Abstract
A seven-center collaborative study was carried out to evaluate the in vitro performance of the 10 micrograms norfloxacin disks on the basis of previously proposed interpretive susceptibility zone standards and quality control parameters. Of 7,858 clinical isolates tested, 93.2, 4.9, and 1.9% fell into the susceptible, moderately susceptible, and resistant groups, respectively. The quality control data based on a total of 1,368 zone diameter measurements compared quite favorably with the proposed performance limits as follows: Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, 28 to 35 mm versus 28 to 36 mm; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, 21 to 29 mm versus 17 to 29 mm; and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, 23 to 27 mm versus 22 to 29 mm.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Downs J., Andriole V. T., Ryan J. L. In vitro activity of MK-0366 against clinical urinary pathogens including gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Apr;21(4):670–672. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.4.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gadebusch H. H., Shungu D. L., Weinberg E., Chung S. K. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of norfloxacin (MK 0366, AM 715), a new organic acid, with that of other orally absorbed chemotherapeutic agents. Infection. 1982 Jan;10(1):41–44. doi: 10.1007/BF01640837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirai K., Ito A., Abe Y., Suzue S., Irikura T., Inoue M., Mitsuhashi S. Comparative activities of AM-715 and pipemidic and nalidixic acids against experimentally induced systemic and urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jan;19(1):188–189. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.1.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. N., Barry A. L. Norfloxacin (MK-0366, AM-715): in vitro activity and cross-resistance with other organic acids including quality control limits for disk diffusion testing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):165–172. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan M. Y., Gruninger R. P., Nelson S. M., Klicker R. E. Comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin (MK-0366) and ten other oral antimicrobial agents against urinary bacterial isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 May;21(5):848–851. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.5.848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neu H. C., Labthavikul P. In vitro activity of norfloxacin, a quinolinecarboxylic acid, compared with that of beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jul;22(1):23–27. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shungu D. L., Weinberg E., Gadebusch H. H. In vitro antibacterial activity of norfloxacin (MK-0366, AM-715) and other agents against gastrointestinal tract pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Jan;23(1):86–90. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.1.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shungu D. L., Weinberg E., Gadebusch H. H. Tentative interpretive standards for disk diffusion susceptibility testing with norfloxacin (MK-0366, AM-715). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Feb;23(2):256–260. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.2.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swanson B. N., Boppana V. K., Vlasses P. H., Rotmensch H. H., Ferguson R. K. Norfloxacin disposition after sequentially increasing oral doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Feb;23(2):284–288. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.2.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]