Abstract
This study evaluated the PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for the identification of anaerobic bacteria. A total of 80 isolates (68 fresh clinical isolates and 12 stock cultures) were examined and included 25 Bacteriodes spp., 7 Fusobacterium spp., 12 Clostridium spp., 2 Veillonella spp., 16 gram-positive cocci, and 18 gram-positive nonsporeforming bacilli. All isolates were initially identified by the procedures outlined in Holdeman et al. (ed.), Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va., 1977; identifications from the PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems were compared with these initial identifications. If no supplemental tests were required, the RapID ANA and API 20A systems had incubation times of 4 and 24 h, respectively; the PRAS II system generally required 2 to 5 days of incubation, depending on the growth rate of the isolate. PRAS II identified 74% correct to species level, 14% correct to genus only, and 6% incorrect; 6% could not be identified. PRAS II data were reevaluated according to a revised data base that was provided after completion of the study; PRAS II (revised) identified 82% correct to species, 12% correct to genus only, and 6% incorrect. RapID ANA identified 62% correct to the species level, 28% correct to genus only, and 10% incorrect. API 20A identified 71% correct to the species level, 10% correct to genus only, and 3% incorrect; 16% could not identified. The API 20A is a more established system for identification of anaerobic bacteria; PRAS II and RapID ANA appear to be promising new methods for the identification of anaerobic bacteria.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Appelbaum P. C., Kaufmann C. S., Keifer J. C., Venbrux H. J. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):614–621. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.614-621.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beaucage C. M., Onderdonk A. B. Evaluation of a prereduced anaerobically sterilized medium (PRAS II) system for identification anaerobic microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):570–572. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.570-572.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen S. L., Stewart B. J. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Sep;4(3):227–231. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.3.227-231.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson C. W., Cassorla R., Martin W. J. API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jul;10(1):14–18. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.1.14-18.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore H. B., Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Comparison of three procedures for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):15–24. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.15-24.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starr S. E., Thompson F. S., Dowell V. R., Jr, Balows A. Micromethod system for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1973 May;25(5):713–717. doi: 10.1128/am.25.5.713-717.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]