Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1985 Jun;21(6):963–968. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.6.963-968.1985

Detection of specific immunoglobulin M antibody to rubella virus by use of an enzyme-labeled antigen.

C Bonfanti, O Meurman, P Halonen
PMCID: PMC271827  PMID: 3891775

Abstract

A direct antibody capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody was developed. Polystyrene microtiter strips coated with rabbit anti-human IgM were used as solid phase, and a semipurified rubella antigen labeled with horseradish peroxidase was used as indicator. By testing a panel of 238 serum specimens (not including sera from newborns with congenital rubella), the direct EIA was compared with the indirect EIA used routinely in our diagnostic unit and with a commercial IgM capture EIA (RubEnz M II) that employs a horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-rubella monoclonal antibody as indicator. Overall agreement of direct EIA with indirect EIA and RubEnz M II was 95%, whereas agreement between direct and indirect EIA was 96.2%, and agreement between direct EIA and RubEnz M II was 97.8%. Sensitivity of the direct assay was higher than that of the indirect EIA and similar to that of the RubEnz M II assay. Specific IgM antibody could always be detected in serum specimens taken from patients with primary acute rubella infection between days 4 and 56 after the onset of rash. The assay was highly specific, and it was not affected either by rheumatoid factor or by high levels of specific IgG in sera. Another important advantage that the direct EIA has over the indirect EIA is that it requires 10 to 20 times less antigen per serum specimen tested.

Full text

PDF
963

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hodgson J., Morgan-Capner P. Evaluation of a commercial antibody capture enzyme immunoassay for the detection of rubella specific IgM. J Clin Pathol. 1984 May;37(5):573–577. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.5.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Isaac M., Payne R. A. Antibody class capture assay (ACCA) for rubella-specific IgM antibody. J Med Virol. 1982;10(1):55–64. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890100108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kurtz J. B., Malic A. Rubella-specific IgM detected by an antibody capture assay/ELISA technique. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Dec;34(12):1392–1395. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.12.1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lehtonen O. P., Meurman O. H. An ELISA for the estimation of high-avidity and total specific IgG and IgM antibodies to rubella virus. J Virol Methods. 1982 Sep;5(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(82)90091-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meurman O. H., Viljanen M. K., Granfors K. Solid-phase radioimmunoassay of rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies: comparison with sucrose density gradient centrifugation test. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Mar;5(3):257–262. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.3.257-262.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meurman O. H., Ziola B. R. IgM-class rheumatoid factor interference in the solid-phase radioimmunoassay of rubella-specific IgM antibodies. J Clin Pathol. 1978 May;31(5):483–487. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.5.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morgan-Capner P., Tedder R. S., Mace J. E. Rubella-specific IgM reactivity in sera from cases of infectious mononucleosis. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Jun;90(3):407–413. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mortimer P. P., Tedder R. S., Hamblig M. H., Shafi M. S., Burkhardt F., Schilt U. Antibody capture radioimmunoassay for anti-rubella IgM. J Hyg (Lond) 1981 Apr;86(2):139–153. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400068856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pattison J. R. Persistence of specific IgM after natural infection with rubella virus. Lancet. 1975 Jan 25;1(7900):185–187. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)91357-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Salonen E. M., Vaheri A., Suni J., Wager O. Rheumatoid factor in acute viral infections: interference with determination of IgM, IgG, and IgA antibodies in an enzyme immunoassay. J Infect Dis. 1980 Aug;142(2):250–255. doi: 10.1093/infdis/142.2.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmitz H. Detection of immunoglobulin M antibody to Epstein-Barr virus by use of an enzyme-labeled antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):361–366. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.361-366.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmitz H., Emmerich P. Detection of specific immunoglobulin M antibody to different flaviviruses by use of enzyme-labeled antigens. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 May;19(5):664–667. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.5.664-667.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schmitz H., von Deimling U., Flehmig B. Detection of IgM antibodies to cytomegalovirus (CMV) using an enzyme-labelled antigen (ELA). J Gen Virol. 1980 Sep;50(1):59–68. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-1-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sundqvist V. A. Frequency and specificity of varicella zoster virus IgM response. J Virol Methods. 1982 Nov;5(3-4):219–227. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(82)90012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vejtorp M. Serodiagnosis of postnatal rubella. A survey of methods with special reference to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Dan Med Bull. 1983 Mar;30(2):53–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vejtorp M. Solid phase anti-IgM ELISA for detection of rubella specific IgM antibodies. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1981 Apr;89(2):123–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1981.tb00163_89b.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Loon A. M., Heessen F. W., van der Logt J. T., van der Veen J. Direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that uses peroxidase-labeled antigen for determination of immunoglobulin M antibody to cytomegalovirus. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):416–422. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.416-422.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES