Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2008 Nov 24;118(24):2550–2554. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.799940

Table 2.

Relation of Collapse of Witnessed VF to Observation of Gasping

Gasping (Yes) (n=191)
% (n) OR (95% CI)*
Collapse after EMS arrival (n=119) 32.8 (39) 2.7 (1.6–4.7)
Collapse before EMS arrival, min (n)
 <7 (363) 20.1 (73) 1.00 (Ref)
 7–9 (360) 13.9 (50) 0.6 (0.4–1.0)
 >9 (338) 7.4 (25) 0.3 (0.2–0.5)
 Missing data (38) 10.5 (4)
Witnessed VF (n)
 No (690) 13.6 (94) 1.00
 Yes (527) 18.4 (97) 1.7 (1.2–2.4)§
*

The model was adjusted for age, gender, bystander CPR performed, location of cardiac arrest, and VF. Negelkerke R2=0.086; Cox and Snell R2=0.05. Model χ2 (8) =60.55; P<0.001.

Thirty-eight cases were missing either collapse time or EMS arrival time and were excluded from analysis.

One case excluded because of missing initial rhythm analysis.

§

P<0.01;

P<0.001.