Abstract
High-affinity antibodies are critical for host protection and underlie successful vaccines. Generation of such antibodies requires T cell-dependent help, which mediates germinal center (GC) reactions where mutation and selection of B cells occurs. Using an interleukin 4 (IL-4)-reporter system, we show that follicular CD4+ T (TFH) cells comprised essentially all of the cytokine-secreting T cells in lymph nodes and were functionally distinct from T cells secreting the same cytokine in peripheral tissues. TFH cells with different cytokine profiles could be isolated as conjugates with B cells undergoing cytokine-specific immunoglobulin class-switching with evidence of somatic hypermutation. These findings subport a model wherein B cells compete for cytokines produced by TFH cells that shape the affinity and isotype of the antibody response.
Keywords: follicular helper T cells, cytokines, germinal center, Th1/Th2 cells, B cell selection
A critical component of protective immunity is the generation of long-lived memory B cells and plasma cells, which produce high-affinity antibodies against foreign antigens. The classic model of affinity maturation postulates that germinal center (GC) B cells in the GC dark zone, termed centroblasts, undergo extensive proliferation and somatic hypermutation before entering the GC light zone where they differentiate into centrocytes. Selection occurs when high-affinity centrocytes in the light zone of the GC are selected by follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) presenting antigen in the form of immune complexes1–3. Although it is clear that affinity for antigen plays a critical role in selection, evidence that mice that lack immune complexes or with deficits in B cell receptor signaling can form normal GCs suggests that cells other than FDCs also play a role in B cell selection4–7. These studies raise the question of whether, in addition to competition for antigen, the mechanism for the selection of high-affinity clones and the induction of isotype-switching may also be influenced by the ability of GC B cells to compete for help from rare GC T cells. Indeed, theoretical models and imaging experiments raise the possibility that T cell help could represent the most efficient mechanism for achieving selection of high-affinity GC B cells8–10.
CD4+ T cells in the follicles, termed T follicular helper cells (TFH), are thought to play an important role in these processes11. Furthermore, these T cells serve as an important reservoir of memory cells in secondary responses to antigen12. However, how these rare T cells interact with antigen-specific B cells to mount a primary T cell-dependent immune response is not defined. Clearly, T cell help in the form of cognate B–T interactions and CD40 ligation is critical for GC formation, function and optimal antibody response13, 14. Similarly, cytokines, such as interleukin 4 (IL-4; http://www.signaling-gateway.org/molecule/query?afcsid=A001262) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ; http://www.signaling-gateway.org/molecule/query?afcsid=A001238), from CD4+ T cells are key mediators regulating antibody isotypes by B cells and represent another such possibility. However, previous studies suggest that TFH cells do not express these cytokines and thus it remains unknown whether these cytokines act locally or through some bystander mechanism to help B cells in the GC15–17. Using histochemical and flow cytometric methods to follow the kinetics of IL-4 production by lymphoid T cells during physiologic immune responses, we observed tight spatiotemporal regulation of IL-4 competence and IL-4 secretion, with the latter restricted to TFH cells in the B cell follicles and GCs. Furthermore, directed cytokine secretion by TFH cells in conjugates with GC B cells regulated the size, isotype and affinity of antibodies, showing that cytokines implicated in the function of canonical TH effector subsets were also critical in mediating the functions of TFH cells.
RESULTS
IL-4 secretion is restricted to TFH cells
To test the role of cytokines in B cell help, we monitored IL-4 production using cytokine-reporter mice, designated 4get × KN2, that facilitate the sensitive detection of IL-4 competence and secretion by individual cells in vivo 18. Cells from the 4get × KN2 mice express green fluorescent protein (GFP) downstream from an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) inserted at the 3' end of the il4 gene (4get), thus identifying cells with an actively transcribed locus, and, on the other allele, a human CD2 (huCD2) marker introduced at the il4 start site (KN2), identifying cells actively producing IL-4 18. Thus, we can follow activation of the locus by monitoring GFP and recent secretion of IL-4 protein by detecting surface huCD2 on single cells without the need for secondary stimulation.
We first infected BALB/c 4get × KN2 mice with Leishmania major to assess the course of IL-4 competence and secretion in lymph nodes draining the site of parasite inoculation. Despite the similar kinetics for GFP and huCD2 expression on CD4+ T cells, immunohistochemistry revealed that IL-4 secretion, as assessed by huCD2 expression, was spatially restricted to distinct regions of the lymph node (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig.1 online). GFP expression appeared in the lymph node paracortex near the T cell-B cell border on day 4 post-infection, indicating that T cell differentiation and cytokine competence initially occurs in the T cell zones (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Fig. 1c). By day 6, a small but significant number of these GFP+ cells began to appear in the B cell follicles. In contrast, huCD2 expression was restricted primarily to the B cell follicles and GCs throughout infection (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1c). By day 10, many of the IL-4-producing cells were clustered in or around GCs, and by day 21, IL-4-secreting cells resided almost exclusively in GCs (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1d). Although concentrated mainly in the light zones on day 14, substantial numbers of IL-4-secreting cells resided in the dark zones at later time points (Fig. 1b). We verified this restricted pattern of IL-4 competence and secretion in lymph nodes after adoptive transfer of ovalbumin (OVA)-specific DO11.10 CD4+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. 2 online). Thus, although CD4+ T cell proliferation and TH2 differentiation, as marked by IL-4 expression (GFP), first occurred in the T cell area, the discharge of TH2 cytokines, as marked by IL-4 secretion (huCD2), was restricted to GFP+ cells in the B cell follicles and later in the GCs.
IL-4-secreting TFH cells are distinct from TH2 cells
The localization of IL-4-expressing lymph node T cells suggested that these cells might indeed be TFH cells, which are specialized for B cell help11. CXCR5, a chemokine receptor involved in the migration of B and T cells into follicles, is expressed by TFH cells 11, 19. After infection with L. major, a large percentage of the GFP+ (IL-4-competent) CD4 T cells increased expression of CXCR5 (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, essentially all huCD2-expressing (IL-4-secreting) CD4+ T cells expressed CXCR5 demonstrating that IL-4-producing T cells were capable of entering B cell follicles. The IL-4-expressing CD4+ T cells also co-expressed high amounts of inducible costimulator of cytokine secretion (ICOS) (Fig. 2b), another marker expressed by TFH cells19. Although in situ analysis revealed that ICOS was expressed throughout the lymph node during infection (Fig. 2c), co-expression of huCD2 and ICOS first occurred in the parafollicular region at day 6 post-infection, a time and location where antibody secreting-cells make low-affinity antibodies, but by day 14, co-expression of ICOS and IL-4 was restricted primarily to the B cell follicles and more specifically to the GCs. Thus, cytokine-expressing CD4+ T cells that developed in response to infection display surface molecules important for movement into B cell follicles and for interacting with B cells in driving GC formation.
ICOS:ICOS-L interactions are required for GC formation and optimal antibody production, but are not needed for TH2 effector cell differentiation, tissue migration or for eosinophil recruitment to sites of infection20–22. Because ICOS is a critical regulator of TFH cell generation and function, we assessed the effects of ICOS:ICOS-L blockade on the appearance of IL-4-expressing lymph node T cells by treating 4get × KN2 mice with anti-ICOS-L19. Consistent with descriptions using ICOS-deficient mice, anti-ICOS-L-treated mice exhibited reduced GC formation based on the absence of the GC marker peanut agglutinin (PNA) and the GC light zone FDC marker, CD23 (Fig. 3a,b). Blocking ICOS-L also led to a substantial reduction in the number of IL-4-secreting cells, as assessed by huCD2 expression, in the B cell follicles (Fig. 3a–c). ICOS blockade after immunization with protein antigen in alum also led to a reduction in CD95+GL7+ GC B cells, and the percentages and numbers of IL-4-secreting cells were reduced despite little change in numbers of overall IL-4-competent TH2 cells as assessed by the GFP marker (Fig. 3c; data not shown). These and the prior results indicate that ICOS-L was not required for TH2 differentiation but was required for the appearance of cytokine-secreting lymph node T cells, consistent with their identification as bona fide TFH cells.
To investigate the generality of IL-4 production by TFH cells during an active TH2-associated immune response, we infected mice with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, a helminth that induces a strong IL-4-dominated host response23. As compared to lung IL-4-producing TH2 cells, IL-4-producing T cells from lymph nodes exhibited higher expression of CXCR5, Slam-associated protein (SAP), the transcription factor BCL-6 and IL-21, and relatively lower expression of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-1 (S1P1, a receptor required for lymphocyte egress), consistent with their identification as TFH cells; both subsets expressed IL-4 (Fig. 4a) 19. To confirm the TFH phenotype, we isolated GFP+ cells from N. brasiliensis-infected tissues and found that the GFP+ cells from the lung produced significantly less IL-21 after activation than did the GFP+ cells from the draining lymph node (Fig. 4b).
The differences in IL-21 production suggested that IL-4-producing TFH cells perform different immune functions as compared to canonical nonlymphoid TH2 cells. To test this we isolated huCD2+CD4+ T cells from the lungs or lymph nodes of 4get × KN2 mice infected 10 days previously with N. brasiliensis. Cells were adoptively transferred to combined IL-4- and IL-13- deficient mice and the recipient mice were infected with N. brasiliensis. Eosinophil recruitment to the lung, which is highly dependent on TH2 cells24, was assayed on day 10. The numbers of eosinophils were over 3-fold higher in tissues of mice that received huCD2+ cells from the lung as compared to mice that received huCD2+ cells from lymph nodes (Fig. 4c). Taken together, these sets of experiments show that IL-4-producing T cells in the lymph nodes were phenotypically and functionally distinct from peripheral TH2 cells, and had the canonical characteristics of TFH cells.
TFH-B cell conjugates are sites of T cell help
The unexpected predominance of IL-4 secretion in and around the follicles and the germinal centers led us to hypothesize that competition among GC B cells for rare cytokine-producing GC T cells may underlie antibody isotype class switching and possibly affinity maturation. Among IL-4-producing TFH cells, a small fraction of GFP+ or huCD2+ cells co-expressed the B cell marker CD19, suggesting that these may represent stable B–T cell conjugates (Fig. 5a; Supplementary Fig. 3 online) 9, 25. Corroborating further their identification as B–T conjugates, GFP+ cells that expressed both T and B cell markers were twice the size of the single cells (Fig. 5b). Although isolated GC B cells can form conjugates with T cells in vitro and real-time studies have imaged B–T conjugates in vivo, no physiological relevance has been established for these conjugates25, 26. To confirm this relevance in vivo, we infected mice with L. major and isolated B–T conjugates after 3 weeks. As compared to non-IL-4-expressing conjugates, the IL-4-expressing conjugates were greatly enriched for expression of germinal center markers, consistent with localization of cytokine expression to regions of active T cell help (Supplementary Fig. 4 online). B–T conjugates represent a rare population (0.2 to 1% of total lymphocytes) in the lymph node during the course of infection (Fig. 5c; data not shown). Furthermore, IL-4-secreting (huCD2+, GFP+) and IL-4-competent (huCD2−, GFP+) conjugates represent only 1 to 3% of total conjugates, respectively (Fig. 5a,c). Indeed, all CD4+B220+ cells that expressed GFP co-expressed the TCR marker CD3 and represented B–T conjugates (Fig. 5c). To analyze stable conjugates, the small percentage of GFP+ or huCD2+ cells that co-expressed the T and B cell markers CD4 and B220 were sorted to high purity and then treated with EDTA to dissociate cell-cell contacts. The resulting single cells segregated into approximately equal numbers of CD4 and B220 single-positive populations, consistent with their original purification as B–T conjugates (Fig. 5d,e). Importantly, all of the GFP+ or huCD2+ cells were identified as CD4+ T cells rather than B cells, consistent with IL-4 production by TFH cells and not by B cells.
To test the role of IL-4 in T cell help, we sorted the B–T cell conjugates from the draining lymph nodes of 4get × KN2 reporter mice infected with L. major 14 days previously and used semi-quantitative RT-PCR to assess the expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), an enzyme required for somatic hypermutation and isotype class switching and largely confined to GC B cells27, 28. Using this method, GFP+huCD2+ conjugates expressed more AID than huCD2− conjugates, indicating that B cells in contact with IL-4-producing T cells were enriched for the machinery necessary to induce affinity maturation and isotype class switching (Fig. 5f). Further, B cells conjugated to GFP+huCD2+ T cells expressed more IgG1 post-switch and germline transcripts than did B cells in GFP+huCD2− or GFP−huCD2− conjugates, consistent with a role for localized cytokine secretion in IgG1 class switching (Fig. 5f; data not shown).
To assess a more global role for cytokine production by TFH cells in conjugation with GC cells, we used BALB/c mice containing the IL-4-huCD2 replacement marker KN2 on one il4 allele and an endogenous ifng allele altered to express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) downstream of an IRES element inserted 3' of the endogenous ifng gene. We infected these dual reporter mice with L. major, which induces both IL-4 and IFN-γ expression in CD4+ T cells after infection29, and used immunohistochemistry to assess the capacity of the IFN-γ-expressing cells to enter GCs. Although greater numbers of IL-4-expressing huCD2+ cells were present in GCs, as expected after this infection, IFN-γ-expressing cells were readily detected as YFP+, often in the same GCs (Fig. 5g). B–T conjugates with IL-4-expressing cells contained IgG1-switched and germline transcripts, whereas the B–T conjugates with IFN-γ-producing cells contained IgG2a-switched and germline transcripts, providing direct evidence that specific cytokine production by TFH cells regulates isotype class switching in conjugated B cells (Fig. 5h).
The elevated amounts of AID in cytokine-expressing B–T conjugates confirms that T cell help is important in somatic hypermutation (SHM) and affinity maturation. To address SHM among B–T conjugates, we utilized the well-defined (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP)-alum immunization model to assess the primary immune response to NP in C57BL/6 mice30, 31,. The majority of B cells selected during a primary response to proteins conjugated to this hapten preferentially utilize a common VH186.2 element to assemble their immunoglobulin heavy chains. Using primers specific for the rearranged VH186.2 heavy chain (or for very closely related VH elements), we analyzed somatic mutation in antigen-specific B cells by quantifying the numbers of mutations relative to the germline VH186.2 sequences in purified (non-conjugated) NP-specific B cells as compared to those in the purified B–T conjugates as they accumulated during the immune response (Supplementary Fig.5 online)30. After sorting to high purity, we compared the rate of mutations in the VH186.2 heavy chain gene segment (mutation in the presence of antigen selection) with the rate of mutations in the intron between the JH3 and JH4 elements (mutation insensitive to selection) as a control. Although the JH4 intronic region had similar levels of nucleotide mutations between the GFP+ B–T conjugates and the NP-specific B cells at day 14 after immunization, the sequences from the B cells in the conjugates were enriched for non-canonical clones and had a 2.7-fold greater mutation rate in the VH186.2 heavy chain region, consistent with a selection process occurring among the conjugated B cells that held true throughout the response (Fig. 6a,b; Supplementary Fig.5 and Fig.6 online)32, 33. By day 14, 56% of the conjugates had greater than 10 nucleotide mutations within the V-region-containing framework regions (FW) 1–3 and complementarity determining regions (CDR) 1 and 2 as compared to only 6.8% of the NP+ B cells. The great majority of these mutations led to amino acid replacements that were localized to the CDRs rather than the FW regions further suggesting that B cells in conjugates were undergoing positive selection (Fig. 6c; Supplemental Fig. 7).
IL-4 is required for IgG1 affinity maturation
To elucidate further the function of IL-4 secretion by TFH cells in GC function, we compared antibody production in heterozygous KN2/+ (IL-4 heterozygous) and homozygous KN2/KN2 (IL-4-deficient as human CD2 replaces il4 on both alleles) mice 34–36. We observed that KN2/+ and KN2/KN2 mice had similar numbers of huCD2+ CD4+ T cells and GC B cells in the lymph node throughout the immune response confirming that IL-4 was not required for GC formation (Fig. 7a,b). Although IL-4-deficient mice had a similar percentage of antigen-experienced, antigen-specific IgD−, CD38− B cells as did IL-4-sufficient animals, IgG1 antibody-secreting B cells in the draining lymph nodes and bone marrow, as well as serum IgG1, were reduced significantly in the absence of IL-4 (Fig. 7c; Supplementary Fig. 8a online). IgG1-switched B cells arising in the presence of IL-4 were almost exclusively GC B cells, as indicated by their high expression of GL7 (Supplementary Fig. 8b). Of note, IL-4-deficient mice also showed substantially impaired affinity maturation within the IgG1-expressing B cell pool but not within the IgG2a-expressing pool, indicating a previously unknown role for IL-4-producing TFH cells in the maturation and/or selection of high-affinity antibodies of this isotype (Fig. 7d; Supplementary Fig. 9 online).
To ascertain whether IL-4-producing TFH cells are sufficient for IgG1 selection and affinity maturation, we isolated GFP+ or GFP+huCD2+ CD4+ T cells from OVA-NP(15)-immunized dual reporter mice and transferred them into naïve combined IL-4 and IL-13-deficient animals, thereby creating a model where IL-4 was only produced by the transferred TFH cells that had committed to IL-4 production. Recipient mice were then challenged with OVA-NP(15) and assayed on day 14 for the ability of the transferred T cells to help B cells. The combined IL-4 and 13-deficient mice that received GFP+ or huCD2+ CD4+ T cells generated significantly more NP-specific IgG1 antibody-secreting cells, IgG1-switched GC B cells and higher serum IgG1 titers than did non-transferred controls (Fig. 7e; Supplementary Fig. 10 online). Moreover, the IgG1 produced by these mice had higher affinity for antigen, indicating that NP-specific B cells had undergone affinity maturation even at this early time point (Fig. 7f). Thus, these data demonstrate that TFH cells play an indispensable role for the optimal maturation and selection of high-affinity IgG1 antibodies through the secretion of IL-4, thus defining specific cytokine secretion by TFH cells as a key component of T cell help not only for isotype switching, but also for qualitative changes in the antibody response.
DISCUSSION
Although the requirements for antigen and T cell help for B cell selection have been long established1–3, 7, the precise role for the canonical TH effector cytokines in the GC reaction process remains controversial19. IL-21 and ICOS are critical for TFH development, and a role for TFH cells in antibody production is clearly evident16, 17. However, studies suggest that the effects of IL-21 on antibody production are due to indirect effects on the generation of TFH cells rather than to direct effects on B cells. Thus, the precise role of TFH-derived effector cytokines in providing B cell help remained unresolved. Earlier studies suggested that TFH represent a distinct T-helper subset due to their lack of expression of canonical transcription factors required for the elaboration of various subsets of TH2 (IL-4), TH1 (IFN-γ) and TH-17 (IL-17) cytokines15, 17. Hence, it remains an open question as to how cytokines, such as IFN-γ and IL-4, which are known to be critical for antibody production, could regulate B cell responses in vivo. The unexpected observation that essentially all of the IL-4-secreting cells in the lymph nodes were TFH cells argues that these cytokines act directly in mediating help for B cells in the follicles and GCs. Indeed, our analysis of B–T cell conjugates supports a direct role for IL-4 and IFN-γ in defining the size, class and affinity of antibodies generated during physiologic immune responses in vivo. Because T cells residing in the follicles represent only a small subset of the CXCR5+, ICOS+ T cells after infection or immunization, our ability to detect cytokine secretion in situ allowed us to analyze TFH cells based on location and function rather than by expression of cell surface markers, which are expressed not only by TFH cells but also by the majority of activated T cells in lymph nodes.
The relationship between TFH cells and canonical TH2 cells has been controversial19. We show that follicular IL-4-secreting T cells were distinct from conventional TH2 cells based on phenotype, location and function. Thus, our data are consistent with a model by which IL-4 competency is first generated by interactions with antigen-bearing DCs in the T cell zones37. Upon activation these IL-4 competent cells move to the follicular border and, if they encounter their cognate antigen and ICOS-ligand presented by B cells, they can help in early antibody production or subsequently enter the B cell follicles and participate in the GC reaction. IL-4 competent cells that fail to encounter antigen will leave the lymph node and become canonical TH2 cells in nonlymphoid tissues. Despite their functional differences, the similar cytokine secretion patterns of TFH cells and peripheral TH effector cells may explain how humoral and cell-mediated immune responses become coordinated38. Thus, cytokine secretion is segregated to distinct tissues in order to activate different target cells — B cells for TFH cells and innate effector cells for TH2 cells — in a manner linked with functional differentiation by CD4+ T cells as they move into their respective effector sites.
Interestingly, our results with dual IL-4- and IFN-γ-reporter mice suggest that cytokines from TFH cells mediate their effects locally in the germinal center, and not globally in a bystander manner, a concept observed in other T cell systems 39, 40. Although competition for rare GC T cells has been suggested as a means to contribute to selection of the highest affinity B cells, direct evidence for this concept has been absent 3. Despite our data showing that the machinery for isotype-switching and SHM are specifically increased among cytokine-producing conjugates, it is difficult to know exactly when and where affinity maturation and B cell selection actually occur. Our isolation of B cells in conjugates that lacked high-affinity antibody mutations associated with NP-binding, as well as cells that used non-canonical but related heavy chain genes, suggests that competition of GC B cells for IL-4 and IFN-γ from rare TFH cells may allow low-affinity B cells to continue to undergo further rounds of selection within the GC. The process would continue until these GC B cells either acquire a BCR with sufficient affinity for antigen to exit the GC as a plasma cell or memory B cell 41, 42 or die due to insufficient binding required to sustain viability. Although a role for GC TFH cells is clear, it is also likely that IL-4 from TFH cells is playing a role in the early plasma cell response as non-canonical clones are highly enriched in parafollicular foci and are recruited to early GCs 43, 44. Thus, in our model, antigen remains implicit for selection of high-affinity clones, but competition for cytokines allows for the persistence of certain low-affinity clones that would otherwise not be selected.
The need for specific cytokines in the process of affinity maturation was evident from the studies using IL-4-deficient mice (KN2/KN2), in which conjugates formed in the germinal centers but there was a failure to generate high-affinity antigen-specific IgG1 antibodies. The effect of IL-4 on affinity maturation works at some level through increased expression of AID and CD40 ligation, although IL-4 is likely to play additional roles during the GC response 45, 46. Competition for IL-4, a known B cell growth factor, may enhance survival of certain clones and affect B cell clonal diversity throughout the response 43, 44. Of note, IFN-γ-expressing B–T conjugates were also enriched for selection machinery despite the absence of detectable IL-4 expression, confirming that IL-4-independent pathways also exist for affinity maturation.
Although we have not formally accomplished cell-fate tracking experiments, our data are most consistent with the activation of shared cytokine loci before helper T cells migrate into follicles or exit to the periphery to continue their maturation to TFH or TH subsets. Such a model ensures the pairing of antibody isotype with peripheral cell functions as noted above. Although our model provides a conceptual framework in which to view the role of TFH cell help and cytokines in antibody maturation, definitive proof awaits the ability to track individual B cells in vivo. Recent advances in two-photon imaging suggest this may soon be possible and provide the means to assess the dynamic nature of interactions between cytokine-competent TFH cells and B cells in the follicles and GCs 9, 10. Further understanding of the mechanisms by which B–TFH conjugate formation and cytokine secretion regulate cell-fate decisions in the germinal center will be important in optimizing vaccine strategies for eliciting high-affinity antibodies, intervening therapeutically in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and in understanding peripheral T and B cell lymphomas that may arise directly or indirectly from chronically activated TFH cells 47, 48
Methods
Mice
Dual IL-4 reporter mice (4get × KN2 mice) have been described18. In brief, 4get mice were generated by introducing an IRES-eGFP construct after the stop codon of IL-4 by homologous recombination, which leads to transcription of a bicistronic IL-4-IRES-eGFP mRNA and translation of both IL-4 and eGFP from the same mRNA. This allows analysis of IL-4–competent cells in vivo by detection of GFP expression without the need for restimulation. KN2 mice were generated by introducing a human CD2 cDNA at the start site of the il4 gene. After appropriate stimulation, IL-4 secretion becomes marked by the appearance of huCD2 on the cell surface18. ‘Great’ (IFN-gamma reporter with endogenous polyA tail) mice were generated by introducing an IRES-eYFP construct after the stop codon of the ifng gene by homologous recombination. The bicistronic IFN-γ-IRES-eYFP mRNA is under the control of the endogenous ifng 3'UTR and polyA tail. Combined IL-4 and IL-13–deficient mice were obtained from A.N. McKenzie (Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland). Mice were maintained in the UCSF specific pathogen-free animal facility in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Infections and immunizations
L. major strain WHOM/IR/-/173 was prepared and injected as 0.5–1 × 106 metacyclic promastigotes in the hind footpad of mice as described29. N. brasiliensis was prepared as described 49. Mice were immunized with 50 µg NP-conjugated chicken ovalbumin protein (OVA -NP(15)) (Biosearch Technologies) emulsified in Alum Imject (Pierce) subcutaneously in the footpad or rear flank.
Tissue immunohistochemistry
For detection of eGFP and YFP, the signal was amplified using tyramide amplification on PFA fixed tissue and huCD2 was detected on acetone-dehydrated slides after incubation with biotinylated anti-human CD2 (RPA-2.10, eBioscience). GFP and YFP were detected using rabbit anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (Ab 6556, Novus Biologicals) followed by biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit F(ab’)2 (Jackson ImmunoReseach). In brief, lymph nodes were isolated at indicated times and either frozen directly in O.C.T. embedding compound (Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc.) or after 2 h incubation in 1–4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) followed by 30% sucrose. 6–8 µm sections were cut using a Leica CM 3050S cryomicrotome (Leica Microsystems Inc.). Sections were treated with FITC-tyramide from the TSA™-fluorescein kit according to manufacturer's instructions (Perkin Elmer). Multiple biotinylated antibodies could be detected on the same slide by repeated quenching and blocking of peroxidase and biotin followed by another round of tyramide-Alexafluor 555 (Invitrogen), tyramide-Cy5 or tyramide-biotin (Perkin Elmer) amplification. Other biotinylated antibodies or reagents used were anti-IgD, CD23 (B3B4, BD Pharmingen), or PNA (Vector Labs). Biotinylated donkey-anti-rabbit secondary reagents were used to detect polyclonal rabbit anti-BCL-6 (Abcam). Nuclei were counterstained with 4', 6-diamidine-2'-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; Roche) in PBS prior to mounting the coverslip. Digital images in the FITC, Cy3 and Cy5 channels were collected using a Nikon Eclipse E800 fluorescence microscope equipped with SimplePCI software (Compix Inc.). Images were converted to RGB, colored and overlaid using Adobe Photoshop CS2 software (Adobe systems Inc.). In some cases, whole lymph nodes were imaged and collaged using Photoshop.
Flow cytometric analysis of eGFP+ and huCD2+ cells in draining lymph nodes
Popliteal lymph nodes were isolated from untreated mice or mice infected with L. major or immunized with OVA-NP(15). Single-cell suspensions were prepared and labeled with antibodies as listed: GFP+ cells were analyzed for expression of huCD2, (555, PE or APC-α-CD2, Caltag), CD4 (RM4–5, Alexa-APC-750-α-CD4, Caltag), CD19 (1D3, PerCP-Cy5.5 or APC-α-CD19, BD-Pharmingen), ICOS (D10.G4.1, PE-α-CD278, Biolegend) and B220 (RA3–6B2, PerCP-Cy5.5 or APC-α-CD45R, BD-Pharmingen and Caltag, respectively), as indicated. Samples were analyzed on a LSR-II (BD Biosciences). Where designated, a dump channel of PerCP-Cy5.5-labeled CD8α (5H10, BD-pharmingen) and CD11b (M1/70, BD-pharmingen) was used to reduce non-specific staining. Live lymphocytes were gated by DAPI exclusion, size and granularity based on forward- and side-scatter.
Flow cytometric analysis of NP-specific B cells in draining lymph nodes
B cell-T cell doublets and cells for adoptive transfer were sorted using a Moflo cell sorter (Dako Cytomation). Conjugates were dissociated using 2 mM EDTA and vigorous vortexing. Popliteal lymph nodes were isolated from treated and untreated mice and single-cell suspensions were labeled with the following antibodies: B220 (RA3–6B2, Alexa-APC-750-α-CD45R, Caltag), IgD (11–26, PE-α-IgD, Southern Biotech; AMS 9.1, biotin-α-IgDa, BD-Pharmingen), IgG1 (RMG1-1, biotin-α-IgG1, Biolegend), CD38 (90, FITC−α-CD38, BD-Pharmingen), GL7 (GL7, FITC-α-GL7, BD-Pharmingen), FAS ((Jo2, PE-α-CD95, BD-Pharmingen). NP-specific B cells were labeled with NP conjugated to APC as described 50. Live cells were gated by DAPI exclusion and CD4+ (RM4-5, Pacific Blue/Alexa405-α-CD4, Biolegend), CD8+ (53-6.7, Pacific Blue-α-CD8, Biolegend) and F4/80+ (BM8, Pacific Blue-α-F4/80, eBioscience) cells were included in the DAPI dump channel. Lymphocytes were gated on size and granularity based on forward- and side-scatter.
Real-time RT-PCR
Cells were isolated from mediastinal lymph nodes and lungs of N. brasiliensis-infected mice and viable GFP+ or GFP+huCD2+ CD4+ T cells were sorted based on DAPI−, CD4+, CD19−, CD8− staining. Cells were lysed and reverse transcribed using Cells Direct cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Transcripts were quantified using platinum SYBR green incorporation on an Opticon-2 real-time system (Biorad) and plotted relative to expression of HPRT. Primers listed in Supplementary Table 1 online.
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR of switch transcripts from B–T cell conjugates
Draining popliteal lymph nodes were isolated from day 14 L. major-infected mice and B–T cell conjugates were sorted based on expression of CD4+, CD19+, B220+, F4/80−, and CD8− staining. RNA was isolated and cDNA prepared as described 27. In brief, total RNA was extracted from sorted B–T conjugates and B cell singlets from the designated mice, converted to cDNA, and then normalized by the initial cell numbers to achieve a final volume for each cDNA sample for use in the RT reaction. A 3-fold serial dilution was then performed on the individual normalized cDNA followed by semi-quantitative PCR. The Pax5 transcript (of B cell origin) level was used to validate both the normalization of cDNA concentration as well as the titration series. PCR for germline and post-switch Ig products was performed as described using 30 to 40 cycles of PCR 27. Conjugates from KN2 × 4get mice were separated based on GFP+ or GFP+, huCD2+ expression. Conjugates from KN2 × great mice were separated based on YFP+ or huCD2+ expression. Primers listed in Supplementary Table 2 online.
Somatic hypermutation
CD4−, CD8−, CD19+, GFP−, NP+ singlets and CD4+, CD8−, CD19+, CD8− GFP+ B–T conjugates were sorted on day 14 post- OVA-NP(15) alum immunization of C57BL/6 4get mice. Genomic DNA was isolated (Puregen genomic DNA kit) and VH186.2 and JH4 intronic regions were amplified by nested PCR with Fusion Taq (Finnzyme) 33 and subcloned using Zero Blunt TOPO PCR cloning kit (Invitrogen). Individual clones were selected for sequencing. Two µl of genomic DNA (equivalent to 1000 cells) were used in initial rounds of nested PCR reactions to amplify the JH4 intron and VH186.2 segments.
JH4 intron primers: 1st round, 5’-GGAATTCGCCTGACATCTGAGGACTCTGC-3’ and 5’-CTGGACTTTCGGTTTGGTG-3’ for 12 cycles (98 C for 10 sec, 66 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C 1.5 min), 2nd round, 5’-GGTCAAGGAACCTCAGTCA-3’ and 5’-TCTCTAGACAGCAACTAC-3’ for 32 cycles (98 °C for 10 sec, 56 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C 30 sec). VH186.2 primers: 1st round, 5’-ACACAGGACCTCACCATG-3’ and 5’TCACAAGAGTCCGATAGACC-3’ for 12 cycles (98 °C for 10 sec, 60 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C 1.5 min), 2nd round, 5’-GGGTGACAATGACATCCA-3’ and 5’-GAGGAGACTGTGAGAGTGGTGCC-3’ for 32 cycles (98 °C for 10 sec, 62 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C 30 sec).
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
To detect NP-specific antibodies in serum of immunized mice, 96-well plates were coated with NP(23)-BSA or NP(3)-BSA (Biosearch) and incubated with serial 5-fold dilutions of serum. IgG1 NP-specific antibodies were detected by incubation with biotinylated anti-mouse IgG1 followed by streptavidin-HRP and o-phenylenediamine (OPD). Affinity maturation was determined as described 14. Briefly, the concentration of serum anti-NP antibodies bound to NP(3)-BSA was divided by the concentration anti-NP antibodies bound to NP(23)-BSA. As the affinity of the antibodies increase, the ratio approaches one. The concentrations of anti-NP IgG1 were determined by comparison to standard curves generated using IgG1 from the anti-NP, IgG1 clone H33Lγ1/λ1 (kindly provided by G. Kelsoe, Duke University).
Enzyme-Linked Immunospot (ELISPOT)
To detect NP-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASC), single-cell suspensions were cultured in plates coated with NP(23)-BSA. NP-specific IgG1 was visualized with biotinylated anti-mouse IgG1 followed by streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate p-toluidine salt (BCIP, Sigma) diluted in alkaline buffer containing 0.6% agarose. For detection of IL-21-secreting cells, CD4+, CD8−, F4/80−, B220− cells were isolated from the lungs and lymph nodes of N. brasiliensis-infected mice 10–12 days post-infection and sorted based on GFP expression. CD4+ T cells were plated at serial 2-fold dilutions into Millipore MultiScreen HTS 96-well plates coated with goat polyclonal anti-IL-21 capture antibody (AF594, R&D Systems). Cells were harvested after 48 h at 37° C with or without PMA and ionomycin treatment and IL-21 was detected using biotinylated goat polyclonal anti-IL-21 (BAF594, R&D Systems) followed by streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase and BCIP/NBT (Vector Labs).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank G. Kelsoe, M. Nussenzweig, K. McBride, and A. N. McKenzie for reagents and helpful suggestions, J. Cyster (UCSF), A. DeFranco (UCSF), and C. Allen (UCSF) for expert review and comments, and N. Flores, L. Stowring and C. McArthur for technical expertise. This work was supported by AI026918 and AI077439 from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Sandler Asthma Basic Research Center at UCSF. R. L. R. is a Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation-Irvington Institute Fellow.
Footnotes
Author Information
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.MacLennan IC. Germinal centers. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:117–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kelsoe G. Life and death in germinal centers (redux) Immunity. 1996;4:107–111. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80675-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Allen CD, Okada T, Cyster JG. Germinal-center organization and cellular dynamics. Immunity. 2007;27:190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fang Y, Xu C, Fu YX, Holers VM, Molina H. Expression of complement receptors 1 and 2 on follicular dendritic cells is necessary for the generation of a strong antigen-specific IgG response. J Immunol. 1998;160:5273–5279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hannum LG, Haberman AM, Anderson SM, Shlomchik MJ. Germinal center initiation, variable gene region hypermutation, and mutant B cell selection without detectable immune complexes on follicular dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2000;192:931–942. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.7.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huntington ND, et al. CD45 links the B cell receptor with cell survival and is required for the persistence of germinal centers. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:190–198. doi: 10.1038/ni1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Allen D, Simon T, Sablitzky F, Rajewsky K, Cumano A. Antibody engineering for the analysis of affinity maturation of an anti-hapten response. The EMBO journal. 1988;7:1995–2001. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03038.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meyer-Hermann ME, Maini PK, Iber D. An analysis of B cell selection mechanisms in germinal centers. Math Med Biol. 2006;23:255–277. doi: 10.1093/imammb/dql012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Allen CD, Okada T, Tang HL, Cyster JG. Imaging of germinal center selection events during affinity maturation. Science. 2007;315:528–531. doi: 10.1126/science.1136736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schwickert TA, et al. In vivo imaging of germinal centres reveals a dynamic open structure. Nature. 2007;446:83–87. doi: 10.1038/nature05573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.King C, Tangye SG, Mackay CR. T Follicular Helper (T(FH)) Cells in Normal and Dysregulated Immune Responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008 doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fazilleau N, McHeyzer-Williams LJ, McHeyzer-Williams MG. Local development of effector and memory T helper cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Garside P, et al. Visualization of specific B and T lymphocyte interactions in the lymph node. Science. 1998;281:96–99. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5373.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Takahashi Y, Dutta PR, Cerasoli DM, Kelsoe G. In situ studies of the primary immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. V. Affinity maturation develops in two stages of clonal selection. J Exp Med. 1998;187:885–895. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.6.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chtanova T, et al. T follicular helper cells express a distinctive transcriptional profile, reflecting their role as non-Th1/Th2 effector cells that provide help for B cells. J Immunol. 2004;173:68–78. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vogelzang A, et al. A fundamental role for interleukin-21 in the generation of T follicular helper cells. Immunity. 2008;29:127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nurieva RI, et al. Generation of T follicular helper cells is mediated by interleukin-21 but independent of T helper 1, 2, or 17 cell lineages. Immunity. 2008;29:138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mohrs K, Wakil AE, Killeen N, Locksley RM, Mohrs M. A two-step process for cytokine production revealed by IL-4 dual-reporter mice. Immunity. 2005;23:419–429. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vinuesa CG, Tangye SG, Moser B, Mackay CR. Follicular B helper T cells in antibody responses and autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:853–865. doi: 10.1038/nri1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Loke P, et al. Inducible costimulator is required for type 2 antibody isotype switching but not T helper cell type 2 responses in chronic nematode infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:9872–9877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503961102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tafuri A, et al. ICOS is essential for effective T-helper-cell responses. Nature. 2001;409:105–109. doi: 10.1038/35051113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dong C, Temann UA, Flavell RA. Cutting edge: critical role of inducible costimulator in germinal center reactions. J Immunol. 2001;166:3659–3662. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.3659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Finkelman FD, et al. Interleukin-4-and interleukin-13-mediated host protection against intestinal nematode parasites. Immunol Rev. 2004;201:139–155. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Voehringer D, Shinkai K, Locksley RM. Type 2 immunity reflects orchestrated recruitment of cells committed to IL-4 production. Immunity. 2004;20:267–277. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Okada T, et al. Antigen-engaged B cells undergo chemotaxis toward the T zone and form motile conjugates with helper T cells. PLoS biology. 2005;3:e150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Casamayor-Palleja M, Feuillard J, Ball J, Drew M, MacLennan IC. Centrocytes rapidly adopt a memory B cell phenotype on co-culture with autologous germinal centre T cell-enriched preparations. Int Immunol. 1996;8:737–744. doi: 10.1093/intimm/8.5.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Muramatsu M, et al. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell. 2000;102:553–563. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Muramatsu M, et al. Specific expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a novel member of the RNA-editing deaminase family in germinal center B cells. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274:18470–18476. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Reiner SL, Zheng S, Wang ZE, Stowring L, Locksley RM. Leishmania promastigotes evade interleukin 12 (IL-12) induction by macrophages and stimulate a broad range of cytokines from CD4+ T cells during initiation of infection. J Exp Med. 1994;179:447–456. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.2.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bothwell AL, et al. Heavy chain variable region contribution to the NPb family of antibodies: somatic mutation evident in a gamma 2a variable region. Cell. 1981;24:625–637. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90089-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rajewsky K, Forster I, Cumano A. Evolutionary and somatic selection of the antibody repertoire in the mouse. Science. 1987;238:1088–1094. doi: 10.1126/science.3317826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jolly CJ, Klix N, Neuberger MS. Rapid methods for the analysis of immunoglobulin gene hypermutation: application to transgenic and gene targeted mice. Nucleic acids research. 1997;25:1913–1919. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.10.1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dorsett Y, et al. MicroRNA-155 suppresses activation-induced cytidine deaminase-mediated Myc-Igh translocation. Immunity. 2008;28:630–638. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reiter R, Pfeffer K. Impaired germinal centre formation and humoral immune response in the absence of CD28 and interleukin-4. Immunology. 2002;106:222–228. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01405.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vajdy M, Kosco-Vilbois MH, Kopf M, Kohler G, Lycke N. Impaired mucosal immune responses in interleukin 4-targeted mice. J Exp Med. 1995;181:41–53. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Andoh A, Masuda A, Yamakawa M, Kumazawa Y, Kasajima T. Absence of interleukin-4 enhances germinal center reaction in secondary immune response. Immunology letters. 2000;73:35–41. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2478(00)00202-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Itano AA, Jenkins MK. Antigen presentation to naive CD4 T cells in the lymph node. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:733–739. doi: 10.1038/ni957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Fcgamma receptors: old friends and new family members. Immunity. 2006;24:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Reichert P, Reinhardt RL, Ingulli E, Jenkins MK. Cutting edge: in vivo identification of TCR redistribution and polarized IL-2 production by naive CD4 T cells. J Immunol. 2001;166:4278–4281. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.7.4278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Maldonado RA, Irvine DJ, Schreiber R, Glimcher LH. A role for the immunological synapse in lineage commitment of CD4 lymphocytes. Nature. 2004;431:527–532. doi: 10.1038/nature02916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Phan TG, et al. High affinity germinal center B cells are actively selected into the plasma cell compartment. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2419–2424. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tarlinton DM. Evolution in miniature: selection, survival and distribution of antigen reactive cells in the germinal centre. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86:133–138. doi: 10.1038/sj.icb.7100148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jacob J, Przylepa J, Miller C, Kelsoe G. In situ studies of the primary immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. III. The kinetics of V region mutation and selection in germinal center B cells. J Exp Med. 1993;178:1293–1307. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.4.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dal Porto JM, Haberman AM, Shlomchik MJ, Kelsoe G. Antigen drives very low affinity B cells to become plasmacytes and enter germinal centers. J Immunol. 1998;161:5373–5381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhou C, Saxon A, Zhang K. Human activation-induced cytidine deaminase is induced by IL-4 and negatively regulated by CD45: implication of CD45 as a Janus kinase phosphatase in antibody diversification. J Immunol. 2003;170:1887–1893. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.1887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dedeoglu F, Horwitz B, Chaudhuri J, Alt FW, Geha RS. Induction of activation-induced cytidine deaminase gene expression by IL-4 and CD40 ligation is dependent on STAT6 and NFkappaB. Int Immunol. 2004;16:395–404. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.de Leval L, et al. The gene expression profile of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma demonstrates a molecular link between angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and follicular helper T (TFH) cells. Blood. 2007;109:4952–4963. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-055145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zangani MM, et al. Lymphomas can develop from B cells chronically helped by idiotype-specific T cells. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1181–1191. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shinkai K, Mohrs M, Locksley RM. Helper T cells regulate type-2 innate immunity in vivo. Nature. 2002;420:825–829. doi: 10.1038/nature01202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lalor PA, Nossal GJ, Sanderson RD, McHeyzer-Williams MG. Functional and molecular characterization of single, (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP)-specific, IgG1+ B cells from antibody-secreting and memory B cell pathways in the C57BL/6 immune response to NP. Eur J Immunol. 1992;22:3001–3011. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830221136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.