Abstract
The MICs of 10 antimicrobial agents were determined for 1,000 clinical aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-negative bacilli by the 6-h AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card (GSC+) (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) and by an 18-h reference agar dilution method. Results obtained by both systems were evaluated for twofold dilution discrepancies and for interpretive category discrepancies. MICs that differed by more than one twofold dilution between the two test systems were considered to be discrepant. The overall twofold dilution agreement of the GSC+ MICs to agar dilution MICs was 94.0%. The agreement for each drug tested ranged from 91.7% (ampicillin and chloramphenicol) to 96.5% (carbenicillin). Interpretive categories were considered in agreement when the susceptibility interpretations obtained by the two systems were both very susceptible, moderately susceptible, or resistant. The overall interpretive category agreement was 80.5%. This agreement increased to 95.8% when all minor errors (moderately susceptible, one system; very susceptible, the other system) that would not affect therapy were omitted. The AutoMicrobic system GSC+ provides rapid and accurate susceptibility test results for clinical aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.
Full text
PDF





Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aldridge C., Jones P. W., Gibson S., Lanham J., Meyer M., Vannest R., Charles R. Automated microbiological detection/identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):406–413. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.406-413.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnes W. G., Green L. R., Talley R. L. Clinical evaluation of automated antibiotic susceptibility testing with the MS-2 system. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):527–532. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.527-532.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barry A. L., Badal R. E. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the automicrobic system: Enterobacteriaceae biochemical cards versus Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):575–581. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.575-581.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dudley M., Nauschuetz W. F., Juchau S. V. Clinical evaluation of new AMS GSC plus card. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):139–143. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen S. L., Freedy P. K. Concurrent comparability of automated systems and commercially prepared microdilution trays for susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):878–886. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.878-886.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson J. E., Jorgensen J. H., Crawford S. A., Redding J. S., Pruneda R. C. Comparison of two automated instrument systems for rapid susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;18(6):1301–1309. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1301-1309.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. N., Thornsberry C., Barry A. L., Gavan T. L. Evaluation of the Sceptor microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing system: a collaborative investigation. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):184–194. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.184-194.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly M. T., Latimer J. M., Balfour L. C. Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):902–905. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.902-905.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thornsberry C., Gavan T. L., Sherris J. C., Balows A., Matsen J. M., Sabath L. D., Schoenknecht F., Thrupp L. D., Washington J. A., 2nd Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):466–480. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.4.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
