Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1982 Jan;15(1):25–27. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.25-27.1982

Comparison of the AutoMicrobic system and a conventional tube system for identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive gram-negative bacilli.

J E Johnson, A W Brinkley
PMCID: PMC272016  PMID: 6764772

Abstract

The AutoMicrobic system (AMS) Enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card was developed to identify a select group of 10 species of glucose-nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative gram-negative bacilli. In this study, 159 nonenteric clinical isolates were identified by the AMS and conventional tube biochemicals based on E. O. King's (Centers for Disease Control) identification schema. The AMS properly identified 96.7% (117 of 121) of isolates whose taxa were included in the AMS data base. Of 38 isolates (94.7%) in which taxa were not included in the data base, 36 were correctly called unidentified organisms. A principal advantage of the AMS is the automated identification of frequently isolated nonenterics in a period of only 8 to 13 h. The AMS, with the use of the Enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card appears to be a rapid and accurate system for the identification of the most commonly isolated nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative gram-negative bacilli.

Full text

PDF
25

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldridge C., Jones P. W., Gibson S., Lanham J., Meyer M., Vannest R., Charles R. Automated microbiological detection/identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):406–413. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.406-413.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burdash N. M., Bannister E. R., Manos J. P., West M. E. A comparison of four commercial systems for the identification of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980 Apr;73(4):564–569. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/73.4.564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferraro M. J., Edelblut M. A., Kunz L. J. Accurate automated identification of selected Enterobacteriaceae at four hours. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):151–157. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.151-157.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hasyn J. J., Cundy K. R., Dietz C. C., Wong W. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Auto-Microbic system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):491–497. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.491-497.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Isenberg H. D., Gavan T. L., Smith P. B., Sonnenwirth A., Taylor W., Martin W. J., Rhoden D., Balows A. Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Jun;11(6):694–702. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.6.694-702.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Warwood N. M., Blazevic D. J., Hofherr L. Comparison of the API 20E and Corning N/F systems for identification of nonfermentative gram-negative rods. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):175–179. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.175-179.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES