Abstract
Superoxide dismutase/catalase mimetics, such as salen Mn complexes and certain metalloporphyrins, catalytically neutralize reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of many serious diseases. Both classes of mimetic are protective in animal models of oxidative stress. However, only AEOL11207 and EUK-418, two uncharged Mn porphyrins, have been shown to be orally bioavailable. In this study, EUK-418 and several new analogs (the EUK-400 series) were synthesized and shown to exhibit superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in vitro. Some also protected PC12 cells against staurosporine-induced cell death. All EUK-400 compounds were stable in simulated gastric fluid, and most were substantially more lipophilic than the salen Mn complexes EUK-189 and EUK-207, which lack oral activity. Pharmacokinetics studies demonstrate the presence of all EUK-400 series compounds in the plasma of rats after oral administration. These EUK-400 series compounds are potential oral therapeutic agents for cellular damage caused by oxidative stress.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00775-009-0550-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Superoxide dismutase/catalase mimetics, Manganese porphyrins, EUK-400 series compounds, Oxidative stress, Apoptosis
Introduction
An excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) mediates cumulative damage to tissues by oxidation of DNA and other macromolecules, peroxidation of lipids, and nitration of tyrosine residues. Mitochondrial injury, microvascular damage, and chronic inflammatory events are also associated with the state of oxidative stress. The brain is especially sensitive to oxidative damage owing at least in part to its high rate of O2 consumption and relative lack of antioxidant defenses [1–3]. Oxidative stress has been implicated in a number of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Huntington’s disease, as well as atherosclerosis, chronic inflammatory disease, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune disease, and injury caused by exposure to ionizing radiation [1, 3].
Superoxide dismutase (SOD)/catalase mimetics such as salen Mn complexes and certain metalloporphyrins are synthetic compounds that catalytically mimic both SOD and catalase, neutralizing the ROS superoxide and hydrogen peroxide [4–6]. Some mimetics also neutralize, via peroxidase-like mechanisms, RNS such as peroxynitrite [7–9]. Treatment with salen Mn mimetics (such as EUK-189) has been shown to protect against injury due to oxidative stress in animal models of diseases, including Parkinson’s disease [10], ALS [11], and Alzheimer’s disease [12], and stroke [13]. Treatment with EUK-189 or EUK-207, a cyclized salen Mn complex, prevents age-associated cognitive impairment in mice [14]. In addition, treatment of mice lacking mitochondrial SOD (sod2−/−) with EUK-189 is neuroprotective and increases median life span from 8 to 30 days [15]. Recent evidence also demonstrates that EUK-189 mitigates radiation damage in rat lung [16] and prolongs survival of mice receiving a lethal dose of total body radiation [17].
Metalloporphyrin SOD/catalase mimetics have also been shown to protect against radiation injury [18–23] and CNS disorders [24–27]. Many diseases characterized by oxidative stress are chronic in nature. For such disorders an orally active therapeutic agent would be highly desirable. The salen Mn complexes (EUK-189 and EUK-207) lack oral bioavailability and, like Mn porphyrins, are administered by injection or infusion. Recently Liang et al. [27] described an improved metalloporphyrin, 5,15-bis(methoxycarbonyl)-10,20-bistrifluoromethylporphyrinato manganese(III) chloride (AEOL11207), found to be orally active and present in the brains of treated mice. We and our collaborators have also described two orally bioavailable low molecular weight Mn porphyrins called “EUK-418” and “EUK-423” [28] that are also found in the brain and other tissues of mice after oral administration [29]. To our knowledge, no bioavailability data are available for any other Mn porphyrins, including the new lipophilic Mn porphyrin compounds described by Lahaye et al. [30] and Trova et al. [31]. The goal of our study was to develop several new EUK-400 series compounds and characterize all EUK-400 compounds with respect to their catalytic activities, oral bioavailability, and other relevant properties.
Materials and methods
Materials
Tissue culture media, sera, and supplements were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). BD BioCoat collagen-coated plates were purchased from Becton, Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Staurosporine (STS; catalog no. 1 055 682) and 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT; catalog no. 1 465 015) were obtained from Roche (Indianapolis, IN, USA). Acetonitrile was purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Formic acid and methanol were from EMD Chemicals (obtained from VWR). Solvents for synthesis were obtained in bulk from Fisher. The 4-tetrahydropyran carboxaldehyde was purchased from Combi-Blocks (San Diego, CA, USA). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemicals (St Louis, MO, USA).
Animals
Sprague–Dawley rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Animal studies giving the data in Table 3 were performed at TGA Sciences (Medford, MA, USA). This facility is USDA-registered and AAALAC-accredited, and these studies were supervised by an in-house Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Animal studies giving the data in Fig. 3 were performed by Cerep (Redmond, WA, USA). Standard operating procedures related to this work were reviewed and approved by the Cerep Ethics Committee.
Table 3.
Compound | Dose (mg kg−1) | Plasma concentration (ng ml−1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 min | 60 min | 120 min | 240 min | 360 min | ||
EUK-418 | 0.96 | 128 ± 83 | 250 ± 147 | 245 ± 145 | 299 ± 224 | 259 ± 166 |
EUK-423 | 0.52 | 25 ± 7 | 53 ± 19 | 48 ± 23 | 110 ± 61 | 118 ± 17 |
EUK-425 | 1.7 | 52 ± 19 | 48 ± 21 | 78 ± 47 | 96 ± 20 | 113 ± 15 |
EUK-450 | 2.7 | 11 ± 10 | 15 ± 9 | 48 ± 46 | 53 ± 53 | 47 ± 38 |
EUK-451 | 0.93 | 44 ± 38 | 61 ± 54 | 66 ± 62 | 107 ± 102 | 86 ± 70 |
EUK-452 | 1.6 | 57 ± 50 | 52 ± 42 | 75 ± 63 | 75 ± 76 | 71 ± 63 |
EUK-453 | 0.23 | 8.8 ± 5.9 | 8.1 ± 5.5 | 7.7 ± 6.1 | 7.7 ± 6.0 | 4.6 ± 4.2 |
EUK-400 compounds (formulated in 0.3 g ml−1 sodium cholate in a final volume of 1.0–1.5 ml) were administered by intragastric gavage to Sprague–Dawley rats in quadruplicate (n = 3 for EUK-450). Plasma was collected by orbital bleeding at various time points, and quantitation of compounds was performed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS). Vials were centrifuged to separate the plasma. Plasma was transferred to fresh vials and chilled in ice before freezing it at −80 °C. Extraction and protein precipitation were done in the same step by adding 40 μl of thawed plasma sample to 1.5 ml of LC-MS/MS mobile phase (3 mM ammonium acetate, 0.065% formic acid, 33.2% acetonitrile, 33.2% methanol) and mixing well. After centrifugation, 50 μl of the supernatant was injected for analysis. A Waters model 2690 HPLC system was used with a Whatman Partisil 10 ODS-3 column (4.6 mm × 100 mm), followed by a Quattro LC instrument manufactured by Micromass. The runs were performed isocratically at a flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1 with a mobile phase of 3 mM ammonium acetate, 0.065% formic acid, 33.2% acetonitrile, and 33.2% methanol. EUK-425 and EUK-452 required a mobile phase of 3 mM ammonium acetate, 0.065% formic acid, 36% acetonitrile, and 36% methanol. Four multiple reaction monitoring transitions were monitored for each compound (see the electronic supplementary material). The following transitions were used for quantitation: for EUK-418, 484.11 m/z → 442.80 m/z; for EUK-423, 556.20 m/z → 514.93 m/z; for EUK-425, 475.21 m/z → 430.02 m/z; for EUK-450, 634.95 m/z → 618.77 m/z; for EUK-451, 571.95 m/z → 530.84 m/z; for EUK-452, 527.05 m/z → 399.77 m/z; for EUK-453, 488.07 m/z → 446.94 m/z. Standard curves for this study had the most useful quantitation range of 4.5–7,600 ng ml−1, although the limits of detection were even lower for many of the compounds. Under similar conditions, EUK-189 and EUK-207, which can be quantitated with similar sensitivity, are undetectable in plasma after oral administration of up to 50 mg kg−1, although they are readily detectable when given by injection (data not shown)
Inhibition of STS-induced cell death in PC12 cells
Rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells from adrenal gland were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA; catalog no. CRL 1721). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 media with 12.5% equine serum and 2.5% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 100 U ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2. For assay, cells were plated at a density of 10,000 cells ml−1 on collagen-coated 96-well microtiter plates. Lyophilized STS was reconstituted in ethanol, and the concentration was determined by UV absorption (ε292 = 57.38 mM−1 cm−1). STS was added at various concentrations to induce cell death. Test compounds were added together with the STS. Cells were incubated overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2. After 18–24 h, test medium was removed, and cell viability was determined using the XTT viability assay [13].
Compound synthesis
The syntheses of EUK-418 and EUK-423 have been described previously [29]. The synthesis of 5,15 porphyrins (all the EUK-400 compounds except EUK-425) is shown in Scheme 1. In a typical experiment, 2,2′-dipyrromethane, 1 (100 mmol), prepared as described in [32], and the appropriate aldehyde (100 mmol) were dissolved in 16 l dichloromethane in a flask. Argon was bubbled into the solution with stirring for 1 h. The contents were protected from light and trifluoroacetic acid was added (22 mmol) and the mixture was stirred 16 h. 2,3-Dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (150 mmol) was then added, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. Triethylamine was added (10 ml) and the mixture was stirred 5 min. The porphyrin was purified by column chromatography on silica with elution with dichloromethane. These porphyrins were characterized by 1H-NMR and thin-layer chromatography (TLC).
Manganese incorporation is shown in Scheme 2 [33]. The 5,15 porphyrin (1 mmol) was dissolved in 100 ml acetic acid. Manganese acetate tetrahydrate (6 mmol) and sodium acetate (6 mmol) were added and the mixture was heated at 100 °C for 2 h. When the reaction was complete as monitored by TLC, the heat was turned off and the red solution cooled. Dichloromethane (500 ml) was added and the organics were extracted with 5 × 250 ml H2O and then 1 × 50 ml brine. The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate. The compound was dissolved in dichloromethane and slowly precipitated with hexane to give a copper-colored crystalline solid that was washed with hexane and dried under vacuum overnight. The ligand was presumed to be acetate in the case of a neutral work-up or chloride when the organic phase was washed with 1 N HCl. The purity and identity of the subsequent Mn(III) 5,15-disubstituted porphyrins was assessed by TLC, UV–vis spectroscopy, electrospray ionization (ESI)–mass spectroscopy (MS), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For TLC screening, compounds were applied to silica plates which were run in 10% methanol, 20% ethyl acetate, and 70% dichloromethane. Samples were considered to be of sufficient purity if there was a single spot of product and no detection of starting materials. (More detailed chromatography information, including retention times in HPLC systems, is given below and in the electronic supplementary material, where chromatograms are shown.) UV–vis spectra were obtained with a Beckmann DU7400 spectrophotometer, using methanol as the solvent. HPLC methods are described below. Elemental analysis, ESI-MS (including methods used), HPLC chromatograms, and absorption spectra of EUK-400 series compounds and multiple reaction monitoring transitions monitored on liquid chromatography with tandem MS (LC-MS/MS) are available online as electronic supplementary material. The compounds synthesized for this work, hereafter referred to by their EUK designation, are summarized in Fig. 1a.
EUK-425, manganese(III) 5,10,15,20-tetraethylporphine acetate, was prepared from 5,10,15,20-tetraethylporphyrin [34] following the method of Meunier and Cosledan [29] as shown in Scheme 3.
The 1H-NMR (CDCl3) data and yield obtained for each unmetallated precursor compound are as follows: precursor to EUK-418—5,15-dicyclopropylporphine, 10.13 (s, 2H), 9.92 (d, 4H), 9.35 (d, 4H), 4.21 (tt, 2H), 1.95 (dt, 4H), 1.75 (dt, 4H), −2.94 (bs, 2H), yield 56%; precursor to EUK-423—5,15-diphenylporphine, 11.88 (s, 2H), 9.40 (d, 4H), 9.09 (d, 4H), 8.28 (m, 4H), 7.82 (6H), −3.12 (bs, 2H), yield 63%; precursor to EUK-450—5,15-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)porphine, 10.31 (s, 2H), 9.40 (d, 4H), 9.13 (d, 4H), 7.83 (m, 4H), 7.31 (d, 2H), 4.21 (s, 6H), 4.04 (s, 6H), −3.11 (bs, 2H), yield 52%; precursor to EUK-451—5,15-di(4-tetrahydropyranyo)porphine, 10.23 (s, 2H), 9.80 (bd, 4H), 9.44 (d, 4H), 5.48 (tt, 2H), 4.53 (dd, 4H), 4.12 (t, 4H), 3.57 (dq, 4H), 2.63 (d, 4H), −2.49 (bs, 2H), yield 32%; precursor to EUK-452—5,15-dicyclohexylporphine, 10.18 (s, 2H), 9.77 (bs, 4H), 9.40 (d, 4H), 5.22 (tt, 2H), 3.12 (dq, 4H), 2.76 (bd, 4H), 2.30 (dd, 6H), 1.98 (m, 6H), −2.45 (bs, 2H), yield 34%; precursor to EUK-453—5,15-dipropylporphine, 10.17 (s, 2H), 9.58 (d, 4H), 9.41 (d, 4H), 5.00 (t, 4H), 2.57 (h, 4H), 1.33 (t, 6H), −2.93 (bs, 2H), yield 25%.
The ESI high-resolution MS (HRMS) and UV–vis data, and the metallation yield obtained for each compound are as follows: EUK-418, manganese(III) 5,15-dicyclopropylporphine acetate, ESI-HRMS: anal. calc. for C26H20N4Mn+ 443.1068, observed 443.1059, UV–vis: λmax, nm; (ε, M−1 cm−1): 373 (40,814), 395 (37,382), 462 (58,498), yield 98%; EUK-423: manganese(III) 5,15-diphenylporphine acetate, ESI-HRMS: anal. calc. for C32H20N4Mn+ 515.1068, observed 515.1071, UV–vis: 372 (66,532), 393 (49,164), 459 (72,914), yield 78%; EUK-425: manganese(III) 5, 10,15, 20-tetraethylporphine acetate, ESI-HRMS: anal. calc. for C28H28N4Mn+ 475.1694, observed 475.1699. UV–vis: 380 (45,203), 402 (41,163), 471 (58,144), yield 36%; EUK-450: manganese(III) 5,15-di-3,4-dimethoxyphenylporphine acetate, ESI-HRMS: anal. calc. for C36H28N4O4Mn+ 635.1491, observed 615.1503, UV–vis: 373 (45,564), 395 (43,122), 462 (68,535), yield 50%; EUK-451: manganese(III) 5,15-ditetrahydropyranyoporphine chloride: ESI-HRMS: anal. calc. for C30H28N4O2Mn+ 531.1593, observed 531.158, UV–vis: 372 (48,088), 393 (43,813), 460 (72,370), yield 95%; EUK-452: manganese(III) 5,15-dicyclohexylporphine chloride, ESI-HRMS: anal. calc. for C32H32N4Mn+ 527.2007, observed 527.1993, UV–vis: 374 (44,365), 394 (40,921), 461 (61,952), yield 97%; EUK-453: manganese(III) 5,15-dipropylporphine chloride, ESI-HRMS: anal. calc. for C26H24N4Mn+ 447.1381, observed 447.1383, UV–vis: 374 (49,723), 395 (44,441), 462 (54,688), yield 95%.
Catalytic activity
Catalase activity was assayed by measuring the disappearance of hydrogen peroxide in 96-well plates, measured using horseradish peroxidase coupled oxidation of 2, 2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonate) diammonium salt (ABTS). The method was as described in [35], except the initial hydrogen peroxide concentration was 100 μM, and oxidation of ABTS was monitored at 690 nm to eliminate interference from porphyrins. SOD activity was measured indirectly in multiwell plates, using xanthine/xanthine oxidase as the superoxide-generating system and nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) as the detector. Reduction of NBT was monitored at 550 nm in a final volume of 0.21 ml. The temperature was maintained at 25 °C. The final concentrations of the reagents were as follows: 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.8, 17.7 mU ml−1 xanthine oxidase, 2,750 U ml−1 catalase, 250 μM xanthine, and 10 μM NBT. Another superoxide indicator, cytochrome c, generated artifacts in this assay, consistent with the interference observed when using manganese(III) tetrakis(4-benzoic acid) porphyrin (MnTBAP) analogs [31]. One unit of activity was defined as the amount of compound which blocked 50% NBT reduction under these conditions. Bovine Cu/Zn SOD was used as a standard (Sigma S-5395). Controls for the SOD assay include ensuring that the compound does not affect the superoxide-generating reaction, testing solvent alone, and ensuring that the compound does not react independently with NBT. Peroxidase activity was assessed in the presence of hydrogen peroxide with tetramethyl benzidine as the substrate. The final concentrations of the reagents were 5 μM sample, 0.2 mM hydrogen peroxide, and 0.225 mM tetramethyl benzidine in a volume of 1.1 ml at a temperature of 27 °C. The reaction was monitored at 655 nm. Controls for the catalase and peroxidase assays include ensuring that the reactions are hydrogen peroxide dependent.
Quantitation of compounds by HPLC
Samples from simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and octanol partitioning studies were analyzed by HPLC using a Waters model 2695 system equipped with a model 2996 photodiode array detector. A Whatman Partisil 10 ODS-3 (4.6 mm × 250 mm) column was used. The column was equilibrated with 50% methanol and 50% 100 mM NaCl, and samples were injected in a volume of 50 μl. All Mn porphyrins except EUK-452 were eluted from the column at 1.0 ml min−1 with a gradient to 80% methanol over 1 min. EUK-452 was eluted with a gradient to 100% methanol over 1 min. A wavelength of 458 nm was used for detection of all EUK-400 series compounds. EUK-189 and EUK-207 compounds were injected similarly onto a column equilibrated with 0% methanol and 100% 100 mM NaCl, and were eluted with a gradient to 60% methanol over 1 min. A wavelength of 324 nm was used for detection of salen Mn complexes. Compound retention times in minutes were 12.9 (EUK-189), 12.8 (EUK-207), 10.9 (EUK-418), 11.9 (EUK-423), 11.5 (EUK-425), 11.2 (EUK-450), 10.0 (EUK-451), 10.8 (EUK-452), and 11.4 (EUK-453).
In vitro stability in SGF
To measure stability in USP SGF, compounds were diluted in SGF (34 mM NaCl, 3.2 mg ml−1 pepsin, 81.2 mM HCl, pH approximately 1.2) and incubated at 37 °C for 90 min (1 h is a standard gastric “transit time” according to the FDA) [36]. Aliquots were withdrawn, and intact compound was quantitated by HPLC–UV analysis as described earlier.
Lipophilicity measurements
Lipophilicity was determined by vortexing a mixture of 400 μl 500 μM compound and 200 μl octanol in a 1.7-ml microfuge tube. The volumes and concentrations used differed from those used in previous methods [15] to optimize quantitation of the porphyrin compounds. Quantitation of the compound in each layer was performed by HPLC–UV analysis. Octanol partitioning coefficients (P) were expressed as the ratio of the concentration of the sample in the octanol phase to that in the aqueous phase:
In vivo oral bioavailability
Aqueous solutions of compounds were administered to Sprague–Dawley rats, and blood samples were collected into vials pretreated with Li heparin at various time points for extraction and measurement of the compound by LC-MS/MS. Details are given in the figure legends.
Results
Synthesis and catalytic activities
Seven EUK-400 series compounds were synthesized (Fig. 1a). Of these, EUK-418, EUK-423, and EUK-425 (originally compounds 3, 20, and 24, respectively) were described in the original patent [29], and the others were designed for this work. The design goals were to produce Mn porphyrin compounds bisubstituted with pharmacologically compatible substituents and having a range of predicted lipophilicities between those of EUK-418 and EUK-423. For comparison, the structures of the salen Mn complexes EUK-189 and EUK-207 [14] are shown in Fig. 1b. All EUK-400 series compounds exhibited significant SOD activities (Table 1), although these activities were lower than those of the salen Mn complexes. Although the assay methods differed, the SOD activities of the EUK-400 series compounds were comparable to that of AEOL11207, when normalized to that of Cu/Zn SOD. (In other words, the EUK-400 compounds are 26- to 205-fold less active than Cu/Zn SOD, whereas AEOL11207 is 123-fold less active [27].) In addition, all EUK-400 series compounds had significant catalase and peroxidase activities (Table 1), although again at lower levels than those of EUK-189 and EUK-207.
Table 1.
Compound | SOD IC50 (μM) | CAT (μM H2O2 min−1) |
POD (μM TMB min−1) |
---|---|---|---|
EUK-189 | 0.37 | 3.15 ± 0.01 | 3.61 ± 0.05 |
EUK-207 | 0.48 | 3.21 ± 0.04 | 4.43 ± 0.003 |
EUK-418 | 1.73 | 0.47 ± 0.10 | 0.63 ± 0.08 |
EUK-423 | 6.36 | 0.45 ± 0.18 | 0.61 ± 0.05 |
EUK-425 | 12.5 | 0.57 ± 0.15 | 0.58 ± 0.03 |
EUK-450 | 6.39 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.66 ± 0.10 |
EUK-451 | 3.36 | 0.64 ± 0.25 | 0.59 ± 0.023 |
EUK-452 | 11.6 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.63 ± 0.05 |
EUK-453 | 5.95 | 0.50 ± 0.11 | 0.56 ± 0.03 |
Assays were performed as described in “Materials and methods.” EUK-400 series compounds were tested from dimethyl sulfoxide stock solutions for superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities, and from H2O for peroxidase (POD) activity. EUK-189 and EUK-207 were diluted from a H2O stock solution. Standard deviations of triplicate samples are given for CAT and POD. Under these conditions, Cu/Zn SOD enzyme exhibited an IC50 value of 0.0011 μM
TMB tetramethyl benzidine
Recent work has shown that MnTBAP in fact possesses no SOD activity [37]. Previously reported SOD activity was due to Mn aggregate impurities in commercial preparations. To rule out the possibility that similar impurities in our preparations of EUK-400s are responsible for catalytic activity, we analyzed samples by ESI-MS. No peaks were observed at 341 or 381 (Fig. S1), which correspond to these Mn aggregates [37]. Since Mn clusters are sensitive to EDTA, whereas intact Mn porphyrins are not, we incubated the diluted compounds with EDTA, and found no change in activity. In addition, HPLC fractions of EUK-451 exhibited SOD and catalase activities only in the peak corresponding to intact compound (data not shown).
Protection against STS-induced cell death in PC12 cells
Previous studies have shown that salen Mn complexes protect cultured cortical neurons from STS-induced apoptosis and concomitantly inhibit intracellular oxidative stress [38]. In this study, we used the rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cell line, which is also sensitive to STS. Low doses of EUK-418, EUK-423, and EUK-451 protect PC12 cells against STS-induced cell death (Fig. 2). EUK-425, EUK-450, EUK-452, and EUK-453 were not significantly protective and were cytotoxic (data not shown). The salen Mn compounds EUK-189 and EUK-207 also show protection. Consistent with its greater stability [14], EUK-207 is more potent than EUK-189 in this model. Higher doses of EUK-400 compounds (30–100 μM) are toxic in the absence of STS, whereas EUK-189 and EUK-207 were not toxic at any dose tested (data not shown). The biphasic dose–response curve for the EUK-400 compounds in Fig. 2 is consistent with this observed toxicity.
In vitro “predictors” of oral availability
The purpose of these experiments was to conduct simple in vitro tests that others have used as potential predictors of oral availability. All EUK-400 series compounds are stable to incubation in SGF at 37 °C for 90 min (Table 2). This time period is longer than the gastric transit time, suggesting that degradation in the stomach is not a barrier to oral availability. In contrast, EUK-189 was much less stable, and EUK-207 had an intermediate stability that is consistent with its survival in the gastrointestinal system during the time period following oral ingestion. The EUK-400 series compounds were originally designed for oral availability [29]. As discussed above, EUK-450, EUK-451, EUK-452, and EUK-453 were designed for this work as lipophilic variations of EUK-418 and EUK-423. Thus, octanol partitioning was performed as a measure of lipophilicity (Table 2). Besides its potential association with oral absorption, this test may also have some predictive value for the ability to cross membrane barriers such as the blood–brain barrier. With the exception of EUK-451, all of the EUK-400 series compounds are substantially more lipophilic than EUK-189 or EUK-207, two salen Mn complexes that have no oral bioavailability. EUK-452 was the most lipophilic, with a log10 P value of 1.98; a value of 2 or greater may predict the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier [39]. Another commonly used in vitro model for oral availability is permeability through a Caco-2 monolayer [40–42]. We found that this model system was not useful for the EUK-400 series compounds, because they stuck to the cellular layer, so we proceeded to test the compounds in vivo.
Table 2.
Compound | SGF stability (%) | P | Log10 P |
---|---|---|---|
EUK-189 | 14 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | −0.90 ± 0.013 |
EUK-207 | 72 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | −1.41 ± 0.15 |
EUK-418 | 92 | 3.53 ± 0.14 | 0.548 ± 0.009 |
EUK-423 | 91 | 8.07 ± 0.10 | 0.907 ± 0.002 |
EUK-425 | 97 | 8.56 ± 0.35 | 0.932 ± 0.006 |
EUK-450 | 98 | 4.46 ± 0.11 | 0.650 ± 0.010 |
EUK-451 | 100 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | −0.660 ± 0.011 |
EUK-452 | 98 | 94.0 ± 1.7 | 1.973 ± 0.008 |
EUK-453 | 98 | 4.16 ± 0.16 | 0.619 ± 0.017 |
EUK compounds were incubated with SGF for 90 min at 37 °C. Intact compound was quantitated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Octanol partitioning was performed as described in “Materials and methods,” except for EUK-207, for which the volumes and concentrations were as described in [15]. The compound in octanol and aqueous phases was quantitated by HPLC, and standard deviations of triplicate samples are given
In vivo oral availability
One compound, EUK-425, was selected for a bioavailability study comparing the pharmacokinetics of oral versus intravenous routes of administration. When EUK-425 was administered to rats by oral gavage and intravenous injection, the compound was detected in plasma by LC-MS/MS (Fig. 3). Plasma levels dropped over the first hour after intravenous administration, whereas they remained relatively constant after administration by oral gavage. Subsequently all EUK-400 series compounds were administered to rats by oral gavage, and the plasma was found to contain a sustained level of the compound at time points up to 6 h (Table 3). Plasma levels of each compound in each individual rat, averaged to produce the data in Table 3, are shown in Table S2. Thus, all compounds tested are orally available in rats. Our intent was not to rank the compounds with respect to their oral bioavailability, but to simply screen them in vivo to demonstrate whether they could be delivered orally. Consequently, each analog was administered at the most convenient dose on the basis of factors such as solubility. Under similar conditions, with oral doses as high as 50 mg kg−1, EUK-189 and EUK-207 are undetectable in plasma (data not shown).
Discussion
Overall, the EUK-400 compounds exhibit biological properties consistent with their potential value as therapeutic agents, including scavenging of ROS and cytoprotective activities. In this respect, these low molecular weight Mn porphyrins share some similarities to the salen Mn complexes but, in addition, they show oral bioavailability, as hypothesized. To facilitate discussion of comparisons among the compounds, Table 4 summarizes their relative properties.
Table 4.
Compound | SOD | CAT | POD | PC12 | TOX | LIP | SGF | ORAL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUK-189 | 1 | ++ | ++ | + | − | 8 | − | − |
EUK-207 | 1 | ++ | ++ | ++ | − | 9 | + | − |
EUK-418 | 2 | + | + | + | ++ | 6 | ++ | + |
EUK-423 | 4 | + | + | +++ | + | 3 | ++ | + |
EUK-425 | 5 | + | + | − | ++ | 2 | +++ | + |
EUK-450 | 4 | + | + | − | ++ | 4 | +++ | + |
EUK-451 | 3 | + | + | +++ | + | 7 | +++ | + |
EUK-452 | 5 | + | + | − | ++ | 1 | +++ | + |
EUK-453 | 4 | + | + | − | ++ | 5 | +++ | + |
Data described elsewhere in the paper are summarized here to facilitate comparison among compounds. For lipophilicity (LIP), compounds are ranked with respect to their octanol partitioning coefficients (Table 2), with 1 being most lipophilic. For SOD activity (Table 1), compounds are assigned scores from 1 (highest activity) to 5 (lowest activity). For the other parameters, + and − scores are used to enable semiquantitative comparisons among compounds. CAT and POD are CAT and POD activities (Table 1), respectively. PC12 represents cytoprotective activity at lower, less toxic doses (less than 4 μM; Fig. 2), so is an indicator of relative potency. TOX represents cytotoxic activity in PC12 cells (Fig. 2), as well as capillary endothelial cells [23], at higher doses (more than 10 μM). SGF is the stability in SGF (Table 2), and ORAL represents whether or not the compound, administered orally at up to 50 mg kg−1, is orally available in rats (Fig. 3, Table 3)
EUK-400s are SOD/catalase mimetics with peroxidase activity
As many metalloporphyrins have been demonstrated to neutralize ROS, we tested the EUK-400 series compounds for antioxidant activity. Relative to the salen Mn complexes [4], the EUK-400 series compounds have lower SOD, catalase, and peroxidase activities (Table 1). Among the EUK-400 series, the compounds have similar catalase and peroxidase activities; however, their SOD activities vary about tenfold from the most active (EUK-418) to the least active (EUK-425). These results contrast with the structure–activity relationship we have reported for a series of salen Mn complexes, which have similar SOD activities, but varying catalase and peroxidase activities [4]. Because of the lack of any obvious trends and the limited number of EUK-400 series compounds examined, no strong structure–activity relationships can be established, but that was not the intent of this study. Nonetheless, we speculate that differences in SOD activity may in part be related to steric differences among the compounds. For example, EUK-418 with its two cyclopropyl groups has an almost fivefold greater SOD activity than EUK-453 with its two linear propyl chains, and might be expected to have a less planar (more “ruffled”) structure owing to the bulkier cyclopropyl groups at two of its meso positions [43]. This in turn should affect the coordination of Mn in relation to the porphyrin, potentially favoring SOD catalytic activity [37, 44]. For the compounds with cycloalkyl groups at the meso positions, the SOD activity seems to be inversely related to the steric bulk of these substituents. The 1H-NMR spectra of the unmetallated precursors to these compounds confirm that the relative steric interactions are EUK-452 > EUK-451 > EUK-418 (less planar to most planar/free spinning). The β protons closest to the cycloalkyl groups are broadened in the 5,15-dicyclohexyl porphyrin, less broadened in the 5,15-ditetrahydropyranoporphryin, and not broadened at all in 5,15-dicyclopropyl porphyrin. Other factors such as electronics and lipophilicity may also affect SOD activity, and studying a broader series of compounds might provide evidence to address such speculations. For example, with a larger group of compounds one could vary separately the solubility, electronics, and steric bulk at the meso position of the porphyrin to see if any logical trends based on these factors develop.
It is interesting to note that, in contrast to many biologically active Mn porphyrins previously reported in the literature, all the EUK-400 series compounds except EUK-425 have two unsubstituted meso positions. In fact, Trova et al. [31] reported that many Mn porphyrins having two unsubstituted meso positions have greater catalase activity and greater inhibition of lipid peroxidation than other MnTBAP analogs.
Some EUK-400s protect PC12 cells against cell death induced by STS
There was no close correlation between SOD or catalase activity of these compounds and their ability to protect PC12 cells against apoptosis. We would not have expected a close association because of the complexity of the cellular model as compared with the individual catalytic activity assays. Similarly, the ROS scavenging properties of a series of salen Mn complexes did not directly predict their relative activities in cell culture or in vivo [4]. In the current circumstance, all the EUK-400 compounds are cytotoxic at certain doses, and this property most certainly influences their relative activities in an assay for cytoprotection. In the PC12 assay, EUK-423 and EUK-451 were the most protective of the seven Mn porphyrins tested, although both showed biphasic dose curves consistent with their cytotoxicity. Although they both had relatively high SOD activities, this property alone was not sufficient. EUK-418, the compound with the highest SOD activity, was a relatively poor protector in the PC12 model, most likely owing to its greater toxicity (Table 4). Similarly, in an endothelial cell culture model, we showed that EUK-418 and EUK-423, as well as EUK-189 and EUK-207, mitigated apoptosis induced by ionizing radiation, with EUK-418 showing the greatest cytotoxicity of the four, EUK-423 showing intermediate toxicity, and the salen Mn complexes showing no detectable toxicity [23]. We subsequently demonstrated that EUK-451 was also a potent mitigator in this model, and had significantly lower cytotoxicity than the other EUK-400 compounds (unpublished data). Four compounds, EUK-450, EUK-452, EUK-453, and EUK-425, were the most cytotoxic and, not surprisingly, showed no cytoprotective activity against STS-induced apoptosis. Overall, the cytotoxicity of the EUK-400 series compounds strongly influences observed cytoprotection. Highly protective, less toxic compounds are favored in this or in any other cellular model. Such differences will not be evident, of course, in an SOD or catalase activity assay. For this and other reasons, direct associations between such specific ROS scavenging activities and cytoprotective activity would not be predicted. Furthermore, no cellular model will absolutely predict relative activity and toxicity in vivo [4]. In addition, mechanisms other than ROS scavenging activity may also contribute to the cytoprotective activity of the EUK-400 series compounds in a given model (see below). Previous work with salen Mn complexes has shown that other properties, such as intracellular accessibility and stability, are at least as important as catalytic activity in predicting cytoprotective activity [4, 38]. Consistent with these findings, EUK-207 is more protective than EUK-189 in the PC12 assay (Fig. 2), although these compounds have similar catalytic activities (Table 1). Although cytotoxicity is not an issue with these two analogs at the concentrations tested, we previously showed that a salen Mn complex with very high catalase activity, EUK-178, showed cytotoxicity in cell culture as well as poor activity in vivo [4].
It is extremely interesting that, despite their lower SOD and other ROS scavenging activities, EUK-451 and EUK-423 protected PC12 cells at lower concentrations than did the salen Mn complexes. This greater apparent potency may very well be related to enhanced intracellular stability since the Mn porphyrins are inherently more stable than the salen Mn complexes as evidenced, for example, in the SGF stability studies. In addition, it is quite possible that Mn porphyrins have more complex mechanisms of cytoprotection than salen Mn complexes (see the discussion later).
In general, it is clear from these and our previous findings that in vitro ROS scavenging activity is unlikely to directly predict activity in cellular models. Consistent with this, others have shown that the in vitro catalytic activities of various ROS scavengers do not correlate with survival of retinal ganglion cells [45]. Again, this finding is not at all surprising given the potential complexity of any cytoprotection assay. Similar to our observations in the ionizing radiation studies cited above, Fig. 2 shows that the salen Mn complexes do not display the dose-limiting cytotoxicity seen in vitro with the EUK-400 series compounds. Although it is promising that no toxicity was observed in the in vivo oral availability studies reported here (Fig. 3, Table 3), no formal toxicity studies have yet been done with the EUK-400 compounds. Further studies using various relevant in vivo models will eventually help to predict the best candidate(s) for potential therapeutic use. Indeed, bioavailability properties will play a key role in this selection.
SGF and octanol partitioning are useful, but insufficient predictors of oral bioavailability
We performed these tests because others have found them helpful in predicting oral availability. Unfortunately, transport across Caco-2 cell monolayers was an unsuitable model system for these compounds owing to their sticking to the cell layer. Not surprisingly, octanol partitioning data alone do not correlate with oral bioavailability. EUK-189 and EUK-451 have similar P values (Table 2); however, EUK-451 is orally bioavailable, whereas EUK-189 is not. The EUK-400 series compounds exhibited a wide range of partitioning coefficients, and all exhibited oral availability. It is possible that a common mechanism operates to transport these porphyrins into the bloodstream; an intestinal heme transporter has been identified [46]. Once in the bloodstream, EUK-400s may bind to serum albumin, as do other porphyrins [47], and as we have observed in vitro with EUK-418, EUK-423, and EUK-425 (data not shown). Stability in SGF is necessary, but not sufficient to predict oral availability. For example, EUK-207 has sufficient stability in SGF on the basis of gastric transit time, yet it is not orally bioavailable. On the basis of its structure, one would not expect EUK-207 to be recognized by a heme transporter.
In vivo oral availability in rats
Previous work [29] showed that EUK-418 is orally bioavailable in mice, and this compound was detected in selected tissues (kidney > liver > lung ≫ brain). The present work compares the plasma levels of one compound, EUK-425, when administered orally and intravenously (Fig. 3) and also demonstrates the oral availability of all EUK-400 series compounds (Table 3). As yet, the tissue distribution of orally administered EUK-400 compounds in rats is unknown. Given that ROS are implicated in neurodegeneration, it is of great interest to learn if any of these compounds pass through the blood–brain barrier. AEOL11207, another lipophilic metalloporphyrin, was shown to be present in the brain tissue of mice after subcutaneous or oral administration [27]. It is possible that different analogs will be appropriate for different target tissues. Our future in vivo studies will include investigation of this question.
Speculation on mechanism of action
The conventional thinking is that SOD/catalase mimetics protect against oxidative stress by neutralizing ROS in vivo, and EUK-400 series compounds may also act by this mechanism. According to a recent paper by Abramov et al. [48], neurons exposed to anoxia and reperfusion exhibit at least three different mechanisms of ROS generation: an initial mitochondrial burst, a delayed xanthine oxidase mediated production, and an NADPH oxidase dependent production upon reoxygenation. Thus, different SOD mimetics may have different site(s) of action, depending on their subcellular localization. Since the EUK compounds exhibit a wide range of partition coefficients (Table 2), they might be expected to migrate into different subcellular compartments. Schlieve et al. [45] recently found a lack of correlation between the activities of ROS scavengers, including manganese(III) tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridyl) porphyrin (MnTMPyP), in cell-free catalytic assays and in cultured retinal ganglion cells, consistent with other findings that catalytic activity in vitro does not correlate to cytoprotection in vivo.
As noted above, the EUK-400 series compounds protect cells at lower concentrations than the salen Mn complexes EUK-189 and EUK-207, even though their catalytic activities are lower. Besides their potential for greater intracellular stability (see Table 2), it is also possible that EUK-400 series compounds act via an additional or alternative mechanism which does not involve ROS. Other groups have proposed alternative mechanisms of action for Mn porphyrins. MnTBAP inhibits nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor [49] and N-methyl d-aspartate receptor mediated increases in intracellular Ca2+ levels [50]. Iron tetrakis(4-benzoic acid) porphyrin and cobalt tetrakis(4-benzoic acid) porphyrin increase expression of heme oxygenase-1 [51], an effect which correlates with the protection of cardiomyocytes against apoptosis by doxorubicin [52]. MnTMPyP scavenges NO and inhibits soluble guanylyl cyclase activity [53]. It also inhibits the activity of purified NO synthase by interfering with its reductase domain [53]. Another possible antiapoptotic mechanism which we have recently considered is inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition. Protoporphyrin IX binds to the peripheral benzodiazepam receptor (PBR) [54] and participates in the induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition [55]. Other PBR ligands inhibit apoptosis [56, 57]. Preliminary data show that some of these compounds have affinity for the PBR [58], although the physiological implications are as yet unknown. The complexity of the mechanisms by which these and similar compounds exert their cytoprotective properties is an avenue for much future research.
Therapeutic potential
Other Mn porphyrins have been proposed as possible therapeutics for various medical conditions. As described in “Introduction,” Mn porphyrins and salen Mn provide neuroprotection in many disease models in vivo. Clinical trials are now under way for manganese(III) tetrakis(N,N′-diethylimidazolium-2-yl) porphyrin (AEOL10150), an injectable Mn porphyrin, for treatment of ALS [59]. In addition to their therapeutic potential in diseases of the CNS, SOD/catalase mimetics should be effective in treating peripheral diseases such as diabetes [60] and heart disease [61]. Recent studies have also suggested a role for salen Mn complexes and Mn porphyrins as medical countermeasures against radiation injury [16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23]. Oral bioavailability is a useful property for a subset of these therapeutic indications, whereas an injectable or sustained-release formulation will be appropriate for others.
In summary, we analyzed EUK-418 and several new analogs. These compounds, called the “EUK-400 series,” are SOD and catalase mimetics, some of which protect cultured cells from STS-induced cell death. Unlike the salen Mn complexes such as EUK-189 and EUK-207, the EUK-400 series compounds are detected in plasma after oral administration. Thus, they are potential orally administered therapeutics for diseases in which oxidative stress is involved as well as injuries caused by radiation exposure.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Bernard Meunier and Frederic Cosledan, who designed and synthesized EUK-418, EUK-423, and EUK-425 [29] with support from and collaboration with B.M.C., K.D.H., and S.R.D., formerly at Eukarion. The authors thank Myra Robinson for able technical assistance and Alexander Lazarev for helpful discussions. This work was supported by a subcontract (S.R.D., principal investigator) under grant no. U19-A1067734 to the Medical College of Wisconsin (John E. Moulder, principal investigator) and a Pilot Grant (R.A.R., principal investigator) awarded by the Centers for Medical Countermeasures Against Radiation (CMCR) program at the Medical College of Wisconsin. The CMCR program is funded by the NIAID.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Abbreviations
- ALS
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- ABTS
2, 2′-Azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonate) diammonium salt
- XTT
2,3-Bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide
- AEOL11207
5,15-Bis(methoxycarbonyl)-10,20-bistrifluoromethylporphyrinato manganese(III) chloride
- ESI
Electrospray ionization
- HPLC
High-performance liquid chromatography
- HRMS
High-resolution mass spectroscopy
- LC-MS/MS
Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectroscopy
- MnTBAP
Manganese(III) tetrakis(4-benzoic acid) porphyrin
- AEOL10150
Manganese(III) tetrakis(N,N′-diethylimidazolium-2-yl) porphyrin
- MnTMPyP
Manganese(III) tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridyl) porphyrin
- MS
Mass spectroscopy
- NBT
Nitro blue tetrazolium
- PBR
Peripheral benzodiazepam receptor
- RNS
Reactive nitrogen species
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- SGF
Simulated gastric fluid
- STS
Staurosporine
- SOD
Superoxide dismutase
- TLC
Thin-layer chromatography
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00775-009-0550-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Robbins MEC, Zhao W (2004) In J Radiat Biol 80:251–259 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2.Reynolds A, Laurie C, Lee Mosley R, Gendelman HE (2007) Int Rev Neurobiol 82:297–325 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC (1999) Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford
- 4.Doctrow SR, Huffman K, Marcus CB, Tocco G, Malfroy E, Adinolfi CA, Kruk H, Baker K, Lazarowych N, Mascarenhas J, Malfroy B (2002) J Med Chem 45:4549–4558 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Faulkner KM, Liochev SI, Fridovich I (1994) J Biol Chem 269:23471–23476 [PubMed]
- 6.Day BJ, Fridovich I, Crapo JD (1997) Arch Biochem Biophys 347:256–262 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Crow JP (2000) Free Radic Biol Med 28:1487–1494 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Shimanovich R, Hannah S, Lynch V, Gerasimchuk N, Mody TD, Magda D, Sessler J, Groves JT (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123:3613–3614 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.Sharpe MA, Ollosson R, Stewart VC, Clark JB (2002) Biochem J 366:97–107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Peng J, Stevenson FF, Doctrow SR, Andersen JK (2005) J Biol Chem 280:29194–29198 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Jung C, Rong Y, Doctrow S, Baudry M, Malfroy B, Xu Z (2001) Neurosci Lett 304:157–160 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Melov S, Wolf N, Strozyk D, Doctrow SR, Bush AI (2005) Free Radic Biol Med 38:258–261 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.Baker K, Bucay-Marcus C, Huffman C, Kruk H, Malfroy B, Doctrow SR (1998) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 284:215–221 [PubMed]
- 14.Liu R, Liu IY, Bi X, Thompson RF, Doctrow SR, Malfroy B, Baudry M (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8526–8531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Melov S, Doctrow SR, Schneider JA, Haberson J, Patel M, Coskun PE, Huffman K, Wallace DC, Malfroy B (2001) J Neurosci 21:8348–8353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Langan AR, Khan MA, Yeung IW, Van Dyk J, Hill RP (2006) Radiother Oncol 79:231–238 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Srinivasan V, Doctrow S, Singh VK, Whitnall MH (2008) Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 30:271–290 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 18.Gauter-Fleckenstein B, Fleckenstein K, Owzar K, Jiang C, Batinic-Haberle I, Vujaskovic Z (2008) Free Radic Biol Med 44:982–989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Vujaskovic Z, Batinic-Haberle I, Rabbani ZN, Feng QF, Kang SK, Spasojevic I, Samulski TV, Fridovich I, Dewhirst MW, Anscher MS (2002) Free Radic Biol Med 33:857–863 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Patel M, Day BJ (1999) Trends Pharmacol Sci 20:359–364 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Lee JH, Lee YM, Park JW (2005) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 334:298–305 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Rabbani ZN, Batinic-Haberle I, Anscher MS, Huang J, Day BJ, Alexander E, Dewhirst MW, Vujaskovic Z (2007) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:573–580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Rosenthal RA, Vorotnikova E, Fisette L, Braunhut S, Huffman K, Tries M, Doctrow SR (2006) Free Radic Biol Med 41:S159–S160
- 24.Crow JP, Calingasan NY, Chen J, Hill JL, Beal MF (2005) Ann Neurol 58:258–265 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Sharma SS, Gupta S (2007) Eur J Pharmacol 561:72–79 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Mackensen GB, Patel M, Sheng H, Calvi CL, Batinic-Haberle I, Day BJ, Liang LP, Fridovich I, Crapo JD, Pearlstein RD, Warner DS (2001) J Neurosci 21:4582–4592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Liang LP, Huang J, Fulton R, Day BJ, Patel M (2007) J Neurosci 27:4326–4333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Rosenthal RA, Fisette LW, Huffman K, Damphousse CA, Callaway WB, Malfroy B, Doctrow S (2007) Free Radic Biol Med 43:S188–S189
- 29.Meunier B, Cosledan F (2006) Office UPaT, 20060241095, 26 October 2006
- 30.Lahaye D, Muthukumaran K, Hung CH, Gryko D, Reboucas JS, Spasojevic I, Batinic-Haberle I, Lindsey JS (2007) Bioorg Med Chem 15:7066–7086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Trova MP, Gauuan PJ, Pechulis AD, Bubb SM, Bocckino SB, Crapo JD, Day BJ (2003) Bioorg Med Chem 11:2695–2707 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Littler BJ, Miller MA, Hung CH, Wagner RW, O’Shea DF, Boyle PD, Lindsey JS (1999) J Org Chem 64:1391–1396 [DOI]
- 33.Falk JE, Smith KM (eds) (1975) Porphyrins and metalloporphyrins. Elsevier, New York
- 34.Neya S, Funasaki N (1997) J Heterocycl Chem 34:689–690 [DOI]
- 35.Giblin GMP, Box PC, Campbell IB, Hancock AP, Roomans S, Mills GI, Molloy C, Tranter GE, Walker AL, Doctrow SR, Huffman K, Malfroy B (2001) Bioorg Med Chem Lett 11:1367–1370 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36.FDA (2000) Waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms based on a biopharmaceutics classification system. http://www.fda.gov/Cder/guidance/3618fnl.htm
- 37.Reboucas JS, Spasojevic I, Batinic-Haberle I (2008) J Biol Inorg Chem 13:289–302 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Pong K, Doctrow SR, Huffman K, Adinolfi CA, Baudry M (2001) Exp Neurol 171:84–97 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Hansch C, Bjorkroth JP, Leo A (1987) J Pharm Sci 76:663–687 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 40.Gres MC, Julian B, Bourrie M, Meunier V, Roques C, Berger M, Boulenc X, Berger Y, Fabre G (1998) Pharm Res 15:726–733 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Yee S (1997) Pharm Res 14:763–766 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 42.Stoner CL, Cleton A, Johnson K, Oh DM, Hallak H, Brodfuehrer J, Surendran N, Hans HK (2004) Int J Pharm 269:241–249 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 43.Song Y, Haddad RE, Jia SL, Hok S, Olmstead MM, Nurco DJ, Schore NE, Zhang J, Ma JG, Smith KM, Gazeau S, Pecaut J, Marchon JC, Medforth CJ, Shelnutt JA (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:1179–1192 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 44.Reboucas JS, Spasojevic I, Tjahjono DH, Richaud A, Mendez F, Benov L, Batinic-Haberle I (2008) Dalton Trans 1233–1242 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 45.Schlieve CR, Lieven CJ, Levin LA (2006) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:3878–3886 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 46.Shayeghi M, Latunde-Dada GO, Oakhill JS, Laftah AH, Takeuchi K, Halliday N, Khan Y, Warley A, McCann FE, Hider RC, Frazer DM, Anderson GJ, Vulpe CD, Simpson RJ, McKie AT (2005) Cell 122:789–801 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 47.Cohen S, Margalit R (1990) Biochem J 270:325–330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Abramov AY, Scorziello A, Duchen MR (2007) J Neurosci 27:1129–1138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Lee BI, Chan PH, Kim GW (2005) Stroke 36:2712–2717 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 50.Tauskela JS, Brunette E, O’Reilly N, Mealing G, Comas T, Gendron TF, Monette R, Morley P (2005) FASEB J 19:1734–1736 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 51.Shan Y, Pepe J, Lu TH, Elbirt KK, Lambrecht RW, Bonkovsky HL (2000) Arch Biochem Biophys 380:219–227 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 52.Konorev EA, Kotamraju S, Zhao H, Kalivendi S, Joseph J, Kalyanaraman B (2002) Free Radic Biol Med 33:988 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 53.Pfeiffer S, Schrammel A, Koesling D, Schmidt K, Mayer B (1998) Mol Pharmacol 53:795–800 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 54.Verma A, Nye JS, Snyder SH (1987) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2256–2260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Pastorino JG, Simbula G, Gilfor E, Hoek JB, Farber JL (1994) J Biol Chem 269:31041–31046 [PubMed]
- 56.Bono F, Lamarche I, Prabonnaud V, Le Fur G, Herbert JM (1999) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 265:457–461 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 57.Leducq N, Bono F, Sulpice T, Vin V, Janiak P, Fur GL, O’Connor SE, Herbert JM (2003) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 306:828–837 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 58.Malfroy-Camine B, Doctrow S (2008) Application UP, 2008033444, 20 March 2008
- 59.Orrell RW (2006) Curr Opin Investig Drugs 7:70–80 [PubMed]
- 60.Piganelli JD, Flores SC, Cruz C, Koepp J, Batinic-Haberle I, Crapo J, Day B, Kachadourian R, Young R, Bradley B, Haskins K (2002) Diabetes 51:347–355 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 61.Lubbers NL, Polakowski JS, Crapo JD, Wegner CD, Cox BF (2003) J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 41:714–719 [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.