Abstract
The reproducibility of identification and biochemical reactions for five different reference organisms of Enterobacteriaceae; Proteus vulgaris, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, and Enterobacter cloacae, were evaluated using the updated MS-2 system software (Abbott Laboratories, Diagnostic Division, Irving, Tex.) in a collaborative study involving 11 laboratories. When a total of 220 randomly coded test organisms were blindly examined, the MS-2 system correctly identified 92.7 and 86.8% for over 80 and 90% probability identification, respectively. Four organisms, P. vulgaris, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and S. marcescens, were correctly identified in all laboratories with high probability, but 9 of 44 tests of Enterobacter cloacae resulted in misidentifications or low-likelihood (less than 80%) identifications. Accuracy was directly related to level of experience and familiarity with the MS-2 system in the individual laboratories. Biochemical reactions varied among the identification trials, especially in the identification of S. marcescens and Enterobacter cloacae. Among a total of 44 subcultures for each organism, 10 different biochemical patterns for P. vulgaris, 6 for K. pneumoniae, 9 for E. coli, 15 for S. marcescens, and 14 for Enterobacter cloacae were obtained. The results indicate that the MS-2 system performs with high accuracy and reproducibility in identifying Enterobacteriaceae, except for Enterobacter cloacae.
Full text
PDF![1135](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928b/271533/267ba7dd2b42/jcm00125-0139.png)
![1136](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928b/271533/5bf4fc007540/jcm00125-0140.png)
![1137](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928b/271533/f8e16096d476/jcm00125-0141.png)
![1138](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928b/271533/5634ad1aa0a0/jcm00125-0142.png)
![1139](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928b/271533/9d3f35ffcee3/jcm00125-0143.png)
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aldridge C., Jones P. W., Gibson S., Lanham J., Meyer M., Vannest R., Charles R. Automated microbiological detection/identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):406–413. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.406-413.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burdash N. M., Teti G., West M. E., Bannister E. R., Manos J. P. Evaluation of an automated, computerized system (automicrobic system) for Enterobacteriaceae identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Feb;13(2):331–334. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.2.331-334.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DiPersio J. R., Dyke J. W., Vannest R. D. Evaluation of the updated MS-2 Bacterial Identification system in comparison with the API 20E system. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):128–135. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.128-135.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoban D. J., Koss J. C., Gratton C. A., Ronald A. R. Urine screening with the MS-2. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;17(6):1061–1065. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.1061-1065.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isenberg H. D., Gavan T. L., Smith P. B., Sonnenwirth A., Taylor W., Martin W. J., Rhoden D., Balows A. Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Jun;11(6):694–702. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.6.694-702.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly M. T., Balfour L. C. Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Apr;13(4):677–680. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.4.677-680.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly M. T., Latimer J. M., Balfour L. C. Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):902–905. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.902-905.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCarthy L. R., Gavan T. L., Robson J., Corlett C. Evaluation of the MS-2 urine screening method for detection of bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):250–252. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.250-252.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCracken A. W., Martin W. J., McCarthy L. R., Schwab D. A., Cooper B. H., Helgeson N. G., Prowant S., Robson J. Evaluation of the MS-2 system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Nov;12(5):684–689. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.5.684-689.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pezzlo M. T., Tan G. L., Peterson E. M., de la Maza L. M. Screening of urine cultures by three automated systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):468–474. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.468-474.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith P. B., Gavan T. L., Isenberg H. D., Sonnenwirth A., Taylor W. I., Washington J. A., 2nd, Balows A. Multi-laboratory evaluation of an automated microbial detection/identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):657–666. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.657-666.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sonnenwirth A. C. Preprototype of an automated microbial detection and identification system: a developmental investigation. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):400–405. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.400-405.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thornsberry C., Anhalt J. P., Washington J. A., 2nd, McCarthy L. R., Schoenknecht F. D., Sherris J. C., Spencer H. J. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Abbott MS-2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Sep;12(3):375–390. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.3.375-390.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thornsberry C., Gavan T. L., Sherris J. C., Balows A., Matsen J. M., Sabath L. D., Schoenknecht F., Thrupp L. D., Washington J. A., 2nd Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):466–480. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.4.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]