Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1982 Jul;16(1):96–98. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.96-98.1982

Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.

T E Kiehn, C Capitolo, D Armstrong
PMCID: PMC272301  PMID: 7107862

Abstract

Turbid broth (0.5 ml) from blood culture bottles was inoculated into 0.5 ml of brain heart infusion broth, incubated for 3 to 6 h, diluted 1:500 in distilled water, and then inoculated directly into microtiter broth dilution susceptibility trays to test for minimal inhibitory concentrations. The results were compared to the standard tests performed 24 h later on colonies from subculture plates. The minimal inhibitory concentrations measured by these two methods were compared in 1,875 organism-antibiotic tests. The two minimal inhibitory concentrations were identical in 86.0% and within one twofold dilution in 98.0% of the tests. An organism was judged to be susceptible by one method and resistant by the other in 13 tests (0.7%). These 13 discrepancies were distributed among several organism-antibiotic combinations; no more than two were seen for any one combination. Highly accurate susceptibility testing can be achieved by using direct inoculation of turbid blood culture broths.

Full text

PDF
96

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Garcia F., Thrupp L. D. An improved single-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly-growing pathogens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970 Feb;53(2):149–158. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/53.2.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellner P. D., Johnson E. Unreliability of direct antibiotic susceptibility testing on wound exudates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Feb;9(2):355–356. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fay D., Oldfather J. E. Standardization of direct susceptibility test for blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Mar;9(3):347–350. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.3.347-350.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hollick G. E., Washington J. A., 2nd Comparison of direct and standardized disk diffusion susceptibility testing of urine cultures. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 May;9(5):804–809. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.5.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson J. E., Washington J. A., 2nd Comparison of direct and standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Aug;10(2):211–214. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.2.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Comparison of direct and standard antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing for bacteria isolated from blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Oct;10(4):482–487. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.4.482-487.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shahidi A., Ellner P. D. Effect of mixed cultures on antibiotic susceptibility testing. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Nov;18(5):766–770. doi: 10.1128/am.18.5.766-770.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wegner D. L., Mathis C. R., Neblett T. R. Direct method to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly growing blood pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 May;9(5):861–862. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.5.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES