Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1983 Aug;18(2):372–375. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.2.372-375.1983

Toxic shock syndrome: modification and comparison of methods for detecting marker proteins in Staphylococcus aureus.

M L Cohen, L M Graves, P S Hayes, R J Gibson, J K Rasheed, J C Feeley
PMCID: PMC270807  PMID: 6619287

Abstract

Development of a new medium and modification of incubation conditions increased production of toxic shock syndrome marker proteins and enabled detection of small volumes of pyrogenic exotoxin C (PEC) by isoelectric focusing and staphylococcal enterotoxin F (SEF) by a newly developed solid-phase radioimmunoassay. The results were compared with those obtained with previously described methods. The results were identical, and all PEC-positive isolates were SEF positive. In a second study of 262 randomly selected Staphylococcus aureus isolates examined by isoelectric focusing and solid-phase radioimmunoassay but grown in fresh beef heart medium, 47 (17.9%) isolates were PEC and SEF positive; however, 9 (3.4%) were PEC positive and SEF negative, and 3 (1.1%) were SEF positive and PEC negative. When grown in buffered beef heart yeast extract medium, six of the previously PEC-positive and SEF-negative isolates were PEC negative. Autoradiographic analysis of selected isolates demonstrated that PEC- and SEF-positive strains bound SEF antitoxin to the protein at isoelectric point 7.2, suggesting that in staphylococci from patients with toxic shock syndrome, PEC and SEF are the same protein. In screening staphylococci for toxic shock syndrome marker proteins, isoelectric focusing to identify PEC may detect false-positive proteins and may be more susceptible to technical variation than immunological methods to detect SEF.

Full text

PDF
372

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergdoll M. S., Crass B. A., Reiser R. F., Robbins R. N., Davis J. P. A new staphylococcal enterotoxin, enterotoxin F, associated with toxic-shock-syndrome Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Lancet. 1981 May 9;1(8228):1017–1021. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92186-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broome C. V., Hayes P. S., Ajello G. W., Feeley J. C., Gibson R. J., Graves L. M., Hancock G. A., Anderson R. L., Highsmith A. K., Mackel D. C. In-vitro studies of interactions between tampons and Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jun;96(6 Pt 2):959–962. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen M. L., Falkow S. Protein antigens from Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with toxic-shock syndrome. Science. 1981 Feb 20;211(4484):842–844. doi: 10.1126/science.7466361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schlievert P. M., Shands K. N., Dan B. B., Schmid G. P., Nishimura R. D. Identification and characterization of an exotoxin from Staphylococcus aureus associated with toxic-shock syndrome. J Infect Dis. 1981 Apr;143(4):509–516. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.4.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shands K. N., Dan B. B., Schmid G. P. Toxic shock syndrome: the emerging picture. Ann Intern Med. 1981 Feb;94(2):264–266. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-94-2-264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shands K. N., Schmid G. P., Dan B. B., Blum D., Guidotti R. J., Hargrett N. T., Anderson R. L., Hill D. L., Broome C. V., Band J. D. Toxic-shock syndrome in menstruating women: association with tampon use and Staphylococcus aureus and clinical features in 52 cases. N Engl J Med. 1980 Dec 18;303(25):1436–1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198012183032502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES