Abstract
A rapid screening test (45 min) for bacteriuria was evaluated in 1,000 clinical urine specimens. The test procedure is based upon firefly luciferase analysis of bacterial ATP and uses the Lumac kit and Lumac M2010 Biocounter (3M Co., St. Paul, Minn.). The procedure allows for removal and destruction of nonbacterial ATP and subsequent analysis of bacterial ATP by firefly luciferase with a single photon counter. Results, expressed in relative light units, were compared with actual CFU by the calibrated loop technique. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated separately for clean-catch midstream specimens and for urines obtained by catheterization. The sensitivity for 719 clean-catch specimens with a Lumac cutoff of greater than or equal to 500 relative light units, representing greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml, was 93%. The sensitivity for 281 catheterized specimens with a Lumac cutoff of greater than or equal to 200 relative light units, representing greater than or equal to 10(4) CFU/ml, was 95%. There were 19 false-negative results in the 1,000 specimens tested; more than 50% of these were contaminated cultures and were not considered significant in determining bacteriuria. In conclusion, the Lumac bioluminescence assay is a reliable, rapid bacteriuria screening technique with the potential of reducing the laboratory cost and for reducing the turnaround time in processing negative urine cultures.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Conn R. B., Charache P., Chappelle E. W. Limits of applicability of the firefly luminescence ATP assay for the detection of bacteria in clinical specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Apr;63(4):493–501. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/63.4.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drow D. L., Baum C. H., Hirschfield G. Comparison of the Lumac and Monolight systems for detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):797–801. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.797-801.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gorus F., Schram E. Applications of bio- and chemiluminescence in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem. 1979 Apr;25(4):512–519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KASS E. H. Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract; with observations on the use of methionine as a urinary antiseptic. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957 Nov;100(5):709–714. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1957.00260110025004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KASS E. H. Pyelonephritis and bacteriuria. A major problem in preventive medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1962 Jan;56:46–53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-56-1-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackett D., Kessock-Philip S., Bascomb S., Easmon C. S. Evaluation of the Lumac kit for the detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jan;35(1):107–110. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamm W. E., Wagner K. F., Amsel R., Alexander E. R., Turck M., Counts G. W., Holmes K. K. Causes of the acute urethral syndrome in women. N Engl J Med. 1980 Aug 21;303(8):409–415. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198008213030801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welch W. D., Layman M. A., Southern P. M., Jr Evaluation of the MS-2 and Lumac systems for the rapid screening of urine specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 May;81(5):629–633. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/81.5.629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welch W. D., Thompson L., Layman M., Southern P. M., Jr Evaluation of two bioluminescence-measuring instruments, the Turner Design and Lumac systems, for the rapid screening of urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1165–1170. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1165-1170.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]