Abstract
The Active Peptide from Shark Liver (APSL) was expressed in E. coli BL21 cells. The cDNA encoding APSL protein was obtained from shark regenerated hepatic tissue by RT-PCR, then it was cloned in the pET-28a expression vector. The expressed fusion protein was purified by Ni-IDA affinity chromatography. SDS-PAGE and HPLC analysis showed the purity of the purified fusion protein was more than 98%. The recombinant APSL (rAPSL) was tested for its biological activity both in vitro, by its ability to improve the proliferation of SMMC7721 cells, and in vivo, by its significant protective effects against acute hepatic injury induced by CCl4 and AAP (acetaminophen) in mice. In addition, the rAPSL could decrease the blood glucose concentration of mice with diabetes mellitus induced by alloxan. Paraffin sections of mouse pancreas tissues showed that rAPSL (3 mg/kg) could effectively protect mouse islets from lesions induced by alloxan, which indicated its potential application in theoretical research and industry.
Keywords: APSL, prokaryotic expression, bioactivity analysis
1. Introduction
Sharks are one of the most active marine animals. The shark liver, whose weight can account for 75% of the viscera, possesses intense immunoregulation effects and contains some novel bioactive substances. Many researchers have studied the bioactive substances in shark liver [1]. Wu and his research group found an active peptide from shark liver (APSL), related to liver regeneration in Chiloscyllium plagiosum and its physicochemical properties and pharmacodynamics have been studied. Due to the low yield of natural APSL from shark liver, its industrial application is limited. This paved the way for obtaining rAPSL by gene engineering methods based on the fact that the cDNA sequence has been obtained by RT-PCR. The overexpression ofrAPSL can make it easy to study the advanced structure and pharmacodynamics mechanism. The use of recombinant APSL is an alternative that could resolve the problem of low availability for industrial applications. Currently, limited information is available on the overexpression of rAPSL, as well as its pharmacological effects. The purpose of this investigation was to overexpress the recombinant APSL (rAPSL) using the gene engineering method, and then rAPSL was purified by SDS-PAGE and HPLC, respectively. Additionally, some in vitro and in vivo experimental methods were used to identify the pharmacological properties of the purified rAPSL, compared with that of natural APSL.
2. Results
2.1. cDNA Cloning
We successfully obtained the cDNA fragment of APSL (350 bp) from shark liver by RT-PCR. The expression vector pET28a-APSL was also constructed for overexpress rAPSL in Escherichia coli. Six continuous histidines were added to the N-terminus of the rAPSL, which greatly accelerated the protein purification process. This work was reported by our group [2].
2.2. Expression and Purification of His-Tagged rAPSL
The expression of rAPSL was carried out under different conditions. The expression level was maximum at the 5th hour after induction by IPTG (Figure 1) with a yield of inclusion bodies > 38%.
Nickel metal affinity resin columns were used for single-step purification of rAPSL. The purity of rAPSL was examined by SDS-PAGE and HPLC, and the purity of the fusion protein reached more than 98% by HPLC.
2.3. The Study of APSL Bioactivity
The SMMC7721 cell line is generally used as a common method to examine the bioactivities of hepatic stimulator substances (HSS) and similar ones. Our present results showed that 50 μg/mL rAPSL could stimulate the proliferation of SMMC7721 cells, and the potency of the stimulative effect was 1.25 times more than that observed in control wells (Table 1).
Table 1.
Group | Dosage (μg/mL) | OD570 |
---|---|---|
Control | - | 0.36 ± 0.03 |
APSL | 50 | 0.65 ± 0.12** |
rAPSL | 50 | 0.45 ± 0.02** |
25 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | |
12.5 | 0.40 ± 0.03 |
P < 0.01 vs control, n = 4, x̄ ± s.
Forty-eight hours after administration of CCl4 (20 ml/kg body wt), the serum levels of AST and ALT were significantly elevated, from 60.88 ± 10.11 to 164.49 ± 27.16, while the ALT levels were elevated from 31.17 ± 10.53 to 111.4 ± 65.05. rAPSL administrated by the intraperitoneal route (3.0 mg/kg body wt and 1.0 mg/kg body wt) can markedly weaken the higher levels of serum AST and ALT induced by CCl4 (Table 2).
Table 2.
Group | Dosage mg/kg | AST (OD505) | AST (cal’s unit) | ALT (OD505) | ALT (cal’s unit) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | - | 0.141 ± 0.017** | 60.88 ± 10.11** | 0.087 ± 0.022** | 31.17 ± 10.53** |
Model | - | 0.317 ± 0.046 | 164.49 ± 27.16 | 0.256 ± 0.079 | 111.4 ± 65.05 |
APSL | 3 | 0.220 ± 0.029** | 107.43 ± 16.88** | 0.153 ± 0.034** | 62.60 ± 21.63** |
rAPSL | 3 | 0.203 ± 0.061** | 97.79 ± 35.94** | 0.152 ± 0.027** | 62.12 ± 15.80** |
1 | 0.266 ± 0.035* | 134.71 ± 20.53* | 0.177 ± 0.045* | 73.96 ± 32.37* |
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs model, n = 10, x̄ ± s
After administration of rAPSL at concentrations of 3.0 mg/kg body wt and 1.0 mg/kg body wt, the serum AST levels were decreased by 40.4% and 18.1%, respectively; while the ALT levels of serum were decreased by 44.2% and 33.6%, respectively, compared with the respective serum AST and ALT levels in the model group.
The histopathologic examination revealed that the cytoplasm of hepatocytes in injured mice liver induced by CCl4 was loose. The hepatocytes were markedly edematous, and hepatic lobules and portal area were significantly infiltrated (Figure 2C) compared with the normal hepatocytes (Figure 2A). Intraperitoneal administration of rAPSL (3.0 mg/kg body wt) protected the hepatocytes (Figure 2D) from the injury by CCl4. Natural APSL also showed these protective effects (Figure 2B).
The rAPSL can also weaken the elevation levels of serum ALT induced by AAP (Table 3). Compared with the ALT level of the model group, those level of serum ALT in the groups treated with rAPSL (3.0 mg/kg body wt and 1.0 mg/kg body wt) were decreased by 61.5% and 44.1%, respectively. The histopathologic examination also showed that the rAPSL can protect the mice liver against the acute hepatic injury induced by AAP (Figure 4).
Table 3.
Group | Dosage (mg/kg) | ALT(OD505) | ALT (cal’s unit) |
---|---|---|---|
Control | - | 0.067 ± 0.016** | 21.52 ± 7.94** |
Model | - | 0.234 ± 0.081 | 101.17 ± 38.83 |
APSL | 3 | 0.104 ± 0.022** | 39.26 ± 10.63** |
rAPSL | 3 | 0.104 ± 0.026** | 38.90 ± 12.39** |
1 | 0.141 ± 0.062* | 56.58 ± 29.62* |
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs model, n = 10, x̄ ± s
The levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG) before and after alloxan administration are shown in Table 4. The FBG level was increased after the induction of diabetes mellitus, which was above 340% (P < 0.001 vs. control) at the first week, and then maintained at about 20 mmol/L after continuous administration of alloxan in the fourth weeks. However, the FBG levels were notably decreased to 11.44 ± 6.03 mmol/L (P < 0.001 vs. model) after continuous administration of rAPSL (3.0 mg/kg body wt) for three weeks, indicating that rAPSL has the protective effects against the diabetes mellitus in mice induced by alloxan by improving the glucose metabolic disturbance in diabetic mice. Paraffin sections of mouse pancreas tissues showed that rAPSL (3 mg/kg) could effectively protect mouse islet from lesions induced by alloxan (Figure 4).
Table 4.
Group | Dosage mg/kg | FPG(mmol/L)
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First week | Second week | Third week | Forth week | ||
Control | - | 6.37 ± 1.10 | 6.42 ± 1..24 | 6.5 ± 1.24*** | 6.74 ± 1.31*** |
Model | - | HI | HI | 22.73 ± 3.65 | 20.08 ± 5.18▴▴▴ |
INS | 6★ | 4.25 ± 0.63 | 4.07 ± 0.73 | 4.23 ± 1.28*** | 4.32 ± 1.10*** |
rAPSL | 3 | HI | HI | 12.28 ± 4.54*** | 11.44 ± 6.03*** |
1 | HI | HI | 20.21 ± 5.92 | 18.04 ± 6.71 |
P < 0.001 vs model,
P < 0.001 vs control, x̄ ± s, n = 10~12,
u/kg; HI: > 28 mmol/L.
3. Discussion
This research revealed that the recombinant APSL from Chiloscyllium plagiosum can improve the proliferation of the SMMC7721 cells as an ALR (augmenter of liver regeneration). However, the results of sequence BLAST between APSL and ALR (including human-ALR and Rat-ALR) showed that the sequence of APSL was significantly different from those of ALR reported by Hagiya [3] and Qiu [4], respectively. No other similar proteins were found. Based on the fact, we regarded it as a novel active protein. Then the cDNA fragment of APSL was obtained in our laboratory by designing the degenerated primer according to the N-terminus sequence of APSL instead of the primer of ALR reported by Hagiya [3].
Because the natural APSL in shark liver is very poor, as well as the mRNA of natural APSL, Qiu had found that the mRNA expression of hepatic stimulatory substances in rats increased significantly 12 h after partial hepatectomy and reached the peak 24 h after the surgery [5]. By establishing the partial hepatectomy model to increase the abundance of the APSL mRNA, we successfully cloned the cDNA fragment of APSL from the regenerated hepatic tissues 24 h after partial hepatectomy in shark by RT-PCR.
The BLAST sequence results in GenBank showed that this cDNA fragment was a novel gene including an ORF (open reading frame). The results of alignment between the sequence of translated product from ORF and the sequence of APSL revealed that the N-terminus of the translated protein was similar to the natural APSL. The molecular weight of the translated protein was also parallel to that of the natural APSL. Our present results showed that the recombinant protein has bioactivities similar to the natural product both in vivo and in vitro. From all these studies, we proposed that the cDNA fragment was the sequence of the natural APSL.
Both the natural APSL and its recombinant product have special bioactivities. Our present study showed for the first time that both the rAPSL and the natural APSL have the potential protective effects against diabetes mellitus induced in mice by alloxan, which is similar to the effects of cytokines to stimulate the regeneration of liver. The results showed that both the rAPSL and the natural APSL could be protective against the acute hepatic injury induced by AAP or CCl4, and no statistical differences were found. The mice with diabetes mellitus induced by alloxan were administrated rAPSL (3.0 mg/kg body wt) for four weeks, then the FBG levels were notably decreased to 11.44 ± 6.03 mmol/L (P < 0.001 vs. model). Paraffin sections of mouse pancreas tissues showed that rAPSL (3 mg/kg) could effectively protect mouse from pancreatic injury caused by alloxan. Our previous research findings also show that the natural APSL also displays protective effects in the pancreas and lowers the FBG levels [6]. So rAPSL has good future prospects for the clinical treatment in type II diabetes mellitus. Moreover, we also first reported the different sequence physicochemical characters and bioactivities of APSL, from ALR. At present, our preclinical research on natural APSL has been finished. In our research, the recombinant APSL (rAPSL) can be overexpressed in E. coli BL21. The subsequent researches about APSL should provide us with a better understanding of the functions of APSL. This work will be beneficial to basic research and industrial applications.
4. Experimental
4.1. Materials
Chiloscyllium plagiosum was purchased from Nanjing Huiminqiao market. Male ICR mice [certificate No. SCXK (Su) 2002-0015], weighing 18~22 g, were purchased from the Animal Center of Nanjing Medical University. AAP purchased from ICN Biomedicals Inc., was dissolved with saline before use. Alloxan, RNasin, M-MLV, Taq DNA polymerase, dNTPs and pGEM-T Easy Vector were all purchased from Promega. The expression vector pET-28a, the host strain BL21 (DE3) and His-Bind Kit were purchased from Novagen. DNA Recovery Kits were offered by Vitagene. The purity of APSL which was prepared by our laboratory and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was above 98%.
4.2 Cloning of the cDNA Fragment of APSL by RT-PCR
Based on the report from Ou [7] about the N-terminus sequence of APSL, we designed one degenerate 5′-AT(C)TIGTIGGICCIATC(T)GGIGCIG-3′ primer. The PH (Partial Hepatectomy) of shark liver model was built according to the method reported by Ye [8]. The total RNA was extracted from the regenerated hepatic tissues, and then the reverse transcription PCR was performed with that degenerated primer and Oligod(T)18. PCR product was purified with DNA Recovery Kits and ligated with pGEM-T Easy Vector. Recombinant vector was selected by digestion with EcoR I and sequencing.
The PCR product (350 bp) was collected, digested with Nde I and Sal I, and then subcloned into the pET-28a plasmid. The recombinant vector, named pET28a-APSL, was selected for sequencing after PCR analysis and restriction enzyme digestion [2].
4.3. Overexpression and Purification of Recombinant APSL (rAPSL)
E. coli BL21 (DE3) with the recombinant expression plasmid pET28a-APSL was grown in LB liquid medium containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin at 37 °C in a shaking incubator. When A600 was about 0.4, IPTG was added into the medium with a final concentration of 1 mmol/L to induce expression of recombinant APSL, and then incubation continued at 37 °C with continuous agitation. At the 0, 1, 3 and 5 h time points of the induction period, samples were centrifuged, and the protein of interest was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, gel electrophoresis according to the protocol described by Sambrook [9].
For high expression of recombinant APSL, the cells were harvested during the incubation at 37 °C at 0, 1, 3, and 5 h time points after IPTG induction (final concentration of 1 mmol/L), then the cells with optimized expression were harvested by centrifugation and washed with 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl. The precipitate was dissolved with 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl and the cells broken with ultrasound on ice. The solution was centrifuged at 5,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C in order to collect the pellets. The pellets were dissolved into 6 mol/L urea and 1 × binding buffer (5 mmol/L imidazole, 0.5 mol/L NaCl, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl pH 7.9), and stored at 4°C. The fusion APSL was purified with a His-Bind kit according to the protocol described by Novagen Co. The purified recombinant APSL was washed by turns twice with 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.9) containing 0.3% mercaptoethanol and twice with ddH2O containing 0.3% β-mercaptoethanol. The purified protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and HPLC (Zorbax 300SB-C18), respectively. SDS-PAGE was carried out using 12% resolving gel and 5% stacking gel. The mobile phase A of HPLC was H2O and 0.1% TFA, and the mobile phase B was analytical grade CH3CN.
4.4. Improved Effects of rAPSL to the Proliferation of SMMC7721 Cells
The bioactivity of rAPSL in vitro was tested by the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphen-yltetrazolium bromide) method [10]. According to the results of extensive pretests, 5 × 104 cells/well MTT solution (5 μg/mL) were selected to carry out the test. The protocol of the present MMT study was performed as follows: after SMMC 7721 cells were seeded at 104 cells/well in a 96-well plate, the various concentrations (12.5, 25, 50 μg/mL) of rAPSL and natural APSL were added to the 96 wells. Then the plates were incubated for 30 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. After the incubation period, 20 μL of MTT solution from a 5 mg/mL stock solution prepared in PBS was added to each well. Plates were returned to the incubator for 6 h. After the 6 h incubation period, the MTT solution was replaced by DMSO. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 10 min with agitation. MTT conversion was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Model 680), reading the absorbance at 570 nm. Cell proliferation (as a percent of the negative control) was evaluated by the absorbance values.
4.5. Protective Effects of rAPSL against Mice of Acute Hepatic Injury Induced by CCl4 or AAP
Fifty male ICR mice weighing 18~22 g were randomly divided into five groups, including the control group, the model group, the group treated with natural APLS (3.0 mg/kg body wt), and the group treated with rAPSL at high dosage (3.0 mg/kg body wt) and at low dosage (1.0 mg/kg body wt), respectively. All groups were treated with the dose intraperitoneally for 4 days (twice per day). The mice, except the control group, were injected with 0.2% CCl4 intraperitoneally half hour after the third administration, CCl4 was dissolved in olive oil [11] and injected at a volume of 20 mL/kg. The mice in the control group and model group were injected with 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl. The blood samples were obtained from the medial canthus after the last time administration. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were determined by modified Reitman-Frankel’s method. The liver samples were obtained from the hepatic median lobe after the last time administration and fixed in 10% formalin solution. Stained with hemotoxylin and erosin, the specimens were observed under microscope. With the same method and dosage, we also tested the protective effect of rAPSL against mice with acute hepatic injury induced by acetaminophen (AAP). AAP was dissolved in phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4) immediately before each experiment. The dosage of AAP was 200 mg/kg body weight [12].
4.6. Protective Effects to the Diabetes Mellitus Mice Induced by Alloxan
Ninety ICR mice, equivalent numbers of females and males, weighing 18~22 g were randomly arranged in six groups, including the control group, the model group, the insulin treated group (6 U/kg body wt), the group treated by natural APLS (3.0 mg/kg body wt), and the group treated by rAPSL at high dosage (3.0 mg/kg body wt) and low dosage (1.0 mg/kg body wt), respectively. Mice in the control group and the model group were treated only with saline (20 ml/kg body wt) [6]. To induce diabetes mellitus, the mice except for the control group were injected with alloxan (70 mg/kg body wt) intravenously 12 h after fasting. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were measured 3 days after the alloxan administration. Only mice with FPG levels over 11.1 mmol/L were selected for experiments. The FPG levels were measured again at the day of 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th after the alloxan administration.
4.7. Statistical Analysis of the Data
All results were presented as x̄ ± s, “Student” t-test was used for statistical analysis and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 or P < 0.01.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by financial grants from the National High Technology Research and Development Program (2003AA624090), and the Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation (Y205449).
Footnotes
Sample Availability: Available from the authors.
References
- 1.Xie ZF, Cheng GM, Huang Y, Xing CX. Study on immune activity of shark liver extracts. Chin J Biochem Pharm. 1999;20:126–129. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ou Y, Liao GY, Wu WT. Cloning and expression of a new gene from Shark Liver and its inhibitory effects on Hepatoma cells. Chin J Nat Med. 2009;7:65–70. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hagiya M, Francavilla A, Polomege L. Cloning and sequence analysis of the augmenter of liver regeneration (ALR) gene: expression of biologically active recombinant ALR and demonstration of tissue distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:8142–8146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.8142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Qiu ZH, Yang XM, Xie L. Cloning and expression of rat augmenter of liver regeneration. Chin J Biochem Pharm. 1997;13:130–135. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Qiu ZH, He FC, Yang XM. The alteration of hepatic stimulatory substance and its mRNA in the process of regenerating liver in rat. Chin Appl Physiol. 1996;12:236–238. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hong G, Wu GZ, Liu GQ. Protective effects of shark hepatic stimulator substance on alloxan-induced diabetes in mice. J Chin Pharm Univ. 2003;34:155–159. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ou Y, Li Q, Lv ZB, Wu WT. Purification and characterization of hepatocyte regenerational stimulatory factor from shark liver. J Chin Pharm Sci. 2003;12:175–180. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ye BP, Xi T, Lv ZB. Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA fragment of shark hepatic stimulator substance’s similarity. Chin J Nat Med. 2003;1:111–115. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sambrool J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. third ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; New York, NY, USA: 2001. p. 1228. Chapter 15. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu A, Guo Y, Wu WT. Optimization and improvement of the MTT assay for HSS bio-activity in vitro. Pharm Biotechnol. 2000;9:344–348. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu SY, Bian RL, Chen X. Methodology of Pharmacological Experiments. third ed. People’s Medical Publishing House; Beijing, China: 2002. pp. 1346–1349. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lv ZB, Li Q, Ye BP, Ruan QP, Wu WT. Protective effects of shark hepatic stimulator substance against acute hepatic injury induced by acetaminophen in mice. Acta Pharm Sin. 2004;39:17–21. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]