Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
. 2008 Mar 27;177(11):1242–1247. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200712-1777OC

Inflammatory Markers at Hospital Discharge Predict Subsequent Mortality after Pneumonia and Sepsis

Sachin Yende 1,2, Gina D'Angelo 3, John A Kellum 1,2, Lisa Weissfeld 2,3, Jonathan Fine 4, Robert D Welch 5, Lan Kong 3, Melinda Carter 1,2, Derek C Angus 1,2; for the GenIMS Investigators*
PMCID: PMC2720087  PMID: 18369199

Abstract

Rationale: Survivors of hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are at increased risk of cardiovascular events, repeat infections, and death in the following months but the cause is unknown.

Objectives: To investigate whether persistent inflammation, defined as elevating circulating inflammatory markers at hospital discharge, is associated with subsequent outcomes.

Methods: Prospective cohort study at 28 sites.

Measurements and Main Results: We used standard criteria to define CAP and the National Death Index to determine all-cause and cause-specific 1-year mortality. At hospital discharge, 1,799 subjects (77.5%) were alive and vital signs had returned to normal in 1,512 (87%) subjects. The geometric means (±SD) for circulating IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations were 6.9 (±1) pg/ml and 1.2 (±1.1) pg/ml. At 1 year, 307 (17.1%) subjects had died. Higher IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations at hospital discharge were associated with an increased risk of death, which gradually fell over time. Using Gray's survival model, the associations were independent of demographics, comorbidities, and severity of illness (for each log-unit increase, the range of adjusted hazard ratios [HRs] for IL-6 were 1.02–1.46, P < 0.0001, and for IL-10 were 1.17–1.44, P = 0.01). The ranges of HRs for each log-unit increase in IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations among subjects who did and did not develop severe sepsis were 0.95–1.27 and 1.07–1.55, respectively. High IL-6 concentrations were associated with death due to cardiovascular disease, cancer, infections, and renal failure (P = 0.008).

Conclusions: Despite clinical recovery, many patients with CAP leave hospital with ongoing subclinical inflammation, which is associated with an increased risk of death.

Keywords: cytokines, mortality, pneumonia, IL-6, IL-10


AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject

Reasons for increased long-term mortality among hospital survivors of pneumonia are not known.

What This Study Adds to the Field

Persistent inflammation, defined as elevated circulating levels of IL-6 and IL-10 at hospital discharge after community-acquired pneumonia, is associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality over one year, despite resolution of clinical signs of an acute infection.

Older individuals who survive community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) hospitalization are at increased risk of death in the subsequent months (17). This increased risk is not obviously explained by sociodemographic and health behavioral characteristics (17), preexisting chronic health and function (16), or nutritional status (6, 7). If CAP is playing a causal role in postdischarge mortality, the mechanism is unknown. Understanding mechanisms and predictors of increased long-term mortality would help design and target future interventions.

In apparently healthy older individuals, low-grade inflammation is associated with increased risk of CAP (6). Once pneumonia occurs, inflammatory marker concentrations are several times higher (8). The highest concentrations occur in individuals with severe sepsis and are associated with increased risk of short-term death. Whether the inflammatory response resolves at hospital discharge when patients appear to have recovered from the acute infection is not known. Persistent inflammation may precipitate deterioration in other diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, and increase long-term mortality. This theory is supported by a recent epidemiologic study linking lower respiratory tract infections to subsequent acute cardiovascular events (9). We therefore sought to understand whether serum markers of inflammation were elevated before discharge in subjects who appeared to have recovered from CAP and to determine whether serum concentrations were associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the subsequent year. Some of the results of this study have been previously reported in the form of an abstract (10).

METHODS

Subjects and Design

The design is a 1-year follow-up study of all hospital survivors of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) study (8). GenIMS is a large, multicenter, observational cohort study of subjects with CAP presenting to the emergency departments of 28 teaching and nonteaching hospitals in four regions (western Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Michigan, and Tennessee) in the United States. We diagnosed CAP based on clinical and radiologic criteria (11). Details of the eligibility criteria are provided in the online supplement. The institutional review boards at the University of Pittsburgh and all participating sites approved the study, and written, informed consent was obtained from all participants or their proxies.

Of the 2,320 subjects enrolled, 291 patients were excluded because they were discharged from the emergency department and another 134 were excluded because the clinical team ruled out CAP during the first 3 days of hospitalization (Figure 1). Of the remaining 1,895 subjects, 87 (4.6%) died in hospital and 9 subjects were excluded because blood samples were not obtained. We conducted our analyses on the remaining 1,799 subjects discharged alive.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Subject disposition for the entire Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) cohort. CAP = community-acquired pneumonia.

Clinical and Outcome Variables

We ascertained comorbid conditions using the Charlson comorbidity index (12) and severity of illness using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) (11, 13). We defined severe sepsis as pneumonia with acute organ dysfunction following the 2001 international consensus criteria (14). We defined acute organ dysfunction as a new Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 3 or greater in any of six organ systems (15). We assessed vital signs at hospital discharge to assess whether subjects met criteria for clinical stability at hospital discharge, as described by Halm and Teirstein (16). The primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality up to 1 year after hospital discharge. We ascertained all-cause and cause-specific mortality using National Death Index (NDI) search and NDI-coded causes of death (17). The reliability of NDI for epidemiologic studies has been previously validated (18).

Laboratory Procedures

We obtained blood for cytokine assays daily for the first week and once weekly thereafter while subjects remained in hospital (8). For this study, we analyzed only the last cytokine measurement. We measured IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations using an Immulite assay (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). The minimum detectable limits for IL-6 and IL-10 were 2 and 5 pg/ml. We used the following upper limits of normal: IL-6, 5.9 pg/ml, and IL-10, 9.1 pg/ml, per the manufacturer's specifications. Intraassay coefficients of variation for IL-6 and IL-10 were 4.2 and 3.2%. Interassay coefficients of variation for IL-6 and IL-10 were 5.8 and 5.6%. We also monitored controls between different kit lots and no major variation was observed for control values. All outlier values were rechecked and laboratory personnel were blinded to clinical data.

Statistical Analyses

We first conducted univariate comparisons for those who survived or died at 1 year to ascertain predictors of mortality. We constructed Tobit models to compare cytokine concentrations to account for data that were truncated because they were below detection thresholds (38 and 81% of subjects for IL-6 and IL-10, respectively) (19). The Tobit model is used to model censored dependent variables. The likelihood specified for the Tobit model consists of two parts: the first part is the density of the observed (noncensored) data and the second part is the distribution of the censored data. Maximum likelihood estimation is used to obtain estimates of the regression coefficients. We used a Gray's survival model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for circulating cytokine concentrations and death over 1 year because the hazards failed Cox's proportionality assumption (20). The Gray's model estimates HRs over 10 intervals (with 11 time nodes) and thus provides a detailed description of the change in HRs over 1 year. For cause-specific mortality, we used Putter's competing risk model (21) to assess associations between cytokines and cause-specific mortality, because the associations between cytokines and different causes of death are dependent and these risks compete with one another until a subject dies due to a specific cause of death. Details of statistical analyses and sensitivity analyses are provided in the online supplement.

RESULTS

Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Course

Of the 1,799 subjects discharged alive after hospitalization for CAP, 136 (7.6%), 206 (11.5%), and 307 (17.1%) died by 90 days, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. Table 1 compares baseline characteristics, severity of illness, and hospital course of all subjects, stratified by survival at 1 year. The mean age of all subjects was 67 years, approximately half were females, and three-fourths had at least one comorbid condition based on the Charlson score. Race was based on self-report and most subjects were non-Hispanic whites (n = 1,443, 80.2%), an additional 292 (16.2%) subjects were blacks, and the remaining 64 subjects represented other races. Severe sepsis occurred in a fourth of the participants and more than half had severe CAP, as indicated by a PSI class of IV or V. Mean hospital stay was 7 days.

TABLE 1.

DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SURVIVORS AND NONSURVIVORS AT 1 YEAR

graphic file with name AJRCCM177111242tbl1.jpg

Most subjects met the Halm criteria for clinical stability on the day of discharge. Only 48 (2.7%), 156 (8.7%), 41 (2.3%), and 33 (1.8%) subjects had a temperature higher than 37.8°C, heart rate higher than 100 beats/minute, respiratory rate higher than 24 breaths/minute, or systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm of Hg, respectively. All four vital signs were normal in 1,512 (87%) subjects, one vital sign was abnormal in 191 (11%) subjects, and only 34 (2%) subjects had abnormalities in two or more vital signs.

Compared with survivors at 1 year, nonsurvivors were older, they had more comorbid conditions (as evidenced by higher Charlson scores), and they had more severe CAP on presentation (as evidenced by higher PSI and APACHE III scores) (Table 1). They were also more likely to develop severe sepsis and they incurred a longer duration of hospital stay. Whites had lower survival at 1 year compared with blacks, but these differences were no longer significant after controlling for age and higher baseline severity of illness seen in whites compared with blacks (data not shown).

Cytokine Concentrations and All-Cause Mortality

Cytokines were measured on the day of discharge in 967 (53%) subjects and within 48 hours before discharge in an additional 475 (27%) subjects. For a minority of subjects (n = 129, 9%), the last available cytokine concentration measurement was more than 96 hours before discharge. Based on the Tobit model, the geometric means of IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations at discharge for all subjects were 6.9 ± 1.0 and 1.2 ± 1.1 pg/ml, respectively. The median, range, and interquartile range for circulating IL-6 concentrations at hospital discharge were 7.4 pg/ml, 2–14,536 pg/ml, and 6.9–17.8 pg/ml, respectively. Similarly, the median, range, and interquartile range for circulating IL-10 concentrations at hospital discharge were 4.6 pg/ml, 1.2–416 pg/ml, and 1.2–1.2 pg/ml, respectively.

Higher IL-6 concentration at hospital discharge was associated with lower 1-year survival (Table 2). Figure 2 shows failure plots for 10th and 90th percentiles of circulating IL-6 concentrations and unadjusted HRs for survival over 1 year. The HRs remained unchanged after adjusting for demographics, comorbid conditions, and severity of illness. The adjusted HRs for each log-unit increase varied over time from 1.02 to 1.46. Figure 3 shows the varying HRs and 95% confidence intervals for IL-6 and IL-10 over 1 year. The HRs for IL-6 were highest at hospital discharge and decreased over the initial 100 days, and the association with mortality was no longer statistically significant after 100 days. The time-dependent effect of IL-6 on survival was also observed when IL-6 concentration (geometric means) at hospital discharge was compared among survivors and nonsurvivors at different time points. The IL-6 concentrations at hospital discharge were higher among subjects who did not survive at 100 days compared with those who survived at 100 days (12.9 vs. 6.6 pg/ml, P < 0.001). However, IL-6 concentrations at hospital discharge were similar among those who did and did not survive between 101 days and 1 year (7.7 vs. 6.5 pg/ml, P = 0.16).

TABLE 2.

HAZARD RATIOS* FOR ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CIRCULATING IL-6 AND IL-10 CONCENTRATIONS AT DISCHARGE AND MORTALITY OVER 1 YEAR

Cytokines Unadjusted Hazard Ratios P Value Adjusted Hazard Ratios P Value
All subjects (n = 1,796)
 IL-6 1.07–1.52 <0.0001 1.02–1.46 <0.0001
 IL-10 1.17–1.55 0.002 1.17–1.44 0.01
 IL-6§ 1.05–1.46 <0.0001 1.00–1.42 <0.0001
 IL-10§ 1.11–1.30 0.12 1.14–1.30 0.08
With severe sepsis (n = 497)
 IL-6 0.97–1.27 0.13 0.95–1.27 0.17
 IL-10 1.11–1.41 0.31 1.15–1.45 0.13
 IL-6§ 0.95–1.23 0.22 0.93–1.23 0.25
 IL-10§ 1.05–1.29 0.53 1.11–1.42 0.21
Without severe sepsis (n = 1,299)
 IL-6 1.15–1.65 <0.0001 1.07–1.55 0.0001
 IL-10 1.21–1.65 0.005 0.97–1.41 0.07
 IL-6§ 1.14–1.57 <0.0001 1.07–1.52 0.0005
 IL-10§ 0.94–1.39 0.16 0.93–1.30 0.28
*

Ranges of hazards ratios are reported for 10 time points over 1 year using the Gray's model (20).

Adjusted for age, race, sex, Charlson comorbidity, and APACHE III.

IL-6 and IL-10 were entered in the model independently.

§

IL-6 and IL-10 were entered in the model concurrently.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Failure plots for circulating IL-6 (A) and IL-10 (B) concentrations and mortality over 1 year. High and low concentrations are the 10th and 90th percentiles of cytokine concentrations. Using the Gray's model, the hazard ratios are estimated over 10 intervals (with 11 time nodes) over 1 year and hazard ratios over five representative periods are shown. P values are obtained from the Gray's survival model.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Varying hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for IL-6 (A) and IL-10 (B) and risk of death over 1 year. The hazard ratios are shown over 10 intervals (with 11 time nodes), based on the Gray's model. For IL-6, the 95% CI is above 1 for 100 days, whereas for IL-10 the 95% CI is above 1 for 177 days or approximately 6 months.

The unadjusted and adjusted HRs for mortality for increased circulating IL-10 concentrations were also similar and varied from 1.17 to 1.44 per log-unit increase (Table 2; Figure 2). The HRs were highest at hospital discharge and the association was statistically significant over the initial 6 months, but no longer significant between 6 months and 1 year (Figure 3). Again, the time-dependent effect of IL-10 on survival was observed when IL-10 concentrations at hospital discharge were compared among nonsurvivors and survivors at different time points. The IL-10 concentrations at hospital discharge were higher among subjects who did not survive at 6 months compared with survivors at the same time point (2 vs. 1.1 pg/ml, P < 0.001). However, concentrations were the same among nonsurvivors and survivors between 6 months and 1 year (1.1 vs. 1.1, P = 0.95). When both IL-6 and IL-10 were entered in the model concurrently, the association between increased IL-6 concentrations and survival remained statistically significant (P < 0.0001), but the significance for the association between IL-10 concentration and survival was lost (P = 0.08).

Compared with subjects with normal vital signs at hospital discharge, the 225 (13%) subjects with abnormal vital signs had higher IL-6 concentrations (10.5 vs. 6.5 pg/ml, P < 0.001), but no differences in IL-10 concentrations were seen between the two groups (1.49 vs. 1.15, P = 0.09). No association was seen between abnormal vital signs at hospital discharge and 1-year mortality (20.6 vs. 16.5% for subjects with at least one abnormal vital sign and those without abnormal vital signs, P = 0.12). Furthermore, of the 307 deaths at 1 year, only 49 (16%) were associated with abnormal vital signs at hospital discharge.

The presence of severe sepsis during hospitalization did not influence the associations between IL-6 and IL-10 with survival (interaction P = 0.07 and 0.45 for IL-6 and IL-10, respectively). The HRs for subjects with and without severe sepsis were similar to that in the full analysis (Table 2), although the small sample precluded statistical significance for the severe sepsis subgroup. We also performed sensitivity analyses by restricting the analyses to subjects with a cytokine measurement within 48 hours (n = 1,440), subjects who did not develop organ dysfunction during the hospital course (n = 904), and those discharged home (n = 1,371). In these analyses, the HRs remained unchanged for the associations between both cytokines and 1-year survival (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSES FOR ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CIRCULATING IL-6 AND IL-10 CONCENTRATIONS AT DISCHARGE AND MORTALITY OVER 1 YEAR

Cytokines Adjusted Hazard Ratios* P Value
Subjects in whom cytokines were drawn within 48 hours (n = 1,440)
 IL-6 1.10–1.52 <0.0001
 IL-10 1.03–1.38 0.23
Subjects who did not experience organ dysfunction (n = 904)
 IL-6 0.90–1.29 0.1100
 IL-10 0.98–1.52 0.06
Subjects discharged home (n = 1,371)
 IL-6 0.97–1.31 0.05
 IL-10 0.92–1.40 0.48
*

Adjusted for age, race, sex, Charlson comorbidity, and APACHE III. Ranges of hazards ratios are reported for 10 time points over 1 year using the Gray's model (10).

IL-6 and IL-10 were entered in the model independently.

SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score did not increase by greater than 1 point during hospital stay.

Cytokines and Cause-specific Mortality

Of the 307 deaths, a cause of death was obtained for 300 (98%) subjects. Cardiovascular disease and cancer were the most common causes of death and accounted for a third and a fourth of deaths (Table 4). Infections, renal failure, and chronic respiratory disease accounted for 11, 6, and 16% of deaths, respectively. Table 4 presents the estimated geometric means (obtained from a Tobit model) for IL-6 and IL-10 for each cause of death. We used a competing risk analysis to estimate the association between the individual cytokines and cause-specific mortality. The association between circulating IL-6 and cause-specific mortality was statistically significant (P = 0.008), whereas the association between IL-10 and cause-specific mortality was not significant (P = 0.54). Circulating IL-6 concentrations at hospital discharge were higher among subjects who subsequently died of cardiovascular diseases, renal failure, infections, and cancer compared with other causes of death.

TABLE 4.

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN IL-6 AND IL-10 AT HOSPITAL DISCHARGE AND CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY OVER 1 YEAR*

Geometric Means of Inflammatory Markers in pg/ml (SD) at Hospital Discharge
Causes of Death over 1 Year No. (%) IL-6 IL-10
Cardiovascular 92 (31) 9.6 (1.2) 1.5 (1.3)
Infection 32 (11) 14.0 (1.3) 2.5 (1.4)
Cancer 73 (25) 11.9 (1.2) 1.5 (1.3)
Chronic lower respiratory disease 47 (16) 5.5 (1.3) 1.4 (1.4)
Renal failure 19 (6) 20.3 (1.4) 2.6 (1.6)
Others 33 (11) 5.9 (1.3) 1.9 (1.4)
*

P = 0.008 for IL-6 and P = 0.54 for IL-10. Causes of death were missing in 11 subjects.

Cardiovascular causes of death include atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, acute myocardial infarction, chronic ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and cerebrovascular accident.

Infectious causes of death include pneumonia, influenza, and sepsis.

Subjects with chronic health conditions have higher circulating inflammatory marker concentrations and they are more likely to die of the same cause. This relationship may confound the association between increased IL-6 concentrations and cause-specific mortality. Therefore, we analyzed causes of death stratified by presence or absence of the chronic health condition (Table E1 in the online supplement). More than a third of subjects who died of cardiovascular causes did not have cardiovascular disease. Deaths due to cancer and renal failure were more common among subjects without these chronic health conditions before the occurrence of CAP. Therefore, the association between IL-6 and cause-specific mortality was not confounded by comorbid conditions.

DISCUSSION

Our study has shown that, after CAP hospitalization, circulating IL-6 concentrations are elevated at hospital discharge and associated with higher mortality over the subsequent 3 months. At discharge, circulating IL-6 concentrations were 10- to 15-fold lower than concentrations seen during severe sepsis (8, 22), but threefold higher than concentrations in older adults at risk for CAP (23). Only 13% of subjects had abnormal vital signs at hospital discharge, but more than half of the cohort had elevated IL-6 concentrations. These findings suggest that the inflammatory response to infection persists at hospital discharge, even though clinical signs have resolved and subjects appeared to be stable for discharge (16). The average IL-10 concentrations at discharge were similar to concentrations reported in healthy individuals, but subjects with above average concentrations also had an increased risk of death over the subsequent 6 months.

The associations between cytokines and mortality in our study were unlikely to be confounded by the severity of illness because associations were independent of APACHE III scores and were even seen in subjects without severe sepsis. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses showed that the HRs were similar when the analysis was restricted to subjects who did not experience new organ dysfunction during hospital stay. Our sensitivity analyses also showed that the association persists when the analyses were restricted to subjects discharged home, those presumably most likely to have adequately recovered from the acute illness as judged by their physicians. These findings suggest that cytokine concentrations are unlikely to be only surrogate markers for subjects with complicated hospital course.

The higher IL-6 concentrations observed at hospital discharge could be elevated before the occurrence of CAP due to chronic health conditions, secondary to slower resolution of inflammation in comparison to clinical recovery, or due to an interaction between poor chronic health and acute illness. We speculate that the latter is likely, because circulating IL-6 concentrations are lower in prior population-based studies (24), even in individuals at risk for CAP (23). Whatever the cause, our findings have important implications in understanding mechanisms of long-term sequelae of infection and to design risk stratification strategies at hospital discharge when patients appear to have recovered from the acute illness.

We examined IL-6 and IL-10, key markers of pro- and antiinflammatory responses because both persistent low-grade inflammation and immune suppression may play important roles in complications after CAP, including coronary (25) and cerebrovascular events (26) and repeat bouts of CAP (23, 27). Our findings are similar to cytokine signatures that predict survival after diagnosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma (28). Our findings of cytokine patterns associated with cause-specific mortality suggest that different mechanisms may influence different causes of death. For instance, a persistent, up-regulated proinflammatory response was associated with deaths due to cardiovascular disease, renal failure, infections, and cancer. This association is consistent with prior studies showing increased risk of these conditions in patients with higher proinflammatory cytokines (25, 26, 29). We also observed a higher risk of death among subjects with higher antiinflammatory cytokines. We speculate that this association could be due to alterations in immune status (30, 31), such as immune suppression observed with higher IL-10 concentrations. However, IL-10 concentrations were low and were detectable only in 19% of subjects in our study. Other assays, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production after ex vivo stimulation of immune cells, should be evaluated in future studies to assess immune suppression (30, 31).

The causes of death in our study are similar to those seen in prior studies that examined causes of rehospitalization and death after CAP (6, 27). The high incidence of deaths due to cardiovascular disease, cancer, and renal failure in subjects without prior history of these health conditions suggests that mechanisms leading to death were perhaps accelerated during the CAP hospitalization. Improved surveillance and preventive strategies targeted to high-risk individuals for common causes of death, such as coronary artery disease, may improve long-term survival.

Our study has limitations. First, cytokine measurements were not collected on the day of discharge in all subjects. Our study protocol required blood collection for cytokine concentrations daily during the first week and weekly thereafter. Patients with longer duration of stay were more likely to have had circulating cytokine concentrations measured on days before discharge. However, more than 80% of subjects had cytokine measurements taken within 48 hours of discharge, and sensitivity analyses excluding subjects with a cytokine measurement more than 48 hours before discharge did not change our results. Second, we only obtained cytokine measurements before, rather than after, hospital discharge. Future studies should explore the relationship of postdischarge cytokine trajectories on subsequent health-related outcomes. Finally, we examined the role of only two cytokines as markers of immune status. Nevertheless, these cytokines are widely used as markers of the pro- and antiinflammatory responses. The results of our study underscore the need to examine the cellular response and other cytokines to understand the recovery of the immune system after infection.

Supplementary Material

[Online Supplement]

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the nurses, respiratory therapists, phlebotomists, physicians, and other health care professionals who participated in GenIMS, as well as the patients and their families who supported this trial.

GenIMS was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences R01 GM61992, with additional support from GlaxoSmithKline for enrollment and clinical data collection, and Diagnostic Products Corporation for the cytokine assays.

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200712-1777OC on March 27, 2008

Conflict of Interest Statement: S.Y. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. G.D. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. J.A.K. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. L.W. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. J.F. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. R.D.W. has received $1,500 from Wyeth Research, $5,235 from Scios, Inc., $9,978 from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of MI Foundation, and $7,980 from Welch-Allen for clinical studies. R.D.W. is ready to start a study sponsored by RIB-X Pharmaceuticals and is currently working on a study with 3M to test a rapid detection of MRSA system. L.K. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. M.C. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. D.C.A. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kaplan V, Clermont G, Griffin MF, Kasal J, Watson RS, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC. Pneumonia: still the old man's friend? Arch Intern Med 2003;163:317–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.LaCroix AZ, Lipson S, Miles TP, White L. Prospective study of pneumonia hospitalizations and mortality of U.S. older people: the role of chronic conditions, health behaviors, and nutritional status. Public Health Rep 1989;104:350–360. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brancati FL, Chow JW, Wagener MM, Vacarello SJ, Yu VL. Is pneumonia really the old man's friend? Two-year prognosis after community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet 1993;342:30–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koivula I, Sten M, Makela PH. Prognosis after community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: a population-based 12-year follow-up study. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1550–1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Waterer GW, Kessler LA, Wunderink RG. Medium-term survival after hospitalization with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:910–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yende S, Angus DC, Ali IS, Somes G, Newman AB, Bauer D, Garcia M, Harris TB, Kritchevsky S. Influence of comorbid conditions on long-term mortality after pneumonia in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:518–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hedlund JU, Ortqvist AB, Kalin ME, Granath F. Factors of importance for the long term prognosis after hospital treated pneumonia. Thorax 1993;48:785–789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kellum JA, Kong L, Fink MP, Weissfeld LA, Yealy DM, Pinsky MR, Fine J, Krichevsky A, Delude RL, Angus DC; GenIMS Investigators. Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) study. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1655–1663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smeeth L, Thomas SL, Hall AJ, Hubbard R, Farrington P, Vallance P. Risk of myocardial infarction and stroke after acute infection or vaccination. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2611–2618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yende S, Kong L, Weissfeld LA, Kellum J, Fink MP, Pinsky MR, Delude R, Angus DC. Inflammatory markers prior to hospital discharge predict subsequent mortality after community acquired pneumonia [abstract]. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006;3:A274. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1997;336:243–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991;100:1619–1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Levy MM, Fink M, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1250–1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Halm EA, Teirstein AS. Management of community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2002;347:2039–2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Death Index [homepage on the Internet]. [accessed 2007. Sep 15]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ndi.htm
  • 18.Rich-Edwards JW, Corsano KA, Stampfer MJ. Test of the National Death Index and Equifax Nationwide Death Search. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:1016–1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Epstein MP, Lin X, Boehnke M. A Tobit variance-component method for linkage analysis of censored trait data. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:611–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kasal J, Jovanovic Z, Clermont G, Weissfeld LA, Kaplan V, Watson RS, Angus DC. Comparison of Cox and Gray's survival models in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2004;32:700–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB. Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med 2007;26:2389–2430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Casey LC, Balk RA, Bone RC. Plasma cytokine and endotoxin levels correlate with survival in patients with the sepsis syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:771–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yende S, Tuomanen EI, Wunderink RG, Kanaya A, Newman AB, Harris T, de Rekeneire N, Kritchevsky SB. Pre-infection systemic inflammatory markers and risk of hospitalization due to pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172:1440–1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shlipak MG, Fried LF, Crump C, Bleyer AJ, Manolio TA, Tracy RP, Furberg CD, Psaty BM. Elevations of inflammatory and procoagulant biomarkers in elderly persons with renal insufficiency. Circulation 2003;107:87–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ridker PM, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH. Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. Circulation 2000;101:1767–1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cesari M, Penninx BW, Newman AB, Kritchevsky SB, Nicklas BJ, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Rubin SM, Ding J, Simonsick EM, Harris TB, et al. Inflammatory markers and onset of cardiovascular events: results from the Health ABC study. Circulation 2003;108:2317–2322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mortensen EM, Coley CM, Singer DE, Marrie TJ, Obrosky DS, Kapoor WN, Fine MJ. Causes of death for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1059–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Casasnovas RO, Mounier N, Brice P, Divine M, Morschhauser F, Gabarre J, Blay JY, Voillat L, Lederlin P, Stamatoullas A, et al. Plasma cytokine and soluble receptor signature predicts outcome of patients with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma: a study from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1732–1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pereira BJ, Shapiro L, King AJ, Falagas ME, Strom JA, Dinarello CA. Plasma levels of IL-1 beta, TNF alpha and their specific inhibitors in undialyzed chronic renal failure, CAPD and hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 1994;45:890–896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cavaillon JM, Adib-Conquy M. Bench-to-bedside review: endotoxin tolerance as a model of leukocyte reprogramming in sepsis. Crit Care 2006;10:233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Docke WD, Randow F, Syrbe U, Krausch D, Asadullah K, Reinke P, Volk HD, Kox W. Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: restoration by IFN-gamma treatment. Nat Med 1997;3:678–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Online Supplement]
supp_177_11_1242__1.pdf (69.5KB, pdf)

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES