Skip to main content
Biomarker Insights logoLink to Biomarker Insights
. 2007 Dec 11;2:447–461.

Using LongSAGE to Detect Biomarkers of Cervical Cancer Potentially Amenable to Optical Contrast Agent Labelling

Julie M Kneller 1,, Thomas Ehlen 2, Jasenka P Matisic 3, Dianne Miller 2, Dirk Van Niekerk 4, Wan L Lam 5, Marco Marra 1, Rebecca Richards-Kortum 6, Michelle Follen 7, Calum MacAulay 3, Steven J M Jones 1
PMCID: PMC2717845  PMID: 19662225

Abstract

Sixteen longSAGE libraries from four different clinical stages of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia have enabled us to identify novel cell-surface biomarkers indicative of CIN stage. By comparing gene expression profiles of cervical tissue at early and advanced stages of CIN, several genes are identified to be novel genetic markers. We present fifty-six cell-surface gene products differentially expressed during progression of CIN. These cell surface proteins are being examined to establish their capacity for optical contrast agent binding. Contrast agent visualization will allow real-time assessment of the physiological state of the disease process bringing vast benefit to cancer care. The data discussed in this publication have been submitted to NCBIs Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE6252.

Keywords: longSAGE, cervical cancer, biomarker, optical imaging

Introduction

Clinical diagnosis of most cancers and their precursors is predominantly based on phenotypic markers such as appearance of cell nuclei. Classification and staging of disease is determined by evaluation of gross structural features, such as extent of local tumour invasion and presence of disease in other organs. It is now established that cancer arises as a result of successive genetic changes altering cellular processes including growth, angiogenesis, senescence, and apoptosis (Hanahan and Weinburg, 2000). Additionally, many cancers appear to have active inflammation and wound healing mechanisms (Chang et al. 2004). Proteins taking part in these cellular mechanisms are often strong candidates for biomarkers and molecular targets.

Cervical cancer is usually the result of a human papillomavirus (HPV) infection which initiates neoplastic progression mainly through viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 within the cervical transformation zone at the squamous/columnar junction. The role of HPV to the pathogenesis of cervical cancer has been addressed in recent reviews (zur Hausen, 2002; Woodman et al. 2007). Many HPV types produce only productive lesions following infection and are not associated with human cancers. In such lesions, the expression of viral gene products is carefully regulated, with viral proteins being produced at defined times and at regulated levels as the infected cell migrates towards the epithelial surface. The events that lead to viral synthesis in the upper epithelial layers appear common to both the low- and high-risk HPV types. Virus-induced cancers most often arise at sites where productive infection cannot be suitably supported. Productive infection can be divided into distinct phases, with different viral proteins playing specific roles (Doorbar, 2006). Upon infection, normal cells gradually advance through stages of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Mild dysplasia (CINI) presents as only a subset of the low third of the epithelium appearing dysplastic, moderate dysplasia (CINII) occurs where the dysplastic cells involve about one-half of the thickness of the epithelium of the cervix, and severe dysplasia (CINIII), or carcinoma-in-situ, is described as the condition where the entire thickness of the epithelium is disordered but the abnormal cells have not yet spread below the surface. If carcinoma-in-situ is not treated, it will often grow into an invasive cervical cancer. High grade dysplasia is considered the most advanced dysplasia with atypical changes in many of the cells and a very abnormal growth pattern of the glands; some of the glands are branching or budding. More than 50% of the cells have large, spotted nuclei and are frequently dividing while the cellular cytoplasm is reduced and looks abnormal. Cancer of the cervix was one of the most common causes of cancer death for American women, but between 1955 and 1992 the number of cervical cancer deaths in the United States dropped by 74% due to the introduction of the Pap test (Papanicolaou and Traut, 1943). Death rates from cervical cancer continue to decline by nearly 4% per year. Even so, the American Cancer Society reports that in 2006, about 3,700 of the 9,710 women diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States have died from this disease.

HPV infection causes changes in expression levels of a wide variety of genes (Yim and Park, 2006). These differences in gene expression between pre-invasive neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue give clues to the molecular basis of cancer. Early detection of cervical cancer based on molecular characterization would be clinically advantageous; risk of neoplastic lesion progression could be predicted and response to therapy could be monitored in real time at a molecular level. To monitor molecular characterisation of cancer it follows that the ability to optically image in real-time the molecular features of cancer in vivo is critical (González et al. 1999; Rajadhyaksha et al. 1999; White et al. 1999; Huzaira et al. 2001; Langley et al. 2001; Selkin et al. 2001; Collier et al. 2002) and requires safe, molecular-specific contrast agents whose images can be monitored rapidly and non-invasively during their uptake and distribution. The analysis presented here evaluates serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) libraries to identify novel, cell-surface gene products. Upon mapping of highly differentially expressed SAGE tags to their corresponding genes, the gene products are candidates for antibody testing and optical contrast agent development.

Contrast Agents and Optical Imaging

Short of prevention, improved early stage cancer diagnosis would provide the greatest benefit for cancer patients. Because proteins may regulate gene expression, ligand-binding properties, molecular structure and dynamics on a temporal basis, protein biomarkers have a significant impact in cancer detection and therapy as therapies are becoming targeted to specific signal transduction and metabolic pathways. For example, breast cancers respond to HERCEPTIN (trastuzumab) if the tumor over-expresses Her-2/neu (Baselga et al. 2004; Ross et al. 2004). In the same way, GLEEVEC (imatinib) is most effective against cancers carrying the bcr-Abl translocation (Druker, 2004) and targeted molecular cancer therapy is already used successfully for the eradication of acute leukaemia (Frater et al. 2003; Yee and Keating, 2003). These examples imply that it will be important to produce biomarkers for all stages of cancer. Reliable diagnostics such as DNA screening and immunocytochemical analysis of known cervical neoplasia biomarkers p16INK4A and minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are not implemented in vivo. Real-time biomarkers of the physiological state of the disease process or markers representative of treatment efficacy will bring immeasurable benefit to cancer care in terms of individualized agent selection and dosing. Furthermore, series of agents could be tested to determine empirically the localization of cancer and/or the most effective therapy.

Routine clinical cancer detection employs non-specific contrast agents such as acetic acid which enhance the nuclear backscattering but are limited by small signal magnitude. The field of molecular imaging is rapidly developing imaging agents with high affinity and specificity for targeted biomarkers. These new agents allow for the possibility of disease detection earlier than is currently feasible (Weissleder, 2001; Jaffer and Weissleder, 2005). For example, cancer metastases missed by conventional anatomically based imaging methods may be detected in patients by molecular imaging (Harisinghani et al. 2003). Optical imaging of tissue can be carried out non-invasively in real time, giving high spatial resolution (<1 μm lateral resolution). A number of optical techniques have been established including confocal microscopy (White et al. 1999; Collier et al. 2005), multispectral fluorescence imaging (Andersson-Engels et al. 1997; Ferris et al. 2001), reflectance spectroscopy with polarised and unpolarised light (Sokolov et al. 1999, 2002; Utzinger et al. 2001), multispectral reflectance imaging with polarised and unpolarised light (Ferris et al. 2001; Gurjar et al. 2001), and fluorescence spectroscopy (Gillenwater et al. 1998; Wagnières et al. 1998; Ramanujam, 2000; Sokolov et al. 2002). Together with emerging molecular tools (e.g. DNA screening, tissue proteomic and serum markers), biomarker imaging may soon be used for real-time screening, diagnosis, and detection of disease recurrence and progression (Rudin and Weissleder, 2003).

Contrast agents consist of a biomarker specific probe molecule, such as an antibody, conjugated to an optically suitable label. By topically applying molecular specific contrast agents to tissues, the scope of molecular changes that can be probed using optical imaging is significantly enhanced. Presently, contrast agents based on metal nanoparticles, organic fluorescent dyes, and quantum dots coupled to monoclonal antibodies against cancer specific biomarkers are being developed (Sokolov et al. 2003; Rahman et al. 2005).

SAGE Libraries and Tag Mapping

The SAGE technique is capable of producing a molecular representation of cervical tissue based on expressed genes. SAGE is not dependent on pre-existing databases of expressed genes and so provides an independent view of gene expression profiles within the mRNA populations (Velculescu et al. 1997). SAGE library construction is well documented in the literature (Velculescu et al. 1995 and 1997; Madden et al. 2000; Saha et al. 2002; Pleasance et al. 2003; Sander et al. 2005). Several recent gene expression profiles of in vitro HPV-infected cultured keratinocytes and from cervical carcinoma clinical samples have proposed changes in gene expression induced by HPV and in early cervical carcinomas (Thomas et al. 2001; Ruutu et al. 2002; Duffy et al. 2003; Pérez-Plasencia et al. 2005). Some studies have compared normal versus tumor-induced gene expression in cervical samples with the aim of identifying potential tumor markers of clinical value (Shim et al. 1998; Chen et al. 2003).

To identify genes expressed at dissimilar levels in preinvasive neoplastic and non-neoplastic untyped cervical tissue, we analysed sixteen long-SAGE libraries; 4 from normal cervical tissue samples, 3 of a mild dysplasia (CINI), 3 of moderate dysplasia (CINII), and 6 of severe dysplasia (CINIII), or carcinoma-in-situ. The CIN tissues are positive for MUC16. Raw numbers of longSAGE tags generated and library names are given in Tables 1 and 2. DiscoverySpace (Robertson et al. 2007), an in-house graphical software application backed by a relational database system designed to support SAGE gene expression analysis, was used to query data from over 25 publicly available data sources, as well as internal experimental results. Using DiscoverySpace, selected SAGE tag sequences were mapped to counterpart RefSeq (Pruitt et al. 2000, 2005) genes and confirmed using SAGE tag co-ordinates to establish gene identity through Ensembl (Hubbard et al. 2007; homo_sapiens_ core_41_36c). Genes were manually curated (EntrezGene) to ascertain gene identity and gene product localisation. These cervical longSAGE libraries were created from the epithelium of cervical biopsy samples collected just prior to LEEP (Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure). Tissue samples were placed into RNAIater and frozen at −80 °C within 10 minutes of being excised from the patient. These longSAGE libraries (Shadeo et al. 2007) have been submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository.

Table 1.

Highly expressed genes with membrane-bound gene products up-regulated in cervical dysplasia stages CINI and CINIII. Up-regulated gene expression, from normal, ≥2-fold.

Tag sequence Number of tags in disease libraries* Number of tags in normal libraries Gene Fold increase from normal RefSeq accession number
CINIII
GACCCAAGATAAAAGAA 704 16 PIGR 22.4 NM_002644
ATCCCCCTGGGCATCGG 52 2 SLC39A3 13.2 NM_144564
ACTCAGACCAGGTCCCA 94 4 STRA6 11.4 NM_022369
ACACAGTATTCGCTCTT 44 2 ITR 11.2 NM_180989
TTACTTCCCCACCCCTA 84 4 FADS2 10.7 NM_004265
GGAACTGTGAAGAGGCA 230 12 TSPAN1 9.7 NM_005727
GCACCTGTCGCCCAGTG 36 2 ANPEP 9.2 NM_001150
CCTGATCTGCGGTGTCC 308 18 MUC16 8.7 NM_024690
CGTTTTCTGATAACTCA 68 4 PTP4A2 8.6 XM_001132367
CAAATAAATTATGCGAT 98 6 TMPRSS2 8.3 NM_005656
TGCTCCTACCCTGCTCT 2022 190 FCGBP 5.4 XM_001131379
GCAGTGCCACTCAAGAA 726 68 SRD5A2L 5.4 NM_024592
CCTGGGAAGTGTTGTGG 730 98 MUC1 3.8 NM_001044391
AATATTTATATTGTATG 1880 400 CEACAM5 2.4 NM_004363
GTTCACATTAGAATAAA 3424 762 CD74 2.3 NM_001025158
GGGCATCTCTTGTGTAC 1602 350 HLA-DRA 2.3 NM_019111
TGCTGCCTGTTGTTATG 826 192 BST2 2.2 NM_004335
CTGACCTGTGTTTCCTC 596 144 HLA-B 2.1 NM_005514
GCAGGGCCTCATCTCAC 1950 484 FXYD3 2.0 NM_005971

CINI
GCACCTGTCGCCCAGTG 42 2 ANPEP 36.5 NM_001150
ATGTTAATAAAATAGGC 66 4 GPC4 28.7 NM_001448
ATAAATGATTAGACTAC 32 2 CLIC6 27.8 NM_053277
GGCCAAGAACTTTCACT 28 2 C14orf101 24.3 NM_017799
GACCCAAGATAAAAGAA 262 16 PIGR 23.0 NM_002644
TAGGTCAGGACCTTGGC 26 2 PTP4A3 22.6 NM_032611
GTATATAACTCTTAAAG 24 2 LOC644410** 20.8 XM_001133198
CCAGCTGCCTGGAGGAG 22 2 MGC45438 19.1 NM_152459
ATAAAAATTAGGGGGAT 22 2 SLC30A1 19.1 NM_021194
TGAGCTACCCCAGAGTC 20 2 FER1L4 17.4 NR_001442
TACATCAGTAAAGAGTT 374 42 GAS1 12.5 NM_002048
CATCACGGATCAATAGA 330 64 IL1R1 7.2 NM_000877
CCTGGGAAGTGTTGTGG 334 98 MUC1 4.1 NM_001044391
TGCAGATTGCAGTTCTG 366 132 PROM1 3.9 NM_006017
CACTTCAAGGGCAGCCT 238 102 LY6E 3.3 NM_002346
GTTCACATTAGAATAAA 1660 762 CD74 3.1 NM_001025158
GGGCATCTCTTGTGTAC 734 350 HLA-DRA 3.0 NM_019111
TGCTCCTACCCTGCTCT 402 190 FCGBP 3.0 XM_001131379
CTGACCTGTGTTTCCTC 256 144 HLA-B 2.5 NM_005514
*

GEO Series Accession Numbers GSE6252. 1,101,702 total longSAGE tags in four normal libraries, GEO Alias N3, N1, N2, N4; 2,165,777 total longSAGE tags in six CINIII libraries, GEO Alias C1, C3, C2, C4, C5, C6; 785,642 total longSAGE tags in three CINI libraries, GEO Alias M1, M2, M3.

**

Mapping unable to be confirmed through ENSEMBL or BLAT.

Table 2.

Highly expressed genes with membrane-bound gene products up-regulated in normal cervical tissue. Up-regulated gene expression, from CINI and/or CINIII, ≥2-fold.

Tag sequence Number of tags in disease libraries* Number of tags in normal libraries Gene Fold increase from disease state RefSeq accession number
CINIII
AGACTTGGCATACACAC 2 30 ACTR3 29.5 NM_005721
TAACTGGCCTTACGATG 6 54 DSG1 17.7 NM_001942
AGAGGGATGAGGCAACC 2 18 GJB2 17.7 NM_004004
AGTCCTGGAGGAGGAGA 2 18 PTPNS1 17.7 NM_001040022
GCTGACAGTCCCAAGTC 2 16 NIP 15.7 NM_144565
ACAGTCACCACGAGGAG 2 16 ODZ2 15.7 XM_047995
AGAGTTCTGTCACGGTC 8 62 UPK1A 15.2 NM_007000
CAGTATTTTAAATAATT 2 12 FLJ32028 11.8 NM_152680
ATAATCACCCTTCATCA 2 12 CACNA2D3 11.8 NM_018398
TGGTGGCTGCTTTTCCC 2 10 TMEM54 9.8 NM_033504
CCAGCGCCAACCAGTCA 272 482 LYPD3 3.5 NM_014400
GTTTCCAAAAAATGGTA 350 438 GJB2 2.5 NM_004004
GTGGAAGACGATAACCC 5664 7334 MAL 2.5 NM_002371
GCCCAGCATTCTCCACC 856 832 PSCA 1.9 NM_005672
CTTGATTCCCACGCTAC 236 230 QSCN6 1.9 NM_002826
GTTATTGAGGGCAAGAA 196 194 C3orf28 1.9 NM_014367

CINI
CAATCTTGCAGTGAAGA 6 226 TMPRSS11B 26.9 NM_182502
TCAGAATGATTCTGGTG 22 346 11.2
AGAGTTCTGTCACGGTC 2 62 UPK1A 22.1 NM_007000
GCATAACAACTCCCCAA 4 60 EMP1 10.7 NM_001423
TAATTTGCATTACTCTG 366 2036 4.0
GATCCAGATGCCTGAGG 4 74 LYNX1 13.2 NM_023946
CCAGCGCCAACCAGTCA 28 482 LYPD3 12.3 NM_014400
GATGAATCCGGGGTATG 4 68 TMEM45B 12.1 NM_138788
TATATTTTTAAATGTTC 2 30 TGFA 10.7 NM_003236
TAACCCCTCTCACCTGC 2 28 FGFR2 10.0 NM_022970
GGGACTAAAACTCACCC 2 28 MAL 10.0 NM_002371
GGAGGGAGCTGAGGGGT 2 28 EPHA1 10.0 NM_005232
GCCCAGCATTCTCCACC 82 832 PSCA 7.2 NM_005672
GTTATTGAGGGCAAGAA 30 194 C3orf28 4.6 NM_014367
GTTTCCAAAAAATGGTA 70 438 GJB2 4.5 NM_004004
GCTTCCTCGGTACCCTT 252 1590 RHCG 4.5 NM_016321
CCACAGGAGAATTCGGG 952 5624 PERP 4.2 NM_022121
GATATGTAAAAACTGTC 38 194 CLCA4 3.6 NM_012128
GCCTACCCGAGGAGAAG 132 616 TACSTD2 3.3 NM_002353
*

GEO Series Accession Number GSE6252. 1,101,702 total longSAGE tags in four normal libraries, GEO Alias N3, N1, N2, N4; 2,165,777 total longSAGE tags in six CINIII libraries, GEO Alias C1, C3, C2, C4, C5, C6; 785,642 total longSAGE tags in three CINI libraries, GEO Alias M1, M2, M3.

Any protein differentially expressed in cancer tissue, compared to normal tissue, or any protein known to be involved in cancer development, has potential as a candidate cancer biomarker. Genes presenting properties which identify them as likely targets for cancer diagnosis or prognosis must be separated from thousands of other genes which also may also possess clinical potential. Hundreds of potential candidates must be set aside in favour of gene products which offer the most promising characteristics. We focus on genes encoding membrane associated proteins because membrane-bound proteins are most likely to be accessible to topical application of contrast agents and have a rapid time frame for contrast agent visualization. Genes expressing the greatest number of tags combined with high levels of differential expression between dysplastic and normal tissue are the most likely to be observed by contrast agents in vivo.

For optical imaging of tumors by topical application in vivo of contrast agents to be of practical use, a large number of contrast agent receptors are required. One of the standard methods to detect candidate biomarkers is to identify genes with amplified expression in cancer and/or normal tissues. We compared transcription profiles and retained the most highly expressed membrane-bound gene products whose differential expression level is greater than two-fold. Many cell-surface proteins can potentially be developed as targets for optical contrast agents. Using longSAGE, we have also identified the most highly differentially expressed transcripts between disease and normal tissue. Table 1 specifies those genes (with cell-surface gene products) up-regulated in the CINI and CINIII stages of dysplasia and Table 2 lists genes up-regulated in normal tissue. Short descriptions of these protein biomarkers are given in the appendix and annotations of protein structural information, if available, are included. Given that CINII is difficult to determine clinically, it was not included in these comparisons. Contrast agent visualization of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) using an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody has already been successful (Rahman et al. 2005). More of these markers should prove amenable to contrast agent development and topical formulations consisting of a range of contrast agents could help adjust to individual patient differences in gene expression.

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Stage Biomarkers

It is possible to evaluate a marker for presence or absence, but to correlate a marker or array of markers to changes in cellular localization relative to other markers is probably the most interesting and beneficial in terms of dysplasia progression, environment, therapy selection, and follow-up. The known function of these genes grants some insight into the biology of cervical neoplasia. For instance, several of these cell surface markers are involved in transport and/or signaling. MUCX and CD74, upregulated in CINI and CINIII, have signaling gene products known to be associated with carcinomas. CD74 is also known to be a high affinity binding protein for macrophage migration-inhibitory factor (MIF) which is implicated in tumor cell growth and angiogenesis. TSPAN1, upregulated in CINIII almost 10-fold, also plays a role in cell motility and growth. See Appendix for gene-specific references.

Our analysis of cervical cancer longSAGE expression profiles direct attention to some genes with relatively equal distribution in CINI and CINIII, such as PIGR. Another marker, ANPEP, is present at significantly different expression levels in CINI and CINIII. This knowledge expands the possibilities for rapid visualization between normal and stages of dysplasia in vivo. As discussed earlier, these cell surface targets were found by identifying differentially expressed genes. More often than not, a highly expressed tag is not localised to the cell surface and, for these purposes, does not warrant further attention. However, a highly differentially expressed gene whose gene product is not membrane-bound is sometimes found to be part of a mechanism which affects the cell surface and thereby the gene product becomes of potential use. TFF3 (trefoil factor 3), for instance, is up-regulated 13-fold in CINIII and 27-fold in CINI. Members of the trefoil family are characterised by having at least one copy of the trefoil motif, a 40-amino acid domain that contains three conserved disulphides. They are stable, secretory proteins whose functions are not defined but may protect the mucosa from insults, stabilize the mucus layer and affect healing of the epithelium. VANGL1 (Van Gogh-like protein 1) is an integral membrane protein which is serine/threonine phosphorylated and translocated to cytoplasmic vesicles in response to TFF3 stimulation (Kalabis et al. 2006). VANGL1 protein acts as a downstream effector of TFF3 signalling and regulates wound healing of intestinal epithelium. TFF3 is commonly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and its expression correlates with tumor grade (Khoury et al. 2005). TFF3 overexpression may be a critical process in mouse and human hepatocellular carcinogenesis (Okada et al. 2005). The group of trefoil factor peptides (TFF1-3) are part of the protective mechanism operating in the intestinal mucosa and play a fundamental role in epithelial protection, repair, and restitution (Vieten et al. 2005). TFF3 and the essential tumor angiogenesis regulator VEGF exert potent pro-invasive activity through STAT3 signalling in human colorectal cancer cells (Rivat et al. 2005). That VANGL1 returned to cell membranes within 45 minutes of TFF3 stimulation (Kalabis et al. 2006) could explain the low VANGL1 tag counts, 1–3 tags per library, observed in the longSAGE libraries.

Conclusions

Molecular specific contrast agents may provide the ability to directly image the cancer process; but biomarker discovery can be a lengthy process as candidate markers suitable for the task-at-hand must be identified from among thousands of proteins. SAGE-identified biomarkers hold promise for recognition of the stages of neoplasia by proteomic patterns. Optical contrast agents bound to these membrane-bound protein biomarkers will serve as a complement to histopathology, thus allowing more effective determination of tumor borders and non-invasive observation of response to treatment at a molecular level. We present fifty-six cell-surface gene products differentially expressed during progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Differential gene expression of these biomarkers will allow individualized selection of therapeutic combinations that best target the entire disease-protein system and advance understanding of carcinogenesis.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NCI 1R01-CA103830-01) and by the British Columbia Cancer Foundation. MA Marra and SJM Jones are Scholars of the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and MA Marra is a Terry Fox Young Investigator of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. We also thank R Varhol, BCGSC, for tag mapping verficiation.

Appendix

Biomarker descriptions

ACTR3 ARP3 actin-related protein 3 homolog (yeast). The protein encoded by this gene is known to be a major constituent of the ARP2/3 complex (Welch et al. 1997). This complex is located at the cell surface and is essential to cell shape and motility through lamellipodial actin assembly and protrusion (Machesky et al. 1997).

Structure information: 1K8K Crystal Structure of Arp2/3 Complex (Robinson et al. 2001).

ANPEP alanyl (membrane) aminopeptidase (aminopeptidase N, aminopeptidase M, microsomal aminopeptidase, CD13, p150). Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for one strain of human coronavirus (Yeager et al. 1992; Breslin et al. 2003). The large extra-cellular carboxyterminal domain contains a pentapeptide consensus sequence characteristic of members of the zinc-binding metalloproteinase super-family. Defects in this gene appear to be a cause of various types of leukemia or lymphoma.

BST2 bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2. Bone marrow stromal cells are involved in the growth and development of B-cells and this protein may play a role in pre-B-cell growth (Ishikawa et al. 1995).

C3orf28 chromosome 3 open reading frame 28 (HGTD-P). When overexpressed, HGTD-P induces cell death via mitochondrial apoptotic cascades (Lee et al. 2004; Kim et al. 2006).

C14orf101 chromosome 14 open reading frame 101. Integral to membrane (Ensembl-Gene ENSG00000070269: inferred from electronic annotation).

CACNA2D3 calcium channel, voltage-dependent, alpha 2/delta 3 subunit. This gene encodes a member of the alpha-2/delta subunit family, a protein in the voltage-dependent calcium channel complex (Hanke et al. 2001).

CD74 CD74 molecule, major histocompatibility complex MHC, class II invariant chain. CD74 is a nonpolymorphic type II integral membrane protein with an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail. CD74 is a regulated intra-membrane proteolysis RIP protein and its roles as a chaperone and as a signalling molecule are tightly regulated (Stumptner-Cuvelette and Benaroch, 2002; Becker-Herman et al. 2005). In addition, CD74 is an accessory signalling molecule during T-cell responses through interactions with CD44 (Naujokas et al. 1993). Providing further evidence for its role in signal transduction pathways, CD74 is now known to be a high affinity binding protein for the proinflammatory cytokine, macrophage migration-inhibitory factor (MIF); MIF binds to the extracellular domain of CD74 (Leng et al. 2003). MIF is also implicated in tumour cell growth and angiogenesis (Nishihira, et al. 2003).

Structure information: 1IIE (75 amino acids; 296 in CD74) HLA-DR antigens associated invariant chain (Jasanoff et al. 1998). 1MIF Macrophase migration inhibitory factor (MIF) (Sun et al. 1996).

CEACAM5 carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5. CEACAM1 interacts heterophilically with the CEA (CEACAM5) protein. Because CEA is expressed on a wide range of carcinomas and commonly used as tumour marker, a novel role for the CEA protein enabling the escape of tumour cells from NK-mediated killing is now apparent (Stern et al. 2005).

Structure information: 1E07 Model of human carcinoembryonic antigen by homology modelling and curve-fitting to experimental solution scattering data (Boehm and Perkins, 2000). 2GK2 Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of human CEACAM1 (Fedarovich et al. 2006). Using the BLOSUM62 comparison matrix, CEACAM1 (468 residues) has 74.3% identity to CEACAM5 (702 residues) in 412 residue overlap.

CLCA4 chloride channel, calcium activated, family member 4. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the calcium sensitive chloride conductance protein family; the exact function is not known (Agnel et al. 1999; Ritzka et al. 2004).

CLIC6 chloride intracellular channel 6. This gene encodes a member of the chloride intracellular channel family of proteins.

Structure information: 2D2Z Crystal structure of soluble form of CLIC4 (Li et al. 2006).

DSG1 desmoglein 1. Desmoglein 1 is a calcium-binding trans-membrane glycoprotein component of desmosomes in vertebrate epithelial cells (Wheeler et al. 1991; Hanakawa et al. 2003).

EMP1 epithelial membrane protein 1. A well-known tumour-associated gene and a member of a novel family of genes encoding membrane glycoproteins (Ben-Porath and Benvenisty, 1996; Schiemann et al. 1997), EMP1 is a biomarker of gefitinib resistance (Jain et al. 2005). Gefitinib is a small-molecule inhibitor that competes for the ATP-binding site on EGF receptor (EGFR) and has been approved for patients with advanced lung cancers.

Structure information: 1EBP Complex between the extracellular domain of erythropoietin (EPO) receptor [EBP] and an agonist peptide [EMP1] (Livnah et al. 1996).

EPHA1 EPH receptor A1. EPH and EPH-related receptors have been implicated in mediating developmental events, particularly in the nervous system (Flanagan and Vanderhaeghen, 1998). Structure information: 2GSF The Human Epha3 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and Juxtamembrane Region (Davis et al. 2006). 1MQB Crystal Structure of Ephrin A2 (ephA2) Receptor Protein Kinase (Nowakowski et al. 2003).

FADS2 fatty acid desaturase 2. FADS family members are considered fusion products composed of an N-terminal cytochrome b5-like domain and a C-terminal multiple membrane-spanning desaturase portion, both of which are characterized by conserved histidine motifs (Marquardt et al. 2000; Schaeffer et al. 2006).

FCGBP Fc fragment of IgG binding protein (Kobayashi et al. 1991; Harada et al. 1997; O’Donovan et al. 2002). The encoded protein is made up of 3004 amino acid residues.

FER1L4 fer-1-like 4 (C. elegans). Novel human gene OTOF is the second member of a mammalian gene family related to C. elegans fer-1. It encodes a predicted cytosolic protein with a single carboxyterminal trans-membrane domain. The sequence homologies and predicted structure of otoferlin, the protein encoded by OTOF, suggest its involvement in vesicle membrane fusion (Yasunaga et al. 1999).

FGFR2 fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (bacteria-expressed kinase, keratinocyte growth factor receptor, craniofacial dysostosis 1, Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome). FGFR2 is a high-affinity receptor for acidic, basic and/or keratinocyte growth factor, depending on the isoform (Bansal et al. 1997). The extra-cellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation.

Structure information: 1OEC FGFR2 kinase domain (Ceska et al. 2004).

FLJ32028 transmembrane protein 154. Hypothetical protein LOC201799. Integral to membrane (Ensembl-Gene ENSG00000170006: inferred from electronic annotation).

FXYD3 FXYD domain containing ion transport regulator 3. FXYD2, also known as the gamma subunit of the Na,K-ATPase, regulates the properties of that enzyme. Trans-membrane topology has been established for two family members (FXYD1 and FXYD2), with the N-terminus extracellular and the C-terminus on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane (Crowell et al. 2003; Franzin et al. 2005). The protein encoded by this gene may function as a chloride channel or as a chloride channel regulator.

GAS1 growth arrest-specific 1. GAS1 plays a role in growth suppression and blocks entry to S phase and prevents cycling of normal and transformed cells (Del Sal et al. 1992). Gas1 is a putative tumour suppressor gene (Evdokiou and Cowled, 1998).

GJB2 gap junction protein, beta 2, 26kDa. The cytoplasmic domains of the connexion 26 gap junction surface, imaged at sub-molecular resolution, form a hexameric pore protruding from the membrane bilayer (Muller et al. 2002).

GPC4 glypican 4. Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans are composed of a membrane-associated protein core substituted with a variable number of heparan sulfate chains. These proteins may play a role in the control of cell division and growth regulation (Bernfield et al. 1999).

HLA-B major histocompatibility complex, class I, B. HLA-B belongs to the HLA class I heavy chain paralogues. Class I molecules play a central role in the immune system by presenting peptides derived from the endoplasmic reticulum lumen and are expressed in nearly all cells. The heavy chain is anchored in the membrane.

Structure information: 1HSA The three-dimensional structure of HLA-B27 at 2.1 Å resolution suggests a general mechanism for tight peptide binding to MHC (Madden et al. 1992).

HLA-DRA major histocompatibility complex, class II, DR alpha. It is a heterodimer consisting of an alpha and a beta chain, both anchored in the membrane, and it plays a central role in the immune system.

Structure information: 1AQD HLA-DR1 (DRA, DRB1 0101) Human class II histocompatibility protein (extracellular domain) complexed with endogenous (Murthy and Stern, 1997). 1YMM TCR/HLA-DR2b/MBP-peptide complex (Hahn et al. 2005).

IL1R1 interleukin 1 receptor, type I. This protein is a receptor for interleukin alpha, interleukin beta, and interleukin 1 receptor, type I (Dower et al. 1986; McMahan et al. 1991). It is an important mediator involved in many cytokine induced immune and inflammatory responses (Boch et al. 2003). Structure information: 1IRA Complex of the interleukin-1 receptor with the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL1RA) (Schreuder et al. 1997).

ITR G protein-coupled receptor 180. This protein is produced predominantly in vascular smooth muscle cells and may play an important role in the regulation of vascular remodelling (Iida et al. 2003).

LOC644410 FCGR1C Fc fragment of IgG, high affinity Ic, receptor (CD64). Only Fc gamma RI has high affinity for ligand and has a unique third extra-cellular domain (EC3). Three genes for human Fc gamma RI (A, B, and C) have been characterised; although they are remarkably similar, genes B and C are notably different from A (Ernst et al. 1992).

Structure information: 1E4J Crystal structure of the soluble human FC-gamma receptor III (Sondermann et al. 2000).

LY6E lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus E. Acute promyelocytic leukemia APL is a human malignancy that responds to differentiation therapy with all-trans-retinoic acid ATRA (Huang et al. 1988). ATRA induces the expression of a novel human gene, RIG-E (Mao et al. 1996). The amino acid composition of its product indicates that it is membrane-associated and has high homology to the murine LY-6 proteins and weak homology with a number of human growth factor receptors.

MGC45438 hypothetical protein MGC45438. Type I membrane protein (LOCATE).

LYNX1 Ly6/neurotoxin 1. Ly-6/neurotoxin gene family members are lymphocyte antigens that attach to the cell surface by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor and have a unique structure displayed 8–10 conserved cysteine residues (Tsuji et al. 2003). Functional analysis indicates that LYNX1 can enhance nicotinic acetylcholine receptor function in the presence of acetylcholine (Arredondo et al. 2006). It is a new marker for human breast cancer (Lee et al. 2006).

LYPD3 LY6/PLAUR domain containing 3 (C4.4A). This protein is known to be a structural homologue of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) but little is known about its function (Hansen et al. 2004).

MAL mal, T-cell differentiation protein. The protein encoded by this gene is a highly hydrophobic integral membrane protein belonging to the MAL family of proteolipids (Llorente et al. 2004; Dukhovny et al. 2006).

MUC1 mucin 1, cell-surface associated. This gene is a member of the mucin family and encodes a membrane bound, glycosylated phosphoprotein. The protein is anchored to the apical surface of many epithelia by a trans-membrane domain, with the degree of glycosylation varying with cell type. The protein serves a protective function by binding to pathogens and also functions in a cell signalling capacity (Ren et al. 2006). Over-expression, aberrant intracellular localization, and changes in glycosylation of this protein have been associated with carcinomas (Rabassa et al. 2006; Raina et al. 2006).

Structure information: 2ACM Solution structure of the SEA domain of human mucin 1 (MUC1) (Macao et al. 2006).

MUC16 mucin 16 (CA125), cell surface associated. CA125 protein core is composed of a short cytoplasmic tail, a trans-membrane domain, and an extraordinarily large glycosylated extracellular structure. The extracellular domain encompasses an interactive disulfide bridged cysteine-loop and the site of OC125 and M11 binding (O’Brien et al. 2001). It is known to be a marker in several cancers, including ovarian (Yin et al. 2002), renal (Bamias et al. 2003), and lung (Pollan et al. 2003).

NIP hypothetical protein FLJ32334 (DUOXA1). Multi-pass membrane protein (Ensembl-Gene ENSG00000140254: inferred from electronic annotation).

ODZ2 odz, odd Oz/ten-m homolog 2 (Drosophila). This protein is membrane-bound transcription regulator (Baqutti et al. 2003).

PERP PERP, TP53 apoptosis effector. This tetraspan protein localizes to the plasma membrane, rather than to mitochondria, and may stimulate apoptosis (Ihrie and Attardi, 2004).

PIGR polymeric immunoglobulin receptor. PIGR mediates trans-cellular transport of polymeric immunoglobulin molecules. The receptor has 5 units with homology to the variable (V) units of immunoglobulins and a trans-membrane region, which also has some homology to certain immunoglobulin variable regions.

Structure information: 1XED Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR (Hamburger et al. 2004).

PROM1 prominin 1. The PROM1 gene codes for a pentaspan trans-membrane glycoprotein. The PROM1 antigen appears to belong to a new molecular family of 5-TM proteins which include an extra-cellular N-terminus, two short intracellular loops, two large extra-cellular loops and an intra-cellular C-terminus. PROM1 has been shown to be expressed on haemangioblasts and neural stem cells as well as on developing epithelium (Horn et al. 1999; Florek et al. 2005). No natural ligand has yet been demonstrated for the PROM1 molecule (Wu et al. 2006).

PSCA prostate stem cell antigen. This gene encodes a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored cell membrane glycoprotein and a target for immunotherapy (Reiter et al. 1998; Wente et al. 2005).

PTP4A2 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 2. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to a small class of prenylated protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). PTPs are cell signalling molecules that play regulatory roles in a variety of cellular processes (Bardelli et al. 2003; Rouleau et al. 2006). Overexpression of this gene in mammalian cells conferred a transformed phenotype, which suggested its role in tumourigenesis (Cates et al. 1996).

Structure information: 1XM2 Crystal structure of Human PRL-1 (Jeong et al. 2005).

PTP4A3 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 3. Over-expression of this PTP gene in mammalian cells was reported to inhibit angiotensin-II induced cell calcium mobilization and promote cell growth (Matter et al. 2001).

Structure information: 1V3A Structure of human PRL-3, the phosphatase associated with cancer metastasis (Kim et al. 2004).

PTPNS1 SIRPA signal-regulatory protein alpha. Signal-regulatory-protein (SIRP) family members are receptor-type transmembrane glycoproteins known to be involved in the negative regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase-coupled signalling processes (Kharitonenkov et al. 1997). CD47 has been known to be a ligand for this PTPNS1 (Subramanian et al. 2006).

Structure information: 2D9C Solution structure of the first ig-like domain of signal-regulatory protein beta-1 (SIRP-beta-1) (Nagashima et al. 2005).

RHCG Rh family, C glycoprotein. RhCG facilitates ammonium movement across the plasma membrane (Zidi-Yahiaoui et al. 2005).

SLC30A1 solute carrier family 30 (zinc transporter), member 1. Transports zinc out of cells; its absence accounts for increased sensitivity of mutant cells to zinc toxicity (Palmiter and Findley, 1995).

SLC39A3 solute carrier family 39 (zinc transporter), member 3. These eight-transmembrane domain proteins are part of the Zrt/Irt-like protein (ZIP) super-family of metal ion transporters and contain a conserved 12-amino acid signature sequence within the fourth transmembrane domain (Gaither and Eide, 2000, 2001; Dufner-Beattie et al. 2003).

SRD5A2L steroid 5 alpha-reductase 2-like; 3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4 dehydrogenase activity.

STRA6 stimulated by retinoic acid gene 6 homolog (mouse). Stra6 codes for a very hydrophobic membrane protein of a new type, which does not display similarities with previously characterized integral membrane proteins (Bouillet et al. 1997).

TACSTD2 tumour-associated calcium signal transducer 2. This gene encodes a carcinoma-associated antigen, defined by the monoclonal antibody GA733. TACSTD2 transduces an intra-cellular calcium signal and acts as a cell surface receptor (Ripani et al. 1998).

TFF3 trefoil factor 3. Trefoil family members are stable, secretory proteins having at least one copy of the trefoil motif, a 40-amino acid domain that contains three conserved disulphides. VANGL, Van Gogh-like protein 1, is phosphorylated in response to Intestinal Trefoil Factor (ITF) stimulation. Vangl1 protein acts as a downstream effector of ITF/TFF3 signalling and regulates wound healing of the intestinal epithelium (Kalabis et al. 2006). TFF3 is commonly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and its expression correlates with tumour grade (Khoury et al. 2005).

Structure information: 1E9T High resolution solution structure of human intestinal trefoil factor (Lemercinier et al. 2001; Muskett et al. 2003).

TGFA transforming growth factor, alpha. TGF-alpha shows about 40% sequence homology with epidermal growth factor (EGF) and competes with EGF for binding to the EGF receptor (Lee et al. 1985; Winkler et al. 1989).

Structure information: 1MOX Crystal Structure of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (residues 1-501) in complex with TGF-alpha (Garret et al. 2002). 2TGF The solution structure of human transforming growth factor alpha (Harvey et al. 2001).

TMEM45B transmembrane protein 45B. Integral to membrane (Ensembl-Gene ENSG0000051715: inferred from electronic annotation).

TMEM54 transmembrane protein 54. Integral to membrane (Ensembl-Gene ENSG00000121900: inferred from electronic annotation).

TMPRSS2 transmembrane protease, serine 2. This gene was demonstrated to be up-regulated by androgenic hormones in prostate cancer cells and down-regulated in androgen-independent prostate cancer tissue (Afar et al. 2001). The protease domain of this protein is thought to be cleaved and secreted into cell media after autocleavage.

The encoded protein contains a type II transmembrane domain, a receptor class A domain, a scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain and a protease domain.

Structure information: 1Z8G Crystal structure of the extracellular region of the transmembrane serine protease hepsin with covalently bound preferred substrate (Herter et al. 2005).

TMPRSS11B transmembrane protease, serine 11B. Integral to membrane (Ensembl-Gene ENSG00000185873: inferred from electronic annotation).

Structure information: 1Z8G (see TMPRSS2)

TSPAN1 tetraspanin 1. Most members of the trans-membrane 4 superfamily are cell-surface proteins characterized by the presence of four hydrophobic domains. The proteins mediate signal transduction events that play a role in the regulation of cell development, activation, growth and motility (Todd et al. 1998). Tetraspanin protein, C4.8, identical to NET-1, has been implicated in cervical carcinogenesis (Wollscheid et al. 2002).

UPK1A uroplakin 1A. The tetraspanin protein encoded by this gene is found in the asymmetrical unit membrane (AUM) where it can complex with other trans-membrane 4 superfamily proteins (Yu et al. 1994). It may play a role in regulating membrane permeability of superficial umbrella cells or in stabilizing the apical membrane through AUM/cytoskeletal interactions (Riedel et al. 2005).

References

  1. Afar DE, Vivanco I, Hubert RS, et al. Catalytic cleavage of the androgen-regulated TMPRSS2 protease results in its secretion by prostate and prostate cancer epithelia. Cancer Res. 2001;61(4):1686–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agnel M, Vermat T, Culouscou JM. Identification of three novel members of the calcium-dependent chloride channel (CaCC) family predominantly expressed in the digestive tract and trachea. FEBS Lett. 1999;455(3):295–301. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00891-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson-Engels S, Klinteberg Ca, Svanber K, et al. In vivo fluorescence imaging for tissue diagnostics. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42:815–24. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/5/006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arredondo J, Chernyavsky AI, Jolkovsky DL, et al. SLURP-2: A novel cholinergic signaling peptide in human mucocutaneous epithelium. J Cell Physiol. 2006;208(1):238–45. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bagutti C, Forro G, Ferralli J, et al. The intracellular domain of teneurin-2 has a nuclear function and represses zic-1-mediated transcription. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 14):2957–66. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bamias A, Chorti M, Deliveliotis C, et al. Prognostic significance of CA 125, CD44, and epithelial membrane antigen in renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2003;62(2):368–73. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00264-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bansal GS, Cox HC, Marsh S, et al. Expression of keratinocyte growth factor and its receptor in human breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1997;75(11):1567–74. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bardelli A, Saha S, Sager JA, et al. PRL-3 expression in metastatic cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(15):5607–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baselga J, Gianni L, Geyer C, et al. Future options with trastuzumab for primary systemic and adjuvant therapy. Semin. Oncol. 2004;31:51–7. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Becker-Herman S, Arie G, Medvedovsky H, et al. CD74 Is a Member of the Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis-processed Protein Family. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2005;16:5061–69. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ben-Porath I, Benvenisty N. Characterization of a tumor-associated gene, a member of a novel family of genes encoding membrane glycoproteins. Gene. 1996;183(1–2):69–75. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00475-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bernfield M, Gotte M, Park PW, et al. Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:729–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boch JA, Yoshida Y, Koyama Y, et al. Characterization of a cascade of protein interactions initiated at the IL-1 receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;303(2):525–31. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00385-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boehm MK, Perkins SJ. Structural Models for Carcinoembryonic Antigen and its Complex with the Single-Chain Fv Antibody Molecule Mfe23. FEBS Lett. 2000;475:11. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01612-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bouillet P, Sapin V, Chazaud C, et al. Developmental expression pattern of Stra6, a retinoic acid-responsive gene encoding a new type of membrane protein. Mech Dev. 1997;63(2):173–86. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(97)00039-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Breslin JJ, Mork I, Smith MK, et al. Human coronavirus 229E: receptor binding domain and neutralization by soluble receptor at 37 degrees C. J Virol. 2003;77(7):4435–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.7.4435-4438.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cates CA, Michael RL, Stayrook KR, et al. Prenylation of oncogenic human PTP(CAAX) protein tyrosine phosphatases. Cancer Lett. 1996;110(1–2):49–55. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(96)04459-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chang HY, Sneddon JB, Alizadeh AA, et al. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds. PloS Biol. 2004;2(2):206–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen Y, Miller C, Mosher R, et al. Identification of cervical cancer markers by cDNA and tissue microarrays. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1927–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Collier T, Lacy A, Richards-Kortum R, et al. Near real-time confocal microscopy of amelanotic tissue: detection of dysplasia in ex vivo cervical tissue. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:504–12. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80326-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Crowell KJ, Franzin CM, Koltay A, et al. Expression and characterization of the FXYD ion transport regulators for NMR structural studies in lipid micelles and lipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1645(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/s1570-9639(02)00473-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ceska TA, Owens R, Doyle C, et al. The crystal structure of the Fgfr2 tyrosine kinase domain in complex with 4-aryl-2-phenylamino pyrimidine angiogenesis inhibitors. To be Published. [Google Scholar]
  23. Davis T, Walker JR, Dong A, et al. Structure of the human Epha3 receptor tyrosine kinase and juxtamembrane region. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2008.03.008. To be Published. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Del Sal G, Ruaro ME, Philipson L, et al. The growth arrest-specific gene, gas1, is involved in growth suppression. Cell. 1992;70(4):595–607. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90429-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Doorbar J. Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clin Sci (Lond) 2006;110:525–41. doi: 10.1042/CS20050369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dower SK, Kronheim SR, Hopp TP, et al. The cell surface receptors for interleukin-1 alpha and interleukin-1 beta are identical. Nature. 1986;324(6094):266–8. doi: 10.1038/324266a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Druker BJ. Imatinib as a paradigm of targeted therapies. Adv Cancer Res. 2004;91:1–30. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(04)91001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Duffy CL, Phillips SL, Klingelhutz AJ. Microarray analysis identifies differentiation-associated genes regulated by human papillomavirus type 16 E6. Virology. 2003;314:196–205. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(03)00390-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dufner-Beattie J, Langmade SJ, Wang F, et al. Structure, function, and regulation of a subfamily of mouse zinc transporter genes. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(50):50142–50. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304163200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dukhovny A, Goldstein Magal L, Hirschberg K. The MAL proteolipid restricts detergent-mediated membrane pore expansion and percolation. Mol Membr Biol. 2006;23(3):245–57. doi: 10.1080/09687860600601445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Entrez Gene. 2007 URL: www.ncbinlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=gene.
  32. Entrez GEO. URL: www.ncbinlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=geo.
  33. Ernst LK, van de Winkel JG, Chiu IM, et al. Three genes for the human high affinity Fc receptor for IgG (Fc gamma RI) encode four distinct transcription products. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(22):15692–700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Evdokiou A, Cowled PA. Tumor-suppressive activity of the growth arrest-specific gene GAS1 in human tumor cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1998;75(4):568–77. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980209)75:4<568::aid-ijc13>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fedarovich A, Tomberg J, Nicholas RA, et al. Structure of the N-terminal domain of human CEACAM1: binding target of the opacity proteins during invasion of Neisseria meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae. Acta Crystallogr, Sect D. 2006;62:971–9. doi: 10.1107/S0907444906020737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ferris DG, Lawhead RA, Dickman ED, et al. Multimodal hyper-spectral imaging for the noninvasive diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. J Low Genital Tract Dis. 2001;5(2):65–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0976.2001.005002065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Flanagan JG, Vanderhaeghen P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:309–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.309. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Florek M, Haase M, Marzesco AM, et al. Prominin-1/CD133, a neural and hematopoietic stem cell marker, is expressed in adult human differentiated cells and certain types of kidney cancer. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;319(1):15–26. doi: 10.1007/s00441-004-1018-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Franzin CM, Yu J, Thai K, et al. Correlation of gene and protein structures in the FXYD family proteins. J Mol Biol. 2005;354(4):743–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Frater JL, Tallman MS, Variakojis D, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia following therapy with imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) Bone marrow histopathology and correlation with genetic status. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2003;119(6):833–41. doi: 10.1309/A4RG-P4LF-12GG-H8MW. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gaither LA, Eide DJ. Functional expression of the human hZIP2 zinc transporter. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:5560–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gaither LA, Eide DJ. The human ZIP1 transporter mediates zinc uptake in human K562 erythroleukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:22258–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101772200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Garrett TPJ, McKern NM, Lou M, et al. Crystal structure of a truncated epidermal growth factor receptor extracellular domain bound to transforming growth factor alpha. Cell. 2002;110:763–73. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00940-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gillenwater A, Jacob R, Richards-Kortum R. Fluorescence spectroscopy: a technique with potential to improve the early detection of aerodigestive tract neoplasia. Head Neck. 1998;20:556–62. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199809)20:6<556::aid-hed11>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. González S, White WM, Rajadhyaksha M, et al. Confocal imaging of sebaceous gland hyperplasia in vivo to assess efficacy and mechanism of pulsed dye laser treatment. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1999;25:8–12. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1999)25:1<8::aid-lsm2>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gurjar RS, Backman V, Perelman LT, et al. Imaging human epithelial properties with polarized light-scattering spectroscopy. Nat Med. 2001;7(11):1245–8. doi: 10.1038/nm1101-1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hahn M, Nicholson MJ, Pyrdol J, et al. Unconventional topology of self peptide-major histocompatibility complex binding by a human autoimmune T cell receptor. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:490–96. doi: 10.1038/ni1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hamburger AE, West AP, Jr, Bjorkman PJ. Crystal structure of a polymeric immunoglobulin binding fragment of the human polymeric immunoglobulin receptor. Structure. 2004;12:1925–35. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hanahan D, Weinburg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hanakawa Y, Selwood T, Woo D, et al. Calcium-dependent conformation of desmoglein 1 is required for its cleavage by exfoliative toxin. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121(2):383–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12362.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hanke S, Bugert P, Chudek J, et al. Cloning a calcium channel alpha2delta-3 subunit gene from a putative tumor suppressor gene region at chromosome 3p21.1 in conventional renal cell carcinoma. Gene. 2001;264(1):69–75. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00600-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hansen LV, Gardsvoll H, Nielsen BS, et al. Structural analysis and tissue localization of human C4.4A: a protein homologue of the urokinase receptor. Biochem J. 2004;380(Pt 3):845–57. doi: 10.1042/BJ20031478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Harada N, Iijima S, Kobayashi K, et al. Human IgGFc binding protein (FcgammaBP) in colonic epithelial cells exhibits mucin-like structure. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(24):15232–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.24.15232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, et al. Non-invasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2491–99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Harvey TS, Wilkinson AJ, Tappin MJ, et al. The solution structure of human transforming growth factor alpha. Eur J Biochem. 1991;198:555–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Herter S, Piper DE, Aaron W, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is a preferred in vitro substrate for human hepsin, a membrane-anchored serine protease implicated in prostate and ovarian cancers. Biochem J. 2005;390:125–36. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Horn PA, Tesch H, Staib P, et al. Expression of AC133, a novel hematopoietic precursor antigen, on acute myeloid leukemia cells. Blood. 1999;93(4):1435–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Huang ME, Ye YC, Chen SR, et al. Use of all-trans retinoic acid in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 1988;72(2):567–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hubbard TJP, Aken BL, Beal K, et al. Ensembl 2007. Nuc Acids Res. 2006;00(Database issue ):D1–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Huzaira M, Rius F, Rajadhyaksha M, et al. Topographic variations in normal skin, as viewed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2001;116:846–52. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ihrie RA, Attardi LD. Perpetrating p53-dependent apoptosis. Cell Cycle. 2004;3(3):267–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Iida A, Tanaka T, Nakamura Y. High-density SNP map of human ITR, a gene associated with vascular remodeling. J Hum Genet. 2003;48(4):170–2. doi: 10.1007/s10038-003-0002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ishikawa J, Kaisho T, Tomizawa H, et al. Molecular cloning and chromosomal mapping of a bone marrow stromal cell surface gene, BST2, that may be involved in pre-B-cell growth. Genomics. 1995;26(3):527–34. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(95)80171-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Jaffer FA, Weissleder R. Molecular imaging in the clinical arena. JAMA. 2005;293(7):855–62. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.7.855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Jain A, Tindell CA, Laux I, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(33):11858–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502113102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Jasanoff A, Wagner G, Wiley DC. Structure of a trimeric domain of the MHC class II-associated chaperonin and targeting protein Ii. EMBO J. 1998;17:6812–18. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.23.6812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Jeong DG, Kim SJ, Kim JH, et al. Trimeric structure of PRL-1 phosphatase reveals an active enzyme conformation and regulation mechanisms. J Mol Biol. 2005;345:401–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kalabis J, Rosenberg I, Podolsky DK. Vangl1 protein acts as a downstream effector of intestinal trefoil factor (ITF)/TFF3 signaling and regulates wound healing of intestinal epithelium. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(10):6434–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512905200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kharitonenkov A, Chen Z, Sures I, et al. A family of proteins that inhibit signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors. Nature. 1997;386(6621):181–6. doi: 10.1038/386181a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Khoury T, Chadha K, Javle M, et al. Expression of intestinal trefoil factor (TFF-3) in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2005;35(3):171–7. doi: 10.1385/IJGC:35:3:171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kim JY, Kim SM, Ko JH, et al. Interaction of pro-apoptotic protein HGTD-P with heat shock protein 90 is required for induction of mitochondrial apoptotic cascades. FEBS Lett. 2006;580(13):3270–5. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kim KA, Song JS, Jee J, et al. Structure of human PRL-3, the phosphatase associated with cancer metastasis. Febs Lett. 2004;565:181–7. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.03.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kobayashi K, Hamada Y, Blaser MJ, et al. The molecular configuration and ultrastructural locations of an IgG Fc binding site in human colonic epithelium. J Immunol. 1991;146(1):68–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Langley RG, Rajadhyaksha M, Dwyer PJ, et al. Confocal scanning laser microscopy of benign and malignant melanocytic skin lesions in vivo. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2001;45:365–76. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2001.117395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lee DC, Rose TM, Webb NR, et al. Cloning and sequence analysis of a cDNA for rat transforming growth factor-alpha. Nature. 1985;313(6002):489–91. doi: 10.1038/313489a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lee MJ, Kim JY, Suk K, et al. Identification of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-responsive HGTD-P gene as a mediator in the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(9):3918–27. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.9.3918-3927.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lee JW, Lee YS, Yoo KH, et al. LY-6K gene: a novel molecular marker for human breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2006;16(6):1211–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lemercinier X, Muskett FW, Cheeseman B, et al. High-resolution solution structure of human intestinal trefoil factor and functional insights from detailed structural comparisons with the other members of the trefoil family of mammalian cell motility factors. Biochemistry. 2001;40:9552–59. doi: 10.1021/bi010184+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Leng L, Metz CN, Fang Y, et al. MIF signal transduction initiated by binding to CD74. J Exp Med. 2003;197:1467–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Li YF, Li DF, Zeng ZH, et al. Trimeric structure of the wild soluble chloride intracellular ion channel CLIC4 observed in crystals. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;343:1272–78. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Livnah O, Stura EA, Johnson DL, et al. Functional mimicry of a protein hormone by a peptide agonist: the EPO receptor complex at 2.8 Å. Science. 1996;273:464–71. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5274.464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Llorente A, de Marco MC, Alonso MA. Caveolin-1 and MAL are located on prostasomes secreted by the prostate cancer PC-3 cell line. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(Pt 22):5343–51. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. LOCATE. subcellular localization database. Copyright 2004, 2005, Institute of Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland and the ARC Centre in Bioinformatics.
  84. Macao B, Johansson DGA, Hansson GC, et al. Autoproteolysis coupled to protein folding in the SEA domain of the membrane-bound MUC1 mucin. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13:71–6. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Machesky LM, Reeves E, Wientjes F, et al. Mammalian actin-related protein 2/3 complex localizes to regions of lamellipodial protrusion and is composed of evolutionarily conserved proteins. Biochem J. 1997;328(Pt 1):105–12. doi: 10.1042/bj3280105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Madden DR, Gorga JC, Strominger JL, et al. The three-dimensional structure of HLA-B27 at 2.1 Å resolution suggests a general mechanism for tight peptide binding to MHC. Cell. 1992;70:1035–48. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90252-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Madden SL, Wang CJ, Landes G. Serial analysis of gene expression: from gene discovery to target identification. Drug Discovery Today. 2000;5(9):415–25. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(00)01544-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Mao M, Yu M, Tong JH, et al. RIG-E, a human homolog of the murine Ly-6 family, is induced by retinoic acid during the differentiation of acute promyelocytic leukemia cell. PNAS. 1996;93:5910–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Marquardt A, Stohr H, White K, et al. cDNA cloning, genomic structure, and chromosomal localization of three members of the human fatty acid desaturase family. Genomics. 2000;66(2):175–83. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Matter WF, Estridge T, Zhang C, et al. Role of PRL-3, a human muscle-specific tyrosine phosphatase, in angiotensin-II signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;283(5):1061–8. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. McMahan CJ, Slack JL, Mosley B, et al. A novel IL-1 receptor, cloned from B cells by mammalian expression, is expressed in many cell types. EMBO J. 1991;10(10):2821–32. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07831.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Muller DJ, Hand GM, Engel A, et al. Conformational changes in surface structures of isolated connexin 26 gap junctions. EMBO J. 2002;21(14):3598–607. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Murthy VL, Stern LJ. The class II MHC protein HLA-DR1 in complex with an endogenous peptide: implications for the structural basis of the specificity of peptide binding. Structure. 1997;5:1385–96. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00288-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Muskett FW, May FE, Westley BR, et al. Solution structure of the disulfide-linked dimer of human intestinal trefoil factor (TFF3): the intermolecular orientation and interactions are markedly different from those of other dimeric trefoil proteins. Biochemistry. 2003;42(51):15139–47. doi: 10.1021/bi030182k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Nagashima K, Hayashi F, Yoshida M, et al. Solution structure of the first ig-like domain of signal-regulatory protein beta-1 (SIRP-beta-1) 2005 To be Published. [Google Scholar]
  96. Naujokas MF, Morin M, Anderson MS, et al. The chondroitin sulfate form of invariant chain can enhance stimulation of T cell responses through interaction with CD44. Cell. 1993;74:257–68. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90417-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Nishihira J, Ishibashi T, Fukushima T, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): its potential role in tumor growth and tumor-associated angiogenesis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2003;995:171–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Nowakowski J, Cronin CN, McRee DE, et al. Structures of the cancer related Aurora-A, FAK and EphA2 protein kinases from nanovolume crystallography. Structure. 2003;10:1659–67. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00907-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. O’Brien TJ, Beard JB, Underwood LJ, et al. The CA 125 gene: an extracellular superstructure dominated by repeat sequences. Tumour Biol. 2001;22(6):348–66. doi: 10.1159/000050638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. O’Donovan N, Fischer A, Abdo EM, et al. Differential expression of IgG Fc binding protein (FcgammaBP) in human normal thyroid tissue, thyroid adenomas and thyroid carcinomas. J Endocrinol. 2002;174(3):517–24. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1740517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Okada H, Kimura MT, Tan D, et al. Frequent trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) overexpression and promoter hypomethylation in mouse and human hepatocellular carcinomas. Int J Oncol. 2005;26(2):369–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Palmiter RD, Findley SD. Cloning and functional characterization of a mammalian zinc transporter that confers resistance to zinc. EMBO J. 1995;14(4):639–49. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07042.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF. Diagnosis of Uterine Cancer by the Vaginal Smear. New York: The Commonwealth Fund. 1997. The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus, 1941. 1997. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1943;121(3):211–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Pérez-Plasencia C, Riggins G, Vázquez-Ortiz G, et al. Characterization of the global profile of genes expressed in cervical epithelium by Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) BMC Genomics. 2005;6:130–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Pleasance ED, Marra MA, Jones SJM. Assessment of SAGE in transcript identification. Genome Res. 2003;13:1203–15. doi: 10.1101/gr.873003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Pollan M, Varela G, Torres A, et al. Clinical value of p53, c-erbB-2, CEA and CA125 regarding relapse, metastasis and death in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2003;107(5):781–90. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Pruitt KD, Katz KS, Sicotte H, et al. Introducing RefSeq and LocusLink: curated human genome resources at the NCBI. Trends Genet. 2000;16(1):44–7. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(99)01882-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(1):D501–D504. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Rabassa ME, Croce MV, Pereyra A, et al. MUC1 expression and anti-MUC1 serum immune response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): a multivariate analysis. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:253. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Raina D, Ahmad R, Kumar S, et al. MUC1 oncoprotein blocks nuclear targeting of c-Abl in the apoptotic response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 2006;25(16):3774–83. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Rahman M, Abd-El-Barr M, Mack V, et al. Optical imaging of cervical pre-cancers with structured illumination: An integrated approach. Gynecologic Oncology. 2005;99:S112–S115. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Rajadhyaksha M, Anderson RR, Webb RH. Video-rate confocal scanning laser microscope for imaging human tissues in vivo. Applied Optics. 1999;38:2105–15. doi: 10.1364/ao.38.002105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Ramanujam N. Fluorescence spectroscopy of neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues. Neoplasia. 2000;2(1–2):89–117. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Reiter RE, Gu Z, Watabe T, et al. Prostate stem cell antigen: a cell surface marker overexpressed in prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(4):1735–40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Ren J, Raina D, Chen W, et al. MUC1 oncoprotein functions in activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling. Mol Cancer Res. 2006;4(11):873–83. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Riedel I, Liang FX, Deng FM, et al. Urothelial umbrella cells of human ureter are heterogeneous with respect to their uroplakin composition: different degrees of urothelial maturity in ureter and bladder? Eur J Cell Biol. 2005;84(2–3):393–405. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2004.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Ripani E, Sacchetti A, Corda D, et al. Human Trop-2 is a tumor-associated calcium signal transducer. Int J Cancer. 1998;76(5):671–6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980529)76:5<671::aid-ijc10>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Ritzka M, Stanke F, Jansen S, et al. The CLCA gene locus as a modulator of the gastrointestinal basic defect in cystic fibrosis. Hum Genet. 2004;115(6):483–91. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1190-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Rivat C, Rodrigues S, Bruyneel E, et al. Implication of STAT3 signaling in human colonic cancer cells during intestinal trefoil factor 3 (TFF3)—and vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated cellular invasion and tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2005;65(1):195–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Robertson N, Oveisi-Fordorei M, Zuyderduyn S, et al. DiscoverySpace: an interactive data analysis application. Genome Biology. 2007;8:R6. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-1-r6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Robinson RC, Turbedsky K, Kaiser DA, et al. Crystal structure of Arp2/3 complex. Science. 2001;294:679–84. doi: 10.1126/science.1066333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Ross JS, Fletcher JA, Bloom KJ, et al. Targeted therapy in breast cancer: the HER-2/neu gene and protein. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3(4):379–98. doi: 10.1074/mcp.R400001-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Rouleau C, Roy A, St Martin T, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase PRL-3 in malignant cells and endothelial cells: expression and function. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5(2):219–29. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Rudin M, Weissleder R. Molecular imaging in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:123–31. doi: 10.1038/nrd1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Ruutu M, Peitsaro P, Johansson B, et al. Transcriptional profiling of a human papillomavirus 33-positive squamous epithelial cell line which acquired a selective growth advantage after viral integration. Int J Cancer. 2002;100:318–26. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Saha S, Sparks AB, Rago C, et al. Using the transcriptome to annotate the genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:508–12. doi: 10.1038/nbt0502-508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Sander J, Ng RT, Sleumer MC, et al. A methodology for analyzing SAGE libraries for cancer profiling. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 2005;23(1):35–60. [Google Scholar]
  128. Schaeffer L, Gohlke H, Muller M, et al. Common genetic variants of the FADS1 FADS2 gene cluster and their reconstructed haplotypes are associated with the fatty acid composition in phospholipids. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(11):1745–56. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Schiemann S, Ruckels M, Engelholm LH, et al. Differential gene expression in human mammary carcinoma cells: identification of a new member of a receptor family. Anticancer Res. 1997;17(1A):13–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Schreuder H, Tardif C, Trump-Kallmeyer S, et al. A new cytokine-receptor binding mode revealed by the crystal structure of the IL-1 receptor with an antagonist. Nature. 1997;386:194–200. doi: 10.1038/386194a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Selkin B, Rajadhyaksha M, González S, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy in dermatology. Dermatologic Clinics. 2001;19(2):369–77. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(05)70274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Shadeo A, Chari R, Lonergan KM, Pusic A, Miller D, Ehlen T, Van Niekerk D, Matisic J, Richards-Kortum R, Follen M, Guillaud M, Lam WL, MacAulay C. BMC Genomics. 2007 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-64. Submitted September. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Shim C, Zhang W, Rhee CH, et al. Profiling of differentially expressed genes in human primary cervical cancer by complementary DNA expression array. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:3045–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Sokolov K, Drezek R, Gossage K, et al. Reflectance spectroscopy with polarized light: is it sensitive to cellular and nuclear morphology? Opt Express. 1999;5(13):302. doi: 10.1364/oe.5.000302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Sokolov K, Follen M, Richards-Kortum R. Optical spectroscopy for detection of neoplasia. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2002;6:651–58. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00381-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Sokolov K, Aaron J, Hsu B, et al. Optical systems for in vivo molecular imaging of cancer. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment. 2003;2(6):491–504. doi: 10.1177/153303460300200602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Sondermann P, Huber R, Oosthuizen V, et al. The 3.2-A crystal structure of the human IgG1 Fc fragment-Fc gammaRIII complex. Nature. 2000;406:267–73. doi: 10.1038/35018508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Stern N, Markel G, Arnon TI, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) inhibits NK killing via interaction with CEA-related cell adhesion molecule 1. J Immunol. 2005;174(11):6692–701. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.6692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Stumptner-Cuvelette P, Benaroch P. Multiple roles of the invariant chain in MHC class II function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1542:1–13. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(01)00166-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Subramanian S, Parthasarathy R, Sen S, et al. Species- and cell type-specific interactions between CD47 and human SIRPalpha. Blood. 2006;107(6):2548–56. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Sun HW, Bernhagen J, Bucala R, et al. Crystal structure at 2.6-Å resolution of human macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:5191–96. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Thomas JT, Oh ST, Terhune SS, et al. Cellular changes induced by low-risk human papillomavirus type 11 in keratinocytes that stably maintain viral episomes. J Virol. 2001;75:7564–71. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7564-7571.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Todd SC, Doctor VS, Levy S. Sequences and expression of six new members of the tetraspanin/TM4SF family. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1399(1):101–4. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(98)00087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Tsuji H, Okamoto K, Matsuzaka Y, et al. SLURP-2, a novel member of the human Ly-6 superfamily that is up-regulated in psoriasis vulgaris. Genomics. 2003;81(1):26–33. doi: 10.1016/s0888-7543(02)00025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Utzinger U, Brewer M, Silva E, et al. Reflectance spectroscopy for in vivo characterization of ovarian tissue. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28:56–66. doi: 10.1002/1096-9101(2001)28:1<56::AID-LSM1017>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Velculescu VE, Zhang L, Zhou W, et al. Characterization of the yeast transcriptome. Cell. 1997;88(2):243–51. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81845-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Velculescu VE, Zhang L, Vogelstein B, et al. Serial analysis of gene expression. Science. 1995;270:484–7. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Vieten D, Corfield A, Carroll D, et al. Impaired mucosal regeneration in neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005;21(3):153–60. doi: 10.1007/s00383-004-1312-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Wagnières GA, Star WM, Wilson BC. In vivo fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging for oncological applications. Photochem Photobiol. 1998;68(5):603–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Weissleder R. Scaling down imaging: molecular mapping of cancer in mice. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:11–18. doi: 10.1038/nrc701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Welch MD, Iwamatsu A, Mitchison TJ. Actin polymerization is induced by Arp2/3 protein complex at the surface of Listeria monocytogenes. Nature. 1997;385(6613):265–9. doi: 10.1038/385265a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Wente MN, Jain A, Kono E, et al. Prostate stem cell antigen is a putative target for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2005;31(2):119–25. doi: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000173459.81193.4d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Wheeler GN, Parker AE, Thomas CL, et al. Desmosomal glycoprotein DGI, a component of intercellular desmosome junctions, is related to the cadherin family of cell adhesion molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(11):4796–800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. White WM, Rajadhyaksha M, González S, et al. Noninvasive imaging of human oral mucosa in vivo by confocal reflectance microscopy. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:1709–17. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199910000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Winkler ME, O’Connor L, Winget M, et al. Epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha bind differently to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Biochemistry. 1989;28(15):6373–8. doi: 10.1021/bi00441a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Wollscheid V, Kuhne-Heid R, Stein I, et al. Identification of a new proliferation-associated protein NET-1/C4.8 characteristic for a subset of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2002;99(6):771–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Woodman CBJ, Collins SI, Young LS. The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues. Nature Rev Cancer. 2007;7:11–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Wu A, Wiesner S, Xiao J, et al. Expression of MHC I and NK ligands on human CD133(+) glioma cells: possible targets of immunotherapy. J Neurooncol. 2006 doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9265-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Yasunaga S, Grati M, Cohen-Salmon M, et al. A mutation in OTOF, encoding otoferlin, a FER-1-like protein, causes DFNB9, a nonsyndromic form of deafness. Nat Genet. 1999;21(4):363–9. doi: 10.1038/7693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Yeager CL, Ashmun RA, Williams RK, et al. Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E. Nature. 1992;357(6377):420–2. doi: 10.1038/357420a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Yee KW, Keating A. Advances in targeted therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 2003;3:295–310. doi: 10.1586/14737140.3.3.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Yim E-K, Park JS. Biomarkers in cervical cancer. Biomarker Insights. 2006;2:215–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Yin BW, Dnistrian A, Lloyd KO. Ovarian cancer antigen CA125 is encoded by the MUC16 mucin gene. Int J Cancer. 2002;98(5):737–40. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Yu J, Lin JH, Wu XR, et al. Uroplakins Ia and Ib, two major differentiation products of bladder epithelium, belong to a family of four transmembrane domain (4TM) proteins. J Cell Biol. 1994;125(1):171–82. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.1.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Zidi-Yahiaoui N, Mouro-Chanteloup I, D’Ambrosio AM, et al. Human Rhesus B and Rhesus C glycoproteins: properties of facilitated ammonium transport in recombinant kidney cells. Biochem J. 2005;391(Pt 1):33–40. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nature Rev Cancer. 2002;2:342–50. doi: 10.1038/nrc798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biomarker Insights are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES