Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1983 Aug;18(2):384–388. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.2.384-388.1983

Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens.

M A Morgan, C D Horstmeier, D R DeYoung, G D Roberts
PMCID: PMC270810  PMID: 6194175

Abstract

The BACTEC system and three conventional media (Middlebrook 7H10, selective Middlebrook 7H11 [S7H11], and Lowenstein-Jensen [LJ] were compared for their mean recovery times and recovery rates of mycobacteria from acid-fast, smear-negative clinical specimens. Of the 71 smear-negative, culture-positive specimens recovered from 2,165 submitted smear-negative cultures, the BACTEC system detected 71.8%, compared with 88.7% for the conventional three-medium system. When media were individually compared, BACTEC medium (Middlebrook 7H12) was more successful in recovering mycobacteria (71.8%) than was LJ (62%), Middlebrook medium 7H10 (55.9%), or Middlebrook S7H11 medium (52.1%). Middlebrook 7H11 medium containing sodium selenate was also evaluated and did not increase the recovery rate or decrease the recovery time of mycobacterial species when compared with LJ, Middlebrook 7H10, S7H11, and 7H12 media. The mean detection time for the BACTEC system was less than that by conventional methods for the seven species of mycobacteria recovered. Detection times for Mycobacterium tuberculosis on the BACTEC system and conventional cultural systems were 13.7 and 26.3 days, respectively.

Full text

PDF
384

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jaquess P. A., Smalley D. L., Duckworth J. K. Enhanced growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the presence of selenium. Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Feb;75(2):209–210. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/75.2.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kubica G. P. Differential identification of mycobacteria. VII. Key features for identification of clinically significant mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1973 Jan;107(1):9–21. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1973.107.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES