Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1984 Aug;20(2):195–198. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.2.195-198.1984

Comparison of latex agglutination and immunofluorescence for direct Lancefield grouping of streptococci from blood cultures.

D M Shlaes, Z Toossi, A Patel
PMCID: PMC271285  PMID: 6436293

Abstract

Simulated positive blood cultures with 84 known stock strains of streptococci were used to comparatively evaluate the direct identification of these organisms by fluorescein-tagged antibody staining (immunofluorescence [IF]) and latex agglutination (LA). IF was not evaluated for Lancefield group D strains (a total of 81 strains tested) and had 89% sensitivity and 91% specificity. IF was least sensitive for the identification of Lancefield group F, in which three of seven strains showed no fluorescence with the group F reagent. Since LA was more convenient and revealed comparable sensitivities and specificities on 84 simulated cultures, we tested this procedure using an additional 29 fresh positive clinical blood cultures, for a total of 113 cultures tested by this technique. Of 11 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains, 9 reacted with the LA group C reagent, a problem not observed with IF. However, all these strains were identified by a rapid modified bile solubility test. Of the 12 Streptococcus faecalis strains, 4 were falsely negative with the group D reagent, but all were correctly identified by a rapid litmus milk reduction test. Of 12 group A strains, 1 was not detected. Of all 113 strains tested by LA, eliminating S. faecalis and S. pneumoniae, the sensitivity and specificity were 97 and 98%, respectively. LA was simple and reliable in the rapid identification of streptococci from blood cultures and appeared to be preferable to IF. When LA is used, the group D reagent should not be used, and all samples reacting with the group C reagent should be tested by a modified rapid bile solubility test to exclude S. pneumoniae.

Full text

PDF
195

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chang G. T., Ellner P. D. Evaluation of slide agglutination methods for identifying group D streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):804–806. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.804-806.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Engel H. W., van Silfhout A. Simplified coagglutination test for serological grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Sep;14(3):252–255. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.3.252-255.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Facklam R. R., Cooksey R. C., Wortham E. C. Evaluation of commercial latex agglutination reagents for grouping streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov;10(5):641–646. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.641-646.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Facklam R. R. Physiological differentiation of viridans streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Feb;5(2):184–201. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.2.184-201.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hook E. W., 3rd, Roberts R. B., Sande M. A. Antimicrobial therapy of experimental enterococcal endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Nov;8(5):564–570. doi: 10.1128/aac.8.5.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Knight R. G., Shlaes D. M. Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jan;17(1):97–99. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.1.97-99.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lerner P. I., Gopalakrishna K. V., Wolinsky E., McHenry M. C., Tan J. S., Rosenthal M. Group B streptococcus (S. agalactiae) bacteremia in adults: analysis of 32 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 1977 Nov;56(6):457–473. doi: 10.1097/00005792-197711000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Setterstrom J. A., Gross A., Stanko R. S. Comparison of Minitek and conventional methods for the biochemical characterization of oral streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Oct;10(4):409–414. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.4.409-414.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shlaes D. M., Lerner P. I., Wolinsky E., Gopalakrishna K. V. Infections due to Lancefield group F and related Streptococci (S. milleri, S. anginosus). Medicine (Baltimore) 1981 May;60(3):197–207. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198105000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Slifkin M., Pouchet-Melvin G. R. Evaluation of three commercially available test products for serogrouping beta-hemolytic streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Mar;11(3):249–255. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.3.249-255.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wasilauskas B. L., Ellner P. D. Presumptive identification of bacteria from blood cultures in four hours. J Infect Dis. 1971 Nov;124(5):499–504. doi: 10.1093/infdis/124.5.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wellstood S. Evaluation of Phadebact and Streptex Kits for rapid grouping of streptococci directly from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):226–230. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.226-230.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wetkowski M. A., Peterson E. M., de la Maza L. M. Direct testing of blood cultures for detection of streptococcal antigens. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jul;16(1):86–91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.86-91.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES