Abstract
BACTEC and conventional methods of antimicrobial susceptibility testing were compared with the use of artificial mixtures of 1% resistant and 99% susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Inocula for the assays were prepared on the basis of radiometric readings. A total of 40 resistant strains were tested: 18 were resistant to isoniazid, 16 to rifampin, 5 to streptomycin, and 1 to ethambutol. The BACTEC method detected 27 of 39 strains at the greater than 0.5% resistance level, whereas the conventional plate method detected only 8 of 40. In addition, the results of the BACTEC assay were closer to the expected 1% resistance level (0.7%) than were the data obtained with the proportional plate method (0.3%; P = 0.001). This difference was most striking with the isoniazid-resistant strains. The precision of the assay methods was quite different (coefficients of variation, 26% for BACTEC and 54% for plates; P = 0.0002). Streptomycin-resistant strains had the highest variability in both assay methods. A 1-day delay in calculating the BACTEC data after the control vial reading was equal to or greater than 30 resulted in a 25% reduction in the calculated level of resistance (0.7 to 0.53). By adhering exactly to the recommended procedures for the BACTEC test method and by using log-phase inocula, this method shows better precision and accuracy at the 1% resistance level than does the proportional plate method.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Canetti G., Fox W., Khomenko A., Mahler H. T., Menon N. K., Mitchison D. A., Rist N., Smelev N. A. Advances in techniques of testing mycobacterial drug sensitivity, and the use of sensitivity tests in tuberculosis control programmes. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;41(1):21–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cummings D. M., Ristroph D., Camargo E. E., Larson S. M., Wagner H. N., Jr Radiometric detection of the metabolic activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Nucl Med. 1975 Dec;16(12):1189–1191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Middlebrook G., Reggiardo Z., Tigertt W. D. Automatable radiometric detection of growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in selective media. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977 Jun;115(6):1066–1069. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1977.115.6.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts G. D., Goodman N. L., Heifets L., Larsh H. W., Lindner T. H., McClatchy J. K., McGinnis M. R., Siddiqi S. H., Wright P. Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for recovery of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from acid-fast smear-positive specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):689–696. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.689-696.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siddiqi S. H., Libonati J. P., Middlebrook G. Evaluation of rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May;13(5):908–912. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.908-912.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snider D. E., Jr, Good R. C., Kilburn J. O., Laskowski L. F., Jr, Lusk R. H., Marr J. J., Reggiardo Z., Middlebrook G. Rapid drug-susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Apr;123(4 Pt 1):402–406. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.4.402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vincké G., Yegers O., Vanachter H., Jenkins P. A., Butzler J. P. Rapid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a radiometric technique. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Oct;10(4):351–354. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.4.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wayne L. G., Krasnow I. Preparation of tuberculosis susceptibility testing mediums by means of impregnated disks. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Jun;45(6):769–771. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/45.6_ts.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]