Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1982 Jul;16(1):77–81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.77-81.1982

Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the Limulus lysate assay for detection of exclusion of gonococcal cervicitis.

V A Spagna, R B Prior, G A Sawaya
PMCID: PMC272297  PMID: 6809791

Abstract

The Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assay was evaluated for its ability to detect or exclude gonococcal cervicitis in two groups of women. The first (positive) group consisted of 100 untreated women who were referred to the venereal disease clinic with culture-proven gonococcal cervicitis. The second (negative) group consisted of 50 normal volunteers who were evaluated on two separate occasions. In the first group, Gram stains and repeat cervical cultures were 53 and 93% sensitive, respectively. In the second group, Gram stains and cultures were negative. For the LAL assay, ectocervical mucus was removed with a sponge, and a depyrogenated cotton-tipped swab was then used to collect endocervical specimens. The swab was placed in 1 ml of diluent (1:1 dilution), and serial twofold dilutions were made and tested for endotoxin by the LAL assay. Incubation was carried out at 37 degrees C for 30 min; positive or negative results were indicated by gelation or lack of gelation, respectively. At a dilution of 1:256, sensitivity and specificity of the LAL assay were 57 and 99%, respectively. The positive predictive values ranged from 36.5 to 97.4% for theoretical prevalence rates of 1 to 40%. At a dilution of 1:8, the sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 78%, respectively. At this dilution, the negative predictive value was 100% regardless of the prevalence rate. Thus, these preliminary results show that at the higher dilution, the LAL assay was comparable to Gram stain in diagnostic accuracy of gonococcal cervicitis, and if used as a screening test at the lower dilution, a negative LAL assay would exclude women without gonococcal cervicitis.

Full text

PDF
77

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow D., Nayyar K., Phillips I., Barrow J. Diagnosis of gonorrhoea in women. Br J Vener Dis. 1976 Oct;52(5):326–328. doi: 10.1136/sti.52.5.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow D., Phillips I. Gonorrhoea in women. Diagnostic, clinical, and laboratory aspects. Lancet. 1978 Apr 8;1(8067):761–764. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90870-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chipperfield E. J., Catterall R. D. Reappraisal of Gram-staining and cultural techniques for the diagnosis of gonorrhoea in women. Br J Vener Dis. 1976 Feb;52(1):36–39. doi: 10.1136/sti.52.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corbishley C. M. Microbial flora of the vagina and cervix. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Aug;30(8):745–748. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.8.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fleming W. L., Brown W. J., Donohue J. F., Branigin P. W. National survey of venereal disease treated by physicians in 1968. JAMA. 1970 Mar 16;211(11):1827–1830. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hager W. D., Wiesner P. J. Selected epidemiologic aspects of acute salpingitis: a review. J Reprod Med. 1977 Jul;19(1):47–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Handsfield H. H., Lipman T. O., Harnisch J. P., Tronca E., Holmes K. K. Asymptomatic gonorrhea in men. Diagnosis, natural course, prevalence and significance. N Engl J Med. 1974 Jan 17;290(3):117–123. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197401172900301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Levison M. E., Corman L. C., Carrington E. R., Kaye D. Quantitative microflora of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jan 1;127(1):80–85. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90318-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lowe T. L., Kraus S. J. Quantitation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from women with gonorrhea. J Infect Dis. 1976 Jun;133(6):621–626. doi: 10.1093/infdis/133.6.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Onderdonk A. B., Polk B. F., Moon N. E., Goren B., Bartlett J. G. Methods for quantitative vaginal flora studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Aug 1;128(7):777–781. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90720-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Prior R. B., Spagna V. A. Application of a Limulus test device in rapid evaluation of gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis in males. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Sep;14(3):256–260. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.3.256-260.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Spagna V. A., Prior R. B., Perkins R. L. Rapid presumptive diagnosis of gonococcal cervicitis by the limulus lysate assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Jul 1;137(5):595–599. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90702-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Spagna V. A., Prior R. B., Perkins R. L. Rapid presumptive diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis in men by the limulus lysate test. Br J Vener Dis. 1979 Jun;55(3):179–182. doi: 10.1136/sti.55.3.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thin R. N., Shaw E. J. Diagnosis of gonorrhoea in women. Br J Vener Dis. 1979 Feb;55(1):10–13. doi: 10.1136/sti.55.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tsuji K., Harrison S. J. Limulus amebocyte lysate - a means to monitor inactivation of lipopolysaccharide. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1979;29:367–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Young H., Harris A. B., Urquhart D., Robertson D. H. Screening by culture for the detection of gonorrhoea in women. Scott Med J. 1979 Oct;24(4):302–306. doi: 10.1177/003693307902400410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Young H., Sarafian S. K., McMillan A. Reactivity of the limulus lysate assay with uterine cervical secretions. A preliminary evaluation. Br J Vener Dis. 1981 Jun;57(3):200–203. doi: 10.1136/sti.57.3.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES