Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1984 Nov;20(5):977–980. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.5.977-980.1984

Use of trehalose-mannitol-phosphatase agar to differentiate Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus from other coagulase-negative staphylococci.

D L Stevens, C Jones
PMCID: PMC271487  PMID: 6096398

Abstract

Using a plate medium containing trehalose, mannitol, and phenolphthalein diphosphate (TMPA), we differentiated significant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis by their lack of acid production in 18 h from other coagulase-negative staphylococci, with our results having a sensitivity (R. S. Galen and S. R. Gambino, Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses) of 100%, a specificity of 89.9%, and a positive predictive value of 94.8%. With a Taxo A bacitracin disk, which differentiates Staphylococcus species from Micrococcus species, no zone of inhibition was seen for 96% of all staphylococcal strains, with 5 of 26 strains of Staphylococcus saprophyticus exhibiting zone diameters up to 10 mm. By using resistance to a 5-microgram novobiocin disk, we differentiated S. saprophyticus, with our results having a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 97.1%, and a positive predictive value of 83.9% on TMPA. These two species represented 77.8% of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated. Reference strains fo Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species were differentiated by TMPA. The cost of TMPA was compared with that of another method. TMPA was found to offer an inexpensive, sensitive method for rapidly differentiating coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolates.

Full text

PDF
977

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldridge K. E., Stratton C. W., Patterson L. S., Evans M. E., Hodges R. L. Comparison of the Staph-Ident system with a conventional method for species identification of urine and blood isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Mar;17(3):516–520. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.3.516-520.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson J. D., Clarke A. M., Anderson M. E., Isaac-Renton J. L., McLoughlin M. G. Urinary tract infections due to Staphylococcus saprophyticus biotype 3. Can Med Assoc J. 1981 Feb 15;124(4):415–418. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christensen G. D., Parisi J. T., Bisno A. L., Simpson W. A., Beachey E. H. Characterization of clinically significant strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Aug;18(2):258–269. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.2.258-269.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gill V. J., Selepak S. T., Williams E. C. Species identification and antibiotic susceptibilities of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;18(6):1314–1319. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1314-1319.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldstein J., Schulman R., Kelley E., McKinley G., Fung J. Effect of different media on determination of novobiocin resistance for differentiation of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):592–595. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.592-595.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kloos W. E., Schleifer K. H. Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):82–88. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.82-88.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kloos W. E., Wolfshohl J. F. Identification of Staphylococcus species with the API STAPH-IDENT system. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):509–516. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.509-516.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marrie T. J., Kwan C., Noble M. A., West A., Duffield L. Staphylococcus saprophyticus as a cause of urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):427–431. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.427-431.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marsik F. J., Brake S. Species identification and susceptibility to 17 antibiotics of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):640–645. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.640-645.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schleifer K. H., Kloos W. E. A simple test system for the separation of staphylococci from micrococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):337–338. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.337-338.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sewell C. M., Clarridge J. E., Young E. J., Guthrie R. K. Clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):236–239. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.236-239.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES