Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1985 May;21(5):726–729. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.726-729.1985

Evaluation of various rapid agglutination methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

J S Baker, M A Bormann, D H Boudreau
PMCID: PMC271767  PMID: 3998102

Abstract

A latex agglutination test (SeroSTAT Staph; Scott Laboratories, Fiskeville, R.I.) and two hemagglutination tests (Staphyloslide; BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.; and Hemastaph; Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) were compared with the slide coagulase (SC) and tube coagulase (TC) tests at room temperature (22 to 25 degrees C) and at 37 degrees C for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 380 clinical strains of staphylococci were tested. The TC test performed at room temperature yielded the largest number of TC-positive results (n = 239), and based on this observation 239 organisms were classified as S. aureus and 141 were classified as non-S. aureus. The SC, TC (37 degrees C), SeroSTAT Staph, Staphyloslide, and Hemastaph tests correctly identified 210 (87.9%), 221 (92.5%), 238 (99.6%), 239 (100%), and 236 (98.7%) of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. Of the S. aureus isolates that were TC positive at room temperature 68% required 24 h of incubation before coagulase production was detected. There was one false-negative SeroSTAT Staph result and one false-negative Hemastaph result. The Staphyloslide test yielded two noninterpretable results (both organisms were later confirmed as non-S. aureus), whereas there were six noninterpretable results recorded with the Hemastaph test (four organisms were classified as non-S. aureus, and two were classified as S. aureus). The SeroSTAT Staph, Staphyloslide, and Hemastaph tests were all more sensitive than the conventional SC and TC (37 degrees C) tests and were considerably more rapid than the TC test at either temperature.

Full text

PDF
726

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldridge K. E., Kogos C., Sanders C. V., Marier R. L. Comparison of rapid identification assays for Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 May;19(5):703–704. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.5.703-704.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry A. L., Lachica R. V., Atchison F. W. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus by simultaneous use of tube coagulase and thermonuclease tests. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Mar;25(3):496–497. doi: 10.1128/am.25.3.496-497.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boothby J., Genigeorgis C., Fanelli M. J. Tandem coagulase/thermonuclease agar method for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Feb;37(2):298–302. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.2.298-302.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doern G. V. Evaluation of a commercial latex agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):416–418. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.416-418.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doern G. V., Robbie L. I. Direct identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood culture fluid with a commercial latex agglutination test. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Dec;16(6):1048–1051. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.6.1048-1051.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Essers L., Radebold K. Rapid and reliable identification of Staphylococcus aureus by a latex agglutination test. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Nov;12(5):641–643. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.5.641-643.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forsgren A. Significance of protein a production by staphylococci. Infect Immun. 1970 Nov;2(5):672–673. doi: 10.1128/iai.2.5.672-673.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gudding R. Differentiation of staphylococci on the basis of nuclease properties. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1098–1101. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1098-1101.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jungkind D. L., Torhan N. J., Corman K. E., Bondi J. M. Comparison of two commercially available test methods with conventional coagulase tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):191–193. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.191-193.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lachica R. V., Hoeprich P. D., Genigeorgis C. Nuclease production and lysostaphin susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and other catalase-positive cocci. Appl Microbiol. 1971 May;21(5):823–826. doi: 10.1128/am.21.5.823-826.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Menzies R. E. Comparison of coagulase, deoxyribonuclease (DNase), and heat-stable nuclease tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jul;30(7):606–608. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.7.606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morton H. E., Cohn J. Coagulase and deoxyribonuclease activities of staphylococci isolated from clinical sources. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Apr;23(4):725–733. doi: 10.1128/am.23.4.725-733.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Myrick B. A., Ellner P. D. Evaluation of the latex slide agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):275–277. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.275-277.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rayman M. K., Park C. E., Philpott J., Todd E. C. Reassessment of the coagulase and thermostable nuclease tests as means of identifying Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Apr;29(4):451–454. doi: 10.1128/am.29.4.451-454.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schleifer K. H., Kloos W. E. A simple test system for the separation of staphylococci from micrococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):337–338. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.337-338.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sperber W. H., Tatini S. R. Interpretation of the tube coagulase test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Apr;29(4):502–505. doi: 10.1128/am.29.4.502-505.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wegrzynowicz Z., Heczko P. B., Jeljaszewicz J., Neugebauer M., Pulverer G. Pseudocoagulase activity of staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jan;9(1):15–19. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.1.15-19.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Winblad S., Ericson C. Sensitized sheep red cells as a reactant for Staphylococcus aureus protein A. Methodology and epidemiology with special reference to weakly reacting methicillin-resistant strains. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1973 Feb;81(1):150–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zarzour J. Y., Belle E. A. Evaluation of three test procedures for identification of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical sources. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Feb;7(2):133–136. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.2.133-136.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES