Abstract
Microscopic evaluation of sputum permits selection of specimens suitable for culture, assessment of likely pathogens, and the best interpretation of culture results. We prospectively evaluated 50 sputum specimens which were promptly submitted to our clinical laboratory; smears and cultures were performed both immediately and after 20 h of refrigeration. Specimens were grouped according to the numbers of squamous epithelial cells and neutrophils per low-power field present on coded Gram-stained smears. The numbers of bacteria in five oil immersion fields were used to characterize smears for predominant, mixed, or scanty forms. After refrigeration, only three specimens changed group from a definite loss of squamous epithelial cells, and only two changed group from a definite loss of neutrophils. Based on cellular composition, the majority of samples would have been processed identically both before and after refrigeration. In contrast, organism forms detected on smears and their relative quantities were dramatically altered after refrigeration. A predominant smear form was gained in 11 and lost in 8 refrigerated specimens. The frequent changes on smears observed overall resulted from both increases and decreases in numbers of bacteria and yeasts. The majority of sputum culture results were insignificantly affected by the refrigeration of specimens. We conclude that 20 h of refrigeration renders sputum useless for the microscopic evaluation of potential pathogens and the subsequent interpretation of culture results. However, overnight refrigeration does not affect the determination from smears of sputum suitability for culture based on cellular composition.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Geckler R. W., Gremillion D. H., McAllister C. K., Ellenbogen C. Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):396–399. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.396-399.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heineman H. S., Chawla J. K., Lopton W. M. Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Nov;6(5):518–527. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.5.518-527.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobson J. T., Burke J. P., Jacobson J. A. Ordering patterns, collection, transport, and screening of sputum cultures in a community hospital: evaluation of methods to improve results. Infect Control. 1981 Jul-Aug;2(4):307–311. doi: 10.1017/s019594170005534x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray P. R., Washington J. A. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porschen R. K. Experience with a microscopic screening program for sputum specimens. Health Lab Sci. 1977 Jan;14(1):17–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Scoy R. E. Bacterial sputum cultures. A clinician's viewpoint. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977 Jan;52(1):39–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams S. G., Kauffman C. A. Survival of Streptococcus pneumoniae in sputum from patients with pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jan;7(1):3–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.1.3-5.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong L. K., Barry A. L., Horgan S. M. Comparison of six different criteria for judging the acceptability of sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Oct;16(4):627–631. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.4.627-631.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]