoperoxide intermediates. The reduction of these intermediates leads to the formation of isoprostanes. Reactive nitrogen species and polyunsaturated fatty acids other than arachidonic acid may also participate in the production of isoprostanes. Isoprostanes can be measured with analytic techniques such as high pressure liquid chromatography, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry or radio-immunoassay. They are stable in isolated samples of body fluids and their measured values do not exhibit diurnal variations.

Montuschi and co-workers (Montuschi et al 2000) showed significantly higher 8-isoprostane levels in COPD patients than in healthy subjects and found no difference between current smokers and ex-smokers, indicating that in COPD, exhaled 8-isoprostane is derived largely from oxidative stress from airway inflammation rather than from cigarette smoking. There was no relation between 8-isoprostane and age, sex, FEV1, and history of smoking.

NO metabolites

NO is a highly reactive molecule with a relatively short half-life in vivo. It can be oxidized or complexed with other biomolecules. The stable oxidation end products of NO metabolism are nitrite (NO2−) and nitrate (NO3−). NO can undergo a reaction with superoxide anion (O2−) to form peroxynitrite (ONOO−). Peroxynitrite reacts with tyrosine residues in proteins to form the stable product nitrotyrosine. NO and NO metabolites can also react with thiols (the major enzymatic antioxidants) to produce S-nitrosothiols. The concentration of nitrite can be assessed by a fluorimetric assay. Incubation of samples with nitrate reductase allows the nitrate to be converted to nitrite, which can be measured subsequently.

Recently, Corradi and co-workers compared nitrosothiols levels in EBC of healthy subjects (smoker and nonsmokers), asthma patients (mild and severe), COPD patients, and patients with CF (Corradi et al 2001). Levels of nitrosothiols were elevated in COPD patients compared with nonsmoking controls.

TBARs

TBARs are also a product of lipid peroxidation; they are volatile and may be present in expired breath. They are low-molecular-weight compounds formed by the decomposition of certain primary and secondary lipid peroxidation products. At a low pH and elevated temperature, the lipid peroxidation products participate in a nucleophilic addition reaction with thiobarbituric acid, generating a red fluorescent complex. They can be measured colorimetrically or fluorimetrically.

In a cross-sectional study the concentration of TBARs was elevated in stable COPD patients compared with healthy subjects. TBARs and H2O2 concentration were elevated in asthma patients compared with both healthy control subjects and COPD patients. A significant positive correlation was found between H2O2 concentration and TBARs concentration (Nowak et al 1999).

Effects of NAC on lung function and exacerbations

Lung function

In an open, observational survey in Sweden, the decline in FEV1 in COPD patients who took NAC for 2 years was less than in a reference group on usual care (Lundbäck et al 1992). This favorable effect was particularly apparent in COPD patients over 50 years of age (yearly decline of 30 mL in FEV1) compared with the reference group (yearly decline of 54 mL in FEV1). After 5 years, the loss of FEV1 in the NAC group was less than in the reference group (Lundbäck B 1993, pers comm). Clearly, it should be noted that the nature of the study design precludes firm conclusions on the effect of NAC on lung function decline in COPD.

Recently, the Bronchitis Randomized on NAC Cost-Utility Study (BRONCUS) trial was conducted, testing the hypothesis that treatment with the antioxidant NAC would reduce the rate of lung function decline, reduce yearly exacerbation rate, and improve outcome variables (Decramer et al 2005). Patients with COPD (n = 523) were randomized in a multicenter, placebo-controlled study of NAC administered orally in a dose of 600 mg once daily. Patients were followed for 3 years. The rate of decline in FEV1 or vital capacity (VC) was not different in the 256 patients in the NAC group and the 267 patients in the placebo group. Secondary analysis in patients completing the trial showed that after 3 years, functional residual capacity (FRC) was decreased (− 0.374 L) in the NAC group, while it was slightly increased (+ 0.008 L) in the placebo group (p = 0.008).

Exacerbations

In a recent systematic review by Stey et al (2000), data on prevention of exacerbation, improvement of symptoms, and adverse effects were extracted from original reports (Figure 1). The relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat were calculated for both individual trials and combined data. In 9 studies, 351 of 723 (48.5%) patients receiving NAC had no exacerbation compared with 229 of 733 (31.2%) patients receiving placebo: relative benefit 1.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37–1.77), number-needed-to-treat 5.8 (95% CI 4.5–8.1). There was no evidence of any effect of study period (12–24 weeks) or cumulative dose of NAC on efficacy. In 5 trials, 286 of 466 (61.4%) patients receiving NAC reported improvement of their symptoms compared with 160 of 462 (34.6%) patients receiving placebo: relative benefit 1.78 (95% CI 1.54–2.05), number-needed-to-treat 3.7 (95% CI 3.0–4.9). These findings are in line with the outcomes of two previous meta-analyses using a less precise selection of these studies (Grandjean et al 2000; Poole and Black 2001) and confirm that NAC has a clinically significant effect on the number and impact of exacerbations. Again, it should be stressed that patients included in these studies were not characterised as detailed, as currently would be demanded according to, eg, the GOLD guidelines (Pauwels et al 2001).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Absence of any exacerbation with oral N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or placebo (P) in patients with COPD and/or chronic bronchitis. Each symbol represents one trial. Symbol sizes are proportional to trial sizes. Arrows are weighted means. -------- = line of equality. Source: Stey et al. 2000. The effect of oral N-acetylcysteine in chronic bronchitis: a quantitative systematic review. Eur Respir J, 16:253–62. Copyright © 2000. Reproduced with permission of the European Respiratory Society Journals Ltd.

In the abovementioned BRONCUS trial, NAC did not influence the yearly exacerbation rate, but the hazard ratio for an exacerbation decreased significantly by 22% in patients treated with NAC and not taking inhaled corticosteroids (p= 0.040) (Decramer et al 2005).

These effects may be explained in part by the protective effect of NAC on viral infections. The effects of NAC on influenza and influenza-like episodes have been studied in 262 patients suffering from nonrespiratory chronic degenerative diseases (De Flora et al 1997). Compared with placebo, NAC 600 mg twice daily for 6 months significantly decreased both the frequency and severity of influenza-like episodes. Local and systemic symptoms were also significantly reduced in the group receiving NAC. Although the seroconversion towards influenza virus was similar in the two groups, only 25% of the virus-infected subjects treated with NAC developed the symptomatic form of the condition compared with 79% of the placebo group.

Is NAC 600 mg once daily the right dose in patients with COPD?

It may be questioned if NAC 600 mg once daily is the right dose for an optimal effect in patients with COPD. The abovementioned studies on exhaled biomarkers indicate that NAC in a dose of 1200 mg daily is superior in reducing oxidative stress, measured by the concentration of exhaled H2O2. A recent study compared NAC 1200 mg daily, 600 mg daily, and placebo on markers of systemic inflammation and symptoms in patients with COPD GOLD II–III (Zuin et al 2005). NAC 1200 mg daily significantly reduced C-reactive protein and IL-8 levels compared with NAC 600 mg daily and placebo. Both dosages were well tolerated.

Another indication that NAC in a higher dose might be more effective is provided by the recent data on the IFIGENIA study in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (Demedts et al 2005). This was a phase III, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study that assessed the effectiveness over 1 year of high-dose NAC (1800 mg daily) on top of the recommended standard therapy of prednisone–azathioprine in 155 IPF patients. The IPF diagnosis was confirmed by independent histology and radiology expert committees.

This study showed that NAC, on top of prednisone–azathioprine, had a significant and clinically relevant effect on VC and diffusion capacity (DLCO test) at 6 and 12 months. NAC was well tolerated and no differences in side-effects were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

Oxidative stress is considered to be an important part of the inflammatory response to both environmental and internal signals. Transcription factors like NF-kb and AP-1 are activated by oxidative stress and in turn amplify the inflammatory response to noxious stimuli. In this way, both oxidative stress and inflammation are involved in the complex pathophysiology of COPD, both in terms of pathogenesis and progression of the disease.

In vitro and in vivo data show that NAC protects the lungs against toxic agents by increasing pulmonary defence mechanisms through its direct antioxidant properties and its indirect role as a precursor of GSH synthesis. Indeed, reductions in exhaled biomarkers like H2O2 by NAC have been demonstrated in intervention studies with NAC.

In patients with COPD, treatment with NAC in a dose of 600 mg once daily reduces the risk of exacerbations and improves symptoms compared with placebo. The BRONCUS trial showed that this is especially the case in those COPD patients not using inhaled corticosteroids.

The partial activity of NAC in the BRONCUS trial might be explained by the relatively low dose administered (ie, 600 mg once daily). Data on exhaled biomarkers and markers of systemic inflammation, as well as the recent IFIGENIA study, indicate that higher dosages such as 600 mg twice daily should be administered in patients with COPD.

References

  1. Abboud RT, Fera T, Richter A, et al. Acute effect of smoking on the functional activity of alpha1- protease inhibitor in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985;131:79–85. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.131.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akaike T, Ando M, Oda T, et al. Dependence on O2− generation by xanthine oxidase of pathogenesis of influenza virus infection in mice. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:739–45. doi: 10.1172/JCI114499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aruoma OI, Halliwell B, Hoey BM, et al. The antioxidant action of N-acetylcysteine: its reaction with hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, superoxide, and hypochlorous acid. J Free Radic Biol Med. 1989;6:593–7. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(89)90066-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnes PJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(4):269–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007273430407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergstrand H, Björnson A, Eklund A, et al. Stimuli-induced superoxide radical generation in vitro by human alveolar macrophages from smokers: modulation by N-acetylcysteine treatment in vivo. J Free Radic Biol Med. 1986;2:119–27. doi: 10.1016/s0748-5514(86)80060-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biagioli MC, Kaul P, Singh I, et al. The role of oxidative stress in rhinovirus induced elaboration of IL-8 by respiratory epithelial cells. J Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:454–62. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00233-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bridgeman MM, Marsden M, MacNee W, et al. Cysteine and glutathione concentrations in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after treatment with N-acetylcysteine. Thorax. 1991;46:39–42. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bridgeman MM, Marsden M, Selby C, et al. Effect of N-acetyl cysteine on the concentrations of thiols in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and lung tissue. Thorax. 1994;49:670–5. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.7.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bridges RB. Protective action of thiols on neutrophil function. Eur J Respir Dis. 1985;66 (Suppl 139):40–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Borgstrom L, Kagedal B, Paulsen O. Pharmacokinetics of N-acetylcysteine in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;31:217–22. doi: 10.1007/BF00606662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Borregaard N, Jensen HS, Bjerrum OW. Prevention of tissue damage: inhibition of myeloperoxidase mediated inactivation of alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor by N-acetyl cysteine, glutathione, and methionine. Agents Actions. 1987;22:255–60. doi: 10.1007/BF02009054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cantin A, Crystal RG. Oxidants, antioxidants and the pathogenesis of emphysema. Eur J Respir Dis. 1985;66 (Suppl 139):7–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cantin AM, North SL, Hubbard R, et al. Normal alveolar epithelial lining fluid contains high levels of glutathione. J Appl Physiol. 1987;63:152–7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.1.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Corradi M, Montuschi P, Donnelly LE, et al. Increased nitrosothiols in exhaled breath condensate in inflammatory airway diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:854–8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.4.2001108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cotgreave IA. N-acetylcysteine: pharmacological considerations and experimental and clinical applications. Adv Pharmacol. 1997;38:205–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cotgreave IA, Eklund A, Larsson K, et al. No penetration of orally administered N-acetylcysteine into bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Eur J Respir Dis. 1987;70:73–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cotgreave IA, Moldeus P. Lung protection by thiol-containing antioxidants. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1987;23:275–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. De Benedetto F, Aceto A, Dragani B, et al. Long-term treatment oral N-actylcysteine (NAC) reduces exhaled hydrogen peroxide in stable COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2005;18:41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2004.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Decramer M, Rutten-van Molken M, Dekhuijzen PNR, et al. Effects of N-acetylcysteine on outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Bronchitis Randomized on NAC Cost-Utility Study, BRONCUS): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1552–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66456-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Flora S, Grassi C, Carati L. Attenuation of influenza symptomatology and improvement of immunological parameters due to long-term treatment with N-acetylcysteine. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:1535–41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10071535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dekhuijzen PNR. Antioxidant properties of N-acetylcysteine: their relevance in relation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2004;23:629–36. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00016804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dekhuijzen PNR, Aben KKH, Dekker I, et al. Increased exhalation of hydrogen peroxide in patients with stable and unstable COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:813–6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Demedts M, Behr J, Buhl R, et al. IFIGENIA Study Group. High-dose acetylcysteine in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2229–42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Drost E, Lannan S, Bridgeman MME, et al. Lack of effect of N-acetylcysteine on the release of oxygen radicals from neutrophils and alveolar macrophages. Eur Respir J. 1991;4:723–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Eklund A, Eriksson O, Hakansson L, et al. Oral N-acetylcysteine reduces selected humoral markers of inflammatory cell activity in BAL fluid from healthy smokers: correlation to effects on cellular variables. Eur Respir J. 1988;1:832–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ghezzi P, Dinarello CA, Bianchi M, et al. Hypoxia increases production of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor by human mono-nuclear cells. Cytokine. 1991;3:189–94. doi: 10.1016/1043-4666(91)90015-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grandjean EM, Berthet P, Ruffmann R, et al. Efficacy of oral long-term N-acetylcysteine in chronic bronchopulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of published double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Clin Ther. 2000;22:209–21. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88479-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jankowska R, Passowicz Muszynska E, Medrala W, et al. The influence of n-acetylcysteine on chemiluminescence of granulocytes in peripheral blood of patients with chronic bronchitis. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 1993;61:586–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jeffery PK. The pathology of COPD and exacerbations. Eur Respir Rev. 2002;12:2–4. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jeffery PK, Rogers DF, Ayers MM. Effect of oral acetylcysteine on tobacco smoke-induced secretory cell hyperplasia. Eur J Respir Dis. 1985;66 (Suppl 139):117–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kasielski M, Nowak D. Long-term administration of N-acetylcysteine decreases hydrogen peroxide exhalation in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2001;95:448–56. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Knobil K, Choi AM, Weigand GW, et al. Role of oxidants in influenza virus-induced gene expression. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:L134–42. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.274.1.L134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Laurent P, Janoff A, Kagan HM. Cigarette smoke blocks cross-linking of elastin in vitro. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127:189–92. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Linden M, Wieslander E, Eklund A, et al. Effects of oral N-acetylcysteine on cell content and macrophage function in bronchoalveolar lavage from healthy smokers. Eur Respir J. 1988;1:645–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lundbäck B, Lindström M, Andersson S, et al. Possible effect of acetylcystein on lung function. Eur Respir J. 1992;5(Suppl 15):S289. [Google Scholar]
  36. MacNee W. Oxidants/antioxidants and COPD. Chest. 2000;117(Suppl 1):S303–17. [Google Scholar]
  37. MacNee W. Oxidative stress and lung inflammation in airways disease. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;429:195–207. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01320-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. MacNee W, Rahman I. Oxidants and antioxidants as therapeutic targets in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:S58–65. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.supplement_1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. MacNee W, Wiggs B, Belzberg AS, et al. The effect of cigarette smoking on neutrophil kinetics in human lungs. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:924–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198910053211402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mateos F, Brock JH, Perez-Arellano JL. Iron metabolism in the lower respiratory tract. Thorax. 1998;53:594–600. doi: 10.1136/thx.53.7.594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Maranzana A, Mehlhorn RJ. Loss of glutathione, ascorbate recycling, and free radical scavenging in human erythrocytes exposed to filtered cigarette smoke. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;350:169–82. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1997.0540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Marui N, Offermann MK, Swerlick R, et al. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) gene transcription and expression are regulated through an antioxidant-sensitive mechanism in human vascular endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:1866–74. doi: 10.1172/JCI116778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Metinko AP, Kunkel SL, Standiford TJ, et al. Anoxia-hyperoxia induces monocyte-derived interleukin-8. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:791–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI115953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Moldeus P, Berggren M, Graffström R. N-acetylcysteine protection against the toxicity of cigarette smoke and cigarette smoke condensates in various tissues and cells in vitro. Eur J Respir Dis. 1985;66 (Suppl 139):123–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Moldeus P, Cotgreave IA, Berggren M. Lung protection by a thiol-containing antioxidant: N-acetylcysteine. Respiration. 1986;50:31–42. doi: 10.1159/000195086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Montuschi P, Collins JV, Ciabattoni G, et al. Exhaled 8-isoprostane as an in vivo biomarker of lung oxidative stress in patients with COPD and healthy smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1175–7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.2001063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Morrison D, Rahman I, Lannan S, et al. Epithelial permeability, inflammation, and oxidant stress in the air spaces of smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:473–9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9804080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nowak D, Kasielski M, Antczak A, et al. Increased content of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and hydrogen peroxide in the expired breath condensate of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: no significant effect of cigarette smoking. Respir Med. 1999;93:389–96. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PMA, et al. on behalf of the GOLD Scientific Committee. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHLBI Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop Summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1256–76. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.2101039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Poole PJ, Black PN. Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review. Br Med J. 2001;322:1271–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rahman I, MacNee W. Role of oxidants/antioxidants in smoking-induced lung diseases. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;21:669–81. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(96)00155-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rahman I, MacNee W. Lung glutathione and oxidative stress: implications in cigarette smoke-induced airway disease. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:L1067–88. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1999.277.6.L1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rahman I, MacNee W. Oxidative stress and regulation of glutathione in lung inflammation. Eur Respir J. 2000;16:534–54. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.016003534.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rahman I, Morrison D, Donaldson K, et al. Systemic oxidative stress in asthma, COPD, and smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1055–60. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rahman I, Skwarska E, MacNee W. Attenuation of oxidant/antioxidant imbalance during treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1997;52:565–8. doi: 10.1136/thx.52.6.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Repine JE, Lankhorst ILM, Debacker WA, et al. Oxidative stress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:341–57. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9611013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rodenstein D, DeCoster A, Gazzaniga A. Pharmacokinetics of oral acetylcysteine: absorption, binding and metabolism in patients with respiratory disorders. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1978;3:247–54. doi: 10.2165/00003088-197803030-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Riise GC, Qvarfordt I, Larsson S, et al. Inhibitory effect of N-acetylcysteine on adherence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae to human oropharyngeal epithelial cells in vitro. Respiration. 2000;67:552–8. doi: 10.1159/000067473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rubio ML, Sanchez-Cifuentes MV, Ortega M, et al. N-acetylcysteine prevents cigarette smoke induced small airways alterations in rats. Eur Respir J. 2000;15:505–11. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15.13.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sadowska AM, van Overveld FJ, Gorecka D, et al. The interrelationship between markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: modulation by inhaled steroids and antioxidant. Respir Med. 2005;99:241–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schleiss MB, Holz O, Behnke M, et al. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide in exhaled air depends on expiratory flow rate. Eur Respir J. 2000;16:1115–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16f16.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schreck R, Albermann K, Baeuerle PA. Nuclear factor kappa B: an oxidative stress-responsive transcription factor of eukaryotic cells (a review) Free Radic Res Commun. 1992;17:221–37. doi: 10.3109/10715769209079515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sheffner AL, Medler EM, Bailey KR, et al. Metabolic studies with acetylcysteine. Biochem Pharmacol. 1966;15:1523–35. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(66)90197-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Stey C, Steurer J, Bachmann S, et al. The effect of oral N-acetylcysteine in chronic bronchitis: a quantitative systematic review. Eur Respir J. 2000;16:253–62. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16b12.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Streightoff F, Redman CE, DeLong DC. In vivo antiviral chemotherapy. II. Anti-influenza action of compounds affecting mucous secretions. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 1996;6:503–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Voisin C, Aerts C, Wallaert B. Prevention of in vitro oxidant-mediated alveolar macrophage injury by cellular glutathione and precursors. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1987;23:309–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Warren JS, Johnson KJ, Ward PA. Consequences of oxidant injury. In: Crystal RG, West JB, Weibel ER, et al., editors. The lung: scientific foundations. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, Ltd; 1997. pp. 2279–88. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zuin R, Palamidese A, Negrin R, et al. High-dose N-acetylcysteine in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Drug Invest. 2005;25:401–8. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200525060-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES