Skip to main content
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI logoLink to Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI
. 2009 May 6;16(7):982–990. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00048-09

Major Species-Specific Antibody Epitopes of the Ehrlichia chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 Orthologs in Surface-Exposed Tandem Repeat Regions

Tian Luo 1, Xiaofeng Zhang 1, Jere W McBride 1,2,3,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC2708412  PMID: 19420187

Abstract

Ehrlichia chaffeensis and E. canis have a small subset of tandem repeat (TR)-containing protein orthologs, including p120/p140, which elicit strong antibody responses. The TR regions of these protein orthologs are immunoreactive, but the molecular characteristics of the p120/p140 epitopes have not been determined. In this study, the immunodeterminants of the E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 were identified and molecularly defined. Major antibody epitope-containing regions of both p120 and p140 were localized to the TR regions, which reacted strongly by Western immunoblotting with antibodies in sera from E. chaffeensis-infected dogs or patients and E. canis-infected dogs, respectively. Single continuous species-specific major epitopes within the E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 TRs were mapped to homologous surface-exposed glutamate/aspartate-rich regions (19 to 22 amino acids). In addition, minor cross-reactive epitopes were localized to homologous N- and C-terminal regions of p120 and p140. Furthermore, although the native and recombinant p120 and p140 proteins exhibited higher-than-predicted molecular masses, posttranslational modifications were not present on abnormally migrating p120 and p140 TR recombinant proteins as determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.


Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia canis are obligately intracellular bacteria that exhibit tropism for mononuclear phagocytes (22). Recently, a number of studies have demonstrated that antibodies play an essential role in immunity against ehrlichia pathogens (5, 23, 24, 26). Furthermore, a small subset of E. chaffeensis and E. canis proteins react strongly with antibodies in sera from infected humans or dogs and thus are considered to be major immunoreactive proteins (2, 3, 13, 19). Molecularly characterized major immunoreactive proteins of E. chaffeensis and E. canis include four protein ortholog pairs (p200/p200, p120/p140, p47/p36, and VLPT/p19) (4, 10, 11, 15-17). Three of these ortholog pairs (p120/p140, p47/p36, and VLPT/p19) have acidic serine-rich tandem repeats (TRs), and continuous species-specific epitopes have been identified in the TRs of p47/p36 and VLPT/p19 (4, 10, 15, 16).

p120 is differentially expressed by dense-cored E. chaffeensis and is found on the surface of the organism and free in the morula space; however, the role of this protein in pathobiology or in eliciting a protective immune response is unknown (18). E. chaffeensis p120 has two to five nearly identical serine-rich 80-amino-acid TRs, and similarly orthologous E. canis p140 contains 12 or 14 nearly identical serine-rich 36-amino-acid TRs (25, 28, 30, 31). Previous studies demonstrated that the TR regions of the p120 and p140 proteins were immunoreactive (16, 27, 30); however, the specific molecular immunodeterminant(s) was not defined.

Determining the molecular characteristics of ehrlichial immunodeterminants involved in eliciting a humoral immune response during infection is important for understanding the molecular basis of immunity to Ehrlichia species. In this study, we mapped and molecularly defined a single major continuous species-specific antibody epitope in the repeat unit of E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 and identified two homologous minor epitope-containing regions in the N- and C-terminal regions of the proteins that elicit cross-reactive antibodies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Culture and purification of ehrlichiae.

E. chaffeensis (Arkansas strain) and E. canis (Jake strain) were propagated and purified by size exclusion chromatography as previously described (12, 20). The fractions containing bacteria were frozen and utilized as antigen and DNA sources.

Preparation of Ehrlichia genomic DNA and antigen.

Genomic DNA and antigen were purified from E. chaffeensis (Arkansas strain) and E. canis (Jake strain) as previously described (14). Ehrlichia-infected DH82 cell culture supernatants (0.5 ml) were collected 5 days postinfection without disturbing the cell monolayer and clarified by high-speed centrifugation (10,000 × g for 5 min) to remove ehrlichiae. Supernatants were subsequently concentrated 10-fold using a Microcon ultracentrifugal filter with a 10-kDa cutoff (Millipore, Billerica, MA).

PCR amplification of the Ehrlichia genes.

Oligonucleotide primers for the amplification of the E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 gene fragments were designed manually or by using PrimerSelect (Lasergene v5.08; DNAStar, Madison, WI) according to the sequences in GenBank (accession numbers U49426 and NC_007354, respectively) and synthesized (Sigma-Genosys, Woodlands, TX) (Table 1). Gene fragments corresponding to the N termini (p120N/p140N), the C termini (p120C/p140C), and the whole open reading frames (p120W/p140W) were amplified by PCR (Fig. 1A). Constructs containing the tandem repeat regions (designated p120TR and p140TR, respectively, in this report) were described previously and used in this study (27, 30). The E. chaffeensis p120TR contained only the first two tandem repeats (R1 and R2), whereas the p140TR contained the complete tandem repeat region (14 repeats) of the E. canis p140 (Fig. 1A).

TABLE 1.

Oligonucleotide primers for amplification of the E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 gene fragments

Fragment Primer
Amplicon size (bp)
Name Sequence (5′ to 3′)
p120 p120N-F ATGGATATTGATAATAGTAACATAAGTAC 1,644
p120C-R TACAATATCATTTACTACATTGTGATT
p120N p120N-F ATGGATATTGATAATAGTAACATAAGTAC 162
p120N-R TGTGTCATCTTCTTGCTCTTG
p120C p120C-F ATTCTAGTAGAAGATTTGCCATTAG 444
p120C-R TACAATATCATTTACTACATTGTGATT
p140 p140N-F ATGGATATTGATAACAATAATGTGACTAC 2,064
p140C-R TATTAAATCAACTGTTTCTTTGTTAGT
p140N p140N-F ATGGATATTGATAACAATAATGTGACTAC 183
p140N-R TGGATTTCCTACATTGTCATTC
p140C p140C-F GAAGTACAGCCTGTTGCAG 324
p140C-R TATTAAATCAACTGTTTCTTTGTTAGT

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

(A) Schematic of E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 proteins showing domains, location of TRs (number of amino acids in parentheses; R = repeat), and recombinant proteins used for epitope mapping. For both p120 and p140, there were two incomplete repeats preceding the first repeat and following the last repeat, respectively, which were homologous to tandem repeats and these are also shown in gray. The N terminus, C terminus, TR region, and whole protein (W) are shown. (B) Schematic of synthetic peptides used to map the tandem repeat epitope of E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 proteins.

PCR was performed with PCR HotMaster mix (Eppendorf, Westbury, NY) and the appropriate Ehrlichia genomic DNA as the template. The thermal cycling profile was 95°C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, annealing temperature (1°C less than the lowest primer melting temperature) for 30 s, and 72°C for the appropriate extension time (1 min/1,000 bp), followed by a 72°C extension for 10 min and a 4°C hold.

Expression and purification of the recombinant Ehrlichia p120 and p140 proteins.

The amplified PCR products were cloned directly into the pBAD/Thio-TOPO expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and transformed into Escherichia coli TOP10 cells (Invitrogen). The resulting transformants were screened by PCR for correctly oriented inserts, and plasmids from the positive transformants were isolated and sequenced to verify the inserts with an ABI Prism 377XL DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) at the University of Texas Medical Branch Protein Chemistry Core Laboratory. Recombinant protein expression was performed for 4 h after induction with 0.2% arabinose, and proteins were purified under native conditions using HisSelect columns (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The recombinant TR regions of Ehrlichia p120 and p140 were expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins as previously described (27, 30).

p120 and p140 synthetic peptides.

For the E. chaffeensis p120, five overlapping peptides corresponding to a single repeat unit (p120R-N, p120R-I1, p120R-I2, p120R-I3, and p120R-C) were commercially synthesized (Bio-Synthesis, Lewisville, TX) (Fig. 1B, left panel; see also Fig. 5A, below, for sequences). Fine mapping within the p120R-I1 region was performed with four overlapping peptides (p120R-I1-S1, p120R-I1-S2, p120R-I1-S3, and p120R-I1-S4; Bio-Synthesis) (Fig. 1B, left panel; see also Fig. 5A for sequences). For p140, six overlapping peptides (p120R-1 to p120R-6) corresponding to the different regions of the E. canis p140R were synthesized (Bio-Synthesis) (Fig. 1B, right panel; see also Fig. 6A, below, for sequences). All peptides were supplied as lyophilized powders and resuspended in molecular biology-grade water (1 mg/ml).

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Immunoreactivity of overlapping synthetic peptides spanning the E. chaffeensis p120 repeat unit by ELISA. (A) Sequence and orientation of all overlapping peptides representing the E. chaffeensis p120 repeat unit. (B) E. chaffeensis p120 peptides reacted with the anti-E. chaffeensis dog serum derived from an experimentally infected dog (no. 2251). (C to E) E. chaffeensis p120 peptides reacted with sera from three HME patients (nos. 3, 18 and 20, respectively). The OD readings represent the means for three wells (±standard deviations) with the OD of the buffer-only wells subtracted. The OD readings of peptide p120R-I1 were significantly higher than those of smaller overlapping peptides (I1-S1, I1-S3, and I1-S4, P < 0.05 for all sera; I1-S2, P < 0.05 for all patient sera). Normal dog or human serum did not recognize these peptides (data not shown).

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Immunoreactivity of E. canis p140 repeat overlapping synthetic peptides as determined by ELISA. (A) Six overlapping peptides spanning the E. canis p140 repeat unit. (B to E) E. canis p140 peptides reacted with anti-E. canis dog sera obtained from four naturally infected dogs (nos. 2160, 6, 10, and 18, respectively). The OD readings represent the means for three wells (±standard deviations) with the OD of the buffer-only wells subtracted. The OD readings of peptide R-4 were significantly higher than those of R-2 with half of the dog sera (nos. 10 and 18, P < 0.05). The normal dog serum did not recognize these peptides (data not shown).

Antisera.

Sera from two convalescent anti-E. chaffeensis dog (nos. 2251 and 2495) sera and one convalescent anti-E. canis dog (no. 2995) serum were obtained from experimentally infected dogs. Sera from dogs exhibiting clinical signs or hematologic abnormalities consistent with canine monocytic ehrlichiosis were submitted to the Louisiana Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory from veterinarians statewide and screened by immunofluorescence assay (IFA), as described previously (12). Human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (HME) patient sera were kind gifts from Focus Technologies (Cypress, CA) and William Nicholson at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA). Rabbit anti-p120 and anti-p140 antisera were generated against synthetic keyhole limpet hemocyanin-conjugated peptides located in the epitope-containing region of each respective repeat unit (p120, SKVEQEETNPEVLIKDLQDVAS; p140, EHSSSEVGEKVSKTSKEESTPEVKA) by a commercial vendor (Bio-Synthesis).

Gel electrophoresis and Western immunoblotting.

Purified E. chaffeensis or E. canis whole-cell lysates or recombinant proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose, and Western immunoblotting was performed as previously described (13), except that primary dog sera were diluted 1:100, human sera were diluted 1:200, and rabbit antisera were diluted 1:1,000.

ELISA.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates (MaxiSorp; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated (0.5 μg/well; 50 μl) with recombinant proteins or synthetic peptides suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4). Proteins and peptides were absorbed for 1 h at room temperature with gentle agitation, and subsequently washed thrice with 200 μl Tris-buffered saline containing 0.2% Tween 20 (TBST). Plates were blocked with 100 μl 10% equine serum (Sigma) in TBST for 1 h at room temperature with agitation and washed. Convalescent dog or human sera diluted (1:100 or 1:200, respectively) in 10% equine serum-TBST were added to each well (50 μl) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with gentle agitation. The plates were washed four times, and 50 μl alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-dog or human immunoglobulin G (H+L) secondary antibody (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) diluted (1:5,000) in 10% equine serum-TBST was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The plates were washed four times, and substrate (100 μl; BluePhos; Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories) was added to each well. The plates were incubated in the dark for 30 min with agitation, color development (A650) was determined on a microplate reader (VersaMax; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA), and data were analyzed by using SoftmaxPro v4.0 (Molecular Devices). Optical density (OD) readings represent the mean OD for three wells (± standard deviations) after subtracting the OD value of the buffer-only wells. A reading of >0.2 OD units above the negative control absorbance was considered positive for all samples. In addition, a reading of 0.2 to 0.5 OD units above the control absorbance was considered a weak positive, and a reading of >0.5 OD units above the control absorbance was considered a strong positive.

Mass spectrometry.

Sample solution or a protein standard (1 μl) was spotted directly onto a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) target plate and allowed to air dry. Sinapic acid (Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI) matrix solution (1 μl; 50:50 acetonitrile/water) was then applied on the sample spot and allowed to dry. The dried MALDI spot was blown with compressed air (Decon Laboratories, King of Prussia, PA) before inserting into the mass spectrometer. Mass spectrometry was performed using a MALDI-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer (4800 MALDI TOF/TOF proteomics analyzer; Applied Biosystems) at the University of Texas Medical Branch Mass Spectrometry Core Laboratory. Data were acquired with the software package including 4000 series Explorer (v3.6 RC1; Applied Biosystems). The instrument was operated in positive ion linear mode, with a mass range as required. A total of 4,000 laser shots were acquired and averaged from each sample shot. External calibration was performed using cytochrome c or bovine serum albumin according to the target molecular weight.

Sequence analysis.

Amino acid sequence alignments of E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 were performed with MegAlign (Lasergene v5.08; DNAStar). The major epitopes of p120 and p140 were examined for sequence similarities with other proteins by using the protein-protein basic local alignment search tool (BLAST [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST]).

Statistics.

Statistical differences between experimental groups were assessed with the two-tailed Student's t test, and significance was indicated by a P value of <0.05.

RESULTS

E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 composition and characteristics.

In the E. chaffeensis (Arkansas strain) p120 and E. canis (Jake strain) p140 proteins, glutamate (17.5% in p120 and 17.4% in p140), serine (12.2% and 15.8%, respectively), and valine (10.8% and 12.9%, respectively) were the most frequently occurring amino acids (Table 2). Moreover, in the TRs of p120 and p140, the occurrences of these three residues (E, S, and V) were more frequent (22.3%/21.4%, 14.8%/18.5%, and 11.4%/13.3%, respectively). On the contrary, in the N and C termini of p120 and p140, the occurrences of these three residues became less frequent, except for the valine content in the C terminus of p120. Due to the large proportion of glutamate residues, the p120 and p140 proteins were highly acidic (pI 3.8 and 3.9, respectively).

TABLE 2.

Predicted and observed molecular masses and amino acid analysis results for E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 proteins

Protein Molecular mass (kDa)a
No. (%) of residues that are:
Predicted Observed MALDI-TOFc Glutamate Serine Valine
E. chaffeensis p120
    p120 77.1 110 NDd 96 (17.5) 67 (12.2) 59 (10.8)
    p120 N 22.3 23 ND 2 (4.0) 4 (8.0) 1 (2.0)
    p120TRb 47.0 58 47.1 78 (22.3) 52 (14.8) 40 (11.4)
    p120 C 33.0 33 ND 16 (10.8) 11 (7.4) 18 (12.2)
    Native p120 60.8 95/75 ND
E. canis p140
    p140 89.9 140 ND 120 (17.4) 109 (15.8) 89 (12.9)
    p140 N 21.5 22 ND 4 (6.6) 6 (9.8) 7 (11.5)
    p140 TR 85.6 130 85.9 111 (21.4) 96 (18.5) 69 (13.3)
    p140 C 28.3 28 ND 5 (4.6) 7 (6.5) 13 (12.0)
    Native p140 73.6 125 ND
a

Including the fusion tags; all were thioredoxin (16.3 kDa) except for p120TR and p140TR (GST tag; 28 kDa).

b

Only the first two repeats were cloned and expressed, but the amino acid content values are for the whole repeat region.

c

As determined by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry of the recombinant protein.

d

ND, not determined.

Amino acid sequence similarity within the N terminus and surface-exposed motif of the repeat region between E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 has been reported (16, 30), but sequence similarity within the C terminus and analyses of specific regions have not been fully explored. The amino acid identity was ∼50% for the first 32 amino acids of the N terminus. Similarly, homologous (∼39% amino acid identity) regions were identified in the C terminus of p120 and p140 (Fig. 2). A BLAST search determined no substantial sequence similarity with other known ehrlichial proteins or proteins from organisms in closely related genera.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Alignments of amino acid sequences of homologous regions in the tandem repeat unit and N- and C-terminal regions of E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 proteins. Residues that match the consensus within two distance units are boxed, and gaps are shown by dashes. The major TR epitopes of E. chaffeensis p120 (22-mer) and E. canis p140 (19-mer) are identified with a bar.

Identification of the native E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 proteins.

Western blotting identified two strongly reactive native proteins with molecular masses of ∼95 kDa and ∼75 kDa (both larger than the predicted mass of 61 kDa, which was based on the amino acid sequence) and a few less prominent proteins (75 to 50 kDa) in E. chaffeensis whole-cell lysates and culture supernatants that reacted with monospecific rabbit antiserum against the synthetic p120R-I1 peptide; however, this antiserum did not react with any proteins in E. canis whole-cell lysates (Fig. 3A). Similarly, a native protein with a molecular mass of ∼125 kDa (larger than the predicted mass of 74 kDa) and a few smaller and less prominent proteins in E. canis whole-cell lysates reacted with monospecific rabbit antiserum against a p140R peptide. Proteins in E. chaffeensis whole-cell lysates did not react with this antiserum (Fig. 3B). Preimmunization rabbit serum controls did not react with proteins in E. chaffeensis or E. canis whole-cell lysates by Western immunoblotting (data not shown).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Identification of native E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 proteins by Western immunoblotting. (A) E. chaffeensis whole-cell lysates (lane 1), supernatants derived from E. chaffeensis-infected cells (lane 2), and E. canis whole-cell lysates (lane 3) reacted with rabbit anti-p120R-I1 antibody. (B) E. canis whole-cell lysates (lane 1), supernatants derived from E. canis-infected cells (lane 2), and E. chaffeensis whole-cell lysates (lane 3) reacted with rabbit anti-p140 peptide antibody. Preimmunization rabbit serum controls did not recognize Ehrlichia whole-cell lysates (data not shown). M, Precision protein standard (Bio-Rad).

Epitope mapping of E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 with recombinant proteins.

To conclusively determine the major epitope-containing regions of p120 and p140, the recombinant full-length p120 and p140 proteins (p120W/p140W) and fragments corresponding to three distinct domains, including the N terminus (p120N/p140N), tandem repeat region (p120TR/p140TR), and C terminus (p120C/p140C), were expressed (Fig. 1A). The p120W/p140W and p120TR/p140TR recombinant proteins exhibited molecular masses substantially larger than predicted by their amino acid sequences by SDS-PAGE. In contrast, the recombinant p120N/p140N and p120C/p140C exhibited masses consistent with those predicted by their amino acid sequences. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry determined that the molecular masses of recombinant p120TR and p140TR proteins were nearly identical to those predicted by the corresponding amino acid sequences (Table 2), and thus the abnormal migration was not associated with posttranslational modifications.

By Western immunoblotting, the recombinant p120W and p120TR reacted very strongly with two anti-E. chaffeensis dog sera derived from two dogs (nos. 2251 and 2495) experimentally infected with E. chaffeensis and sera from two HME patients (nos. SC07 and CDC4) that had detectable E. chaffeensis antibodies by IFA; however, recombinant fragments of the p120N and p120C did not react or reacted weakly with the dog or patient sera (Fig. 4A). Similarly, recombinant p140W and p140TR reacted very strongly with three anti-E. canis dog sera derived from an experimentally infected dog (no. 2995) and two naturally infected dogs (nos. 2160 and 4283); however, recombinant p140N and p140C did not react or reacted weakly with those dog sera (Fig. 4B). These human or dog sera did not recognize thioredoxin or GST proteins, and the normal human or dog sera did not recognize these recombinant proteins by Western immunoblotting (data not shown).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Immunoreactivity of recombinant proteins of E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 by Western immunoblotting. (A) SDS-PAGE and total protein staining of purified recombinant p120 recombinant fragments (whole protein [W], N terminus, TRs [two repeats], and C terminus) (left) and the corresponding Western immunoblot probed with two anti-E. chaffeensis dog sera (experimentally infected animals, nos. 2251 and 2495 [D-2251/Ech and D-2495/Ech]) and two HME patient sera (nos. SC07 and CDC4 [H-SC07/Ech and H-CDC4/Ech]) (right). (B) SDS-PAGE and total protein staining of purified recombinant p140 protein fragments (whole protein [W], N terminus, TR [14 repeats], and C terminus) (left) and corresponding Western immunoblot probed with three anti-E. canis sera from one experimentally infected dog (no. 2995 [D-2995/Eca]) and two naturally infected dogs (nos. 4283 and 2160 [D-4283/Eca and D-2160/Eca]) (right). Human or dog sera did not recognize thioredoxin or GST proteins, and the normal human or dog sera did not recognize these recombinant proteins by Western immunoblotting (data not shown). M, Precision protein standard (Bio-Rad).

Peptide mapping of the major immunodeterminants of E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140.

To localize the major epitope(s) of E. chaffeensis p120 protein, five overlapping peptides (p120R-N, p120R-I1, p120R-I2, p120R-I3, and p120R-C) spanning the repeat unit of p120 (Fig. 1B [left panel] and 5A) were detected by ELISA with the anti-E. chaffeensis dog serum (no. 2251) and three HME patient sera (nos. 3, 18, and 20) that demonstrated E. chaffeensis antibodies by IFA. Four peptides (p120R-N, p120R-I2, p120R-I3, and p120R-C) were not immunoreactive or weakly immunoreactive with only one serum, but p120R-I1 (22-mer) located in the N-terminal region of the p120R reacted strongly with all sera by ELISA (Fig. 5B to E). Furthermore, peptides p120R-N and p120R-I2, which contain amino acids (SKVEQEETNP and DLQDVAS, respectively) present in the N and C termini of the p120R-I1 (22-mer) and p120-S1 (EQEETNPEVLIK), representing a central overlapping region, were not reactive with antibodies individually; however, collectively the peptide p120-I1 (SKVEQEETNPEVLIKDLQDVAS) reacted strongly with antibodies in sera, suggesting that 22 amino acids were necessary for full constitution of the p120 TR epitope (Fig. 5A to E). Additional mapping with smaller peptides (p120R-I1-S1, S2, S3, and S4) demonstrated a significant contribution (S1, S3, and S4 [P < 0.05 for all sera]; S2 [P < 0.05 for all patient sera]) by both N-terminal (SKV) or C-terminal (DLQD) amino acids of peptide p120R-I1 and indicated that the continuous epitope was represented by this peptide (Fig. 5A to E).

To identify the peptide sequence containing the immunodeterminant in E. canis p140 protein, six overlapping peptides (designated p140R-1 to p140R-6 from the N terminus to C terminus) spanning the repeat unit of p140 (Fig. 1B, right panel, and 6A) were reacted with four anti-E. canis sera from naturally infected dogs (nos. 2160, 6, 10, and 18) (Fig. 6B to E). By ELISA, all overlapping peptides except for peptide p140R-3 (11-mer) reacted with anti-E. canis dog sera. Peptide p140R-4 (19 amino acids; SKEESTPEVKAEDLQPAVD), which was predicted to be surface exposed and overlapped with the identified E. chaffeensis p120 epitope (see above and Fig. 2), had significantly (P < 0.05) stronger immunoreactivity with the majority of sera tested by ELISA. Additional peptide mapping with overlapping peptides (p140-R1) demonstrated that the N-terminal amino acids (SKEESTP) of p140-R4 did react with antibodies and contributed to the epitope, as p140-R4 exhibited consistently stronger immunoreactivity than p140R-5, which lacked amino acids SKEES (Fig. 6A to E). Furthermore, peptide p140R-4, which contained additional C-terminal amino acids (EDLQPAVD) compared to p140R-3, exhibited strong immunoreactivity, whereas p140R-3 lacking these amino acids was virtually nonreactive, indicating a dominant contribution associated with these residues (EDLQPAVD) to the epitope. Comparative immunoreactivity between peptides p140R-2 and R-4 indicated that additional C-terminal amino acid residues, AVD, also contributed significantly (P < 0.05) to epitope reactivity with half of the dog sera examined (Fig. 6A to E).

Identification of immunoreactive regions for cross-reaction between E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140.

To examine cross-reactions between p120 and p140 and to localize the regions containing the cross-reactive epitope(s), the recombinant p120 and p140 proteins corresponding to three distinct domains (N terminus, TR region, and C terminus) were reacted with the anti-E. canis dog sera and anti-E. chaffeensis dog or patient sera. By Western immunoblotting, the recombinant p120TR and p140TR proteins did not react or reacted weakly with heterologous anti-E. canis sera and anti-E. chaffeensis sera, respectively; however, either recombinant N or C termini of the p120 and p140 proteins did cross-react with heterologous sera (Fig. 7).

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Localization of minor cross-reactive epitopes between E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 proteins by Western immunoblotting. E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 recombinant proteins (N terminus, TR, and C terminus) reacted with anti-E. canis sera (nos. 4283 and 2995 [D-4283/Eca and D-2995/Eca]) and anti-E. chaffeensis sera (nos. 2251 and CDC3 [D-2251/Ech and H-CDC3/Ech]).

DISCUSSION

It is well established that tandem repeat-containing proteins of Ehrlichia spp. are primary targets of the humoral immune response and elicit vigorous and, in many instances, species-specific antibodies (4, 10, 16). E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 protein orthologs are well-characterized major immunoreactive proteins strongly recognized by sera from HME patients and E. canis-infected dogs (16, 28, 30). Although previous studies demonstrated that E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 proteins reacted with antibodies in dog and/or patient sera (12, 27, 29, 30), the immunologic properties of these two proteins were not fully defined, and the extent of the host response directed against them has remained undetermined.

All of the major immunoreactive TR proteins of E. chaffeensis and E. canis that have been characterized, including p120 and p140 orthologs, are highly acidic due to a predominance of glutamate/aspartate; moreover, they also appear to be serine rich, which usually occurs more frequently within TRs of these proteins (4, 10, 11, 15, 16). Interestingly, major continuous antibody epitopes of these proteins have been mapped to serine-rich acidic domains (4, 10, 15-17), which indicates a relationship between these domains and the host immune response; however, the specific role of these amino acids in directing the immune response against Ehrlichia is still unknown. The major epitope-containing regions of both E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 protein orthologs were mapped to the serine-rich tandem repeat units, which is consistent with the location of epitopes in other ehrlichial TR-containing proteins. The antibody epitopes in p120TR and p140 TR, which exhibited the strongest antibody reactivity with both dog and human sera, were localized to the p120R-I1 (22 amino acids) and p140R-4 (19 amino acids) regions, respectively, which are homologous and predicted to be surface-exposed domains. Therefore, consistent with the location of epitopes mapped in other TR ehrlichial proteins, the conserved surface-exposed domains of p120 and p140 TRs contained a dominant continuous immunodeterminant.

The lengths of the E. chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 epitopes were similar (∼20 amino acids) and consistent in size with that described of other molecularly characterized continuous ehrlichial epitopes, including those of VLPT/p19, p47/36, and p200 (E. canis) (4, 10, 15, 17). Although smaller peptides associated with the mapped epitope reacted with antibodies, significantly higher antibody reactivities were observed with peptides consisting of ∼20 amino acids, a finding that is consistent with the epitope length we have mapped on other TR proteins and similar in size to a neutralizing continuous antibody epitope consisting of 15 amino acids recently mapped in the Helicobacter UreB protein (8). However, a smaller 6-amino-acid continuous epitope has been mapped in Anaplasma marginale msp1a (1). Although major continuous epitopes have been mapped on several ehrlichial TR proteins, one conformational epitope has been mapped in VLPT (10), and there may be other discontinuous epitopes associated with these major immunoreactive proteins that were not determined in this study. However, the host response to the continuous epitopes is strong and consistent with the response observed with recombinant folded proteins, suggesting the absence of dominant conformational epitopes.

Unlike other immunoreactive protein orthologs of Ehrlichia, the major epitopes of p120 and p140 do exhibit some sequence similarity, raising the possibility of eliciting cross-reactive antibodies; however, antibodies generated against epitope-containing peptides did not cross-react by Western immunoblotting, indicating that these epitopes appear to be primarily species specific, a finding consistent with a previous study using antisera against recombinant p120TR and p140TR (16). Hence, the cross-reactive immune response elicited by Ehrlichia species does not appear to be directed against the major continuous antibody epitopes identified thus far in E. chaffeensis and E. canis TR proteins, including p120/p140. However, we did identify that minor cross-reactive epitopes in the N- and C- terminal regions, which is consistent with the fact that substantial sequence similarity occurs in these regions. Therefore, as we have proposed with major continuous epitopes identified in other ehrlichial TR proteins, the p120/p140 TR epitopes could be utilized for species-specific diagnostic development.

We previously reported that some recombinant ehrlichial immunoreactive proteins exhibited larger-than-predicted masses, similar to their native counterparts, by gel electrophoresis (4, 10, 15, 16), which was also observed in this study with both recombinant and native p120 and p140 proteins. The recombinant p120W/p140W and p120TR/p140TR exhibited abnormally large molecular masses, but the recombinant N- and C-terminal regions (p120N/p140N, p120C/p140C) migrated as expected, indicating that the highly acidic serine-rich TR was responsible for the anomalous electrophoretic behavior of these proteins. This abnormal electrophoretic migration was previously associated with detection of carbohydrate, based on chemical reactivity, suggesting glycosylation of TRs (16). In this study, we determined by mass spectrometry that the molecular masses of p120TR and p140TR were consistent with those predicted by their amino acid sequences; therefore, the glycosylation is not responsible for the larger-than-predicted masses of the p120 and p140 proteins. It is likely that the high acidity of these proteins, particularly in the TR regions, is responsible for the abnormal electrophoretic behavior. This is supported by studies demonstrating that highly acidic proteins exhibit abnormal migration patterns during gel electrophoresis (6, 7). Like p120 and p140 proteins, we recently reported that another major immunoreactive protein (VLPT) of E. chaffeensis also exhibited a larger-than-predicted mass on gel, but mass spectrometry determined that this protein was not posttranslationally modified (10). The molecular masses of the native E. chaffeensis p120 (∼95 kDa) and E. canis p140 (∼125 kDa) proteins were smaller than previously reported masses (∼120 kDa and ∼140 kDa, respectively) (16, 30). This difference is likely related to differences in SDS-PAGE procedures and accuracy of molecular mass markers. Nevertheless, the native proteins identified from the ehrlichial lysate by the antibodies against synthetic epitope peptides and the masses of the recombinant p120 or p140 protein (without fusion tag) were in agreement in this study.

The major immunoreactive proteins of Ehrlichia spp. have been identified and consist of a small subset of proteins. Three of these proteins in E. chaffeensis and E. canis are acidic, serine rich, and contain TRs (4, 10, 15, 30). The host immune response appears to be primarily directed at continuous species-specific epitopes within the TRs, which suggests similar characteristics contribute to immune response stimulation and production of species-specific antibodies directed at these TR epitopes. However, the role of continuous major antibody epitopes within ehrlichial TR proteins in eliciting a protective immune response is currently undefined. Although protective antibody epitopes have been mapped to an E. chaffeensis major outer membrane protein, p28 (9), new studies indicate that ehrlichial TR proteins are secreted and interact with important host cell targets and facilitate pathogen survival (21). Thus, studies to examine whether the host antibody response elicited by continuous epitopes in TR proteins such as p120/p140 are protective will provide much needed insight into the protective ehrlichial antigens and effective immune responses.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 AI 071145 and the Clayton Foundation for Research.

We thank David Walker and Xue-jie Yu for reviewing the manuscript and providing helpful suggestions.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 6 May 2009.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Allred, D. R., T. C. McGuire, G. H. Palmer, S. R. Leib, T. M. Harkins, T. F. McElwain, and A. F. Barbet. 1990. Molecular basis for surface antigen size polymorphisms and conservation of a neutralization-sensitive epitope in Anaplasma marginale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 873220-3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen, S. M., L. C. Cullman, and D. H. Walker. 1997. Western immunoblotting analysis of the antibody responses of patients with human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis to different strains of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia canis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 4731-735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen, S. M., J. S. Dumler, H. M. Feng, and D. H. Walker. 1994. Identification of the antigenic constituents of Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 5052-58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doyle, C. K., K. A. Nethery, V. L. Popov, and J. W. McBride. 2006. Differentially expressed and secreted major immunoreactive protein orthologs of Ehrlichia canis and E. chaffeensis elicit early antibody responses to epitopes on glycosylated tandem repeats. Infect. Immun. 74711-720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feng, H. M., and D. H. Walker. 2004. Mechanisms of immunity to Ehrlichia muris: a model of monocytotropic ehrlichiosis. Infect. Immun. 72966-971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garcia-Ortega, L., V. De los Rios, A. Martinez-Ruiz, M. Onaderra, J. Lacadena, A. M. del Pozo, and J. G. Gavilanes. 2005. Anomalous electrophoretic behavior of a very acidic protein: ribonuclease U2. Electrophoresis 263407-3413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Graceffa, P., A. Jancso, and K. Mabuchi. 1992. Modification of acidic residues normalizes sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of caldesmon and other proteins that migrate anomalously. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 29746-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li, H. X., X. H. Mao, Y. Shi, Y. Ma, Y. N. Wu, W. J. Zhang, P. Luo, S. Yu, W. Y. Zhou, Y. Guo, C. Wu, G. Guo, and Q. M. Zou. 2008. Screening and identification of a novel B-cell neutralizing epitope from Helicobacter pylori UreB. Vaccine 266945-6949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li, J. S., F. Chu, A. Reilly, and G. M. Winslow. 2002. Antibodies highly effective in SCID mice during infection by the intracellular bacterium Ehrlichia chaffeensis are of picomolar affinity and exhibit preferential epitope and isotype utilization. J. Immunol. 1691419-1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luo, T., X. Zhang, A. Wakeel, V. L. Popov, and J. W. McBride. 2008. A variable-length PCR target protein of Ehrlichia chaffeensis contains major species-specific antibody epitopes in acidic serine-rich tandem repeats. Infect. Immun. 761572-1580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McBride, J. W., J. E. Comer, and D. H. Walker. 2003. Novel immunoreactive glycoprotein orthologs of Ehrlichia spp. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 990678-684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McBride, J. W., R. E. Corstvet, E. B. Breitschwerdt, and D. H. Walker. 2001. Immunodiagnosis of Ehrlichia canis infection with recombinant proteins. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39315-322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McBride, J. W., R. E. Corstvet, S. D. Gaunt, C. Boudreaux, T. Guedry, and D. H. Walker. 2003. Kinetics of antibody response to Ehrlichia canis immunoreactive proteins. Infect. Immun. 712516-2524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McBride, J. W., R. E. Corstvet, S. D. Gaunt, J. Chinsangaram, G. Y. Akita, and B. I. Osburn. 1996. PCR detection of acute Ehrlichia canis infection in dogs. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 8441-447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McBride, J. W., C. K. Doyle, X. Zhang, A. M. Cardenas, V. L. Popov, K. A. Nethery, and M. E. Woods. 2007. Identification of a glycosylated Ehrlichia canis 19-kilodalton major immunoreactive protein with a species-specific serine-rich glycopeptide epitope. Infect. Immun. 7574-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McBride, J. W., X. J. Yu, and D. H. Walker. 2000. Glycosylation of homologous immunodominant proteins of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia canis. Infect. Immun. 6813-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nethery, K. A., C. K. Doyle, X. Zhang, and J. W. McBride. 2007. Ehrlichia canis gp200 contains dominant species-specific antibody epitopes in terminal acidic domains. Infect. Immun. 754900-4908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Popov, V. L., X. Yu, and D. H. Walker. 2000. The 120 kDa outer membrane protein of Ehrlichia chaffeensis: preferential expression on dense-core cells and gene expression in Escherichia coli associated with attachment and entry. Microb. Pathog. 2871-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rikihisa, Y., S. A. Ewing, and J. C. Fox. 1994. Western immunoblot analysis of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, E. canis, or E. ewingii infections in dogs and humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 322107-2112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rikihisa, Y., S. A. Ewing, J. C. Fox, A. G. Siregar, F. H. Pasaribu, and M. B. Malole. 1992. Analyses of Ehrlichia canis and a canine granulocytic Ehrlichia infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30143-148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wakeel, A., J. A. Kuriakose, and J. W. McBride. 2009. An Ehrlichia chaffeensis tandem repeat protein interacts with multiple host targets involved in cell signaling, transcriptional regulation, and vesicle trafficking. Infect. Immun. 771734-1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Winslow, G. M., and C. Bitsaktsis. 2005. Immunity to the ehrlichiae: new tools and recent developments. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 18217-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Winslow, G. M., E. Yager, and J. S. Li. 2003. Mechanisms of humoral immunity during Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 990435-443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Winslow, G. M., E. Yager, K. Shilo, E. Volk, A. Reilly, and F. K. Chu. 2000. Antibody-mediated elimination of the obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Ehrlichia chaffeensis during active infection. Infect. Immun. 682187-2195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yabsley, M. J., S. E. Little, E. J. Sims, V. G. Dugan, D. E. Stallknecht, and W. R. Davidson. 2003. Molecular variation in the variable-length PCR target and 120-kilodalton antigen genes of Ehrlichia chaffeensis from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). J. Clin. Microbiol. 415202-5206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yager, E., C. Bitsaktsis, B. Nandi, J. W. McBride, and G. Winslow. 2005. Essential role for humoral immunity during Ehrlichia infection in immunocompetent mice. Infect. Immun. 738009-8016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yu, X. J., P. Crocquet-Valdes, L. C. Cullman, and D. H. Walker. 1996. The recombinant 120-kilodalton protein of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, a potential diagnostic tool. J. Clin. Microbiol. 342853-2855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yu, X. J., P. Crocquet-Valdes, and D. H. Walker. 1997. Cloning and sequencing of the gene for a 120-kDa immunodominant protein of Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Gene 184149-154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yu, X. J., P. A. Crocquet-Valdes, L. C. Cullman, V. L. Popov, and D. H. Walker. 1999. Comparison of Ehrlichia chaffeensis recombinant proteins for serologic diagnosis of human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 372568-2575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yu, X. J., J. W. McBride, C. M. Diaz, and D. H. Walker. 2000. Molecular cloning and characterization of the 120-kilodalton protein gene of Ehrlichia canis and application of the recombinant 120-kilodalton protein for serodiagnosis of canine ehrlichiosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38369-374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang, X., T. Luo, A. Keysary, G. Baneth, S. Miyashiro, C. Strenger, T. Waner, and J. W. McBride. 2008. Genetic and antigenic diversities of major immunoreactive proteins in globally distributed Ehrlichia canis strains. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 151080-1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES