Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1985 Feb;21(2):143–145. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.143-145.1985

Evaluation of Gonodecten for the presumptive diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis in men.

W M Janda, T Jackson
PMCID: PMC271599  PMID: 2579091

Abstract

Gonodecten (Gd; U.S. Packaging Corp., LaPorte, Ind.) is a commercially available test for the presumptive diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis in men. With this test, urethral discharge is collected on a swab, placed in a plastic tube, and moistened with oxidase reagent. Development of a purple color on the swab within 3 min indicates the presence of gonococci. This system was compared with culture and Gram-stained smear for the diagnosis of gonorrhea. Of 240 specimens tested, 174 were positive with culture, Gram stain, and the Gd test and 48 were negative with all tests. For eight specimens, cultures and smears were positive, but the Gd test was negative. Nine specimens produced positive Gd tests with negative smears and cultures. Only one specimen was positive on culture and with the Gd test and negative on Gram-stained smear. Haemophilus species were isolated from 14 specimens; 5 produced positive Gd test reactions, with gonococci being coisolated from 4. The sensitivity and specificity of the Gd test compared with culture were 95.6 and 84.2%, respectively, whereas the Gram stain was 99.5% sensitive and 100% specific compared with culture. The Gd test may be a useful screening test for the diagnosis of gonorrhea in men with urethral discharge, particularly in settings where a microscope, Gram stain reagents, or technological expertise is not readily available.

Full text

PDF
143

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albritton W. L., Hammond G. W., Ronald A. R. Bacteremic Haemophilus influenzae genitourinary tract infections in adults. Arch Intern Med. 1978 Dec;138(12):1819–1821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burns M., Rossi P. H., Cox D. W., Edwards T., Kramer M., Kraus S. J. A preliminary evaluation of the Gonozyme test. Sex Transm Dis. 1983 Oct-Dec;10(4):180–183. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198311000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chowdhury M. N., Pareek S. S. Urethritis associated with Haemophilus parainfluenzae: a case report. Sex Transm Dis. 1983 Jan-Mar;10(1):45–46. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198301000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Felman Y. M., William D. C. Gonodecten--new 3-minute in vitro diagnostic test for gonorrhea in the male without use of conventional culture or gram stain. Urology. 1982 Mar;19(3):252–255. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(82)90493-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jacobs N. F., Kraus S. J. Gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis in men. Clinical and laboratory differentiation. Ann Intern Med. 1975 Jan;82(1):7–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-82-1-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Messing M., Sottnek F. O., Biddle J. W., Schlater L. K., Kramer M. A., Kraus S. J. Isolation of Haemophilus species from the genital tract. Sex Transm Dis. 1983 Apr-Jun;10(2):56–61. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198304000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prior R. B., Spagna V. A. Application of a Limulus test device in rapid evaluation of gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis in males. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Sep;14(3):256–260. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.3.256-260.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schachter J., McCormack W. M., Smith R. F., Parks R. M., Bailey R., Ohlin A. C. Enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of gonorrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jan;19(1):57–59. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.1.57-59.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES