Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1983 Sep;18(3):689–696. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.689-696.1983

Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for recovery of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from acid-fast smear-positive specimens.

G D Roberts, N L Goodman, L Heifets, H W Larsh, T H Lindner, J K McClatchy, M R McGinnis, S H Siddiqi, P Wright
PMCID: PMC270876  PMID: 6195181

Abstract

A total of 463 respiratory specimens, all smear positive for acid-fast bacteria, were inoculated onto routine solid media and into BACTEC 7H12 Middlebrook medium for detection of mycobacterial growth. Conventional drug susceptibility testing (1% proportion method) was performed on Middlebrook 7H10/7H11 medium, and radiometric susceptibility testing was performed on BACTEC 7H12 medium. The average detection times for BACTEC-positive cultures were 8.3 days for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 5.2 days for mycobacteria other than tuberculosis; by conventional methods, they were 19.4 and 17.8 days, respectively. These detection times do not include time required for identification, which was done by the conventional method only. There was an excellent correlation in the recovery rates of mycobacteria by the two methods. Drug susceptibility test results of M. tuberculosis isolates by the two methods showed 95.1 to 100% overall agreement. The average reporting time for drug susceptibility results ranged from 4.2 to 6.9 days for the BACTEC method and 13.7 to 21 days for the conventional methods. An average of 18 days was required by the BACTEC method for complete recovery and drug susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis, as compared with 38.5 days for the conventional methods.

Full text

PDF
689

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cummings D. M., Ristroph D., Camargo E. E., Larson S. M., Wagner H. N., Jr Radiometric detection of the metabolic activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Nucl Med. 1975 Dec;16(12):1189–1191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Middlebrook G., Reggiardo Z., Tigertt W. D. Automatable radiometric detection of growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in selective media. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977 Jun;115(6):1066–1069. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1977.115.6.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mitchison D. A., Allen B. W., Carrol L., Dickinson J. M., Aber V. R. A selective oleic acid albumin agar medium for tubercle bacilli. J Med Microbiol. 1972 May;5(2):165–175. doi: 10.1099/00222615-5-2-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Siddiqi S. H., Libonati J. P., Middlebrook G. Evaluation of rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May;13(5):908–912. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.908-912.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vincké G., Yegers O., Vanachter H., Jenkins P. A., Butzler J. P. Rapid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a radiometric technique. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Oct;10(4):351–354. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.4.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES